Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Night On Philly Streets Highlights Dangers Of Assault Weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:04 PM
Original message
Night On Philly Streets Highlights Dangers Of Assault Weapons
Police Say Job Is Harder After Assault Weapon Ban Allowed To Expire

POSTED: 6:01 pm EDT September 15, 2004
UPDATED: 8:24 pm EDT September 15, 2004

<snip> Within minutes of the shift's start, Costello found himself accompanying police as they rushed through the streets of Philadelphia, past Temple University, to back up officers in a foot chase.

The suspect got away, but not before he dropped one of his weapons -- a modified AK-47, also known as an assault weapon. Each bullet is capable of slicing through a cop's bulletproof vest. <snip>

Police said that the now-expired assault weapons ban was full of holes, but at least is was something and it didn't make any sense to lift it. <snip>

http://www.nbc10.com/news/3734052/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did the gun still have the sales reciept with it?
Edited on Wed Sep-15-04 08:44 PM by NickB79
So is this article implying this criminal just bought this gun on Monday, after the AWB expired? Or is it possible (and far more likely) he has been in possession of it long before the AWB expired?

I mean, just WHAT happened on Monday that suddenly opened the floodgates on these guns being more available? Were there airdrops of crates of AK's on the streets (and if so, why wasn't I informed)? The point is that these very weapons have been on the streets for the past 10 yrs since the ban went into effect, and in the past few days since it has expired virtually nothing has changed. AK clones have been fully legal to own the entire time the AWB was in effect, so how has it expiring suddenly put more on the streets?

A more accurate title would have been "Night On Philly Streets Highlights Long-Existing Dangers Of Living in Philly"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Repeat for those with short attention span...
"Police said that the now-expired assault weapons ban was full of holes, but at least is was something and it didn't make any sense to lift it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. "But at least it was something."
:eyes: Obviously said by someone who never bothered to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. If a police officer said this I think it needs to be respected.
As one whose ASS is actually on the line, they need to be heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Even if they're ignorant halfwits?
"Police said that the now-expired assault weapons ban was full of holes, but at least is was something"

Anyone making that claim is either ignorant or lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. of course you're ignoring
the the impressions of the ban is just as important if not more so than the reality of the ban.

"assault weapons are banned" would make ignorant criminals abandon efforts to get them. Even if the statement itself is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You have got to be kidding.
"of course you're ignoring the the impressions of the ban is just as important if not more so than the reality of the ban.

"assault weapons are banned" would make ignorant criminals abandon efforts to get them. Even if the statement itself is wrong."



There should be a stunned silence smiley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Don't you realize he's hit onto something profound here?
His hypothesis is that mere impressions make ignorant criminals abandon efforts to commit crimes. So, lets ban murder! Genius I tell you, pure genius. With murder banned, criminals will start to abandon efforts to kill people, right? Right? Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. If only criminals
were as ignorant as AWB supporters.

It's sad really. Gun control supporters have gone from a group that gets things like the Gun Control Act passed to a group that gets things like the Assault Weapons Ban passed and they're seemingly happy about the whole turn of events. I think they'd actually prefer getting the AWB renewed to expanding the National Firearms Act to register more guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. So how did this criminal get an AK clone?
If the AWB was doing something, how did this guy get an AK clone mere days after the AWB expired? Like I said, where were the airdropped crates of AK's into urban areas that I missed? It is far, far more likely he had possessed this firearm long before the ban expired.

And once again, how does removing bayonet lugs, pistol grips or flash hiders from rifles do "something" to fight crime? What does this do to reduce the crime rate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, according to another thread this evening, depleted uranium
is good for you, and so we should let these guys buy DU ammo for these "peace-keepers"! (Or is that piece-makers?) (Or blow the meeces to pieces makers?)

So hard to keep track:

Assault weapons - good.
Depleted uranium - good.
Showing up * as a blinding lifelong hypocrite - bad.

I'll work on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. If you were in an Abrams tank in GW1
DU was your friend. It let you kill people who were trying to kill you. DU is used against armor, not people. Tanks don't fire du at buildings, they fire HE rounds.

Have they released figures on how much DU ordinance has been used in the current war?

Check junkscience.com for all the du debunking. The UN report on DU I posted basically calls it a non issue.

It is all relative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. "DU is used against armor, not people"
Yeah, when they dropped the nukes on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, they were aiming for armor too. Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It figures nukes would get brought up
in an AWB thread. Wouldn't want to break the streak.

What do the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki have to do with anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I'll jump in here.
I think the point is (or should be) that this statement " DU is used against armor, not people.' is pretty ridiculous. So DU is designed to DISABLE the armor without killing anybody? Is that your position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FeebMaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I've made no claims about depleted uranium.
I was questioning what nuclear weapons have to do with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Assault weapon
is a drama word made up by nazis applied to a automatic weapon.

A 30-30 lever action(like roy rodgers had) will "slice" through a bullet proof vest.

Unless the weapon was brand spankin new it was probably purchased legally under the ban, and then stolen, by this cracked out asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And your point is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Unless
Edited on Wed Sep-15-04 09:50 PM by Radius
the person used a new weapon purchased yesterday and bayoneted someone or beat them to death with the bipod it has nothing to do with the AWB. Which didn't ban semi automatic rifles that look like military rifles.

So the story has no point. The bill was always about warm fuzzies.

edit:spell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm still not clear.
Is the point that since the AWB wasn't perfect, that it is therefore worthless? Since we cannot prevent all criminals from ever obtaining any weapons, there is no point in trying to prevent them from getting even the most demonstrably anti-social?

If you would say that AWB had NO effect, I would say, why are there no new Uzi's here? Why did Intertek (or whatever they were called) go out of business (and noboidy take their place?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. There are no Uzis here
Because the Israeli company that owns the rights to them won't licence the design to anyone else, because they don't want anyone ripping off their weapons design. As was repeated in a previous thread, George Bush Sr, in 1989, banned the import of Uzis, 5 yrs BEFORE the AWB came into effect. The AWB had NOTHING to do with Uzis.

The reason Intratec went out of business was that they sold a firearm (the Tec-9) that jammed, was inaccurate, was heavy, and basically as much of a piece of shit as you could design into one gun (short of actually wrapping it in shit). They didn't go out of business until just a few yrs ago, continuing to operate years after the AWB was passed. How did they hold on for so long if their weapons were banned in 1994? What did they sell?

Ironically, before the AWB, Intratec was struggling to survive because their firearms sucked so hard. With the ban and the publicity that came with it, they saw a boom in sales of their post-ban firearms as everyone wanted one of those "evil-looking" assault weapons everyone was now talking about. The AWB probably bought Intratec a few more years of life, rather than cut it short. Similarly, more AK clones, HK's, and AR-15's were sold in the 10 yrs during the ban than in the 20 yrs before it, putting far more of these weapons into circulation. That's a good gun control bill??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC