Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Says Kerry Has Many, Many Positions on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:28 PM
Original message
Bush Says Kerry Has Many, Many Positions on Iraq
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040910/us_nm/campaign_bush_dc_15

President Bush (news - web sites) accused Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites) on Friday of having more positions on Iraq (news - web sites) than all his 99 colleagues in the Senate combined and said if the Massachusetts senator had his way Saddam Hussein would still be in power.

It was some of the harshest rhetoric Bush has used against Kerry during the presidential campaign and represented an aggressive response to attacks Kerry has been making this week against Bush, reflecting the importance the Iraq war may have on the Nov. 2 election.

-snip-

Bush took specific aim at Kerry's attack that the costs of the Iraq war, which Kerry estimated at $200 billion but the White House put at $119 billion, has drained the federal government of resources needed elsewhere.

"The newest wrinkle is that Sen. Kerry has now decided we are spending too much money in Iraq, even though he criticized us earlier for not spending enough," Bush said. "One thing about Sen. Kerry's position is clear. If he had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power, it would still be a threat to the security of the world."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Bush has just one, the wrong one (go to war at all costs).
He did however have many (false) rationalles .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. LOL! I think you just came up with Kerry's rebuttal!
I hope he uses it...:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Bush has one, lie and lie and lie again n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunarboy13 Donating Member (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. And all of them are better than Bush's!
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. OBL is still on the run
and terrorist attacks are still occuring throughout the world including a recent hotel bombing in the far east
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. No Georgie, Senator Kery criticized you for not PAYING for Iraq....
As usual liberal spender and idiot savant George Bush misses the point and hopes that the rest of America will too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. P,S, George...where's all that oil money you said would pay for your war?
I'M waiting..........still waiting......hmmmmmmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Geez! Bush has many many positions on Iraq-Pick one
*iraq has WMD
*Iraq has weapons of mass destruction related program activities
*We went to Iraq to free the people and bring democracy
*We went to Iraq to depose Saddam because he is a bad man
*Knowing what I know now, i still would have gone to Iraq.

What a hypocrite!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. Excellent observation
That should be Kerry's rebuttal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not spending it wisely - you moran! Then again, Shrub has only one
position on Iraq, kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out. They don't believe in Jesus anyway. Besides they are sitting on top of all that oil!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. And Bush has changed his rationale for this mess how many times?
All of them bogus:

•Sadaam is an imminent threat with weapons of mass destruction.

•Iraq conspired with al Qaeda on 9/11.

•Sadaam tried to kill my daddy.

•"Liberating" and "democratizing" Iraq will lead to 1,000 flowers blooming across the Middle East.

•The world will be safer without Sadaam.

•We'll be safer by bringing the fight to the terrorists.

Etc., etc.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. And when challenged on this - he accused others of Revisionist History
and added that Saddam's WMD programs were his motivation all along. When even evidence of concrete WMD programs didn't surface, it became programs to contemplate the development of theories that might eventually lead to Saddam's project to convene research groups to eventually get around to writing proposals for eventual WMD programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. LOL! And that could have been a problem
this decade. Or next. Or even later this century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kimber Scott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush lies.
But, he's good at it. Gotta give him that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Practice. Practice. Practice.
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 03:46 PM by TahitiNut
:shrug: He's been lying about getting busted for cocaine possession for 30 years.

However, to be fair, it's like everything else. He hasn't done it on his own. Others do it for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. I see Benidict Arnold is with him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. The ass chose to continue to campaign with the
crazy Judas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demoman123 Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's right. Even war criminals like Bush aren't wrong about everything.
I have never been able to figure out what Kerry's position on the war is.

I am voting for him because he has a clear position on Social Security.

Go ahead and flame if you want. I am wearing my asbestos suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noahmijo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. And Kerry didn't start this war, Kerry didn't fuck this war up
Kerry wasn't the bumbling fool who continues to push the lies behind why this war was started.

Nov. 2nd can't come soon enough is all I can say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arioch Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. George can't read...
Like so many others he seems incapable of understanding what Kerry actually said about Iraq...

"When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security and that of our allies in the Persian Gulf region."

"Let me be clear, the vote I will give to the President is for one reason and one reason only: To disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, if we cannot accomplish that objective through new, tough weapons inspections in joint concert with our allies. "

"If we do wind up going to war with Iraq, it is imperative that we do so with others in the international community, unless there is a showing of a grave, imminent — and I emphasize "imminent" — threat to this country which requires the President to respond in a way that protects our immediate national security needs."

"Let there be no doubt or confusion about where we stand on this. I will support a multilateral effort to disarm him by force, if we ever exhaust those other options, as the President has promised, but I will not support a unilateral U.S. war against Iraq unless that threat is imminent and the multilateral effort has not proven possible under any circumstances."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think America wants to see somebody with any position on Iraq
except "it's not a quagmire" and "wasn't the fuehrer noble to jump into it."

"If he had his way, Saddam Hussein would still be in power, it would still be a threat to the security of the world." Due to all those WMDS he had...doh, there weren't any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. And Bush has many explanations for why 911 happened-all wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eagler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. "No Nation Building "
was a Bush promise I seem to remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hmmm...and how many bogus reasons did Bush float for murdering
tens of thousands of Iraqis who did nothing to us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. Georgie's policies are one-size fits all
He won't even have to change them for the next country he invades. He just hangs on the podium smirking, kind of sneers up that upper lip and hurls his all-occasion policy:

"What ever it takes." (Google that if you have lots of time.)

"Stay the course." (See lemmings cartoon on today's front page.)

After those pearls of wisdom, he kind of "heh, heh, hehs" like a dirty old man while the kool-aid crowd cheers wildly.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. Bush is nothing but excuses, excuses, excuses.
He screwed up badly and everyone with more than half a brain knows it. Bush is just hoping to keep the idiots in the dark through November. Then the new Iraq budget requests will start to be made, the Iraqi elections will be postponed, and we'll start engaging the enemy in futile battle again.

Bush is an ass. Will the people figure it out or is it too "nuanced?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
26. What? Bush speaks? Must be LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES LIES. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
28. kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hansolsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. I think Kerry needs one more position on Iraq. here it is:
Here is what I want him to say.

QUOTE
Fellow citizens, hear me: I served in Vietnam and experienced the combat of war. I saw people killed and I killed enemy soldiers. I learned some things from that experience that will profoundly effect the orders I will issue as Commander and Chief. I will keep our soldiers safe from the folly of war. I will not send them on combat missions with no clear objective. I will not send them into battle where they cannot tell friend from foe. I will not ask them to fight for people who will not fight for themselves. I will never send American soldiers on a combat mission with rules of engagement where they cannot fire unless fired upon. I will never ask young soldiers to risk their lives because old men in high places cannot admit their mistakes.

I will go to Baghdad myself and I will meet with the leaders of the Iraqi insurgency. I will end this war on Iraq. I will not fire another shot in that war. I will hold an immediate national referendum in Iraq to determine if the Iraqi people want us to stay. If the people of Iraq want us out of there, I will bring the troops home. If a clear majority of Iraqis want us to stay, I will demand they stand along side American troops and prove it. If they refuse or shirk that duty, I will still bring our troops home. If they want us to stay and will stand with us, I will keep American forces there as true peace keepers.

I believe that God helps those who help themselves, and so do I. That principle will guide my policy in iraq. Please give me your vote and your confidence. Please trust that what I learned in the rice fields of South Vietnam is relevant to what must be done now. I ask for your trust. Quote.

Fellow bloggers: Will this mesage resonate?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. Delete four words and it's perfect
"the rice fields of"

Leave those in and the SBVT dumbasses will start screaming about how Kerry thinks he was a footsoldier now.

"Please trust that what I learned in South Vietnam is relevant to what must be done now."

Also change "so do I" to "so will I."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. kerry should tell Bush Saddam wasn't as important as Osama
Bush continually brags about Saddam and Iraq but the gruesome reality of the place and the devastation is NEVER an issue for him. If threats to the world's security was THE only issue (as he implies), then Saddam was just one of many.......what a major hypocrite!!! How can people be so stupid to believe this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. Poor bush...
Always just such a TOTAL LIAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. Kerry's position on Iraq HAS NOT CHANGED.
Edited on Fri Sep-10-04 11:29 PM by LynnTheDem
Kerry might not be the best speaker in the world, but his position on the war has been pretty consistent all along. Even William Saletan, the best known critic of Kerry's "caveats and curlicues," came to the same conclusion after examining a Republican video of Kerry's supposed flip-flops on Iraq: the RNC video carefully edits Kerry's quotes to make them look inconsistent, but in fact every one of them tells the same story. He summarized the RNC clips in a Slate article on Thursday:

Kerry wants pressure and inspections....doubts Iraq would comply with inspections, but he thinks we have to go through the process of trying....doesn't like the way Bush is pursuing the goal, particularly because it "alienated our allies."

....consistent with Kerry's previous statements calling for "heat," "inspections," "process," and cooperation with "allies."....No conflict here....voting to turn up the heat and get compliance with inspections....Bush betrayed two of Kerry's principles: process and allies....it isn't a change of position.

....This is the same position Kerry has stated all along: compliance, inspections, skepticism, process....There you have it. Edwards says if Kerry had been president, we would have found out Iraq had no WMD, and "we would never be in this place." Kerry emphatically agrees with this translation.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2004_08/004512.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-10-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
33. If he really wants to run with the flip flop thing...
Where's our ad with the Osama flip flop --?
1) GWB hisself: Git Osama dead or alive
2) GWB: It doesn't really matter if we get Osama or not

Yes, we have The Daily Show's wonderful "Because He Says So" video, but we also need ads with those themes... Nothing like clips of His Royal Cardboard Cowboy saying things himself... You wanted to talk Vietnam, Mr. AWOL? Well okay, here's your marvelous record for all to see. Yet you still wanna run this flip flop thing out?

A) GWB: We gotta cut taxes to stimulate the economy.
B) GWB: The rich got lawyers so they can avoid paying taxes.

President Photo Op better watch out... If I wasn't afraid Karl Rove was right about people judging by images rather than realities, I would suggest a "President Photo Op" campaign... Photo Op of GWB with soldiers lookin' holy, then two headlines on veterans' benefit cuts... GWB talking "help the seniors get persciption drugs" and then headlines about the price increases...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-04 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
34. And BUSH SAID Saddam could REMAIN IN POWER
Edited on Sat Sep-11-04 12:05 AM by LynnTheDem
Blair: March 2, 2003

"If military action proves necessary, it will be to uphold the authority of the UN and to ensure Saddam is disarmed of his weapons of mass destruction, not to overthrow him. It is why, detestable as I find his regime, he could stay in power if he disarms peacefully."

http://www.sundayherald.com/print31827

Bush: March 5, 2003

"We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq. But if Saddam Hussein does not disarm peacefully, he will be disarmed by force,"

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030308-1.html

Saddam can stay if he disarms, Powell says

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/10/21/1034561443683.html

Rice and Powell Say that a Disarmed Saddam Could Stay in Power

http://www.intelmessages.org/Messages/National_Security/wwwboard/messages/2159.html

IF he disarmed.

But then BUSH kicked out the UN weapons inspectors.

And lookie what we have now...

ISG (Iraq Survey Group) bush's own pet weapons inspectors.
Final ISG report; NO WMD IN IRAQ BEFORE THE INVASION.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5012717-103690,00.html

Oops, huh bush; Saddam WAS DISARMED. Which we would all have known IF YOU hadn't kicked out the UN weapons inspectors, bush.

And we wouldn't have 1007 DEAD US SOLDIERS and THOUSANDS WOUNDED, bush.

http://icasualties.org/oif/

And we wouldn't have TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DEAD IRAQIS, bush.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/091004E.shtml

And we WOULDN'T BE OUT $200 BILLION, bush.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2004-05-13-costs-war-analysis_x.htm

And the WORLD WOULDN'T HATE US, bush.

http://www.twf.org/News/Y2002/1109-Poll.html

http://www.iht.com/articles/537873.html

And the US STATE DEPARTMENT and all the thinktanks and experts reports WOULDN'T BE REPORTING WE'RE LESS SAFE NOW because of your invasion of Iraq, bush.

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2004/06/23/state_dept_doubles_03_terrorism_death_toll/

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5889435/

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_17-10-2003_pg4_9

http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,1063717,00.html

http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article2629.html

You've been a useless failure all your life, georgie; you always will be. And as always, it's others who pay the price.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-04 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. EXACTLY ! WELL SAID !!
It's all out there-- you called up all the links-- how sad that the punditocracy won't even bother...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-11-04 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
36. kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC