Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

French Probe Led to 'Fake Niger Uranium Papers'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
floda Donating Member (296 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:31 PM
Original message
French Probe Led to 'Fake Niger Uranium Papers'
Financial Times
August 2, 2004

A French intelligence operation to safeguard Niger's uranium industry and prevent weapons proliferation, inadvertently led to the forging of documents relating to an apparent clandestine uranium trade with Iraq, western intelligence officials say.

The operation, begun in 1999, reflected concern among several intelligence services that rogue states may have been trying to procure uranium. France was also concerned about the security of its own uranium supplies from Niger, as well as the security of the two French companies that control Niger's uranium industry. Rocco Martino, an Italian businessman who has admitted that he has made a career out of "selling information", has held regular meetings with French intelligence officials in Brussels since at least 1999.

According to senior European officials, in 1999 he provided French officials with genuine documents which revealed Iraq may have been planning to expand "trade" with Niger. This trade was assumed to be in uranium, which is Niger's main export. It was then that Mr Martino first became aware of the value of documents relating to Niger's uranium exports. He was then asked by French officials to provide more information, which led to a flourishing "market" in documents.

He subsequently provided France with more documents, which turned out to have been forged when they were handed to the International Atomic Energy Agency by US diplomats. The exposure of the forgeries appeared to undermine British government claims that Iraq had sought to buy uranium from Niger. US officials have distanced themselves from the claim, though the UK has insisted the forged documents were not part of their evidence. According to senior intelligence officials, the forged documents were produced with the involvement of people familiar with Niger, and were created in 2000.

more...

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/justif...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, this doesn't add up
The French Agencies are quite well informed about the former Colonies and certainly among the best in Europe (far "better" reputation than the British). No way they would have bought papers forged this poorly.

Also, the "the papers weren't the evidence" sounds strange: then why didn't the IAEA receive the real evidence?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree.
It is also inconsistent with Josh Marshall's information that the documents were forged in 2001 and he says he knows who the forger is. I have seen this story in 3 different European papers now. I think it is a front story to cast doubt on the possible indictments that (hopefully) are forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Looks like we've gone to the 2nd layer
Intel officers are taught to build their stories in layers, like an onion, so that interrogators or investigators will feel they've peeled away the "lie" and gotten at the "truth." I suspect they've got a few more to go here.

Waiting for Josh to weigh in on this one. Where'd I put my popcorn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder how much this known forger and all around scoundrel
got paid to implicate the French just before our election. This guy's livelihood is in lies, so I'm supposed to believe that his revelation is out of the goodness of his heart? Not until the tooth fairy leaves a billion dollars under my pillow! :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Nov 28th 2014, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC