Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brkg: Alert Causing Al Qaeda Documents 3-5 yrs old

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cygy2k Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:11 PM
Original message
Brkg: Alert Causing Al Qaeda Documents 3-5 yrs old
Edited on Mon Aug-02-04 08:15 PM by cygy2k
DrudgeReport

Much of the information that led authorities to raise the terror alert at several large financial institutions in the New York City and Washington areas was 3 or 4 years old...NYT Tuesday Page One Spalsh Claims: Intelligence and law enforcement officials 'had not yet found concrete evidence that a terror plot or preparatory surveillance operations were still under way'... Developing..

http://www.drudgereport.com/ Headline Flashing


Per Drudge so judge for yourself, siting NYT...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cygy2k Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmmmm.
Shure makes Shrub and Co look a little dumb doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. No, dear. Malicious.
AND stupid.

Think the truck drivers who waited hours at check points are thinking, I have to vote for George?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Okay .. thanks..
Soon you will get a couple of posts:

1) wanting a link

2) blasting you for YET AGAIN linking to Drudge site..

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. How come I heard this yesterday
Is this Back to the Future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, some of the information about Saddam's WMDs was older than that
!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WLKjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. if your going to post from that pile
Please have a link ready so I can see it for myself. Thank you
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. the link is
www.drudgereport.com

He's citing tomorrow's New York Times. He doesn't have a link to the story yet, just his summary which is posted in its entirety above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
45. New York Times link is up now
Tuesday 8/3/04

Reports That Led to Terror Alert Were Years Old, Officials Say

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/03/politics/03intel.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. In another thread in GD, someone posted that the BBC
reported this today.

Anybody have a link? My husband wants to see this and so do I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Welcome to DU
I hope people aren't too rude to you for posting Drudge-- he does have up the flashing light and all.

:hi: :hi: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. So Dean was right in what he said to blitzer?
How dare they put Old info out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cygy2k Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Been here
I have been here for years but didnt ever post much, I work on many democratic campaigns and have for years been a political campaign advisor. Just saw the blinking light twice in two nights first and thought to post it, never know if it is real but it should be posted and then disproved. Not the other way around, that is what news is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toby109 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. If Drudge is what respresents "news" in this country,
then we are in a world of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lottie244 Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. Sorry, but sometimes Drudge posts shit that he doesn't the meaning of.
One thing they are trying to do is to make it look like Clinton's problem. However, they are making themselves look bad in the process.
Drudge is not the only source of this info. The BBC ran a similar story and I think that is where Drudge got his info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Have the DHS said where, when or how they
came into this latest intel and why they felt it was worth going public with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I heard a woman on the news hour tell Lehrer that the info was from 2000
and 2001...but that they also compared it with recent info and came up with the threat.

she had something to do with Homeland security..
Jim asked her where they got it.....it was from pakistan..........so much for the alert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I thought I heard that too, she kind of mumbled it
Edited on Mon Aug-02-04 08:39 PM by crozet4clark
It was Fran Townsend, the lady in the grey suit bowing her head in the press conference photo, maybe she's embarrassed to work for two A-1 idiots? (Bu$h and DOHRidge)

EDIT to add her comments from the NewHour transcript:

JIM LEHRER: As far as the U.S. Government knows, these people are still here?

FRANCES TOWNSEND: Well, no, it's not clear. This information was gathered in 2000 and 2001.

It appears that some of it may have been updated as recently as January of this year but it's not clear... you can't tell from the intelligence itself whether or not those individuals are still here.


http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/july-dec04/townsend_8-02.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. So they've had this shit for years,
last reviewed it in January, and trot it out now? Obviously Dean was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlcandie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Well, remember TERROR was NOT important then and they
didn't report about it then or talk about it or research or study it. So, now they are trying to prove they DID know about it years later. LoL
:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buff2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Will the whore media put this out?
Or will they keep going along with the lie? Geesus,this is to ridiculous for words.Look at the money wasted by putting out all the law enforcement....all for political points for Dumbo.:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. umm..
yeah. He's citing tomorrow's New York Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. So they send out some old,
tired, useless intel disguised as fresh new threats -- and what? People aren't supposed to notice or ask questions? What kind of horseshit is this? I know what kind it is, the kind tailor-made to provide NYC with an excuse to shut down all protests during the repuke convention. Can't let people know that hundreds of thousands are willing to take it to the streets in opposition to this band of thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Chimpy got his dates wrong
He thinks this is 2001, and this is the warning he was SUPPOSED to deliver!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
44. Oh you mean gw* thought he could go back in time and make
people think he did the right thing at the right time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Exactly!
Saw an interview with the DC Police Chief this afternoon. He said that no specific time window was associated with the threat, so heightened security measures could go on "indefinitely". Surprise, surprise... NOT! No protests will be allowed in NYC or DC for the duration and there will be further crackdowns on civil liberties, eg, take Ashcrofts edict -- specific and outrageous -- to America's librarians, as noted on other DU threads.

I don't know why the American media likes being continually played for fools by this administration. This latest terra alert was such an obvious political ploy even a child could decipher it.

My partner has likened this to the metaphor of the lobster which doesn't realize its being cooked because the heat is turned up so gradually it doesn't react until its too late. The same thing is happening with our civil liberities in this country -- a Patriot Act here, another terror alert there, one book removed from a library shelf, then another... by the time the American people realize they're living in a neo-fascist state our goose, so to speak, will have already been cooked, and I accuse the American media as willing co-conspirators in this assault on democracy and the Consitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #25
50. Bingo. I think they're hedging their bets.
Depending on what polls they cling to (witness CNN, and its precious "he got no bounce! HEE HEE!) CNN/Gallup poll, which Keith Olbermann on MSNBC spoke about, WHILE ALSO MENTIONING TWO, count 'em, 2 other polls, Newsweek/MSNBC, AND CBS News, that showed the opposite. I think the Newsweek poll had Kerry up by as much as a ten point lead. Does CNN mention any of this? Not that I've heard. But then again, I'm reading this stuff about them. I'm now avoiding the actual viewing of CNN, and I'm mostly watching MSNBC.

Anyway - I think because of this poll crap, some news producers and directors, in the back of their minds, are seriously doubtful about which side to take, the Dems or republi-CONS, because it looks too close to call. They don't dare piss off kkkarl rove just yet, because nobody's too sure that Kerry can win. And if bush steals it again and gets back in power, and they'll have sided with Kerry, they will be made to pay dearly for it. Count on that. And they KNOW this. In the last week or so, in all my reading and convention watching, I've seen/heard this come up several times. That some in the media recognize the hardball tactics these people play, and know there will be vengeance if they don't cooperate.

It's sad. If these people stopped capitulating again and again and again, and just REFUSED to be intimidated, the bullying power of this White House would be stopped. If they only had a spine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
56. Ahh, yes, good catch. It all makes sense now.
Although they've done a masterful job of seelling this this one (it's credible enough to have made the Canadian news), I KNEW there was probably an ulterior motive here. I just couldn't figure it out.

So, this is an "open-ended" terror alert level, eh? I suppose it will be downgraded right after the GOP convention with much back-slapping and huzzahs for the Shrub and Crashcart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peaches2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. Unfortunately people won't notice
The truth about what Bush and his band of stooges next to him today is that they are not idiots. They know that when the truth comes out on what they did to make us think this threat was imminent the people won't notice or care. Much like a retraction in a newspaper. No one pays any attention.

Blame the public who has the truth in front of them but don't WANT to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Looks like Howard Dean was right again!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Right on what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. He said something like.
Every time Bush gets into political trouble he raises these alerts. Dean was accused of being "conspiratorial".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
36. Hmmmm..........Dean always knew the jig was up!!!
Wish he were still running!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Howard Dean is "Thomas Paine" not "George Washington".
He couldn't get elected. But without him nor could Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. Yep. The Doctor is always about 9 months ahead of conventional
wisdom, which is what IMHO would have made him a remarkable and great president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeArrival Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. It should be simple to determine the date of the files
Either by the date of the files or other attributes buried within the hard drive if the computer was set to julian zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stilpist Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. This was in the NY Times today also
that the information was from before 9/11. here

What I want to know is whether there was info included about the WTC.

All politics all the time from Commander Bunnypants!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. So What Happens Tomorrow
and the day after, and the day after that - will NYC & D.C. be in lockup for ever now? They made it sound like today was D-day based on 2 year old information!!!

Political timing for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. so R all the talking hairdos
apologizing 2 Howard?.......hmmmmmm......didn't think so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Isere Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. They've had them in the basement
just waiting for the election season!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Bushit!!!
That little photo op of Stepford wife and sleaze daughters in one of places designated for an attack is blatant crap. Fraudulent terror warining! Can't someone sue these Neo Fascists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
30. 200M see "ORANGE ALERT TERR'TERR'TERR!!!!"
10M see "Old intel, never mind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lottie244 Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
34. If the media allows this to pass we should all stop buying newspapers and
stop watching all cable and network news. This calls for bombarding the 9/11 Commission with protests about this lates alert and how Bush is still misusing and misleading about intelligence. I am absolutely pissed about this. Just think what this shit is costing our economy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #34
49. They will and you should stop buying papers and watching mainstream
news anyway. It's bad for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AKing Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
37. Depkafile also skeptical
Two Men Held in Pakistan Are Back Numbers

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report

August 2, 2004, 5:27 PM (GMT+02:00)



Improbable hideaway for al Qaeda secrets


DEBKAfile’s counter-terror experts are skeptical about the sourcing of the intelligence which prompted the terror alert - declared Sunday at five financial bastions in New York, Washington and New Jersey - to Pakistan’s two newest al Qaeda captives, the Tanzanian Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani, caught on July 25, and the Pakistani Muhammed Naeem Noor Khan, apprehended on July 13.

http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=885
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
39. This in a WaPo article
Damian Milverton, a spokesman for the World Bank, said more than 1,200 employees attended a staff meeting at which World Bank President James Wolfensohn said they could expect increased security measures.

Milverton said Wolfensohn told employees that "the information that the U.S. authorities picked up was from 2001 and there was no evidence to suggest an imminent threat to the Bank."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33730-2004Aug2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. I just read that in today's local paper, laughed my ass off on the 1st
paragraph.

The federal government raised the terror alert level Sunday to "orange" for the financial services sectors in New York City, Washington and Newark NJ, citing the discovery of remarkably detailed intelligence showing that al-Qaida operatives have been plotting for years to blow up specific buildings with car or truck bombs.

All I could think of was so how old are these plans and wouldn't they be a bit obsolete by now? Are these from before 9/11? What a bunch of maroons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REVOLT823 Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
42. I heard on Hardball that this information was captured in Pakistan
last week, but, that yes, the information found on the laptop was from 2000/2001. My question is, since this was supposedly found on the African guys (sorry, don't remeber his name) laptop, the one implicated in the embassy bombings, why was it not brought to the attention of the intelligence people unitl Thurs or Fri. when claimed. News reports from last week indicated this guy was nabbed by the Pakis last Saturday/Sunday. News of it did not break here unitl Thurs. (conveniently enough), then we don't hear about pics of the buildings being on his laptop until 2-3 days later. If this is such an all-fired emergency, raising terror levels etc. why was it so slow in getting out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
43. Cheneying unbelievable. Bush has hit a new low. This may be
the tipping point. How can anybody believe anything that man says anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-04 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Maybe you know?
More imporant is if you take Bushies word for what kind of "chatter" they are picking up. They have a poor track record in that area, one would be wise to use reason rather than take their word for it.

It just flat out makes no sense to alert the polulation if they actually have some specific and potentailly actionable intel. It makes less sense to agrivate the situation by sending Barbara Bush and Pataki to the suposed scene of the threat.

Use your head man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
48. My first thought, even before this revelation, was that it all sounded..
like the information that would have been gathered by the blind Sheik and his band of merry men, who were convicted of trying to bomb several sites in NYC in the mid-90's. The sheik is also believed to have been behind the truck bombing of the WTC in 1993, which while sadly killing some people,did almost nothing to the building itself. It sounded too conceptually dated in a way.The washington post online is reporting:

"Numerous officials said yesterday, however, that most of the information was compiled prior to the Sept. 11 attacks and that there are serious doubts about the age of other, undated files. One senior counterterrorism official said many of the documents include dates prior to Sept. 11, 2001, but there are no dates after that."

(from:<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35466-2004Aug2_2.html>)

You would think with 2 political conventions AND the Olympics all occuring within weeks of each other, that there might have been some reference to these major events on the guy's computer.

I live in NYC and passed a garage in midtown today where the check-in guy was actually examining the underside of the car of a guy who had pulled up to park in it, with one of those mirrors on a pole contraptions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
51. WHAT A CROCK OF BULL-SHIT
The sheep are running willy nilly in Circles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasev Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
52. more intelligence failures n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
53. The New York Times is getting more like Drudge every day
Edited on Tue Aug-03-04 08:52 AM by rocknation
Speaking of old, here's an article the Times ran YESTERDAY:

Captured Qaeda Figure Led Way to Information Behind Warning

A senior United States official would not confirm or deny that Mr. Khan had been the Qaeda figure whose capture led to the information. But the official said 'documentary evidence' found after the capture had demonstrated in extraordinary detail that Qaeda members had for years conducted sophisticated and extensive reconnaissance of the financial institutions cited in the warnings on Sunday.
And not a minute too late...Well, let's REALLY be safe and cancel the GOP covention, why don't we?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mighty Undecided Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
54. August 6 memo just became "actionable" (Aug 6, 2001) Good for W!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
55. Was one of the targets the WTC?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
57. Why are we using this 'historical document' but we ignored
others? I wonder if anyone in the whore press has the balls to ask McClellan and Condi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-03-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
58. "The view" bimbo Elizabeth saying "Bush* was
misled! Thank god he's our President and Not John Kerry"! This in response to other view host Joy who said "I'm sorry-the buck STOPS with the President! If Kerry were president and this happened, I would critisize him"!

The other hosts were saying that it was the CIAs fault, and that BushCo was acting in our best interest. I'm appalled that any (non-Faux) network show has a regular host that declares "Thank God John Kerry isn't President". Sickening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC