Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: (National Guard) Troops Could Stay Beyond (24-mo.) Limit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 03:59 AM
Original message
LAT: (National Guard) Troops Could Stay Beyond (24-mo.) Limit
THE WORLD
Troops Could Stay Beyond Limit
Pentagon is considering extending the tours of National Guard troops in Iraq who are nearing the 24-month active-duty maximum.

By Mark Mazzetti, Times Staff Writer


WASHINGTON — In yet another sign of the strains on the U.S. military in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks and the Iraq war, the Pentagon for the first time is considering extending the mobilization of National Guard soldiers who will soon hit the federal limit of 24 months of active service, defense officials said Tuesday.

Initially, the decision would affect about 450 soldiers of the Arkansas National Guard who are in Iraq with the 39th Brigade Combat Team. The soldiers, mobilized after Sept. 11 and first sent to the Sinai Peninsula on a peacekeeping rotation, are the first group of National Guard troops to approach the 24-month limit that the Pentagon established days after the terrorist attacks in the United States.

Ultimately, however, waiving the limit in this case might lead to extended deployments for thousands of other reservists and National Guard members in Iraq and Afghanistan, and provide ammunition to critics in Congress who are pushing the Bush administration to increase the size of the military.

"Every day it seems to be another improvisational attempt to stretch forces that are already stretched very thin," said Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), a former paratrooper with the Army's 82nd Airborne Division and an advocate of bolstering the Army's ranks.

But the status of the soldiers, being considered by David S.C. Chu, undersecretary of Defense for personnel and readiness, has not yet been decided, Pentagon officials said....


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-guard21jul21,1,3332329.story?coll=la-home-world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fighting unnecessary wars, and...
... basing so many soldiers overseas might be part of the problem, but everyone would rather have a draft again, I guess.

It's a fact--a country can't have imperial ambitions without having enough troops and the means of paying for them. At this point, we have neither. Compared to what Bush has done in the last thirty-two months or so, intense diplomacy is downright cheap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. No wonder
Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D) is touting her Soldier's Bill of Rights in her campaign literature. I've noticed that there has been a change in folks in AR since the Guard has been deployed, and it hasn't been for cheering Bush. The folks I've talked to call him an arrogant illegitimate son and worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Another improvisational attempt"
Remember "stretched but not broken, we have a plan?"

I guess this is "the plan."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. and as with all of the neo-con plans....
it sucks. Get bush* out NOW! :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Newspeak for juggling act
very creative aren't they? that's why they wear the stars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. These poor soldiers are actually prisoners of their own
government. They have contracts that are being
invalidated by the bush regime who does not want
to install a draft until after the election. I
don't understand how any military family could
vote for AWOL this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. They'll run them right into the ground
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Was that in the contract Join the Army Forever or till 67!!!
These people didn't realize they signed up to be cheap labor for the Bush Regime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well, no problem right? The are simply guarding the 51st
and most oil rich state. The state of Iraq. Let freedom reign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC