Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Capitol Hill Sees the Flip Side of a Powerful Warrior

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 10:01 PM
Original message
WP: Capitol Hill Sees the Flip Side of a Powerful Warrior
Saturday, May 8, 2004; Page A01

Congress saw a new face of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld yesterday.

Summoned to Capitol Hill for a bipartisan trip to the woodshed over the Iraq prison abuse crisis, the man who has spoken so often of transforming the world's largest military testified that he has been trying for "days and days and days" to simply get a CD copy of the Abu Ghraib photographs and video -- but has not been able to find one.

"The disc that I saw that had photos on it did not have the videos on it," Rumsfeld told the Senate Armed Services Committee. All the pictures, both stills and video, have been in the hands of military investigators since January, he told Congress. But the secretary has had trouble getting hold of them.

Rumsfeld testified that he and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard B. Myers, finally saw the stills Thursday night, more than a week after CBS broadcast the first images of U.S. soldiers humiliating and threatening naked Iraqi prisoners.

This image of a powerless secretary unable to summon up a cheap piece of plastic in the face of a "catastrophe," as Rumsfeld described the prison scandal, was a long way from the boldly assured Rumsfeld of a year ago. Back then, during the U.S. military's lightning drive on Baghdad, the civilian architect of two wars in two years described a computerized force in which data leapt from soldier to satellite to smart bomb, in which unimaginable firepower was just a few keystrokes away.

Rumsfeld was a sort of Achilles for the Information Age, and his bold assurance won him a place among People magazine's sexiest humans. President Bush nicknamed him "Rumstud."

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9495-2004May7.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. How the mighty have fallen
Collector of bad and doubtful debts....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. A LITTLE DOSE OF WAR CRIMES GETS YA EVERY TIME
Rumsfeld did not describe the photos, but U.S. military officials told NBC News that the unreleased images showed U.S. soldiers severely beating an Iraqi prisoner nearly to death, having sex with a female Iraqi female prisoner and “acting inappropriately with a dead body.” The officials said there was also a videotape, apparently shot by U.S. personnel, showing Iraqi guards raping young boys.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4855930 /

SCREWED IN THE RECTUM WHILE MILTARY GUARDS STOOD AND WATCHED. CHILDREN SCREAMING AS THEY WERE SODOMIZED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. bullshit Rumsfeld knew long ago and saw it all
Edited on Fri May-07-04 10:07 PM by wellstone_democrat
I don't believe that for one minute. I also believe that soon we will know that he's been aware of every minute of what is out there. Every minute. This is too big and too politically dangerous not to have full DOD and WH knowledge up and down the line.

bullshit


on edit: fix subject line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Haven't see the CD? I guess until he see it, then...

his plausible deniability is maintained. Where have I seen this before? So, I guess where we are on this deja-vu timeline is somewhere around 1973. So that means Bush won't resign until another year and a half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. They should call him and Fieth back
Edited on Fri May-07-04 11:19 PM by teryang
...to explain Fieths views on the Geneva conventions as support for terrorism and the use of contractors to kill people with impunity.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x49395
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is a revealing quote, the key phrase
"I wish I knew how you reach down into a criminal investigation when . . . it turns out to be something that is radioactive, something that has strategic impact in the world," Rumsfeld said, with unfamiliar helplessness. "We don't have those procedures. They've never been designed. We're functioning in a -- with peacetime constraints,with legal requirements, in a wartime situation, in the Information Age, where people are running around with digital cameras and taking these unbelievable photographs and then passing them off, against the law, to the media, to our surprise, when they had -- they had not even arrived in the Pentagon."

Rummy isn't upset about what happened, just at the fact the pictures have gotten out, and there are still "legal requirements" and "peacetime constraints" that prevent him and the administration from preventing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What happened to us being "at war" The people we are holding
for no good reason were told by the Supreme Court last week that we were a nation at war.

So, we are at war, but Rummy is not?

So is * a wartime president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. This is why I am not jumping on the lynch the six
bandwagon.

Because it was an enlisted person, or several who brought this story to the light of day.

Meanwhile all the higher-ups stood by and did nothing, and were it up to them the world would never have known. And now that they are caught they are whining about geneva conventions and how constrained they are and were.

They make me sick with all their apologies and protestations of disgust,etc. They are not sorry this happened, they are only sorry they got caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC