He is also the the chairman of the board. All of them seem to have gotten fat and sassy as of late
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2004/05/05/news/californian/21_23_235_4_04.txtSupervisors OK lawsuit over voting machines
By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer
RIVERSIDE ---- In open defiance of the state's sweeping order to decertify touch-screen voting machines in 14 counties, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 Tuesday to authorize filing a lawsuit to overturn the order.
(snip)
(snip)
Time and moneyBut all that will take time, said Mischelle Townsend, the Riverside County registrar of voters.
"And we don't have time before November because candidates will be filing their nomination documents in July," Townsend said.
Compliance also would be quite costly at $2.7 million, most of it for printing paper ballots, she said.
Riverside County supervisors suggested the conditions were unreasonable. And they maintained Shelley was overreacting to widespread problems reported with the startup of new electronic voting systems in other counties, including San Diego, and giving in to political pressure from critics of electronic voting.
"There are problems with computers, and we need to make improvements," said Supervisor Bob Buster. "But this is more than asking for improvements. They (state officials) are really pandering to the conspiratorial what-if scenarios" being raised by critics.
"In my own recount, the problems lay in the old paper ballot system," Buster said.
In the primary, supervisors must receive 50 percent of the votes, plus one, to avoid a fall runoff with the second-place finisher. Buster barely cleared that threshold ---- by 48 votes in the initial count and 34 in a recount ---- in a three-way race.
(snip)
The republican operative in Mischelle Townsend should have thought about time when she was running around the Republican candidate for Boxer's seat in the person of Bill Jones
http://www.thedesertsun.com/news/stories2003/local/20031029021102.shtml(snip)
Court denies appeal of voting lawsuit
A federal appeals court has ruled against a Palm Desert woman who challenged Riverside County’s touch-screen voting machines.
Susan Marie Weber had argued that votes recorded on touch-screen ballots cannot be confirmed because the systems don’t provide a voter-verified paper record of the voter’s ballot.
In a suit filed in 2001, she also maintained the machines offer no way of legitimately recounting votes in the case of a close election.
The suit was dismissed in 2002 in U.S. District Court and Weber appealed.
In its ruling this week, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel in Pasadena agreed with then-California Secretary of State Bill Jones and Riverside County Registrar of Voters Mischelle Townsend that the machines met the state’s certification process for voting machines and other requirements.
(snip)