Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E-Voting: 1 County Sues State (California) | Los Angeles Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 10:50 AM
Original message
E-Voting: 1 County Sues State (California) | Los Angeles Times
E-Voting: 1 County Sues State
Five others may follow Riverside in fighting the decertification of digital vote machines.


By Seema Mehta and Stuart Pfeifer, Times Staff Writers

Riverside County's Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to sue the state's top election official to regain the right to use electronic voting machines in November.

Officials in five other counties said they also might seek court approval to use their touch-screen voting machines on election day, which would overturn the temporary ban on their use and keep California on an aggressive path from paper to electronic balloting.

Secretary of State Kevin Shelley, noting security and technological concerns about the machines, banned electronic voting in four counties whose machines used unapproved software. He also decertified and set strict conditions for recertifying 10 other counties, including Riverside, that intended to use the machines in November.

More at the Los Angeles Times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, look my worthless undemocratic registrar of voters made the news
I love my county for how they try to steam roll anybody that don't adhere to their fascist republican ways
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here they are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hey check this out, with just a few more links you find out what state ..
policies they work under

(snip)
FLORIDA STATE ASSOCIATION OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS

The State Association of Florida's elected Supervisors of Elections has published a position paper in response to those who have concerns about the accuracy, security and reliability of Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) Voting Equipment.


(snip)

http://www.election.co.riverside.ca.us/ts/vvpat/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. They don't work properly, but we want to use them anyway.
I bet this goes over big with the voters. Good Grief!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. James Venable vice chair some links on him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. My supervisor doesn't want a run off either
He is also the the chairman of the board. All of them seem to have gotten fat and sassy as of late

http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2004/05/05/news/californian/21_23_235_4_04.txt

Supervisors OK lawsuit over voting machines

By: DAVE DOWNEY - Staff Writer

RIVERSIDE ---- In open defiance of the state's sweeping order to decertify touch-screen voting machines in 14 counties, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 Tuesday to authorize filing a lawsuit to overturn the order.
(snip)
(snip)
Time and money

But all that will take time, said Mischelle Townsend, the Riverside County registrar of voters.

"And we don't have time before November because candidates will be filing their nomination documents in July," Townsend said.

Compliance also would be quite costly at $2.7 million, most of it for printing paper ballots, she said.

Riverside County supervisors suggested the conditions were unreasonable. And they maintained Shelley was overreacting to widespread problems reported with the startup of new electronic voting systems in other counties, including San Diego, and giving in to political pressure from critics of electronic voting.

"There are problems with computers, and we need to make improvements," said Supervisor Bob Buster. "But this is more than asking for improvements. They (state officials) are really pandering to the conspiratorial what-if scenarios" being raised by critics.

"In my own recount, the problems lay in the old paper ballot system," Buster said.

In the primary, supervisors must receive 50 percent of the votes, plus one, to avoid a fall runoff with the second-place finisher. Buster barely cleared that threshold ---- by 48 votes in the initial count and 34 in a recount ---- in a three-way race.
(snip)

The republican operative in Mischelle Townsend should have thought about time when she was running around the Republican candidate for Boxer's seat in the person of Bill Jones

http://www.thedesertsun.com/news/stories2003/local/20031029021102.shtml
(snip)
Court denies appeal of voting lawsuit

A federal appeals court has ruled against a Palm Desert woman who challenged Riverside County’s touch-screen voting machines.

Susan Marie Weber had argued that votes recorded on touch-screen ballots cannot be confirmed because the systems don’t provide a voter-verified paper record of the voter’s ballot.

In a suit filed in 2001, she also maintained the machines offer no way of legitimately recounting votes in the case of a close election.

The suit was dismissed in 2002 in U.S. District Court and Weber appealed.

In its ruling this week, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel in Pasadena agreed with then-California Secretary of State Bill Jones and Riverside County Registrar of Voters Mischelle Townsend that the machines met the state’s certification process for voting machines and other requirements.
(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Repeat after me...
Corporations GOOD!
Government BAD!
Corporations GOOD!
Government BAD!
Corporations GOOD!
Government BAD!
Corporations GOOD!
Government BAD!

With the proper mindset it doesn't make any sense to sue the people who sold you the voting machines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. why would they want to use voting devices
that even appear to have an accuracy/security problem?

is the fix in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not that I support the BBV machines
But some counties may have legitimate concerns about what to do with millions of dollars worth of illegal machines that have already been bought and paid for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Easy. Scrap the machines...
Sue the manufacturers...

What would they do if they'd bought unreliable cars that often didn't start, couldn't be driven safely, and could be stolen by any fifteen year old gangster using a bent paper clip?

The regulatory bar for these machines was set pretty low by the State, and still the voting machine manufacturers managed to trip over it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That's one route
But again, not to support the BBV manufacturers, but the BBV manufacturers could come back and say, "They were legal when you bought them, tough shit if you can't use them now." I really doubt any state has a voting machine lemon law, so I'm not sure how much recourse the counties would really have.

But having said that, the counties definately should sue the pants off of Diebold, or at the very least try to return the machines for a refund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Expert Says E-Voting Is 'Terrible'
31 minutes ago Add U.S. Government - AP to My Yahoo!


By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - A computer science expert criticized electronic voting systems planned for the November election as highly vulnerable and flawed, saying on Wednesday a backup paper system is the only short-term solution to avoid another disputed presidential election.

"On a spectrum of terrible to very good, we are sitting at terrible," Aviel D. Rubin, a computer science professor at Johns Hopkins University, told the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. "Not only have the vendors not implemented security safeguards that are possible, they have not even correctly implemented the ones that are easy."


Other experts said electronic voting offers advantages over paper balloting, including increasing access to the blind and people who do not speak English. They contended that backing up electronic systems with paper ballots could be costly.


"We want systems that are secure but also accessible to people with disabilities," said Stephen Berger, an expert at TEM Consulting, an engineering services consulting firm.


The first public hearing by the commission came as many states consider legislation to require a paper record of every vote cast as a backup to technology they consider potentially faulty or vulnerable to attack.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=513&e=3&u=/ap/20040505/ap_on_go_ot/electronic_voting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Legal or not, The Machinez are DEFECTIVE!
A lot of them crashed during the primaries and were unusable.
They are hopelessly insecure.
Sue the bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
narcjen Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Is Riverside a Blue or Red area?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. So what is the name of the politician who OK'd this law suit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC