Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Snowe challenger: Obama not Christian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:28 PM
Original message
Snowe challenger: Obama not Christian
Source: Politico

Sen. Olympia Snowe's tea party challenger in Maine doesn't believe President Obama is a Christian.

Scott D'Amboise told Frum Forum Obama has "Muslim sympathies."

"The President, he says he is Christian but yet he’s exercises a lot of Muslim faith too. Me personally, I’m a Christian conservative. I don’t hold any malice to anybody, whether they are Muslim, or Jewish, or Catholic, or anything else. I just believe that he needs to come forward with his views a little bit clearer.”

When asked whether D’Amboise believed that Obama was secretly a Muslim–or how holding Muslim sympathies might effect his policies–D’Amboise replied: “I don’t know if he is or isn’t, but I don’t believe he’s a Christian.”



Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/davidcatanese/0711/Snowe_challenger_Obama_not_Christian_.html



And will Olympia have the courage to stand up to this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. If he beats her in the primary I suspect a Democrat could win
Am I correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. It . . . . does . . . . not . . . . matter
Here's why:

The No Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution is found in Article VI, paragraph 3, and states that:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

This has been interpreted to mean that no federal employee, whether elected or appointed, career or political, can be required to adhere to or accept any religion or belief. This clause immediately follows one requiring all federal and state officers to take an oath or affirmation of support to the Constitution, indicating that the requirement of such a statement does not imply any requirement by those so sworn to accept a particular religion or a particular doctrine. The option of giving an "affirmation" (rather than an "oath") can be interpreted as not requiring any metaphysical belief or as a nod to Mennonites and Quakers who would not swear oaths but would make affirmations.

The clause is cited by advocates of separation of church and state as an example of "original intent" of the Framers of the Constitution of avoiding any entanglement between church and state, or involving the government in any way as a determiner of religious beliefs or practices. This is significant because this clause represents the words of the original Framers, even prior to the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Religious_Test_Clause

My friend, Roy Torcaso, went to the Supreme Court and they agreed with him: No Religious Test to hold office.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torcaso_v._Watkins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Only a "Christian" fuck-head would imo raise this issue or make such claim
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. I think only a bigot would make such a claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Your... answer... does... not... matter...
The issue at hand is not whether the President is ELIGIBLE to be President. The insinuation is that the President doesn't DESERVE to be President because of his "foreign" inclinations, and the tea partiers to whom this message is being sent won't care about legal issues anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. Then your contention is that if the President isn't a Christian, therefore he isn't an American?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
64. Of course not...
Your original reply addressed the legal aspect of whether a Muslim was ineligible based on the Constitutional prohibition on a religious test for office; my point is that I don't think the tea bagger is bringing up a legal impediment; he's making an argument, and I think his audience is responding to an argument that to be non-Christian makes one morally ineligible to be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. You're right
There is no "religious test", but that hardly matters to the rabid fanatics that this idiot will attract...just like Bachmann saying that money slated for Black American farmers denied loans because of the color of their skin, should be given to idiots who keep building their houses in flood plains...most of whom are white!

So, as far as the racist or religious fanatics are concerned...this asshat and Bachmann are their heroes...and regardless of what the US Constitution says...the praise will only increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. So true, yet it does matter if you sway voters and no one counters this bs.
If you think the average American, or even the average member of the House, knows everything the Constitution says without being told, you are mistaken.

And, if Obama were inclined to come back with this argument, he would have done so long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thav Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. That's not in the Tea Party's Constitution (tm)
We'll just gloss over that part, k? We'll focus on the Important Parts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
67. More importantly, it's not in the bible, and that's the only law these freaks
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 09:26 PM by kestrel91316
acknowledge as legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedUp_Queer Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
53. BINGO.
Instead of defending the fact that he's Christian, the CORRECT answer is your answer...it doesn't matter what he is...THAT'S the proper response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. AND you'll see he also doesn't believe Catholics are Christians, if you pay attention.
"I’m a Christian conservative. I don’t hold any malice to anybody, whether they are Muslim, or Jewish, or Catholic, or anything else. I just believe that he needs to come forward with his views a little bit clearer."

But this one comes with plausible deniability. If called out on it, he'll say he didn't say that. Dog whistle. Saying without saying. Right-wing extremists are experts on it. I learned that from observing DU trolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wait Wut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Nice catch.
In other words, "It's all fine by me as long as they think like I do".

Perfect teaper candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. Duh. How could Catholics possibly be Christians, when the Pope is the anti-Christ?
Mel Gibson even said Pope John Paul was the anti-Christ--and Gibson calls himself a Catholic.

I don't know how Gibson feels now that Pope John Paul has passed without fulfilling any of the prophesies about the anti-Christ, though. He probably has some rationalizations, just as they all do when their brilliant interpretations of Revelation don't pan out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. "exercises a lot of Muslim faith too"?? WTF does that even mean???
I don't suppose someone could ask her that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
32. D'Amnoise to English translation: Obama does not openly disrespect all Muslims, like any
decent "Christian" neo theo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
68. Translation: Obama won't come out and declare Islam to be the work of the devil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. No one cares. 2008 called and wants their catch phrase back.
We're dealing with the President cutting social programs right now, which is just a teensy bit bigger than whatever fucking religion he or anyone has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. Well, that proves it. If he were a "real" Christian, he'd cut them a lot more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I didn't know it was "give unto Caesar what is yours" Lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. It sort of was. The question was about paying taxes.
Jesus held up a coin and asked whose likeness appeared on it. The reply was "Caesar's." And his response was "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's." However, before you pay a coin or anything else it taxes, it has to be yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I meant "yours" as in everything you have. My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. "And will Olympia have the courage to stand up to this?" If not she deserves to lose.
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 03:39 PM by yellowcanine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Olympia is a good person
We are lucky to have her in the Senate. She's a sensible New Englander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I don't question her "goodness", But when "good people" keep quiet about bigotry they deserve to
lose. I assume she won't let this slide. But if she does.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
54. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I've always thought so too.
I've been paying attention to her for a few years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Ummm, okay... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. As in "sensible liberal?" Or are you being serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
52. and on every close important vote she votes with an evil caucus

Politics isn't an individual sport its a team support.

She openly lied about supporting the Health Care Bill stating repeatedly that she would support it if the public option was not part of the legislation but had a delayed 'trigger'.

They cut the public option out completely and she still voted against it saying that it was 'rushing the legislation through'.

Its 'sensible' ones like Snowe that give the Republican Party a thin veneer of respectibility and allows it enter country clubs without being laughed out the door.

In that sense she is the worst of the Republicans as she appears to give the Party balance while in reality voting for the worst of the Republican legislation ever offered.

If Snowe had simply stood up and defended Warren it would have provided enough of a split to give her a fighting chance to get confirmed. She sat on her hands while real sensible New Englanders get thrown to the wolves.

She is neither sensible nor courageous and has had zero impact on mimizing the radical nature of the caucus that she conntinues to support in vote after vote, she could leave the caucus but doesn't.

Ironically she has become docile in her votes because she wanted to avoid a primary contest, which she now has anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. recent bills
3/3/2011--Introduced.

Medicare Mental Health Access Act - Amends title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act to treat as a physician, for Medicare purposes, a clinical psychologist acting within the scope of a psychologist's license (or other state law authorization), but only with respect to the furnishing of clinical psychologists services which the psychologist is legally authorized to perform by the state.

2/10/2011--Introduced.

Pharmaceutical Market Access and Drug Safety Act of 2011 - Amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to revise provisions governing the importation of prescription drugs. Waives the limitation on importation of prescription drugs that have been exported from the United States.

4/8/2011--Introduced.

Insurance Fairness for Amputees Act - Amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Public Health Service Act to require a group health plan that provides medical and surgical benefits and also provides benefits for prosthetics and custom orthotics to offer such prosthetics and custom orthotics in the same manner as applicable to medical and surgical benefits. Prohibits separate financial requirements or more restrictive treatment limitations. Requires a health plan that does not provide coverage for benefits outside of a network to ensure that such provider network is adequate to ensure enrollee access to prosthetic and custom orthotic devices and related services provided by appropriately credentialed practitioners and accredited suppliers.


Well, she;s just scum, I can see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. Oh she introduces lots of good bills

Here is where she introduced a bill for a trigger on the public option

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/09/olympia_snowes_trigger_amendme.html

Here Snowe explains in detail how the current system is collapsing, how the current bill incorporates Republican and Democratic ideas, that it will reduce suffering of real people.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3rdPOkY4_M

Here is her saying that she will support the right policy even if she is the only Republican


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPd6B6OCwP0


here is Snowe saying that she didn't leave the Republican Party but that the Party has changed.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPrqJKLYQBA&feature=relmfu

Here is from Senator Snowe's Senate website where she argues that the Health Care Bill is bad for "job creators" (the right wing name for billionaires. Here she is support Hatch's criticism of the HCB which is a double irony because when Clinton promoted health care reform Hatch co sponsored a health care bill very similar to the bill that was eventually passed.

Here her capitulation is complete as she is now the spokeswoman for the Republican Caucus going on Face the Nation absolutely lying that it is more expansive than what was in her committee. It is less expansive than her ammendment that would have allowed for a trigger for a public option.

http://www.youtube.com/user/SenatorOlympiaSnowe?blend=22&ob=5#p/u/36/Jw4XuMhyaoQ

Snowe is big on talk, big on sound bites and on important votes goes with her caucus all the time giving the Republican Party a reasonable vaneer that bears no relation to the reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Snowe will win in a land slide.
Mainers like her...well, enough Mainers like her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Yup. Sadly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wow! Are there enough drooling idiots in Maine to elect him?
http://static.bangordailynews.com.nyud.net:8090/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/CONGRESS-414x600.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com.nyud.net:8090/1249/1153653153_af5ec98281.jpg

He does look like a prime teabagger, for sure.

How can he possibly substantiate gibberish like this?
"The President, he says he is Christian but yet he’s exercises a lot of Muslim faith too."
How the heck do they even make it out of their houses by themselves? Unbelievably stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well, there were enough to elect LePage
albeit in a needless three-way race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
69. Hey, he passed third grade, so that's all that matters (and he writes like it, too).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. Are these the new code words for Obama is not American born or American enough?
Good grief. He needs to go back into the woodwork where he belongs IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. Remind us, D"Amnoise, WHY President Obama has to come forward with his religious views a bit clearer
Read your Constitution, D'Ambigot. It specifies clearly, no religious test for a President.

Sit down and shut up.

Ooops. Another Teabagger who pretends to be about the Constitution and has no idea what that beautiful document says, let alone means.

Hope we're running a decent Democrat against Snowe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. one thing for sure
I'm sure he's not a hypocrite Christian phony like the D'Amboise---Obama has compassion for others like Jesus. Jesus never said "have compassion for the rich"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. Cutting Medicare, Social Security and fuel subsidies for the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. He's doing several things here
One is the tired 'Obama is not one of us' red meat for the right that has died down a bit since the birther movement jumped the shark, but is still out there. Another is for the hardcore fundies - the idea that only very devout protestants are 'real' Christians. The last is the more subtle accusation (and not just for the right) that Obama's faith is for show and that he adopted it for political reasons when he began his career in public life in Chicago.

The first is hogwash. The second I have no opinion on. The third might have some truth to it, though the only people who know for sure are the president and those close to him. Though to be fair, skin-deep religious faith often comes with the territory when you want to have a political career here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
25. If he holds no malice, why's he hold truck with such discrimination?. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. Another GOPer punk-bully. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
33. "Christian conservative" means he takes the Bible literally.
The Bible compels him to hold malice to many people - it even prescribes violence under numerous circumstances. Jesus did not completely abrogate the Old Testament.
Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone out from among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known;
Then shalt thou enquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought among you;
Thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword.
And thou shalt gather all the spoil of it into the midst of the street thereof, and shalt burn with fire the city, and all the spoil thereof every whit, for the LORD thy God: and it shall be an heap for ever; it shall not be built again.
And there shall cleave nought of the cursed thing to thine hand: that the LORD may turn from the fierceness of his anger, and shew thee mercy, and have compassion upon thee, and multiply thee, as he hath sworn unto thy fathers;
When thou shalt hearken to the voice of the LORD thy God, to keep all his commandments which I command thee this day, to do that which is right in the eyes of the LORD thy God.

Do we really want anyone in public office who thinks that's his duty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. I very much disagree with your definition of Christian conservative.
"Christian" conservatives of the RW twist the Bible to suit their agenda and ignore huge chunks of the teachings of Jesus.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heywood J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-11 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #43
71. OK. I'll give you that.
"Free-market parables" and all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frisbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
34. And this jerk needs to come forward with his...
racist views. A-hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Agreed. When Jack Johnson became the first Black world heavyweight boxing champ
they did everything they could to discredit his win.

(from Wiki)In 1910, former undefeated heavyweight champion James J. Jeffries came out of retirement and said, "I feel obligated to the sporting public at least to make an effort to reclaim the heavyweight championship for the white race. . . . I should step into the ring again and demonstrate that a white man is king of them all."

Jackson beat Jeffries. In the US, many states and cities banned the exhibition of the Johnson-Jeffries film. The movement to censor Johnson's victory took over the country within three days after the fight. It was a spontaneous movement, mobilized by the Christian lobby and police forces.

Doesn't this just sound like the teabaggers? And remember how schools wouldn't let students listen to the President's speech? I know this is not politics, but it's the same old tired stuff.
It's just despicable that this still goes on in 2011!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
35. Neither was Jesus
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
larwdem Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
40. when
when are the fucking people from the blue state of maine going to put a dem in that seat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Butch350 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
42. If you don't hold any malice - then STFU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roy Rolling Donating Member (762 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Amen
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 04:22 PM by Roy Rolling
Well said (STFU above). . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getting old in mke Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
45. With a name like "D'Amboise"
the man is clearly a foreigner and even worse, French. No doubt a damn crypto-Socialist!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iliyah Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. And neither
Edited on Tue Jul-19-11 04:28 PM by Iliyah
is he, no Christian acts like most the gopers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
47. I would be listening for her to simply say..."Outrageous!"
...will she have the balls?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnd83 Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
48. There is no requirement to be Christian
There is no requirement to be Christian to hold office. People who think that other religions are evil have never had a Muslim or Jewish friend. Most non-Christian Americans are happy to be here for the same reason that Christians are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwooldri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
49. I don't believe Scott D'Amboise is a Christian. And so what?
Religion should be SEPARATE from politics. I don't care who you worship or not.

Mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
50. Ah are we back to that old meme?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
51. Well I wish that were true...
Scott D'Amboise however is a christofascist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
55. I don't care I don't care I don't care I don't fucking goddamn care!
Take your religion and shove it firmly where the sun don't shine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
57. will someone explain to this idiot that Obama doesn't have to
be 'Christian' to be in office, any office in the federal government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
58. Actually, I don't believe him to be a devout Christian either, beyond the lip service that Politics
has come to demand. Be that as it may, I really could care less whether he is or isn't a Christian, or a Muslim, or a Pastafarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
59. in other words
Sen. Olympia Snowe's tea party challenger in Maine doesn't believe President Obama is a BLACK.

Scott D'Amboise told Frum Forum Obama has "BLACK sympathies."

"The President, he says he is Christian but yet he’s exercises a lot of BLACK faith too. Me personally, I’m a Christian conservative. I don’t hold any malice to anybody, whether they are BLACK, or Jewish, or Catholic, or anything else. I just believe that he needs to come forward with his views a little bit clearer.”

When asked whether D’Amboise believed that Obama was secretly a BLACK–or how holding BLACK sympathies might effect his policies–D’Amboise replied: “I don’t know if he is or isn’t, but I don’t believe he’s a WHITE PERSON.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
60. Me: Religion is irrelevant n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
62. WTF
are "Muslim sympathies??????? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
63. OFFS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDemVoter Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
65. Let's pray Snow gets beaten. . .
As somebody has already posted, a Democrat could beat that tea party asshole, and Olympia Snow is nothing more than a whoremonger, pardon my language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
66. D’Amboise is Arabic for "Douchebag"
yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TxVietVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
70. Maine elected a goofball for governor, so why not elect another teabaggin' idiot for Senate.
That ought to work really well. Such a good conservanazi christian that he claims to be. Probably one of those 6 or 7 commandment christians. He only obeys the ones he likes. F*ckin' idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC