Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US soldier caught boarding flight with explosive

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 04:30 PM
Original message
US soldier caught boarding flight with explosive
Source: MSNBC

Police in Arizona have arrested a U.S. soldier after he attempted to board a flight to Los Angeles with a small amount of high-velocity plastic explosive in his baggage, authorities said on Thursday.

United States Army Private First Class Christopher Eric Wey, 19, was arrested after he tried to board a United Airlines flight to Los Angeles from Yuma, Ariz., on Wednesday, the U.S. Attorney's office for Arizona said.

Transportation Security Administration officers detected explosives in his baggage during security screening at Yuma International Airport. A subsequent search found a half ounce of C4 explosive hidden in a tobacco can inside one of the bags. Wey was detained for investigation and interviewed by FBI agents.

The complaint says that Wey stole the C4 while attending an explosive training course. Authorities found no evidence that he intended any harm with the small amount of explosives in his possession.



Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43759903/ns/travel-news/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm. Feeling him up wouldn't have helped -- or didn't help -- detect this.
"Authorities found no evidence that he intended any harm with the small amount of explosives in his possession"

I wonder how many of us would get the same consideration...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. That's because the contraband has a distinctive odor.
As compared to, oh, a ceramic knife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. It's the plastisizer that has the odor.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 03:15 PM by formercia
The RDX (the explosive)is essentially odorless, unless it's old and has begun to degrade. I carried a bag through TSA security that I knew was contaminated with powder residue from the Shooting Range. The odor was strong enough that I could smell it, yet TSA didn't pick it up.

TSA is like a Polygraph. The experts know that it really doesn't work, but they use it anyway, hoping it acts as a deterrent to the masses. Real Terrorists will find ways to get around the Security.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess he just wanted something more from his smokes.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Goldbricks would eat it to get on sick call.
A dangerous game, but it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Are you implying this theiving attempted smuggler is lazy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. No.
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 05:12 PM by formercia
I wasn't referring to him at all. I think it was just a souvenir. I was just providing a little Historical reference to unofficial use of the item in question.

The man is an idiot, no doubt, but lazy people don't get selected for demolition training. Lazy people tend to take shortcuts,not something you want to see in a person handling explosives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. First, it IS good that they can actually catch people with explosives. Second...
...what a fucking idiot..

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He could have driven
What an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Well at least he didn't have over 3 ounces of shampoo
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 08:26 AM by WatsonT
that would be a serious infraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Once again, shampoo is not the problem. The 3 oz limit is
someone's best guess as to a compromise between banning all liquids completely and insuring that no one smuggles enough hazardous material on board to bring down a plane. In addition, by limiting the amount of "chaff", the hope is that it improves the odds of spotting something bad.

And yes, I'm sure there are dozens of ways around this procedure, but the goal is to at least make things harder for terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dumbass...
and that is that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Without a blasting cap
C4 will only burn. Half an ounce would boil a cup of water in about 30 seconds. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. a giant firecracker will also work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. You'd think so.
An M80 generates a shock wave powerful enough to do it. The article doesn't note that the guy had any type of detonator. Also, an M80 may be more powerful than 1/2 ounce of C4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanbean Donating Member (957 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. It takes 500 psi. Maybe he was thinking of prill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Not so.
RDX is not that sensitive. I've done a lot of demolition work with C-4, and it takes quite an impact to set it off. The new style C-4 that comes in a bulk package is even less sensitive than the old-style blocks. The RDX crystals are much bigger and the plasticizer has a different odor. I've seen unconfined charges leave bits of C-4 undetonated because the charge was not properly constructed. The only reliable way to set it off is with a Military type Blasting Cap. A commercial cap may not have enough energy to do the job.

No, a half ounce of C-4 is a lot more powerful than an M-80.

Don't try to bullshit here. Urban legends don't last long on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. Pardon me.
I just made some comments. I was wrong about the M80. It doesn't have enough poop to detonate C4 and a half ounce of it is more powerful than an M80. My mistake, but I thought we were having a friendly discussion. I just wrote what came off the top of my head. I forgot how many rude jerk-offs there are here. As for using C4, I've probably burned more of it heating water than you've ever detonated, and that's no bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I bet an M 80 would get it going
Not that 1/2 an ounce is all that much
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. No it won't.
That is all...Out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. You don't think so?
the blasting caps I put into Claymores werent as big as an M80 and they did the trick. You haven't by chance tried this have you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. The Blasting Cap used in a Claymore has a booster charge.
It is much more powerful than a Commercial Blasting Cap or an M-80, which has a low-velocity filler. Apples and oranges.

The M-80 filler is mostly Aluminum Powder with an Oxidizer. It's made to make a lot of noise and flash. It will not detonate RDX. I'm not trying to imply that an M-80 isn't dangerous. I know someone who lost part of their hand with one, but it's not the same animal as a Military Blasting Cap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Live and learn
About they only exposure I got to C4 was in a claymore mine. the H.E. filler on all our artillery rounds was T.N.T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Did the artillery rounds give off Black Smoke or White Smoke
when they impacted?
If it was Black, it's probably TNT.
If it's White, Likely Comp B.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. They impacted 29,000 meters away
I never saw the smoke.

according to the FM the H.E. rounds were packed w/ T.N.T as were the supplemental charges the powder charges were Nitro Cellulose. This was the same on M109s, M 198s, M102's and M110A2's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I thought you might have been at a Fire Base
like Khe Sanh, where things got a little more close and personal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. I was like three when the siege of Khe Sanh occurred
I joined the Army in 1988 as a 13 Bang Bang. I actually did see a few M110 rounds impact in Graf. But the smoke cloud that I saw was dust brown. I blew up an old M60 on the direct fire range there once too.

FWIW I also got to fire the last M110 round ever fired by any U.S. Army Field Artillery unit (B 2/157th FA Co NG) I wasn't picked for the honor or anything that's just how it worked out. I still have the lanyard in my garage somewhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Yeah - and no terrorist would ever team up with a buddy so
each carries part of the bomb on board......

The kid did a stupid thing. Maybe the absence of a blasting cap will be presented as mitigating evidence, but I'm glad they spotted the C4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buckrogers1965 Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Lucky he didn't just mail it to himself before he flew.
But thankfully he was a complete idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAnthony Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
12. I'm gonna guess he's not going to be in the Army any longer
but that's just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. He probably just thought it'd be cool to show to the guys back home
idiot.

I wonder what hysterical overreaction this will create? Every must now subject themselves to rectal exams before boarding. That wouldn't have helped in this case but you know, we have to do something. For the children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. A souvenir
I agree with your assessment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. So someone was caught with an illicit substance and that proves
that airport security is ineffective and/or unneeded?

:eyes:

If he'd carried it on board, and then the story came out, we'd be reading the mandatory thread that this is all Kabucki theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. Army private arrested after C4 allegedly found in luggage
Source: CNN

(CNN) -- A 19-year-old Army private was arrested Thursday, one day after airport screeners allegedly found a small amount of C4 explosive in his checked luggage at Yuma, Arizona's International Airport.

Officials said they found no evidence to suggesting he intended any harm with the explosives.

According to an account from the U.S. attorney's office, Pfc. Christopher Eric Wey was attempting to board a United Airlines flight to Los Angeles on Wednesday when Transportation Security Administration screeners detected the presence of explosives in Wey's luggage. TSA personnel subsequently found one-half ounce of C4 explosive hidden in a tobacco can inside one of Wey's bags, officials said.

Wey was detained and interviewed by FBI agents. He has been charged with attempting to carry an explosive on an aircraft and transportation of a stolen explosive. The charge carries a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/07/14/arizona.soldier.explosives/index.html



It was in his checked luggage, not in any body cavities...so what's the point of the pat-downs/full-body scanners again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I thought the checked luggage was supposed to be xrayed.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. They use explosive dogs, sniffer tech, and that goofy test they sometimes do on your luggage
They x-ray too.


I'll bet a dog got that bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. PETA will want to hear more about the explosive dogs!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. Nyuck, nyuck! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. They flat out open and search your luggage, too.
A number of years ago--don't remember how many, I had an ordinary lock on my luggage as I had not yet heard about TSA approved locks.

When I picked up my luggage from the carousel at my destination, the lock was gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Yes, I didn't mention that--they leave a note inside your bag saying
Kilroy was here!

Of course, if something is missing and there is no note, odds are good that was a baggage handler supplementing his income....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Well heres the question
Were did he get the C4, did he steal it from the Army?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Yes, he stole it from explosives training. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. It creates jobs!
:sarcasm:

"Officials said they found no evidence to suggesting he intended any harm with the explosives".
Isn't that nice. I bet if he was of Muslim descent, that line would never be there, and the airport would have been evacuated. So explosives in a can, not such a big deal, but shampoo in a 16oz bottle, look out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. They found it, didn't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Jeez, don't you know the point of the pat downs?
so the TSA can get their jollies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
26. All snark aside, I'm glad they caught it
As to the soldier's intent that's a separate issue. I don't think too many nineteen year olds are mature enough or experienced enough to use their intelligence as wisely as they will in the future. There's a reason why the military recruits that age group. In my experience with raising two males it's a very susceptible age when they desperately want to find their avocation and prove themselves to be grown ups.

Still I'm glad he was caught because it means at least some of our security measures are working. It would be horrible if another airplane had exploded or crashed due to a terrorist act.

We may not like the security measures but unfortunately the times are what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC