Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Anthony Weiner Exploring Legal Action Over ‘Weinergate’ Fiasco

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:29 PM
Original message
Rep. Anthony Weiner Exploring Legal Action Over ‘Weinergate’ Fiasco
Source: Raw Story

Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner is consulting with his lawyers after it was reported that the New York congressman sent a racy photo to a female college student from Seattle via Twitter.

Rep. Anthony Weiner exploring legal action over ‘Weinergate’ fiasco
Published on May 30th, 2011
Written by: Eric W. Dolan

Democratic Rep. Anthony Weiner is consulting with his lawyers after it was reported that the New York congressman sent a racy photo to a female college student from Seattle via Twitter.

“We’ve retained counsel to explore the proper next steps and to advise us on what civil or criminal actions should be taken,” Weiner spokesman Dave Arnold told The Daily Caller in an email. “This was a prank. We are loath to treat it as more, but we are relying on professional advice."

Weiner has claimed that his Facebook account was hacked and that, while the photo did appear on his Twitter feed, he did not send it. The photo shows a man’s erect penis outlined in a pair of tight boxer briefs. The photo was first published by Andrew Breitbart’s BigGovernment.

- snip -

An analysis of a screenshot of the congressman’s yFrog account, which was published by BigGovernment, shows the image was manipulated, according to the progressive blog DailyKos. The screenshot was allegedly altered to make it appear that the racy photo was associated with Rep. Weiner’s account. Another DailyKos blogger has suggested that nearly the entire incident was fabricated by a conservative Twitter user.

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/05/30/rep-anthony-weine... /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. YES!YES!YES!YES!YES!
:applause: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChrisBorg Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bring the FBI in and find out who and how the account was hacked.
Then prosecute to the fullest extent. Anything less is just letting them get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
66. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. GOOD !
These phonies need to fear the LAW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Go Anthony Go!
...do it, do it, do it...

Track down this scum and launch everything you can against them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why have I never seen the 'dirty photo'?,,,,I keep lookin but I have not seen
Edited on Mon May-30-11 04:45 PM by angstlessk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iliyah Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Goper hacks
and turn about is fair play, but we all know that they can't take what they dish out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nenagh Donating Member (657 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. DKos deserves great credit..
for their work on this over the weekend ..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. I don't need to see it to believe that this incident happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
connecticut yankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
44. It really wasn't that sensational
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
53. It's a pair of grey trunks with a lump in them. Taken so close up...
...it took me 3 shots to actually figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. I Hate CONSERVATIVE HACKS

....the only game they know how to play is FEAR -OR- SMEAR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good. It wasn't a joke and it wasn't funny.
It was a deliberate attempt to destroy the career of an articulate Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Perhaps it is time for Breitbart to go to jail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Agreed. And, just this once, I wouldn't yell
if the arresting officers roughed him up a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sue the Hell Out of Them!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. THIS WAS NOT A PRANK. IT WAS FRAUD DESIGNED TO TAKE THE CONGRESSMAN DOWN.
Sorry for yelling, but I am sick and tired and tired and sick of people treating these goons as pranksters.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeMc Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. + 1 nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY!
Edited on Mon May-30-11 05:52 PM by calimary
And yeah, deminks, I join you in SHOUTING at the top of my lungs!!!!!!! We ALL should be shouting!!!

This was NO prank. This was deliberate because evidently somebody in the bad-guy contigent regards him as a pretty effective threat. He does speak out a lot and make a tremendous amount of sense. He's one of our leading lights now. And they would LOVE to discredit him and make his life miserable. So he's doing the exactly-correct thing: turning the tables and discrediting THEM and making THEIR lives miserable. That's the only way to fight these bastards. Because up til now they've been able to do this with no consequences whatsoever.

And if you don't fight, either because you think you don't want to give the scandal any oxygen (yeah, sure, with THIS adversarial "media" nowadays - look what "rising above it" and "not dignifying it with a response" did for John Kerry after he was swiftboated!), or you just don't want to get into the mud or you just don't have the stomach for it, it WILL be perceived in many quarters as being true. "Well, he's not saying anything about it. He isn't denying it. His camp is being awfully quiet about it these days. Hmmm. Must be something to it, then."

NO. You get your ass out there in public and make as big a noise about it as possible, and fight it as hard as you can, and speak out as hard as you can, and DEFEND YOURSELF!!!! Shirley Sherrod took far too long. Her FIRST and IMMEDIATE reflect should have been to call in the lawyers - as many of them as she could afford. Before anyone felt they had to take time and look at it fully and otherwise jerk off and waste precious days. The FIRST thing she should have done was to lawyer up. People in this country like fighters. Whether for good or bad. They have more respect for people who yell and scream and make a stink, regardless whether there's any justification. I mean, look what it did for the teabaggers! Even to this very day. Maybe 20 of 'em show up at some lame-ass "rally" and yet they get coverage up the ying-yang! Too many Americans just like and approve of the sound and fury. So our side needs to start making some! ESPECIALLY when we have PLENTY of justification! If you take the so-called high road, you're regarded these days as a wuss, a wimp, spineless, and probably also guilty of whatever shit the bad guys are trying to throw at you. You HAVE TO respond, and the sooner the better!!!

I hope he goes all the way with this, and doesn't decide after looking at it that there's nothing worth doing except issuing one of those fabulous :eyes: "strongly-worded letters." Which the bad guys will just take to the bathroom to use for toilet paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. That has to been written on a rock and delivered to the DNC to be held for
posterity.


:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. Our side HAS TO respond. Whether they want to or not. That's the stock in trade
of the bad guys in the propaganda war.

Remember when ann coulter got her knickers in a knot over the Jersey Girls - the 9/11 widows, who'd speak out on something she'd inevitably disagree with, but somehow their personal loss during 9/11 indemnified them and gave them protection. They were HUGELY sympathetic characters in the media, for good reason, and it was AWFULLY hard to criticize them about anything. You really didn't dare. and ann coulter hated-hated-hated that. She just vomited bile about how unfair it was. She kept screeching - "we can't respond!" "We can't respond!" She insisted it was her right to lambaste them and call them names because they took stands she disagreed and she hated how it reflected poorly on her and her un-American, traitorous cronies if she dared to criticize them for anything. "We can't respond! We can't respond! UNFAIR!!!!"

I will NEVER forget that. That just gave away the whole game, to me. It's being able to fire back, as wantonly and recklessly and noisily as you damn well feel like, and who cares what anybody else thinks. It's far more important just to get your criticism or your twisted world-view or your complete bullshit out there on the record, regardless.

Well, I think WE need to rip a page outta her book.

Taste of their own medicine. See how they like it.

We need to fight a LOT harder, a LOT meaner, and yes, even a lot dirtier. Nobody EVER said politics was a clean business. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just being naive in this day and age. And unfortunately, as much as we would wish it to be otherwise, naivete doesn't win elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. I think I wholeheartedly agree w/ you
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
54. Bingo. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
61. That is exactly what it was.
Criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
75. +100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Interestingly, the entire underbelly of the wingnutariat . . .
Edited on Mon May-30-11 05:40 PM by MrModerate
Is just about peeing itself with glee over this.

"Of course Weiner would have sent a dick-pic by tweet to a college girl (non-white) in Seattle. He's a liberal, right, and only liberals are that stupid."

One certainly hopes Weiner isn't that stupid. Because if he isn't and Breitbart has one of his phony scams blow up in his face again, it might be the end of him and O'Keefe as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. Yeah...
it might be the end of him and O'Keefe as well.


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Please share whatever you're smoking. this won't do anything to Breitbart's career
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. It's really not that much of a stretch . . .
Breitbart has been on a downward slope for some time. O'Keefe's "music video" was particularly embarassing and Breitbart has been busily trying to pick a fight with Glenn Beck to whip up some more press for himself.

If he's guilty of colluding in a case of felony hacking (not saying he is, but that's one of the scenarios floating around out there), then the legal case itself could quite likely grind him down at the same time making him even more toxic for the few 'Licans with an ounce of shame left.

I realize that last group is increasingly small, but every little bit helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. Repubs should have to follow the same rules as Dems
The person who hacked Palin's emails was prosecuted and got a sentence, so whoever did this should have to obey the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. You are so correct! This is character assassination and worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'll bet there's enough evidence there to make a case for malicious defamation.
Rep. Weiner is damned right to be looking at suing Breitbart for every penny he's got!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guilded Lilly Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. Send them to Hell Anthony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. the girl who received this may have a case too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Oh yes.
Maybe get those responsible classified as sex criminals and thereby restricting their movements and employment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Breitbart has become the WikiLeaks of right-wing smear jobs
The article linked in the OP notes that there's no evidence tying the creation of the hoax directly to Breitbart, and that may well be true.

But as with those Missouri college lecture videos, it seems that any young Rove wannabe who fabricates something scurrilous about the left shoots it right off to Breitbart -- who's all too happy to publish without any concern for the facts.

The result is that simply by existing, Breitbart encourages the manufacture of these smears.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. More like "The National Observer" of the right.
Wikileaks establishes the authenticity of their releases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RyanPsych Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. Burn that idiot Breitbart
How anyone (including...I know...HuffPo) every took him seriously is a nasty indictment on the state of our media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
25. You cannot make "jokes" like this in today's political climate. He should absolutely pursue this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. this action would have to meet the standards of intentional defamation
Even public figures still have some modicum of protection from slander and libel. Sue their asses, Rep. Weiner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Either way, this is going to force Breitbart's hand
He can't really do a victory jig because the lawsuit can't be done because of a technicality. He's going to have to face the music one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Sounds like us. Debating legal minutiae and semantics while
the wingers are trying to destroy a great congressman.

We suck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. No we don't, we're for Weiner! Go, Anthony, we're behind you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
55. That is true. Giving up one's right to privacy...
... does not involve giving up one's right to protection from slander and defamation. There's no "but it's free speech!" defense for slander and defamation.

--------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. fiasco lasted 5 minutes and i decree that it cannot have -gate status
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
30. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. "Exploring Legal Action"
Edited on Mon May-30-11 06:29 PM by Doctor_J
That won't take more than a few years :eyes:

I bet Breitbart is :scared:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCollar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
33. Good....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Randypiper Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
35. I don't think action will be against Breitbart
unless you think he was the hacker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #35
65. he may have paid the hacker to do the hit, er, hack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
38. I hope to someday get to vote for Anthony Weiner for President
to me the perfect ticket would be him teamed up with Alan Grayson
2016
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
39. Since the young woman has suffered threats and harassment, they
should definitely seek criminal charges AND sue for civil penalties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
41. invasion of privacy, identification theft, defamation of character...sounds like Breitbart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
42. Go gitum, Anthony!
Hang his/their ass out to dry! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
45. Glad to see legal action
This is what ACORN should have done. Lawyered up and sued Breitbart IMMEDIATELY.

Instead, they caved, fearing "bad publicity" from Fox.

Good to see people like Weiner and Shirley Sherrod fighting back,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
46. If it isn't true
Nail them to the wall by their proverbial Weiners :).

Personally, I think this is the dirty tricks squad, but at some point someone needs to stand up to the assholes like Brietbart. I understand why he doesn't want to do so, but at some point, somebody has to say enough is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
47. Has Breitbart even posted any kind of retraction or even taken down the story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnakeEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. Maybe haven't followed it enough
But what does Breitbart need to actually retract? There was a photo that was tweeted from Weiner's account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. No.
It looks like someone photoshopped something to make it look like it was Tweeted from his account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
48. If Weiner is not in anyway guilty
Then he is doing exactly what someone has needed to do to Brietbart for a long time - hoist him on his own petard.

Let him drag out all the slander, sleeze and commentary possible while the FBI investigates. If Weiner wasn't involved, that's exactly what he's doing, and all the right-wing glee over this is going to screw them harder than just one Weiner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
52. Another reason why, ELECTIONS MATTER
The Courts...not only the SCOTUS (needless to say is the highest priority ) but the lower Courts that this kind of stuff is acted upon first.

Go AW !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnakeEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
57. What I don't understand is...
why they are only considering legal action? This hack was a serious breach of a sitting member of congress. The FBI/Secret Service should have been contacted immediately and any evidence retained. I would have thought it would be automatic, that when a member of congress reports being hacked that there are protocols in place that just happen whether someone wants to pursue things or not. Twitter should have been notified immediately as well so that they could assist (which didn't happen since he never lost his "verified" status as occurs in the case of hacks).

This should be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #57
71. Because this is considered major push back for Dems
If someone did this to a Repuke that that would already be in jail, and receiving death threats from hundreds or maybe thousands of tebaggers and hate radio addicts. But since it was perpetrated on a Dem, "contemplating legal action" is about as aggressive as it will get.

This is a major reason why the far right has taken over the country over the last 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
58. Breitfart always finds a way to remove himself from it
"Who will rid me of this meddlesome Congressman?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
60. Now, that's how it's done
President Obama, please take note.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl_interrupted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
62. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
63. I knew the name Breitbart would come up. Sue, Rep. Weiner, sue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
64. A Weiner got exposed on the Internet???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
67. Proving who the hacker is should be easy
Doesn't twitter keep a record of the IP addresses of who sends a tweet? Although they can be spoofed (I think - some IT folks can help out on this account) knowing the IP would do wonders. This hacker is doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #67
69. That's right.
This should be an easy find. Whoever sent that message should be exposed and charged.

One curious thing though - why the hell was Weiner following a 21-year-old college student on Twitter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
68. This is actually great news:
It means that the repubs are being very threatened by Anthony!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bongbong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
70. Ha ha!
Every time another repig smear becomes public, it becomes even more hilarious that pearl-clutchers on DU admonish me for calling these pigs "repigs".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinee Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #70
80. I just had to LOL at this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
72. And just ini case the trail leads right back to O'Keefe and Breitbart....
Toss the both of them away for 15 years at hard labor. I suggest Angola, Louisiana.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
73. obviously it's a break-in. does this guy even KNOW any college students,
much less one from SEATTLE?? And the pun regarding his last name...it's just so obvious...you have to be a dummy freeper to believe this is for real
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse.com Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
74. It's funny..
..how Republicans have to make it up, whereas it just falls into our laps. We got it easy. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duval Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-11 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
76. Damn right! Engage FBI! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
77. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
78. This ought to be interesting, I've never seen a guy sue himself before. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. There is precedent...
See the South Park case of everybody vs. everybody as represented by Kyle's dad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Oct 25th 2014, 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC