Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PM meets US president, rejects Obama land-concession plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:09 PM
Original message
PM meets US president, rejects Obama land-concession plan
Source: JPost

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Friday he was prepared to make compromises to achieve peace but he rejected President Barack Obama's proposal that Israel return to 1967 borders.

Obama and Netanyahu met at the White House a day after the US president endorsed a longstanding Palestinian demand on the borders for their future state.

The US president said that any final solution must include two states, Israel and a Palestinian state, which exist viably on each others borders.

Netanyahu said that while the refugee issue needed to be resolved, it could not be resolved within Israel's borders

Read more: http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=221499



this is a cross post from the I/P forum but considering it involves a between the POTUS and Israel's PM it is also US news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. "land-concession plan"
Interesting editorial decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Jefferson Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Indeed, how about: The spoils of war exemption plan.
Edited on Fri May-20-11 03:59 PM by Mr. Jefferson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. So was referring to the President's plan as a "final solution".
Edited on Fri May-20-11 04:07 PM by MilesColtrane
No one saw that and said, "Wait a minute" before it went to press?

How about substituting the phrase "lasting peace"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 03:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. That jumped right out at me, too. Isn't it a dog whistley kind of thing to use in this context?
I think so, and would not be surprised if it generated a whole lot of caustic comments and implanted some unfounded subliminal hatred towards Obama in response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoisB Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Netanyahu
Screw Bebe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
on point Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. OK then. Let's go for a single secular state solution w/o ANY special rights for any religion!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Sure.
Except the "Jew" is also an ethnicity. As such, it's as much a religious term as "Arab" or "Palestinian."

The entire nomenclature system in English is a mess, with the same terms being religious or ethnic, ethnic or legal/citizenship. I mean, it's possible for a Frenchman to be a Christian Jew from Algeria. Then when you call him "French" you don't mean ethnicity, you mean legal citizenship; he's Algerian by country of origin; Jewish by ethnicity; Xian by religion. But "French" is also an ethnicity; Jewish is also a religion.

Anyway, this messy nomenclature keeps biting us in the rump. For example, the idea that a Jewish state must be religious. It's like saying we should insist that Canada should be secular and not just for Canadians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
on point Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think that is a fair point.
Then the thing to do is to stop making Israel about anything special be it religion or ethnic group. Then it can simply follow good standard practice in accord with human righs standards and a special state is no longer needed.

All the people who live there, and the 6 million forced out can live in one big secular, non ethnic, non special case state. SImple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-21-11 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. "6 million forced out?" What "6 million?" Who are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
on point Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-22-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The palestinians that Israel doesn't want to let return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tootrueleft Donating Member (385 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is getting embarrasing. Cut the aid and back the palestinian statehood anouncement.
This '1967s boorders are indefensible' stuff is crap. Israels got 200+ nukes and weaponry generations ahead of anybody else in the region.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-20-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Benjamin Netanyahu
is a very sick individual. Check out this video of him bragging about stopping the Oslo Accords.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeT_KLuCdug&feature=player_embedded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC