Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheh, others arrested during Capitol Hill protest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 08:32 AM
Original message
Cheh, others arrested during Capitol Hill protest
Source: Washington Post blog

D.C. Council member Mary M. Cheh (D-Ward 3) and several other women were arrested Wednesday evening when they blocked Constitution Avenue a short time after the House of Representatives voted to permanently ban the District’s use of tax dollars to pay for abortions for low-income residents. Cheh was released about 11 p.m.

The arrests occurred after several prominent District women, including Council members Yvette D. Alexander (D-Ward 7) and Muriel Bowser (D-Ward 4), Maudine Cooper, president of the Greater Washington Urban League, and Patrice Sulton of the DC NAACP, held a rally at Upper Senate Park next to the U.S. Capitol in support of District autonomy.

After a series of speakers blasted Congress for meddling and undermining Home Rule in the city, After the speeches, she grabbed the microphone and told the crowd “it’s time to take it to the streets.”

“Its time to show we are not going to be humiliated,” Cheh said. “We are not going to crouch.Who is going to stand with me for freedom?”

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-wire/post/cheh-others-arrested-during-capitol-hill-protest/2011/05/04/AFBdbXrF_blog.html



DC's colonial status must end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. "..permanently ban"? Nothing in polictics is permanent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. As opposed to "ban with a sunset" (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainlion55 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
3.  Religion
responsible for more human suffering then any other single idea in the history of humanity.:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's not just abortion though
Congress overrides DC's government at its whim all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orangeapple Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yeah, it's called the Constitution
to wit, Article I, Section 8:

"To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States..."

D.C. belongs to Congress. There were concerns about the impact of a 'Federal City', and so, by subjugating it to Congress it was subservient to the States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Wow, thanks, I'd never read Article I, Section 8 before!
:sarcasm:

I never said it was unconstitutional, I said it was colonial, undemocratic, and wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orangeapple Donating Member (167 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. actually, you said
"Congress overrides DC's government at its whim all the time"

Now, you may think that is 'colonial, undemocratic, and wrong', yet it is the law of the land. Been that way for well over 200 years, and ANYONE that doesn't like it can leave D.C.

I'm curious, how do you feel when Congress 'overrides the State governments at its whim all the time'?

Which side of the 10th amendment would you place yourself on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainlion55 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-05-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Good point
but the current rulers are still asses:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC