Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. says no deal with BP as it seeks to drill again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 03:01 PM
Original message
U.S. says no deal with BP as it seeks to drill again
Source: Reuters

U.S. says no deal with BP as it seeks to drill again

(2011-04-04)
(Reuters) -
By Mica Rosenberg and Ayesha Rascoe

MEXICO CITY/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government lashed out at companies at the heart of last year's Gulf oil spill on Monday, denying reports it had negotiated a deal with BP to resume drilling.

The tough talk by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar highlights the Obama administration's sensitivity toward letting BP -- the biggest holder of deepwater acreage in the Gulf of Mexico -- drill there again a year after an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig led to the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history.

The blast killed 11 workers, ruptured the company's underwater Macondo well and unleashed millions of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

Since the government lifted a ban on drilling in the region in October established after the spill, BP has submitted one permit application to drill one well, said a source who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the request was under review.



Read more: http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/ksje/news.newsmain/article/0/0/1784339/Business/U.S..says.no.deal.with.BP.as.it.seeks.to.drill.again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good, ban BP from the Gulf, not just new drilling in the Gulf.
And prosecute those responsible for the outrage to the fullest -- from all three companies directly involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. KNR! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iandhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. the administration will cave in 5,4,3,2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iemitsu Donating Member (524 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. BP should not be allowed to drill again until they have paid every legitimate claim
filed by any gulf coast resident, any gulf coast business, and the governments of the gulf states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wait a minute!!!!! What about THIS story that BP GOT a permit?????
BP will restart deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, a U.K. newspaper reported on Sunday, a year after one of the petroleum giant's wells exploded and leaked more than 200 million gallons of oil.

In a deal made with American regulators, the company promised to abide by safety requirements that are stricter than guidelines set after the April 11 blast on the Deepwater Horizon rig that killed 11 workers, The Sunday Times reported without citing its sources. The accident, which released almost 5 billion barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, was the largest marine spill in history.

The oil slick produced by the spill, estimated to be more than 130 miles long and 70 miles wide, wreaked havoc along the coastlines of Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida.

BP will start in July but not be allowed to drill exploratory wells. The company has over 20 deepwater fields in the area, according to the newspaper.

Somebody is trying to mislead us. Is it Reuters, for the story above
(found here in DU yesterday)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x285582

or

public broadcasting.net for the OP story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Noble Energy?
Edited on Mon Apr-04-11 05:22 PM by nc4bo
Ok found a good link for a site "we" can trust: http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/03/01/us-approves-first-gulf-deepwater-well-and-bp-is-the-majority-owner/

The BP/Noble Energy's deep well is a helluva lot deeper than BP's.


“Noble Energy,” as it turns out, is not accurate. In fact, BP holds the largest stake in the well approved today.

Noble Energy also makes no mention of BP in its press release from yesterday. In announcing a major discovery in Mississippi Canyon Block 519, back in 2009, Noble spelled out the various ownership stakes, including BP’s — the largest single slice, with a 46.5 percent stake alongside Noble Energy’s 23.25 percent share.

So to recap, BP owns twice as much a stake in this well as Noble Energy, and yet the announcement of the permit says that Noble Energy received it. Noble operates the well, but BP is the biggest stakeholder, and as such could be the biggest voice in making key decisions about cost and safety. Reuters managed to mention this, unlike the AP.


So IOW, BP got the first deep water drilling permit.

Ain't that nuttin'?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Actions speak louder than words, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No wonder there's so much back peddling.
I wonder who's really responsible for looking the other way on this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. If I Trash an Apartment Due to Gross Negligence, the Landlord Would CANCEL THE LEASE!
and he'd never rent to me again.

CANCEL THEIR LEASES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Then all you'd have to do was get your girlfriend to sign the lease
and you're right back in the ballgame.

I keep waiting for our collective emotional pots to boil over....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC