Source:
AOL NewsLONDON -- Britain's close relationship with Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi has come under attack from U.S. officials, human rights campaigners and victims of the Lockerbie bombing after the North African dictator ordered a brutal crackdown on anti-government protesters. ..... Susman's criticism was seemingly directed at former Prime Minister Tony Blair's attempts to bring the pariah nation in from the cold. In 2004, Blair held a historic summit with Gadhafi in Tripoli, where he announced a "new relationship" between the U.K. and Libya.
.....
The North African leader agreed to join the fight against al-Qaida, stop funding terrorism and abandon his weapons of mass destruction program. In return, British businesses would set up profitable operations in the country. That same day, Libya announced a $900 million exploration deal with Anglo-Dutch energy giant Shell. Three years later, BP signed a comparable offshore oil-exploration deal with Gadhafi.
British arms companies have also profited from the detente. In the first nine months of 2010, British daily The Guardian reports, the U.K. government approved the sale to Libya of military and crowd-control equipment worth $325 million. Items authorized for export included tear gas canisters, small arms ammunition, weapon sights and sniper rifles.
The U.K. Foreign Office revoked all export licenses to Libya this weekend. However, it didn't explain why those exports had been approved in the first place. According to official guidelines, the government is not allowed to "issue an export license if there is a clear risk that the proposed export might be used for internal repression."
Read more:
http://www.aolnews.com/2011/02/21/british-government-accused-of-appeasing-moammar-gadhafi/
Again, the observation: Why are Western governments supporting tyrants who repress their own people?
Are the world's people finally standing up to these deplorable 'business relationships'?
By God, may it be so.