WASHINGTON, April 6 — With little more than a day until Condoleezza Rice testifies before the Sept. 11 commission, the White House is still deciding what kind of tone she should strike as she explains the intelligence lapses leading up to the attacks, officials involved in the internal debate said Tuesday.
In conference calls and other discussions preparing Ms. Rice for two-and-a-half hours of testimony on Thursday morning, she and her White House colleagues have prepared an opening statement that one official described as "a detailed, almost day-by-day overview" of what the administration was doing in the months before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
~snip~
At the same meeting, officials said, members of the commission will be briefed by the panel's lawyers about the results of a two-day review of thousands of national security documents from the Clinton administration that the Bush administration acknowledged last week it had withheld from the panel until now. Panel members said the lawyers, who spent much of Monday and Tuesday with the documents, had been instructed to keep their findings secret until they could be shared with the commissioners.
Ms. Rice's presentation is considered critical to the White House's election-year effort to put questions about the Sept. 11 attacks behind it. But it may be just as critical for Ms. Rice herself. While she has indicated that she plans to leave the job of national security adviser at the end of Mr. Bush's first term, she has not ruled out taking a Cabinet post — secretary of defense is the one possibility most often discussed — should Donald H. Rumsfeld leave the job. Ms. Rice has also been mentioned as a possible secretary of state, though she would likely be less interested in that post, her friends and colleagues say.
~snip~
more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/07/politics/07PANE.html Is condi auditioning for Sec.of State or Sec.of Defense after she botched her job as Security Advisor?