Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bond & Feinstein urge prosecution of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:04 PM
Original message
Bond & Feinstein urge prosecution of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange
Source: Politico

Categories: Leaks

Bond & Feinstein urge prosecution of WikiLeaks' Julian Assange

The leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Kit Bond (R-Mo.) are prodding Attorney General Eric Holder to file criminal charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in connection with the huge troves of classified military reports and diplomatic cables his group has obtained and made public.

"We respectfully urge the Department of Justice (DOJ) to take action to bring criminal charges against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and any and all of his possible accomplices involved in the unauthorized possession and distribution of vast quantities of classified and unclassified material from the U.S. government," Feinstein and Bond wrote in a letter sent to Holder on Thursday and later released to reporters.

Feinstein and Bond, the chair and vice chair of the intelligence panel, were adding their voices to a pro-prosecution drumbeat which grew considerably louder Thursday, despite warnings that a prosecution faces a series of daunting and perhaps fatal obstacles.

The pair of senators alluded to those concerns as they closed their letter. "If Mr. Assange and his possible accomplices cannot be charged under the Espionage Act (or any other applicable statute), please know that we stand ready and willing to support your efforts to 'close those gaps' in the law," they wrote.

A Justice Department spokeswoman said the department would review the letter.

Full text of the letter after the jump.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/joshgerstein/1210/Bond__Feinstein_urge_prosecution_of_WikiLeaks_Julian_Assange.html



Sorry for the Politico link. Only coverage so far, after announcement on Twitter by Attackerman of FDL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Feinstein doesn't speak for most grassroots Democrats
Which is a damn good thing. Seems like I remember she wouldn't even commit to labelling waterboarding as torture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
30. CA voters seem to like her, as they keep reelecting her by wide margins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. yeah arrest assange, let bush, cheney, obama, etc. go free; perfect (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Liars, Thugs and Grifters hate it when they get caught
hence the 'outcry'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fuck them
DiFi should have been primaried long ago


Why we still put up with her GOP lite shit is beyond me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Well said n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
29. Because the CDP Party Bosses LOVE her.
She does what she's paid to do so they "discourage" (translate: starve) challengers. She's up in 2012 and will be 79. I'm hoping like hell she won't try and run again. PERFECT time to try and get a progressive in (with or without the CDP Party Bosses).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. tsk tsk tsk Diane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. And prosecuting war crimes? How do they feel about that?
Snort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. Classic DiFi (Condi's sponsor)
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 06:38 PM by RufusTFirefly
Bad for hubby's bidness, I guess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Bite me Diane
Ill work for anyone who goes up against your stinking republican ass if your challenged in the primaries. Yeah it makes so much sense to go after Wikileaks for publishing information that was leaked by a washington insider. I see it's treason to publish leaked information but it isn't treason to send billions of us taxpayer dollars to bailout foreign banks and then claim austerity measures (slashing social security and raising the retirement age) are needed to appease same banks.
Yes lets be mad at the person who published the cables not the idiotic, treasonous, schemeing shit within the cables. Kill the messenger and drown the message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruperto31 Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, well. Dianne shows her true colors.
An over-the-top defender for US imperialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. lol
Funny... the worst elements of our party are the ones leading this charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yea, let's get Assange and not focus on who is actually leaking
to him and WHY.

Keep Bush/Cheney, Rove and the gang free from prosecution and get Assange..the real villain.

Pathetic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aggiesal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here's what I don't understand ...
Jane's can produce yearly books about the Navy Ships, AF Aircraft,
Army equipment that prints more classified information, but because
everyone at Jane's has never signed or received a clearance from any
country, they're never prosecuted for printing classified information.

At the same time Tom Clancy produces fictional novels based on actual
classified intelligence data, and because he's hadn't signed or received
a clearance from any country, he's never prosecuted for printing
classified information.

Am I missing something here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes, you are missing the political angle
Yelling and screaming about Jane's and Tom Clancy gives no one a political edge. Screaming about an Australian who posts leaked information gives US politicians a lot of political points.

It truly is amazing. These leaks shake up the power structure and let the public know what really goes on behind closed doors. In any other context that would be a good thing. But Team USA doesn't like it so it must be destroyed. What is also interesting is that some in the media and talking head establishment seem to also think that it is bad. Strange days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Also he's funny looking and has an exotic name.
Feel the hate flow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Right. Also, he is running around the world hiding
He MUST be a bad guy!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It's what Serious People think, after all. :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. You're not missing anything. That's how the law works.
Only those cleared for classified info can be prosecuted for passing said info on. That's why the press CANNOT EVER be held liable for printing classified info, they have no security clearance to violate.

There's a reason the law is the way it is. This stupid grandstanding by those yelling for Assange's head just show their ignorance or their assumption of our ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Look how TPTB closes ranks when they are threatened. UGH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. How embarrssing it would be to prosecute someone for airing our dirty laundry... we ought to make
him a hero!

We got some cleaning up to do.

The pimple has burst and pus is all over the place. 
But like any pimple, the burst is the first step in the
healing,
painful as it may be. 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. hey Bond & Feinstein First arrest the war criminals and get them charged and prosecuted..Otherwise.
Edited on Thu Dec-02-10 08:47 PM by flyarm
STFU!

Arresting the messenger just doesn't cut the shit anymore.

Today I was getting my nails done..MSNBC was on and the nail place was crowded..every woman there started speaking out..and I will tell you this, between the pat downs and radiating people at the airport..women are god damned pissed..

It was unanimous among at least 50 women in my nail place...just today...Arrest Bush and Cheney and Rummy..Not Julian!

And stop radiating people at the airport and frisking people's genitalia.

The anger is definitely pointed at Dems and Obama.

Take heed Dems...women are angry...if you think Nov 2010 was a slaughter..you ain't seen nothing yet!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-02-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. Feinstein is the kind of senator that fuels the ammunition for Rethugs complaints on big gubmint!
She's always wanting to defend the government's right to come down on little people in most of the legislation she passes, even if at times she votes with the Dems on social issue. On things like the Communications Decency Act, and other stuff that take our rights away, she's always been on the "statist" side of things (as the Libertarian's would describe people like her).

She needs to believe more in democracy with the little d, not power of the DLC with the big D!

I'm glad I have Merkley and Wyden instead of Boxer and Feinstein. Boxer is great, but Feinstein drags down the California delegation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes indeed. That is who Di is.
I wish we could dump her as our Senator. She is so republican it makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
23. well, DiFi is back to usual form...
my surprised respect for her last week was quite brief. and yet this disappointment is unsurprising. hmm... i'll be glad to have a real flaming liberal senator as an option in the next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
25. GAWD...
Everytime I see that awful feinstein's name, it makes me puke! :puke:

GAWD, I loath that execrable waste of skin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armodem08 Donating Member (186 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
26. Ex post facto
Edited on Fri Dec-03-10 02:46 AM by armodem08
"The pair of senators alluded to those concerns as they closed their letter. "If Mr. Assange and his possible accomplices cannot be charged under the Espionage Act (or any other applicable statute), please know that we stand ready and willing to support your efforts to 'close those gaps' in the law," they wrote."

Just like the food safety bill constitutional order flub.... These people have no idea what is actually in the Constitution. Most changes applying retroactively (ex post facto), and/or specifically targeting one person or organization (bills of attainder) are forbidden under the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
27. It's spelled "persecution." And another thing these people need to know... the moment he's arrested
The key will be released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
border_town Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
28. If the United States had any charges
against him they would have filed them already. This is the reason for the so called rape charges. Keep it coming Wikileaks. If my government is breaking the law we need to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-03-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
31. I suspect many Democrats will make this request of "D of J." Pubs, too.
There will be a groundswell. He may get convicted in absentia because he will not willingly come to the U.S. to deend himself,


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC