Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court: N.Y. Town's Opposition to Church Violated Federal Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 03:50 PM
Original message
Court: N.Y. Town's Opposition to Church Violated Federal Law
Source: New York Law Journal

Court: N.Y. Town's Opposition to Church Violated Federal Law

Mark Hamblett

New York Law Journal

August 19, 2010


A Westchester County, N.Y., town violated a federal act barring religious discrimination in land use decisions by putting one obstacle after another in the path of a Pentecostal congregation's plans to build a new church to accommodate its growing flock, according to a federal judge.

Southern District Judge Stephen C. Robinson ruled that the town of Greenburgh used fire, safety and traffic concerns as pretexts to derail a project proposed by the Fortress Bible Church that the town supervisor and some board members had wanted to kill from the outset.

In a 206-page decision last week summing up his findings after a 26-day bench trial, Robinson also said the town would be liable for an unspecified amount of money damages and was subject to sanctions for the deliberate destruction of documents in the decade-long fight over the church.

The judge said in Fortress Bible Church v. Feiner, 03 Civ. 4235, that the town's "purported concerns were unsupported, if not wholly fabricated," and therefore it had violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. §2000cc.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode42/usc_sec_42_00002000--cc000-.html

Read more: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202470575438
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. i can only hope the verdict would be the same no matter what kind of
church or synogogue or mosque it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 51 Park Place, New York also falls within the Southern District.
We shall see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They have blocked to Mosque here in Ga
One I followed and the reason they gave for blocking it was "increased traffic"...WHATEVER! There are MEGA CHURCHES everywhere down here & if you happen to be near one when they let out you are screwed!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-19-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. that's what i thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC