Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

United Technologies plans another 1,500 job cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:25 PM
Original message
United Technologies plans another 1,500 job cuts
Source: Economic Times of India

27 Jul 2010, 0032 hrs IST,AGENCIES

HARTFORD (Connecticut): United Technologies Corp says it plans to cut another 1,500 jobs through 2011 after eliminating 900 positions in the first half of this year.

The parent company of jet engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney, Otis elevator, Sikorsky Aircraft and other businesses said Monday in a regulatory filing that it will take restructuring and other costs of $121 million in 2010 related to the cuts.

The company didn't specify where the job cuts are coming. It says it cut about 900 jobs as of June 30 and expects to complete most of the remaining cost-cutting this year and in 2011.

United Technologies announced 11,600 job cuts in 2009. It employed 206,700 workers as of the end of 2009.

Shares rose 49 cents, to $71.39 in afternoon trading.

Read more: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international-business/United-Technologies-plans-another-1500-job-cuts/articleshow/6221044.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's something wrong with a market that goes up based on people losing their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SocialistLez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. There really is. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Short-term gain for them, long-term loss for everyone.
It's the business model of every transnational: Lower the cost of production (i.e., move jobs overseas) and then sell the products back in the US at the same price they were selling them before. It's a short-term win for the company that does it, since 99%+ of Americans aren't affected by the job cuts at one company, and profit margins go through the roof. But when enough companies get in on the act, the overall buying power of Americans will fall (as we're seeing now), and surprise, surprise, they can't sell their products at the prices they wanted anymore, and there go the profits, down the drain. Party over!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hartford Courant: UTC To Cut 1,500 More Jobs Through 2011
http://www.courant.com/business/hc-utc-job-cuts-726-20100726,0,7490517.story

United Technologies Corp. expects to trim its global workforce by an additional 1,500 positions by 2012, a net reduction of about half of 1 percent. So far this year, the company has cut about 900 jobs worldwide, including at least a couple hundred in Connecticut, where it employs about 26,000.

The further cuts, disclosed today in a filing with federal securities regulators, continue a massive restructuring of the Hartford-based industrial conglomerate that began in earnest in March 2009, when UTC said it would cut 11,600 jobs that year alone.

The company did not say in the filing how many of the 1,500 new job cuts would come from operations in Connecticut, where the company is the largest private employer. The new reductions will affect both hourly and salaried employees. As of the end of 2009, UTC employed nearly 207,000 people worldwide.

Pratt & Whitney, Sikorsky Aircraft, Hamilton Sundstrand, Otis Elevator Co., Carrier Corp. and UTC Fire & Security are all UTC divisions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very sad. There really aren't jobs out there.
Edited on Mon Jul-26-10 02:54 PM by superconnected
I'm lucky to be employed but my brother has been working literally minimum wages jobs since getting laid off from his real job 2 years ago making 30 something an hour. Believe me he is always looking for a better paying job. His latest is he may get a job at a rent-a-center - that could pay up to $12. I know this because he lives with me, including his wife and teenage son. His wife went from office worker to cashier at Walmart when she got laid off. I really feel for these 1500 people. Most will lose their houses and most will not find another job anywhere near what they were making if they find a job at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. 1500 is a lot to lay off without resulting to foreign manufacturing
Edited on Mon Jul-26-10 02:58 PM by superconnected
From another article on the economy but relates to Americans being cut from jobs:

"The reality is that no matter how smart, how strong, how educated or how hard working American workers are, they just cannot compete with people who are desperate to put in 10 to 12 hour days at less than a dollar an hour on the other side of the world. After all, what corporation in their right mind is going to pay an American worker 10 times more (plus benefits) to do the same job? The world is fundamentally changing. Wealth and power are rapidly becoming concentrated at the top and the big global corporations are making massive amounts of money. Meanwhile, the American middle class is being systematically wiped out of existence as U.S. workers are slowly being merged into the new "global" labor pool.

What do most Americans have to offer in the marketplace other than their labor? Not much. The truth is that most Americans are absolutely dependent on someone else giving them a job. But today, U.S. workers are "less attractive" than ever. Compared to the rest of the world, American workers are extremely expensive, and the government keeps passing more rules and regulations seemingly on a monthly basis that makes it even more difficult to conduct business in the United States.

So corporations are moving operations out of the U.S. at breathtaking speed. Since the U.S. government does not penalize them for doing so, there really is no incentive for them to stay."

From this article:
http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/the-u.s.-middle-class-is-being-wiped-out-here%27s-the-stats-to-prove-it-520657.html?tickers=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. There have been rumors of more cuts for a long time. My mother in law works at Pratt and Whitney.
Two other family members do too. They have been telling me they thought there was more likely more cuts coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC