Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Indian professionals to oppose UK cap

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 11:30 AM
Original message
Indian professionals to oppose UK cap
Source: Economic Times of India

27 Jun 2010, 1901 hrs IST,PTI

LONDON: An influential group representing professionals from India and other non-European Union countries will challenge the temporary annual cap of 24,100 to be announced by Home secretary Theresa May on Monday. .

Amit Kapadia, director of Highly Skilled Migrant Programme (HSMP) Forum that fought a successful legal challenge against immigration rules, said the government's move to impose an "illogical" cap will be opposed.

"Any such cap will affect Indian professionals because most non-European Union migrants to the UK come from India. But we will oppose and lobby against any illogical number or cap that the government may seek to impose," he told media.

Placing the cap at 24,100 between now and April 2011 means that British employers will not be able to employ any Indian and other non-EU professionals once the limit is reached.

Indians have been among the largest group of professionals recruited in the IT, medicine, education and services sector every year.


Read more: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/travel/visa-power/Non-EU-Immigration-Indian-professionals-to-oppose-UK-cap/articleshow/6098584.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. The UK is already pretty fucked up in terms of jobs and salaries
These indian professionals think they will come here to make a lot of money. They will be disappointed.
The UK is reaching third world salary levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. So it is okay to put a cap
solely on non-EU immigrants? Isn't that racial discrimination?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. No its not racial discrimination
Edited on Sun Jun-27-10 01:08 PM by dipsydoodle
The EU effectively has no borders in this respect. I think you may find that India is not in the EU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Racial discrimination disguised under geographic constraints
is still what it is.

UK is barely in EU -- it is not a member of Schengen states, not a member of Eurozone and its monetary policy is not governed by European Central Bank.

This discrimination is manifestly racial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. I meant with right to work
which you conveniently missed. Odd you should miss out the key issue here.

Given that Australia, Canada and New Zealand would fall under the same rules on this instance as India where's the racial discrimination ?

You need to get a life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. How many Australians, Canadians and New Zealanders are
applying under the HSMWP and how many are affected?

You forget that Aussies, Canadians and New Zealanders don't need a visa to enter the UK. They enter as visitors, get jobs and then apply for adjustment of status -- a luxury not available to people from poor countries.

The US has a visa waiver program and there are several brits working in California who came under the visa waiver program and then got an adjustment in status -- again, something that is not available to people from Mexico.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #14
25. That's rich coming from you ...
If it had been a Pakistani complaining about the "cap" then
you'd have been the first reply supporting the British position ...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. You don't know that ....
I have nothing against Pakistani professionals wanting to emigrate to the UK. Just because I detest Pakistan's military/terror apparatus doesn't mean I am against the people. In fact, I believe the military ambitions, jealousy and hatred which has consumed Pakistani generals has worked against the poor Pakistani people, many of whom are extremely bright, creative and educated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Dude.....
You're always calling for "the annihilation of Pakistan." Do a search and maybe you can find a post or two that hasn't yet been deleted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Balkanization yes .. Annhilation .. no. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Sure you did....
I remember it vividly, on this thread: (your post was deleted as well as the posters that responded to you on your comment of "annihilation")

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=4369097
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. How convenient! Using a deleted thread to prove something nonexistent! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Yay!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Oh F'n please!
Quit being such a whiner and face up to the fact that YOU have anger issues. You attack Pakistan and it's people every chance you get. You bash the US for any humanitarian attempts to helping the people of that region. You fault the Brits for everything that doesn't work in India's favor. Your use of broad-brushed statements against all things Pakistani is more than tiresome.






The noose is tightening around Pakistan and pretty soon, everyone will be out to destroy that illegitimate terrorist nation.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3635962&mesg_id=3637549


We should also stop all aid to Pakistan to make sure this illegitimate country, created by the nefarious brits ceases to exist!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4098818&mesg_id=4099310






The sooner Pakistan realizes that India is the regional superpower and it has to learn to live withing that sphere of influence, Pakistan will be a happy place indeed.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3764712&mesg_id=3767017


Now tell me... how can anyone respect the thoughts of an individual that spews that much hatred on a consistent basis? All the while, ornamenting this spew of shit with the Om symbol. I have no problem with reading facts, I just cannot find any between your hate speak.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Thanks, Chrome
Speaks volumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-29-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Where do you see "annihilate" in there?
Balkanizing Pakistan into smaller countries is in the world's and the local people's interest. The "state" of Pakistan has not served either well and balkanizing it is not tantamount to annihilating.

For the record, I harbor neither hatred nor ill-will towards the people of Pakistan. That doesn't mean that the Pakistani military, ISI and state sponsored terrorism should not be eliminated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SocialistLez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. They would be better off staying in India. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Perhaps the brits should have thought of this
before colonizing and looting the world of its resources.

If the brits had not looted India for 200+ years, they wouldn't have this problem today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. And we are following right in their footsteps, hence the cause of a.........
.........lot of our "Muslim" problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. what condition are UK schools in that they are so overdependent
upon India to provide competent IT workers in their own country?

Is the school system so dismal that no one is smart enough
to complete certification in IT, or is it that charming
accent that's got them so mesmerized?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It is not about the condition of UK schools.
It is about UK corporations getting cheaper labor from India, undermining UK workers.

The same thing is done in the US to undermine US workers when HB1 workers are brought here to replace American workers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SocialistLez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. +1 NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Try taking a look around the Country you are living in for the answer.........
.....to your question. Actually, I think your question IS the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. He obviously speaks english
but has yet to grasp our colloquial use of the word "tough".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yes, "tough"
a. invade other countries and colonize them
b. loot them of their resources
c. leave them when the looting is over, granting "independence"
d. partition them illegally and arbitrarily so they will never rise
e. then say "tough"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Right of entry was ended years ago.
.

Tough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. This is not about right to entry.
Perhaps Britain should return all the money looted from India (some £18,685,000,000 corrected for inflation) and return all the objects in British museums and Tower of London to India. The resulting money will help Indian professionals to stay in India.

Perhaps all the European countries should do it. Spain can return funds to Mexico and South America, the Dutch to Indonesia, the French to Africa and Indochina etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bert Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I got it
Edited on Sun Jun-27-10 07:04 PM by Bert
In other words you think we owe you. F*** off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yes. Do you deny that Europeans looted the world? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincent441 Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. You obviously need education. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-27-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. wow. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DakotaBlue75 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. What?
Ouch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. With our own jobless rate...
we should be capping H1-Bs at 10.

We need to get our own people back to work.

The UK is facing the same problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. I agree with you.....
All countries "should" be taking care of their own citizens, first.

India is.

Expatriate executives making way for local hires

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/News_By_Industry/Jobs/Expatriate_executives_making_way_for_local_hires/articleshow/4039529.cms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
27. The struggle continues
A global economy with regional governments. It's one or the other. Trying to have both isn't going to work.

Corporations, as opposed to governments, are global now. Even though corporations should not be stronger than a centralized, monopolistic government, they are, because we live in a world of regional, fractured governments. So corporations are able to play each government against the other.

If we're going to have a global economy, then we're going to need a global governing body. As in, no more "India", "Britain", "America", "China", etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pettypace Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
32. India comprises 17% of the world's population
The British should have introduced birth control during the 300 year occupation for chrisakes :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GlennWRECK Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. Reverse AA
disgusting, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC