Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Sandra Day) O'Connor: Arizona must show it's not biased

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ed Barrow Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:10 PM
Original message
(Sandra Day) O'Connor: Arizona must show it's not biased
Source: Associated Press

Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor says Arizona must figure out how to show it appreciates, respects and admires the Hispanics who live there after passing a tough new immigration law.

The law will make entering the country illegally a state crime in Arizona and requires local police to enforce it. It has sparked demonstrations across the country, predominantly from Hispanics, who feel they will be targeted by racial profiling.

O'Connor tells ABC's "Good Morning America" that Hispanics have lived in Arizona since long before it was a state, and Arizona must now show it is not "as a whole, a biased state."

The former Arizona state senator and judge declined to say whether the law is constitutional, but says she is sure "sections of it will be challenged."



Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iv_iDeOEBeIKVll9_-Tkx93JrYTwD9FV6H0O2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sandra, you could have done the world so much good ten years ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Instead she screwed the pooch..And the entire world has trembled.
I Hate that woman...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. x2
grrrr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Bush and her unconstitutional act will be her legacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D-Lee Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Yes, but ... she did some good too
Edited on Thu May-27-10 10:10 PM by D-Lee
Read her bio. Yes, there was a LOT of discrimination against women lawyers and she kept going despite it.

She was generally against that corporatist zest for issuing overly broad decisions, which likely was a product of have been a trial judge and wanting to decide the case in front of the court instead of promulgating a legal philosophy.

She really appreciated native American culture.

And, yes, that Bush v Gore was really awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. She must have a terminal disease
All this soul-searching that should have taken place 30 years ago.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. I appreciate what she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. thanx for bush v Gore, Sandy
thanx for the Gulf oil spill
thanx for 9-11
thanx for the iraq war
thanx for the Afghani war
thanx for torture
thanx for spying
thanx for Ohio 2004
thanx for the outing of V. Plame
thanx for a massive kill of wild run salmon
thanx for massive debt
thanx for the economy in the ditch under bush
thanx for the failed response for Katrina
thanx for the money for the Levies around New Orleans not getting there so the money could go to the iraq war

you have done enough go the f*** away
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yep.
Can you hear us now, Sandra? STFU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sandra has earned the right to sit down and shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. So the law is OK until we find out that AZ is biased? Way to go... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. That is easy to do. Just enforce the law as written. Require
that EVERYONE carry proof of citizenship or immigration status. Force everyone in or transiting Arizona to carry a passport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Except that is not what the law says
A drivers license or state i.d. are some of the many ways that are allowed by the law. What does a passport have to do with anything? Have you rread the law? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Does every state drivers license require citizenship or does
everyone have a drivers license? How do you authenticate a birth certificate? Is there a national database of footprints?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yup, forging documents is easy. And trying to assess what's real and whose are not, is impossible.
I've hired an illegal. He spoke perfect English but had a Hispanic name so I made copies of his SS card and drivers license. It took the IRS 10 years to discover that he was using a perfectly legitimate SS # that was assigned to someone else (and yes, I did check the IRS database on SS #'s before hiring).

How does a state trooper ascertain some teen's birth certificate is "real"? Nobody's gonna know.

For sure someone is going to be detained illegally. For sure some child is going to be molested in state custody because of this.

This law is bogus. When NAFTA was implemented and "free trade zones" were developed, we should have implemented immigration reform. Instead we have exploitation of the poorest areas without the poor having any recourse to the wealthy areas. It's bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. What is your idea of immigration reform
Interesting you don't mention that. Why are you posting about birth certificates? The law does not require that. Some child is going to be "molested in state custody because of this"? Then I guess the state should never take any child into custody for any reason because there is always going to be a possibility they will be molested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. I did mention my solution. Open the borders. NAFTA should have had a provision
that created avenues for this. Maybe not right away but the plan should have included open transit like the EU.

If we are going to have a free economic zone, then all citizens of that zone should have access to all areas, rich and poor.

I'm posting about birth certificates because most CHILDREN don't have any other form of ID. They don't drive (and many urban residents don't either) so they don't have a drivers license. Children being taken into custody because their parents may not have the appropriate form of ID are going to be victimized. I'm sorry but I absolutely do not believe it's just, or fair that even one single child more needs to be traumatized by being held in state custody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. I don't believe in open borders or free economic zones
Open borders is a tenet of the libertarians not of the Democrats. Should juvenile criminals be taken into state custody since there is a possiblity of molestation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Open borders and free economic zones are a tenet of European progressives if not all American ones.
I've heard libertarians react hysterically to the idea of a mythical North American Union would would open borders with Canada and Mexico. I don't think open borders is a tenet of most libertarians as they see if as an affront to national sovereignty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #39
83. Open borders and free economic zones are not necessarily libertarian

The US and Canada needed to implement a long term policy to address immigration and the inevitable inequities caused by NAFTA. The maquiladora workers are making significantly less (for example but we could easily use farmers or fishermen etc.), and that's because they are held hostage in their country - unable to legally migrate to the more prosperous nations.

And your strawman comparison about juvenile CRIMINALS vs. legal US juveniles who are seized and put into foster care because their parents are illegal is ridiculous. You honestly think legal innocent US citizen/juveniles should be subjected to the vicissitudes of the juvie system is a just by product of this law, and that nobody should object to this?

That's sick.

This is just one aspect of this law that's wrong. There are many others. I've only engaged (tried to engage) you on this one facet. You clearly are invested in this draconian destructive piece of legislation. It's wrong on so many levels but if you can't even envision the injustice to children, then you are truly unable to see clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Who said anything about a birth certificate?
I said state issued i.d. not just drivers license. Virtually everyone has one or the other. If you randomly stopped people on the street you would find 99% have one or the other. If you are reduced to making up unreal scenarios to try and make your argument go ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Stop them in golf carts in Sun City and see if you make 99%
Edited on Fri May-28-10 01:31 AM by Downwinder
If you had read your law, you would note that only licenses and ID issued by sates that require citizenship for issuance qualify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I believe that is 48 states.
What is the problem? Are you suggesting people in Sun City have no government i.d.? How ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. No, I am saying that if they ask EVERYBODY for papers there can be no question of profiling.
Of course that will not be good for a tourist based economy. And since I am one of your !%, I will not be attending the Central High reunion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. I have a feeling you won't be missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. I am glad the economy is doing so well there that my $3,000.00 won't be missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. The economy is doing well, thanks for your concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. I think you will find that there will be at least 300 others who will not be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #58
76. Arizona is a fine state and a good economy
If people want to stay in the frozen tundra fine. Everyone will do just fine. People are really full of themselves if they think they will substantially affect people's lifestyles and well being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #25
87. Actually, 44 states besides Arizona verify "lawful presence," not citizenship
BUT the five exceptions are HI, IL, WA, NM, and UT--and NM and UT are bordering states, so the fact that a NM or UT driver's license doesn't meet the legal proof requirements of the law is likely to present problems. Drivers from those states may, indeed, have to carry a birth certificate or passport in Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
38. No, there are 5 including next-door New Mexico that allow illegal immigrants to get a drivers
license as a public safety measure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Your figures may be old but regardless states that have issued licenses
Edited on Fri May-28-10 12:38 PM by harkadog
are reversing that. There used to be as many as 15 states that issued illegals drivers licenses but most have reversed that policy and there are movements in the rest to abandon it. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-01-29-illegal-immigrants-licenses_N.htm (two 1/2 years old but just one of many that are available).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-30-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #44
90. Actually, pampango's figures are not "old." They are up-to-date.
The assertion that his figures are "old" is a cheap shot, made with absolutely no evidence to support it. His statement can be supported--can yours? With evidence that is current, not 2 1/2 years out of date?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
47. Only in fascist police states like Arizona...
Most other states do not require authentication of citizenship to get a driver's license...

Nor to vote...

Arizona is the new Mississippi -- the heart of oppression and fascist rule...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. You don't know what you are talking about.
Almost all states require proof of legal status for a driver's license or to vote. Since you say most don't which ones are they or are you just pulling it out of your ass? BTW do you think illegals should have the right to vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. Yes....
Undocumented immigrants are human beings and should have a voice in their local communities so, yes, I'd allow every adult to vote in local elections...

but only once per election...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #54
62. And YOU don't know WTF you're talking about...
Edited on Fri May-28-10 01:23 PM by ProudDad
I didn't have to PROVE CITIZENSHIP to get a California driver's license nor to vote in California...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #62
74. BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #54
88. Five states do not verify legal status: HI, IL, WA, NM, and UT
Their driver's licenses don't prove lawful presence under Arizona's law--and two of them BORDER Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
86. Database of baby footprints, LOL! (Maybe The Onion would have that) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SargeUNN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
81. I take it you live in Arizona?
If not then you need to become familiar with how things work here in Arizona BEFORE this stupid law and then you might have a little more credibility with that statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I have to carry my passport to visit AZ?
whoa, I guess they really ARE setting up a prison camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. This is a silly comment made by people who have not read the law
or enjoy making things up on the internet to try and make points. There is no requirements of a passport by anyone in the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. What other document is a domestic and international proof of citizenship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. :crickets:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. We don't all live in our mother's basement posting on the computer 24/7
Get out in the world sometime and you won't be posting such lame comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #35
61. Piss off /ignore
Edited on Fri May-28-10 01:33 PM by Bluebear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #28
34. Drivers license or state i.d.
Which everyone who is legal in AZ has one or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. How many under age 18 have them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Under the law police contact must be made as the result of the person breaking another law.
People in that age range have some sort of state i.d. or drivers license nearly 100% if they are legal. Otherwise their parents would be able to establish it. Since they have broken another law their parents would be involved anyway. Got anymore unrealistic scenarios to throw in there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. The act does not say that someone has to have broken a law
to be queried for their documents. Currently MCSO requires documents for passengers in a vehicle even if they have broken no law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. "Any lawful contact"
Which means broken or suspected of breaking a law. If those categories don't exist you can legally leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Stopping someone walking down the sidewalk and asking for an ID?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. BINGO!!! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. Shows how little you know about the law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. And you're demonstrating your utter ignorance of how the world actually works!
Edited on Fri May-28-10 01:27 PM by ProudDad
And why the hell are you so hot about this (fascist, unconstitutional, voter suppression) law...

Written by a neo-nazi fuck...

Some Mexican person piss you off somehow, hmmmm?

It can't be because some undocumented person grabbed your sheet-rocking job, could it?

They sure aren't burning up your tax dollars -- that's a fucking right-wing myths...

http://immigration.change.org/blog/view/fact_check_undocumented_immigrants_dont_take_jobs_from_american_workers

So what ox are you goring???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. Of course that is not legal and you know it or should know it.
What other b.s. are you going to throw in there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #55
63. What world do you live in? Have you ever been a pedestrian?
If you have you would know that any pedestrian is suspicious to an Officer in a cruiser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. Pedestrians are against the law in Phoenix (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Translation
Edited on Fri May-28-10 12:51 PM by ProudDad
"Any lawful contact" in English translates to "You look very brown to me." in Arizona-speak...

Anyway, undocumented immigrants CONTRIBUTE more to the economy than they take out of it...

http://www.factcheck.org/2010/05/does-immigration-cost-jobs/

So this fascist attempt at voter suppression is based on bullshit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #50
56. That is your racist translation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #46
84. The "lawful contact" provision was dropped
The amendments bill (House Bill 2162) replaced it with the "stop, detention or arrest" requirement. It also extended the law to apply BEYOND stop, detention or arrest to include enforcement of any town, city or county law or ordinance. So if the police come to your door because your neighbor complained about barking dogs, loud music, overgrown yard, etc., the law can be applied to you--even when there is no lawbreaking involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #46
85. Dupe
Edited on Sat May-29-10 10:11 PM by pinboy3niner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. You asked for it, "Racial profiling"
it's a time-honored tradition all over USAmerica...

And alive and well here in fascist Arizona...

You're the one who's seriously deluded about the way things happen in the real world if you think that the letter of the law is what police follow...

You're the one who's being unrealistic if you think that this law won't be abused...

And, obviously, you haven't read the ENTIRE law (just the Voice of America summary, eh?)...

It also allows ANYONE to sue the Police Dept. and City if THEY think that the cops aren't sufficiently enforcing the law...

Amazing the kind of jingoist, fascist, right-wing shit one finds on DU....!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. All you can do in your posts is name call
You have no ability to bring up intellectual arguments. If you have nothing but shit I guess that is what you have to throw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. And you have nothing but utter ignorance of how the world REALLY works...
But then again, maybe you do...

Did you vote for sheriff joe too???

You definitely sound like one of his constituents...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Maybe if the Democrats didn't nominate people with bizarre sexual histories
we could get rid of Arpaio. A person who raped his adoptive mother? Is that the best we can get to go against Arpaio?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Looks like any way you go, you are dragging the bottom of the barrel.
The days of Carl Hayden and Stu and Mo Udall are long gone. Must be the result of all of those immigrants, from the east.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. You don't even know who Arpaio's opponent was, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. Matter of fact, I do. Do you know who Carl Hayden was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. He was a congressman and Senator
I was talking about present day -- Dan Saban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #72
73. And Dan was a Police Chief in Buckeye. One of his former Officers
who is here now speaks very highly of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. Well his mother didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. I can well understand your attitudes if you get your interpretations
from Hendershott.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. I don't know who he or she is but I know what was said about Saban.
I also know that a jury found against Saban when he sued Arpaio. I also know there were other more recent allegations by women against Saban. So that is the candidate you want to defeat Arpaio? He couldn't have asked for a better person to run against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. You take good care. Remember they tend to be cannibalistic.
I could wish nothing better for Arizonans than for the individual to assume the burden of proof and pay for his own prosecution. It is so, how shall I say it, so -- Mexican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. You're morally bankrupt, Sandra!
You illegally installed the most incompetent asshole we've ever had as President. NOTHING you can ever do will atone for that act of treason you willingly committed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Even better, SCOTUS must show it's not biased. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Second Stone Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
27. Arizona is a biased state
Why try to show something that is not true? How about changing instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
91. Arizona
is a very nice place to live,but the state is suffering because of all the carpet baggers in government,state and national,Kyl and McCain were born out of state,the nitwit that is opposing McCain is a good old boy from north carolina,sheriff joe is from new england,governor jan is from hollywood,state senator pearce is fro utah,all of them came here with their racist mind sets.Vote all of them out of office arizona will be better off without the scumbags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
29. Bush v Gore is her legacy and I couldn't care less about any of her thoughts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
32. Did she know all those Hispanic things when she did her voter harassment like REHNQUIST?!1
Besides her Coup 2000 activities. She's got a lot to make up for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
33. Meh, sandra says what?
she can go fuck off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
36. I didn't Know Sandra Went Into Stand-Up Comedy!
Excellent! She's finally found her forte!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
45. Fat Chance!
Edited on Fri May-28-10 12:41 PM by ProudDad
Just about every white bigot who could scrape together a few dollars to pump up the (now ended) real estate bubble moved to Arizona and voted in these right-wing fascists...

Good f*cking luck...

Arizona is, in general, a state CHOCK FULL OF BIGOTS -- mainly in the phoenix area and rural environs. It's also a military-industrial rump state...

Yeah, Sandy, you white fucks stole the place "fair and square"...

The fucking war machine owns this place even more than corporate USAmerika...

And this from the woman who gave us bush!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
70. As you were, Sandra. You are not trustworthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
79. Yo, Sandra! If I want your opinion I'll ask for it.
Until then, kindly STFU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
82. Shut the fuck up, Sandy.
After the shit you pulled, it's too late to act like a human being now. Fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
89. Oh look . . . Mrs "5-4" has something to say.
Edited on Sat May-29-10 11:21 PM by HughBeaumont
I'm quite positive that Mrs. "5-4"'s feedback on issues pertaining to our states are of the utmost value and intelligence, and not at ALLLLLLL political. Just like a certain decision Mrs. "FIVE-FOUR" made back in 2000 on a certain state-run election, installing a certain governor's immensely unqualified failure brother as The Leader of the "Most Powerful Nation on Earth".

So I'm sure we're all just WAITING with baited breath for the input of Mrs. "5-4".

Floor's all yours . . . Mrs. "5-4".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #89
92. ++++++++++++++
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
93. Sandra honey, you lost your credibility when you installed bush into the White House
now kindly fuck off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC