Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The runaway well spewing crude into the Gulf of Mexico might be sealed within as little as two weeks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:51 PM
Original message
The runaway well spewing crude into the Gulf of Mexico might be sealed within as little as two weeks
Source: Houston Chronicle

The runaway well spewing crude into the Gulf of Mexico might be sealed within as little as two weeks using a new, untested approach that has emerged in the last two days, BP CEO Tony Hayward told the Houston Chronicle today.

The method, which he called “top kill,” involves reconfiguring existing wellhead equipment to provide a conduit for pumping heavy fluids into the well. That would stop the flow and allow for a permanent seal, Hayward said during a visit to the BP operations center in west Houston that is headquarters for the spill response.

In an odd twist, the possible fix would use the blowout preventer that may have failed April 20 when a sudden burst of high-pressure hydrocarbons apparently blew out from the well and up to the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, triggering a fire and explosion that killed 11 workers. The method has been used before to seal wells after blowouts on land, but has not been tried at the depths of the Macondo well on which the Deepwater Horizon was working.

The wellhead is under 5,000 feet of water and taps a reservoir 18,000 feet below the seabed.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/6991278.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. "As little"?!
Oh, yeah. There's good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Beats the hell outta 3 months.
Yesterday would've been better, but sooner beats later anytime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breadandwine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. The unspoken point is that if these efforts fail the plants of the oceans are poisoned
and all animal life on the surface of the planet suffocates from a reduction in atmospheric oxygen.

THAT'S why any fix even in weeks is such a relief.

Because the situation is much worse than BP is admitting.



Science fiction becoming science fact ---


•••••• Video - BP's "Crack In The World" - from 1965 movie to real life nightmare ••••••


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8269354&mesg_id=8269354








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, they certainly did find oil down there.
the coffer dam should be in place on Thursday. Lowering it down through 5000 feet of water against the pressure of a blowout is the tricky part.

If it works (and we all hope it does), that gusher will be capped within another week from Thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why of why ,. ., .
. . . does the word "untested" make me cringe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I am with you..big time!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. What could possibly go wrong?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. Only TWO (2) days ago - the world's experts claimed it will take AT LEAST three months ...
Edited on Wed May-05-10 04:00 PM by ShortnFiery
to stop the oil spill?!?

http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/05/03/allen-at-least-90-days-to-stop-oil-spill/

It will take at least three months to effectively stop the flow of oil rushing through a damaged well that is leaking oil into the Gulf of Mexico, Admiral Thad Allen, Commandant of the United States Coast Guard, and now National Incident Commander of the Gulf Coast oil spill said Monday morning.


What has happened in TWO DAYS to change that prediction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. More ...
Allen says the three-month window is the best case scenario for drilling a new well into the reservoir of oil that’s 23,000 feet below the water’s surface. He says that is the only way to stop the flow of oil at the source.

IMO, the powers that be must believe that American People are either stupid or forgetful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Maybe the well is losing pressure on its own
And they want to take the credit for it. Oil doesn't flow from a reservoir on its own forever, especially from a single exploration hole.

Just a conspiratorial suspicion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. PR happened. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. April 20 til May 19. 29 days @ up to 1,000,000 gallons per day...
Edited on Wed May-05-10 04:03 PM by BrklynLiberal
So the cleanup may "only be as little as" 29,000,000 gallons of oil spill....

Exxon Valdez spilled 10,800,000 gallons of oil...

So we might as well just not worry....it will only be twice as bad.

:sarcasm:

in case it was not obvious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B2G Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Where have you seem the million gallon per day estimate?
Everything I've seen is more like 200,000. TIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. ....
http://blog.al.com/live/2010/04/deepwater_horizon_secret_memo.html
In scientific circles, an order of magnitude means something is 10 times larger. In this case, an order of magnitude higher would mean the volume of oil coming from the well could be 10 times higher than the 5,000 barrels a day coming out now. That would mean 50,000 barrels a day, or 2.1 million gallons a day. It appears the new leaks mentioned in the Wednesday release are the leaks reported to the public late Wednesday night.

http://newsone.com/nation/associated-press/bp-caps-1-of-3-leaks-but-up-to-2-5-million-gallons-of-oil-per-day-may-keep-spilling/
BP Caps 1 Of 3 Leaks, But Up To 2.5 Million Gallons Of Oil Per Day May Keep Spilling
View Photos
In their worst-case scenario, BP executives told members of a congressional committee that up to 2.5 million gallons a day could spill if the leaks worsened, though it would be more like 1.7 million gallons.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_drilling_rig_explosion
The oil spill covers a surface area of at least 2,500 square miles (6,500 km2) according to estimates reported on May 3, 2010 by CNBC.<3> The oil spill, originating from a deepwater oil well 5,000 feet (1,500 m) below sea level, is currently discharging an estimated 5–25 thousand barrels (210,000–1,100,000 US gallons; 790,000–4,000,000 litres) of crude oil daily.<6> The spill is expected to eclipse the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill as the worst US oil disaster in history.<7> Experts fear that it will result in an environmental disaster as the oil from the well site reaches the Gulf coast, damaging the Gulf of Mexico fishing industry, tourism industry, and habitat of hundreds of bird species
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. It's worse than that even....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. I saw some crude oil come up my commode this morning while doing
#2. Imma be okay? Do I have standing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. The sooner the better
I vote for April 21, 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLPanhandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'll believe when it happens, but I hope they are right
Been watching the beaches lately and keeping my fingers crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. BP CEO's are incapable of telling the truth. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. Do you guys realize that this plan ASSUMES that the funnel dome approach will fail? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

European press is reporting that the geyser is 10X LARGER than previously stated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sounds like they are going to cut off the top of the drill pipe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. Why then, that's the same as causing no harm at all!
I am so unimpressed by the BP response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. This flies in the face of what they told CONGRESS earlier today... WTF?
.....the lies from BP continue to fly...hour by hour...day by day. :wtf:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4369374
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. This sounds like a possibility, provided that the rig doesn't just spring
more leaks due to the pressure from the heavy liquid that is to be added. I guess they will have to calculate very carefully just how much of the heavy fluid is needed.

Is this the only rig on the particular oil reservoir in question. If not, could the additional fluid cause a different rig to blow?

The assumption that BP appears to be working on is that the cause really was equipment that did not function correctly and not maybe an increase in pressure from under the rig for some reason. I'm a total know-nothing when it comes to physics. Is my opinion completely unrelated to reality?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. "could" "might" are weasel words meaning "not news". Here's another DU LBN link
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4369374&mesg_id=4369374

Amount of Spill Could Escalate, Company Admits


WASHINGTON — In a closed-door briefing for members of Congress, a senior BP executive conceded Tuesday that the ruptured oil well in the Gulf of Mexico could conceivably spill as much as 60,000 barrels a day of oil, more than 10 times the estimate of the current flow....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC