Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans say Obama's Supreme Court pick must be mainstream

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:00 PM
Original message
Republicans say Obama's Supreme Court pick must be mainstream
Source: WP

Senate Republican leaders declined to rule out a filibuster of President Obama's nominee to succeed retiring Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, if they think the pick falls outside the judicial mainstream.

While calling each of the most commonly mentioned candidates to succeed Stevens "nominally qualified," Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) would not take the filibuster off the table. But he said Sunday on ABC's "This Week" that it is "unlikely" Republicans will use the procedural move to block the nominee except under "extraordinary circumstances."

Among those widely believed to be under consideration for the nomination are Solicitor General Elena Kagan, federal judges Diane Wood and Merrick Garland, and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. Stevens announced Friday that he plans to retire at the end of the court's current term. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), predicted Sunday that Obama's nominee will be confirmed before the new court session begins in the fall.

Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) didn't rule out a filibuster if the president chooses someone from "the fringe instead of the middle" or someone who would "apply their feelings" instead of the law. Asked if he would support a filibuster of any of the potential nominees said to be on Obama's shortlist, Alexander said on "Fox News Sunday" that he is "not about to start picking nominees I would reject before the president even makes one." He said he believes that qualified nominees should receive an up-or-down vote, pointing to his vote to confirm Obama's first choice for the high court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/11/AR2010041103342.html?hpid=moreheadlines




Email the WH and tell them.....

WE WANT A LIBERAL TO REPLACE A LIBERAL!

WE DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES WANT A MODERATE OR A CENTRIST!

DO NOT MOVE THE COURT TO THE RIGHT! DO NOT DO IT!

THE BACKLASH FROM THE BASE WILL BE BRUTAL!

http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wait - hold on - what is "mainstream?"
I suppose they mean bourgeois, or a white anglo-saxon Protestant male with center-right politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. No, they mean this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
38. WASP males on the SCOTUS are so pre-Roe v. Wade. We want devout Catholics now.
More likely to be anti-abortion AND anti-gay.

You don't have to ask embarrassing specific questions. Just ask privately if they obey ALL the teachings of the Church. No litmus test. Well, not overtly.

Why do you think 6 of 9 Justices are now Roman Catholic, even though the Presidents appointing them were one denomination or Protestant or another or evangelicals?

(Sotomayor is not anti-choice or anti-gay, IMO, but I am assuming that bc she is a Democrat--and from NYC.)

Is America 2/3 Roman Catholic?

But, mean ole me, am I suggesting Presidents should discriminate on the basis of religion when appointing a SCOTUS Justice? No, I am suggesting that is exactly what they have been doing since Antonin Gregory "Get over it!" Scalia.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Frankly my dear repukes, we don't give a damn what YOU want!!!!!!!!!
Edited on Sun Apr-11-10 08:05 PM by BrklynLiberal
As if any repuke president gave a damn what the Democrats wanted..even when the repuke in the White House was not there legitimately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. "we' don't but obama does, being bipartisan and all lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Exactly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:11 PM
Original message
Free clue for Republicon Homelanders: You lost. America won.
So STFU, and salute America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
44. Ditto....I don't recall Bush giving a damn about anyone but himself..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm thinking door in the face, nominate Hitler's clone. then offer Lani Guinnere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Or Angela Davis. She is still vital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Or Hugo Chavez
I think we could expedite citizenship pretty damn fast if we wanted to. That's what the Teabaggers are expecting anyway. Might as well give them what they expect BIG TIME!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dude, anything right of you is "mainstream" - how's my answer?
FUCK YOU - LET OBAMA MAKE HIS CHOICE AND YOU LOSE ALL FILIBUSTERING PRIVILEGES ONCE NUCLEAR OPTION IS ACTIVATED!?! OK?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. And elections has consequences.
Republicans will sustain massive losses again this November once the Teaborn decides to split off from mainstream Republican votes and vote looney.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. freaknuts thing they are "mainstream"
so, screw them and go with someone who will actually replace Stevens - he is and has been a great justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. oh....mainstream like GWB's picks were mainstream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Like Alito and Roberts? No thanks.
You lost the election, get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keroro gunsou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
12. dear republicans
two words: fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Four words: "Go win an election"
If you can :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Their idea of mainstream is Coke-Can Thomas.
Fuck that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Coke-can?
Afraid I don't get the reference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Link..Thomas vs. Hill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. I thought he was pubic hair Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
42. Yes, he has a Pht.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh mainstream like Roberts and Alito! Uh...NO THANK YOU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. DEMOCRATS won the last two elections and we are in charge
republicans you can go to Hades so take a flying leap. Obama has to pick a liberal with liberal ideas. And we have to work on a reason to get rid of Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
20. Fuck off, Repukes! "Elections have consequences" "Up or Down Vote"! No filibusters!
fucking hypocritical pieces of shit douchebags.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. When Republicans become mainstream then we will consider it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
22. Up yours, repukes.
YOU LOST. Get over it, you whiny little brats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unlegendary Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
23. Keep eating our shit or else
Edited on Sun Apr-11-10 11:15 PM by unlegendary
They really mean they want Obama to just quit the Democratic party and be one of them. Nothing else will work for them.. Good luck with that horseshit you palincloneassholes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. Tell them Rs that Obama should do as Bush did, pick who he wants to pick
And to balance out Bush's radical, right-wingnut, anti-judical appointees, the best person might be Hugo Chavez :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
26. translation: whoever you pick is not conservative enough
It doesn't matter who. If Obama nominated Ken Starr, the republicans would try to paint him as a communist scofflaw.

Their only gains occur when Obama's agenda is paralyzed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
27. Who the fuck cares what Republicans say?
Edited on Mon Apr-12-10 12:57 AM by cutlassmama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
29. As long as he kept the make up the same and appointed someone similar to Stephens...
it should be fine. He isn't going to appoint another Roberts or anyone who is a right-winger. A moderate would vote both ways, and since one of those was is liberal there will be an uproar. I say go hard left. Nothing is going to keep the teabaggers from saying they are an activist left wing nazi judge anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
30. I don't want a Conservative, or a Centrist or a Liberal.
I want someone who can actually read the Constitution as plain language, understands what it says and means, and won't fuck with it.

I know, I know, why try something new... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
31. my Republican party is full of shit, feel free to ignore the craziness among them.
-- with love, Nutty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
32. Notice how the term ideologue is only a term used to describe democrat nominations.
The Republicans are always allowed to create the word use and the media never challenges them on their use of them. The Supreme Court is filled with ideologues on the right. And those Bush nominations weren't mainstream. And filibuster? Go haead. Make our day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
33. Dear Republicans: Go fuck yourselves!
That is all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
34. "Mainstream"? Like Alito? Like Roberts? Like Scalia? Like Thomas?
Bite me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. You beat me to it. I was about to reply that there is nothing
mainstream about Roberts and Alito. Or Scalia and Thomas. In fact, you might even call them "activist" judges after granting personhood to corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
36. It'll be someone mainstream, someone "central"
No way he'll select anyone liberal, or leftist.

Obama's a centrist, he'll strive to appease the Republicans and the corporations.

And he'll still have a battle to get Republicans to say "yes".

This court will move to the right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
37. At this point all I can say is "Eat shit" to the Republicans
They have truly done their absolute best to ruin this country. They are practicing scorched earth policies where they will destroy all that this country has that's worth anything just because they want to. Not for a better country. Not to go forth into a brighter future. Not to save the planet. Not to govern. Just to rule like a bunch of punch drunk pre-teen bullies so they can be Lords of the Flies for real. They're having a serious psychotic episode right before our eyes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
39. Kabuki is very boring and makes me "drowsier and drowsier." ZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
40. Like Alito and Roberts were mainstream?
Lets just hope Obama doesnt make a 'bipartisan' pick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
41. Look at the record with the Washington Post this past Decade
Edited on Mon Apr-12-10 08:10 AM by depakid
What would a paper whose editors are outright liars- who go so far as to deny facts dug up by their own reporters consider mainstream?

People who cut off comments to their ombudman about it?

What sort of ethics would this group of people want?

What should their opinion on any matter of importance mean?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
43. Done!
Since I consider myself liberal, I asked that the replacement be someone who feels the same way.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
45. I wish more people would ignore the Rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
46. What pukes want and say is highly irrelevant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
47. Mainstream means George Carlin to me. Shame he's gone.
Edited on Tue Apr-13-10 12:09 AM by Kablooie
Or did I mix that up with mainlining?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
48. Last time I checked - repukes were a SMALL minority in the government...
they don't get a voice.

Elections have consequences. Democrats won BIG last time around. Sit Down And Shut Up Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC