|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
| 24601
|
Wed Feb-03-10 05:40 AM Original message |
| Rahm Emanuel apologizes for 'retarded' remark after Palin attack |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| no_hypocrisy
|
Wed Feb-03-10 05:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. OK, now it's Sarah's turn to apologize to a Kennedy. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 24601
|
Wed Feb-03-10 05:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Palin's involvement is merely amusing - I'm far more concerned |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| timo
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 10. meh |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| iamjoy
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:43 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. Yep, He's Trash |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| timo
|
Wed Feb-03-10 09:09 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 23. bet your hind teeth |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 50. Birds of a feather, etc. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| marshall
|
Thu Feb-04-10 09:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 42. Has she ever acknowledged that Levi's version is accurate? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IndyJones
|
Fri Feb-05-10 02:06 AM Response to Reply #42 |
| 60. Why would she? He's spewed so much since the election, it would be a full time |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DailyGrind51
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:16 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. But, what if Rahm resigns and winds up back in Chicago? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| booksenkatz
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. By the way, did Cheney ever apologize for his GFY on the Senate floor? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| secondwind
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:25 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. To my knowledge, he did not. On the contrary, he made another remark. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 24601
|
Wed Feb-03-10 08:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 20. I pay no attention to him - he doesn't have the President's ear nor |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 04:08 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 49. Please see Reply 47. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 04:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 48. That's like insulting your own Party members and handicapped people? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| panzerfaust
|
Fri Feb-05-10 06:23 AM Response to Reply #48 |
| 62. Pleeeze: Differently Abled |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mdmc
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:24 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. When will that hideous man apologize to us? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Sienna86
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. Having a nephew with Down's Syndrome |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| provis99
|
Wed Feb-03-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 35. odd, considering "retard" started as a politically correct alternative for "moron". |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 46. Nothing odd about it. Rahm was using the word as an insult, not to describe someone born "slow." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tularetom
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:26 AM Response to Original message |
| 8. Liberals object to something he said - he tells them to get f*#ked |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 04:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 51. Please see Reply # 47. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| democrank
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 9. Rahm Emanuel was wrong. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Demeter
|
Wed Feb-03-10 07:04 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. It's His Way |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 57. He works for Obama, not the DNC. But, IMO, he does both a disservice whenever he shows his |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mmonk
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. I told you he would listen to her, not us. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tomm2thumbs
|
Wed Feb-03-10 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
| 14. This from 'No, I don't want the retarded baby--I want the other one'-Palin? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cornermouse
|
Wed Feb-03-10 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
| 15. He apologized in private to the CEO of Special Olympics. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| customerserviceguy
|
Wed Feb-03-10 07:46 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 16. Obama would have a tough time with that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| KamaAina
|
Thu Feb-04-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 44. "Special Olympics crack" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 04:41 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 53. That's not all Obama said. And your interpretation is....charitable. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 04:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 52. Heh. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| salguine
|
Wed Feb-03-10 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 17. Maybe "retarded" liberals shouldn't be able to vote in 2012. They're retarded, after all... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 04:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
| 54. They should vote. That's why God made primaries. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WVRICK13
|
Wed Feb-03-10 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
| 18. I'll Say It Again |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 04:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 55. Yep. Please see Reply # 47. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bluenorthwest
|
Wed Feb-03-10 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
| 19. Rahm is fucking ingnorant |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raschel
|
Wed Feb-03-10 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 21. So Palin's saying 'if you don't want me to say ni**er don't say retarded'. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Salmonslayer
|
Wed Feb-03-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #21 |
| 26. You put words in her mouth and then you call her a hateful bigot |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raschel
|
Wed Feb-03-10 11:26 AM Response to Reply #26 |
| 31. First, apart from this article let me state again, she is a hateful bigot. Second, why |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| closeupready
|
Wed Feb-03-10 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
| 22. So when will Sarah call on Peggy Noonan to apologize? Probably never. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Salmonslayer
|
Wed Feb-03-10 09:51 AM Response to Reply #22 |
| 29. Noonan is a writer not the Chief of Staff |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| closeupready
|
Wed Feb-03-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 30. Yes, of course I'm reaching; I'm sometimes too subtle with my points. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hojomo
|
Thu Feb-11-10 03:33 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 64. Noonan was Reagan's top speechwriter and she did it THREE TIMES |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| seeinfweggos
|
Wed Feb-03-10 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
| 24. poor choice of words, but i still love rahm. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 03:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 45. In this case, he's a DLCer who was calling other Dems "fucking retarded." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Nihil
|
Wed Feb-03-10 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
| 25. More like a caption competition every day ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| gaijinlaw
|
Wed Feb-03-10 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 27. I find Rahm Emanuel's personality a little grating |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Hawkeye-X
|
Wed Feb-03-10 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
| 28. Your apology is accepted, if it accompained with a RESIGNATION |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| fascisthunter
|
Wed Feb-03-10 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. yet no apology to the left |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 04:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 47. You noticed that, too, eh? How smart can Rahm be if he thinks insulting the left repeatedly is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Arkana
|
Wed Feb-03-10 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Son of a bitch, Rahm, why did you do this? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SKKY
|
Wed Feb-03-10 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. Obama made a Special Olympics snide remark on Leno.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raine
|
Thu Feb-04-10 02:13 AM Response to Reply #34 |
| 39. I thought Obama had apologized for that remark |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 02:26 AM Response to Reply #39 |
| 40. Obama called Shriver from Air Force One, right after that show. Still, it was not a great remark. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SKKY
|
Thu Feb-04-10 01:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 43. That's correct, he did appologize. And you could see on his face... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 05:15 PM Response to Reply #43 |
| 56. I disagree. I don't think Obama's remark was more pointed and acute. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SKKY
|
Thu Feb-04-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 59. Please check post #34 by me. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DeSwiss
|
Wed Feb-03-10 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 36. K&R n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| boppers
|
Wed Feb-03-10 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. Interesting how the controversy has overshadowed its origins... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 02:28 AM Response to Reply #37 |
| 41. That's their Constitutional right. After Rahm dumped on the "left of the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raine
|
Thu Feb-04-10 02:12 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. Now Rahm needs to apologize to liberals and |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Thu Feb-04-10 05:49 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 58. Why would a liberal accept Rahm's apology when, obviously, Rahm truly believes what he said? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Wardoc
|
Fri Feb-05-10 05:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 61. 41 > 59, healthcare = mandated insurance, Dems obey Palin, Mass = Rep Senator, Corps = people... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| timtom
|
Fri Feb-05-10 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
| 63. So that's TWO major gaffes: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| w4rma
|
Thu Feb-11-10 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
| 65. Weasel. (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 23rd 2013, 11:26 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC