Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA 'questioned UK uranium claim'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 07:36 AM
Original message
CIA 'questioned UK uranium claim'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3109993.stm

The CIA called into question UK claims in last September's dossier that Saddam Hussein was buying in uranium from Africa even before the document was published, it has been confirmed.


The Foreign Office in London - which made the admission - also said that, despite US concerns, Britain decided to go ahead and publish the claims because they believed their intelligence to reliable.

A decision was therefore taken not to include the doubts expressed by America.

The news comes in the latest report by the Commons foreign affairs committee which has been investigating the way the government's case for war with Iraq was presented.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting story
Well, just as long is it isn't another Gilligan job if you know what I mean.

I do have a question though, why then did the Niger uranium story end up in the SOTU in january if the claim was being queried in September?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Because if you repeat a lie enough
people will take it for the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldCurmudgeon Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. what I find simply AMAZING
is that it took the IAEA two hours with Google to find out that the Niger uranium documents were a blatent, grotesque forgery!

Two Hours!

with

Google

for crying out loud!

I think it took them longer to write the press release that described their findings....

Yet the UK and the CIA had those documents for months.

Okay, perhaps the CIA and MI-5 are a pack of simpering morons that couldn't find their own butts given the use of both hands and a flashlight.

More likely, they didn't check those documents because they didn't want to find out if they were true or not. Their Lords and Masters would be displeased.

There needs to be a major investigation. Heads Must Roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike6640 Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm going to ask this question here
even though it probably deserves its own thread.

How is it that this Uranium from some "African" country is/was so much of a concern, yet little is being reported that Iraq already had tons of the stuff? (UN knew it was there, and had it in a secure site)

I can recall our own (US) troops going in, breaking the IAEA seals on a containment facility in Iraq, then saying "AHA!!! We found WMD!!!". Then it was revised to "Oops, our bad". The troops then left this site unguarded. The place was looted, radiocative barrels dumped and used as drinking water containers of all things.

Stupidity that boggles the mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. you're too smart for your own good!
expect a knock at your door.
asskkkroft is probably lurking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Media Watch: Congratulations, Karl Rove!
A couple terra warnings and some good suspcion (can't release the report) about Saudi Arabia in the 911 report sure got Bush's lies about uranium out of the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-03 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Don't matter whether it is the news 24/7 or not. The damage has been done
People are showing their douts. The good old boy BS that Bush trys to pull with his "who you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes(?)" stuff is not holding up any more due to closer scrutiny.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-31-03 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. We need more damage dammit
Let's get those doubts on the news 24/7! Let's get the lying bastards!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC