436
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 03:55 PM
Original message
G.O.P. Considers ‘Purity’ Resolution for Candidates
Source: New York Times

Republican leaders are circulating a resolution listing 10 positions Republican candidates should support to demonstrate that they “espouse conservative principles and public policies” that are in opposition to “Obama’s socialist agenda.” According to the resolution, any Republican candidate who broke with the party on three or more of these issues– in votes cast, public statements made or answering a questionnaire – would be penalized by being denied party funds or the party endorsement.

The proposed resolution was signed by 10 Republican national committee members and was distributed on Monday morning. They are asking for the resolution to be debated when Republicans gather for their winter meeting.

The resolution invokes Ronald Reagan, and noted that Mr. Reagan had said the Republican Party should be devoted to conservative principles but also be open to diverse views. President Reagan believed, the resolution notes, “that someone who agreed with him 8 out of 10 times was his friend, not his opponent.”

Hence the provision calling for cutting off Republicans who agree with the party on seven of 10 items. The resolution demands that Republicans support “smaller government, smaller national deficits and lower taxes,” denial of government funding for abortion, and “victory in Iraq and Afghanistan.” It calls on candidates to oppose amnesty for illegal immigrants and repealing of the Defense of Marriage Act.

Read more: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/23/gop-consi...



I'd say keep going GOP. Pretty soon the only people who will want to call themselves Republicans will be professional politicians, reich wing talk show hosts, and teabaggers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   We can now forget Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins an any votes.  AlinPA   Nov-23-09 04:00 PM   #1 
   Snowe and Collins are unelectable if they move too far to the right  Tempest   Nov-23-09 04:09 PM   #3 
   Wait and see . . .  h9socialist   Nov-23-09 04:48 PM   #14 
   GOP Epic Fail!  Odin2005   Nov-23-09 04:01 PM   #2 
   That should work about as well as the purity pledges fundie teenagers make,  tanyev   Nov-23-09 04:13 PM   #4 
   Ensign, Craig, Sanford are signing up.  wilt the stilt   Nov-23-09 04:17 PM   #6 
   I dunno about Craig, after all he has a wide stance  47of74   Nov-23-09 05:59 PM   #28 
   Sure, but now that sodomy is legal, they just have to further broaden the definition.  DCKit   Nov-23-09 04:54 PM   #18 
   Tell me this will have to do with purity rings!  Fearless   Nov-23-09 04:16 PM   #5 
   Call it "Anh's Law"  KamaAina   Nov-23-09 04:24 PM   #7 
   That's So Petty AND Self-Defeating  Demeter   Nov-23-09 04:29 PM   #9 
   GOP Purity Is an Oxymoron  Demeter   Nov-23-09 04:28 PM   #8 
   You've never heard of "pure stupidity"?????????  h9socialist   Nov-23-09 04:52 PM   #16 
   Political Eugenics?  wysimdnwyg   Nov-23-09 04:34 PM   #10 
   I welcome our Republicanly pure rulers!!  immoderate   Nov-23-09 04:40 PM   #11 
   Wasn't there a Reich-wing party in 1930's Germany  chollybocker   Nov-23-09 04:44 PM   #12 
   GODWIN! GODWIN! AAEEEEEIIIIEEE!!!! GODWIN!!!!!!!  Taverner   Nov-23-09 04:54 PM   #19 
      I don't have the energy to freak out or run, amok or otherwise.  SpookyCat   Nov-23-09 06:58 PM   #30 
         Yes, but you have to settle for a lollipop...  Taverner   Nov-23-09 07:05 PM   #33 
            Nom nom...grin...mmmmm...Tootsie Pop!  SpookyCat   Nov-23-09 09:36 PM   #45 
   Purity Oaths  h9socialist   Nov-23-09 04:44 PM   #13 
   They keep calling Obama "socialist."  Bette Noir   Nov-23-09 04:49 PM   #15 
   They have never known what that word really means.  harun   Nov-23-09 09:56 PM   #46 
   Yeah, if only  47of74   Nov-24-09 12:15 AM   #50 
   They should change their name to the Whig Party  Taverner   Nov-23-09 04:53 PM   #17 
   But, hey! They're nothing like Nazis  Doctor_J   Nov-23-09 04:57 PM   #20 
   fascist  fascisthunter   Nov-23-09 05:02 PM   #21 
   Whee, Just Like California's GOP's Anti-Tax Oaths, Look Where It Got Us...  TomCADem   Nov-23-09 05:13 PM   #22 
   Service oath for public servants  santamargarita   Nov-23-09 05:28 PM   #23 
   When do they get a uniform?  AlbertCat   Nov-23-09 05:36 PM   #24 
   Republicans continue march to irrelevence - lets all cheer them on!  BlueIdaho   Nov-23-09 05:52 PM   #25 
   to be fair, dont we wish we could do this?  La Lioness Priyanka   Nov-23-09 05:53 PM   #26 
   I would like to see the Democratic platform upheld by the voters,  SpookyCat   Nov-23-09 07:02 PM   #31 
   In today's GOP Regan would be considered a RINO  rpannier   Nov-23-09 05:54 PM   #27 
   And what of Barry Goldwater?  47of74   Nov-25-09 12:33 PM   #53 
   They would also see Nixon being to the left of Castro  Blue_Tires   Nov-26-09 02:49 PM   #60 
   The virgin Connie Swail for President!!!  underpants   Nov-23-09 06:32 PM   #29 
   i'd vote for her!  Blue_Tires   Nov-26-09 02:50 PM   #61 
   Purity Of Essence  Prisoner_Number_Six   Nov-23-09 07:03 PM   #32 
   Typical GOP/fundie stupidity. One thing about it, their bullshit is pure,  Blue For You   Nov-23-09 07:09 PM   #34 
   Lockstep on your collar. Shame on you.  SalmonChantedEvening   Nov-23-09 07:26 PM   #35 
   We should work this memo to all the Congress Rethugs  agentS   Nov-23-09 07:28 PM   #36 
   Yeah, THIS isn't a way for them to stay a permanent minority.  Arkana   Nov-23-09 07:29 PM   #37 
   Their purity test is stupid.  krabigirl   Nov-23-09 07:42 PM   #38 
   "If you only agree with us 7 out of 10 times, you're our enemy!" This should be fun!  struggle4progress   Nov-23-09 07:48 PM   #39 
   This from the party that objects to "litmus tests" for anti-choice candidates.  KamaAina   Nov-23-09 07:52 PM   #40 
   With perhaps the exception of Snowe and maybe Collins, they are already adhering  AlinPA   Nov-23-09 08:21 PM   #41 
   SIEG HEIL!!!!!!!!!!!  pattmarty   Nov-23-09 08:30 PM   #42 
   Why don't they quit beating around the bush and call themselves the Fascist Party?  harun   Nov-23-09 09:58 PM   #48 
   Are they going to have "Purity Balls"?  ThoughtCriminal   Nov-23-09 09:00 PM   #43 
   Your post cracked me up, lol.  harun   Nov-23-09 09:57 PM   #47 
   I guess they should start selling cocaine from Central America in order to espouse Reagan's values.  Crowman1979   Nov-23-09 09:07 PM   #44 
   Some of their items are mutually exclusive. For example if you want smaller  harun   Nov-23-09 10:00 PM   #49 
   Olbermann noted last night  semillama   Nov-24-09 11:08 AM   #51 
   Saint Ronald Reagan would be excommunicated  47of74   Nov-24-09 11:33 AM   #52 
   Why can't this be done to Lieberman?  Sub Atomic   Nov-25-09 01:00 PM   #54 
   Purity of Essense...  LeftHander   Nov-25-09 01:32 PM   #55 
   At least people know that Republican stand for something  depakid   Nov-26-09 01:40 AM   #56 
   Many here would like to see us do the same thing. n/t  Cessna Invesco Palin   Nov-26-09 01:41 AM   #57 
   Typical Conservative Black/White thinking  Thor_MN   Nov-26-09 11:35 AM   #58 
   And does the agenda for the "winter meeting"  indypaul   Nov-26-09 02:29 PM   #59 
   we can laugh and joke, and while I'm not saying this is a good thing to do,  Blue_Tires   Nov-26-09 03:09 PM   #62 
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. We can now forget Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins an any votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Snowe and Collins are unelectable if they move too far to the right

Maine is too moderate a state to accept a far right agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
h9socialist Donating Member (160 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Wait and see . . .
There are plenty of twists and turns to come. Besides, Olympia Snowe has already shown that she at least considers other points of view. That's communistic according to Glenn Beck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. GOP Epic Fail!
BWAHAHAHA!!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. That should work about as well as the purity pledges fundie teenagers make,
but ya'll go right ahead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ensign, Craig, Sanford are signing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. I dunno about Craig, after all he has a wide stance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Sure, but now that sodomy is legal, they just have to further broaden the definition.
No silly pledge will slow them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tell me this will have to do with purity rings!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Call it "Anh's Law"
for Anh "Joseph" Cao, the lone repuke who (gasp!) voted for Obama's socialist* takeover of health care.

*-not really socialist at all; RW nutjobs just like saying "socialist".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's So Petty AND Self-DefeatingUpdated at 6:24 AM
It's not like the GOP is the Catholic Church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. GOP Purity Is an OxymoronUpdated at 6:24 AM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
h9socialist Donating Member (160 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. You've never heard of "pure stupidity"?????????
How about "pure bullshit"??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wysimdnwyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Political Eugenics?
They're both solidifying and broadening their racist tendencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. I welcome our Republicanly pure rulers!!
For a moment there, I thought it was moral purity! Whew! :rofl:

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wasn't there a Reich-wing party in 1930's Germany
that also demanded Purity Pledges?


:hide:
(I didn't say Naz*)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. GODWIN! GODWIN! AAEEEEEIIIIEEE!!!! GODWIN!!!!!!!
Edited on Mon Nov-23-09 04:55 PM by Taverner
Quick! Run amok! Someone said the N (no dipshit, the other one) word and now we have to freak out!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpookyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Mon Nov-23-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. I don't have the energy to freak out or run, amok or otherwise.
Can I just scoff derisively?

(phh-AH!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Yes, but you have to settle for a lollipop...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpookyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Mon Nov-23-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. Nom nom...grin...mmmmm...Tootsie Pop!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
h9socialist Donating Member (160 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. Purity Oaths
I urge the Republicans to use more of them. They should kick out anyone to the Left of Rush Limbaugh! Make sure it's a club of Patricians and closed minded old white guys!

The problem here is that they already are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. They keep calling Obama "socialist."
I do not think this word means what they think it means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
46. They have never known what that word really means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Nov-24-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
50. Yeah, if only
If only Obama and the Democrats were socialist then you'd see some real changes being shoved through for health care, gay rights, etc etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. They should change their name to the Whig Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. But, hey! They're nothing like Nazis
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Mon Nov-23-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. fascist
Edited on Mon Nov-23-09 05:02 PM by fascisthunter
the Republican Party is more like a cult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. Whee, Just Like California's GOP's Anti-Tax Oaths, Look Where It Got Us...
Oh yeah, on the brink of bankruptcy.

Carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Mon Nov-23-09 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. Service oath for public servants
I swear: I will be faithful and obedient to Adolf Hitler (Ronald Reagan), leader of the German (American) state and people, to observe the law (Ha Ha), and to conscientiously fulfill my official duties, so help me God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Mon Nov-23-09 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. When do they get a uniform?
Chickenhawks love a uniform!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
25. Republicans continue march to irrelevence - lets all cheer them on!
Let's here it for ideological purity everyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
26. to be fair, dont we wish we could do this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpookyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Mon Nov-23-09 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I would like to see the Democratic platform upheld by the voters,
not by some sort of Party Purity Pledge, and especially not something one must sign.

And yes, I do personally think there are planks in our platform that should not be sawed in half. That's a crap metaphor, but I'm powerful tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
27. In today's GOP Regan would be considered a RINO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-25-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
53. And what of Barry Goldwater?
He'd be even more so in the eyes of the reich wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Nov-26-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
60. They would also see Nixon being to the left of Castro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. The virgin Connie Swail for President!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Nov-26-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
61. i'd vote for her!
actually, Ms. Paul is pretty active in liberal/environmental causes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. Purity Of Essence
...not to mention our precious bodily fluids...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue For You (434 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
34. Typical GOP/fundie stupidity. One thing about it, their bullshit is pure,
grade-A bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
35. Lockstep on your collar. Shame on you.
When Loyalthy Oaths meet Purity Balls you know the end is near for these peole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agentS (729 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
36. We should work this memo to all the Congress Rethugs
If they're gonna vote no on 7 out of 10 items anyway automatically to meet this ideological purity standard, then perhaps they should just put a heavy book on top of their no voting button and stay home.

Why bother showing up for debate and votes if your vote is automatically no on everything? You can have a robot or intern or homeless guy do that for you instead?

Should the Dems consider a similar pledge for candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. Yeah, THIS isn't a way for them to stay a permanent minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
38. Their purity test is stupid.
Edited on Mon Nov-23-09 07:43 PM by krabigirl
They don't even realize what a failure it is..increase troops, more wars, less taxes? borrow and spend like crazy for these wars. lol, is it 2002 again or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Mon Nov-23-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
39. "If you only agree with us 7 out of 10 times, you're our enemy!" This should be fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
40. This from the party that objects to "litmus tests" for anti-choice candidates.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
41. With perhaps the exception of Snowe and maybe Collins, they are already adhering
to the purity rules. No big deal except it will be written down in that 10 commandments form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
42. SIEG HEIL!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. Why don't they quit beating around the bush and call themselves the Fascist Party?
Edited on Mon Nov-23-09 09:58 PM by harun
It would be the only honest thing they've done in the last 10 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
43. Are they going to have "Purity Balls"?
Complete with prom dresses and pledge they will stay pure for Daddy (Haliburton, Exxon,...)?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Your post cracked me up, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
44. I guess they should start selling cocaine from Central America in order to espouse Reagan's values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Nov-23-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
49. Some of their items are mutually exclusive. For example if you want smaller
national deficits you can't afford to occupy Iraq and Afghanistan. So if anyone supports occupying those countries they are for bigger deficits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
semillama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Nov-24-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
51. Olbermann noted last night
That Reagan himself would only meet 4 of the ten qualifications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Nov-24-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Saint Ronald Reagan would be excommunicated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-25-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
54. Why can't this be done to Lieberman?
Oh that's right. Harry Reid is a fucking pussy and traitor to the Democratic Party.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-25-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
55. Purity of Essense...
"I like it!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Nov-26-09 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
56. At least people know that Republican stand for something
unhinged as it is. The same isn't true about Democrats, who've never seen an issue or interest that some of them wouldn't sell out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Nov-26-09 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
57. Many here would like to see us do the same thing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Nov-26-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
58. Typical Conservative Black/White thinking
Conservatives are boolean, it's true/false, no possible shades of gray. They oppose any solutions that do not solve 100% of a problem (unless they suggest them, they have no issues with hypocrisy).

Want to drive a conservative crazy? Refuse to answer 100% yes or no. Qualify your answers, giving cases where the answer may be different.

I'm hoping that the two nuts of the teabagger party (Palin and Bachmann) can siphon off enough off the loonies, diluting the GOP base and allowing them to return to a weakened, but not totally ridiculous, political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indypaul Donating Member (733 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Nov-26-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
59. And does the agenda for the "winter meeting"
also include scheduling a "night of the long knives"
after these responses are reviewed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Nov-26-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
62. we can laugh and joke, and while I'm not saying this is a good thing to do,
Edited on Thu Nov-26-09 03:15 PM by Blue_Tires
at the end of the day we all know damn well when the GOP leadership cracks its whip, everyone from moderates to extremes get in line to take orders (which they carry out faithfully without doubt or negotiation)...

no matter as a minority or majority, the GOP's "us-against-the-world" bunker mentality has been a huge obstacle to overcome (especially since there are too many dems in congress who appease and enable it)...when given marching orders from up top, the GOP lackeys NEVER publicly ask "How will this play in my district?" or "We must include the other side of the aisle and other stakeholders in this decision", or "What do the most recent polls say?" or "What about the costs involved?" or most importantly, "What if we're wrong about this??"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb 10th 2010, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC