|
|
|
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
sabra
|
Mon Nov-02-09 01:16 PM Original message |
| (Sen.) Burris continues to be thorn ("will only vote for a bill with a strong public option") | ![]() |
| Refresh | +82 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| |
WatchWhatISay
|
Mon Nov-02-09 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. And this from the most liberal major channel out there |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 01:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 5. MSNBC is NOT a liberal network. It hired Keith Olberman after |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Prophet 451
|
Mon Nov-02-09 04:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 20. MSNBC is the MOST liberal network |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis
|
Mon Nov-02-09 07:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 36. NBC IS THE MOST HONEST FEED |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| pundaint
(261 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 01:23 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 83. Faint praise indeed! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| PatrynXX
(514 posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 07:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 40. In response to Fox, MSNBC is the most liberal network on the air. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Prophet 451
|
Mon Nov-02-09 08:08 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 42. Sure |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| idrahaje
(8 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 01:10 AM Response to Reply #42 |
| 68. Miss the old days... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 07:40 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 75. Sorry no. MSNBC is a conservative network that hired three liberal hosts |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Prophet 451
|
Tue Nov-03-09 08:59 AM Response to Reply #75 |
| 79. Having 3 liberal hosts... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LynneSin
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 22. And guess what - they are still the most liberal network out there |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
truedelphi
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:43 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 27. Even people like Olbermann turn to people like Howard Fineman |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| depakid
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:45 PM Original message |
| Relatively speaking- that's how it's ended up |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
GoCubsGo
|
Mon Nov-02-09 08:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 45. Countdown premiered in March 31, 2003 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
pennylane100
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. wow, did harry see that coming. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bjobotts
|
Mon Nov-02-09 07:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 38. Don't worry. The only group the WH strong-arms are liberal progresives. so they'll whip into line |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
bjobotts
|
Mon Nov-02-09 07:35 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 39. But since Rurris isn't seeking re-election or going for employment with Ins. comp.??? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Burris has the freedom to do this because, supposedly, he will not run for election. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Bette Noir
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 10. Yes, there's power in lame duckitude. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| vssmith
(835 posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 31. We need 59 more lame ducks then |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| pundaint
(261 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 01:29 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 84. Keep Sanders and Franken, give the newbe from MA a chance: 96 more |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 07:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 74. I don't know about power, but there is freedom to follow your conscience, rather than |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BumRushDaShow
|
Mon Nov-02-09 03:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 12. OMG |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| IsItJustMe
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 03:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 17. You got that right. He has nothing to loose and vote the way he really feels about the situation. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ooglymoogly
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 25. The beat of the windshield wiper is a powerful thing. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
|
Mon Nov-02-09 10:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 61. Burris intended to run for reelection and only withdrew when his funding was low. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
earcandle
|
Mon Nov-02-09 11:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 64. My Mom loved this song! Thanks for the memory. | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
whathehell
|
Tue Nov-03-09 08:47 AM Response to Reply #3 |
| 77. Yeah..We get it.......But the important thing at the moment is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| SandWalker1984
(228 posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. We can only hope Sen Burris sticks to his promise |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| joeycola
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 11. and I hope he gets other Dem Senators to follow him. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
John Q. Citizen
|
Mon Nov-02-09 03:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 15. The PO needs to be structured so that people will want to enroll. As of now it will cost more for |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
saracat
|
Tue Nov-03-09 12:41 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 81. He is a good man. Thank god he still has a vote. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| chadmak09
(91 posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 09:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 52. +1 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| subterranean
(825 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 12:01 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 67. There will be standards for coverage, deductibles and cost sharing. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
natrat
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. and now it is clear why rham, obama and crew were so against him |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
John Q. Citizen
|
Mon Nov-02-09 03:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 16. Yep, Burris isn't a corporate stooge, apparently. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
truedelphi
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 28. The one certain thing about the "HCR" bill is that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
harkadog
|
Mon Nov-02-09 06:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 32. Judging from the posts most of DU was against him also |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
|
Mon Nov-02-09 10:39 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 60. Isn't it odd how people forget that? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| no limit
|
Mon Nov-02-09 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Let's just hope nobody offers to buy his vote otherwise, a vote is a fucking valuable thing |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 02:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. LOL. I'm sure Burris has had some offers. I think he came out insisting on the strong |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| no limit
|
Mon Nov-02-09 02:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. Hey, now there is an idea. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
whathehell
|
Tue Nov-03-09 08:48 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 78. Yeah..I think it's called "term limits" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Fearless
|
Mon Nov-02-09 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. GOOD! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Alhena
|
Mon Nov-02-09 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. Does he mean he will fillibuster? If not, then his vote is meaningless |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
t0dd
|
Mon Nov-02-09 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. What a lame title. This man is a hero for vowing to do this. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| ej510
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 04:17 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 19. Thank God for Roland Burris! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| GreenTea
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:35 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 24. I ABSOLUTELY AGEED!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
LaPera
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 08:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 43. I'm with you & Burris all the way - He is a standing up for what is right... | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Oerdin
(907 posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. I'd rather torpedo the whole thing. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| backscatter712
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. GOOD!!! Bout time we got some pressure from our side! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ChicagoSuz219
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. I wish people would stop drawing lines in the sand!! We need this bill to go through!! nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Divine Discontent
|
Mon Nov-02-09 06:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 34. he's fighting for the most progressive bill he can. I commend him for it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ChicagoSuz219
|
Mon Nov-02-09 07:28 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 37. I appreciate the sentiments just don't want the bill to tank... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
closeupready
|
Mon Nov-02-09 09:32 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 56. At the same time, if they pass a take-out menu called "Health Care Reform", then we get nothing and |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ChicagoSuz219
|
Mon Nov-02-09 11:07 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 62. I know you believe that... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
earcandle
|
Mon Nov-02-09 11:25 PM Response to Reply #62 |
| 66. you must already have insurance to say that. | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ChicagoSuz219
|
Tue Nov-03-09 02:12 AM Response to Reply #66 |
| 71. Yeah... after 5 years of no insurance, I do... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
saracat
|
Tue Nov-03-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #62 |
| 82. You really "trust" any of these folks to do that? Seriously? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Laelth
|
Mon Nov-02-09 09:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 55. No we don't. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| chadmak09
(91 posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 10:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 57. why?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
dflprincess
|
Mon Nov-02-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 58. This is not the bill we need |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
placton
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. how can he oppose Obama? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ooglymoogly
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. KR...I have stood with this man from the beginning of his rocky road |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jacksonian
|
Mon Nov-02-09 07:24 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 35. yes indeed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Fire1
|
Mon Nov-02-09 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Say what you will about Roland Burris but he's Aces in my book! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Vidar
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 41. Who knew that Burris would be the one to stand up & say: "The emperor |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| fascisthunter
|
Mon Nov-02-09 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 44. Good! (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HughMoran
|
Mon Nov-02-09 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 46. We found a use for this guy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
madrchsod
|
Mon Nov-02-09 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 47. i support him 100% |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| jasonbarrett
(1 posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 48. It takes no genius to see that |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
clixtox
|
Tue Nov-03-09 10:22 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 86. Great first DU post! Welcome aboard and please keep posting... N/T |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| Kermitt Gribble
|
Mon Nov-02-09 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 49. A thorn?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| sharesunited
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. Vanity and ambition step aside. Here comes principle? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| chadmak09
(91 posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 51. I hope burris hold his ground and blocks this bill |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| idrahaje
(8 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 01:14 AM Response to Reply #51 |
| 69. He's always been in for a surprise. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
closeupready
|
Mon Nov-02-09 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 53. Good for you, Burris! You go - truth to power. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Laelth
|
Mon Nov-02-09 09:21 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 54. +1 n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Unvanguard
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Nov-02-09 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 59. Will he filibuster, though? That's what counts. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rpannier
|
Mon Nov-02-09 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 63. I opposed him and the way he lied/misrepresented certain facts about his assoc with Blago |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
earcandle
|
Mon Nov-02-09 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 65. Thanks Senator Burris! | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| maglatinavi
(448 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 70. Burris |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Ganja Ninja
|
Tue Nov-03-09 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 72. We could only hope they were all as big a thorns. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
GinaMaria
|
Tue Nov-03-09 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
| 73. That's not a thorn in my book |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Krashkopf
(763 posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
| 76. Thank you Sen. Burris! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
global1
|
Tue Nov-03-09 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
| 80. You All Understand That Whatever Happens It's A Win-Win For The Insurance...... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| classysassy
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Nov-03-09 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 85. Give um heck Roland |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Nov 23rd 2009, 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC