|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
kpete
|
Sun Nov-01-09 10:13 AM Original message |
| A changed race (Scozzafava Tells Supporters To Vote For Dem) Owens is best-equipped to represent NNY | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
saltpoint
|
Sun Nov-01-09 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
| 1. What a hell of a mess. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tsuki
|
Sun Nov-01-09 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
| 2. Wow. The comments say it all. When you LaFarge the Eisenhower/Rockefeller |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob
|
Sun Nov-01-09 11:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 124. Interesting allusion to Marie Lafarge, executed in France in 1852. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tsuki
|
Mon Nov-02-09 10:19 AM Response to Reply #124 |
| 143. Article confusion. Meant DeFarge. Sorry for the confusion. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob
|
Tue Nov-03-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #143 |
| 145. Ah, the Dickens character from Tale of Two Cities. Thanks. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Nov-02-09 03:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 131. Rockefellers and Eisenhowers are now Democrats, along with some Goldwaters. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adamuu
|
Sun Nov-01-09 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 3. Awesome! n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8
|
Sun Nov-01-09 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
| 4. I'm afraid that changes the race into a 2-person race, making it harder for Owens. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MidwestTransplant
|
Sun Nov-01-09 10:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. They are still North East Republicans. Hopefully the don't want Palin wingnuts representing them |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WePurrsevere
|
Sun Nov-01-09 11:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. IMO this is the key... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
|
Sun Nov-01-09 06:09 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 117. we have a supermajority in NYS |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MidwestTransplant
|
Mon Nov-02-09 02:14 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 130. Yeah supposedly NY will lose a congressional seat after teh 2010 census. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OswegoAtheist
|
Sun Nov-01-09 10:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 8. Anecdotal evidence follows: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8
|
Sun Nov-01-09 08:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 122. I hope you're right. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| quiller4
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 13. Actually the local press speculates that most of the conservatives |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8
|
Sun Nov-01-09 08:44 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 123. A win is a win, even a narrow one. I hope that's what happens. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sadbear
(92 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
| 5. Fox Opinion was telling it different yesterday |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Demoiselle
|
Sun Nov-01-09 11:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
| 11. Yeah. I heard she threw her support to Hoffman yesterday, too... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| katanalori
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 22. FUX - THEY LIE! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama
|
Sun Nov-01-09 04:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 113. Yeah... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SpiralHawk
|
Sun Nov-01-09 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
| 7. The Spiritual character of NY 23 - Native perspective |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WePurrsevere
|
Sun Nov-01-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
| 10. We live very close to Akwesasne and |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarLeftFist
(911 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
| 12. Republicans held that district for over 100+ years. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| quiller4
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 14. but the district went for Obama in 2008 and Bush just barely held it in 2004. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| harmonicon
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. instant run-off voting would make this a non-issue |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69
|
Sun Nov-01-09 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. No shit. Gotta go rag on a friend on Facebook now who told me Hoffman was a shoe in now heh. | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
|
Mon Nov-02-09 02:01 AM Response to Reply #16 |
| 129. ... “Since announcing the suspension of my campaign, I have thought long and hard about what i... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana
|
Sun Nov-01-09 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. This is huge! It shows that Ms Scozzafava actually has some |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
|
Sun Nov-01-09 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Owens is a shitty Democrat--if I were in the 23rd I might have voted |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TeaBagsAreForCups
(48 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:49 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 23. Absolutely correct - this Dem is a waste... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OswegoAtheist
|
Sun Nov-01-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #18 |
| 108. I am in the 23rd |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harry_pothead
|
Sun Nov-01-09 06:30 PM Response to Reply #108 |
| 118. I don't live in NY23, but doesn't a vote for DeDe instead of Owens at this point only help Hoffman? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OswegoAtheist
|
Mon Nov-02-09 09:45 AM Response to Reply #118 |
| 142. yes. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Nov-02-09 04:03 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 132. Tell him. And, if he wins, primary him next time. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
|
Mon Nov-02-09 10:36 AM Response to Reply #132 |
| 144. I don't live in the 23rd--I live in Massachusetts and my rep is awesome. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. United Auto Workers endorsement..goes to Owen.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. A Republican told Republicans to VOTE DEM? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. "lightning speed" is the new talking point? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. BREAKING: Scozzafava suspends NY 23 campaign |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SpiralHawk
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 25. Hmmmmm - Republicon Family Values behind this? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DumbBassRepublicans
(96 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #25 |
| 81. Scozzafava drops out... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine1967
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 26. So the race is now between a Dem and a teabagger? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 39. Further and further to the right do they slip. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 40. IMO, the Democrats should take the blame for their own moves. If Democrats insist |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 47. Trouble is, the Democratic Party has been split for a long time |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Nov-02-09 04:11 AM Response to Reply #47 |
| 133. Yep, which is why I never blame Republicrats for the shortcomings of Demlicans, or vice versa. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 27. Interesting indeed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CitizenLeft
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 32. I can't remember who said it last night, but... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 37. But they aren't unelectable if this teabagger wins |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CitizenLeft
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 44. no, he meant statewide and nationally... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 51. I certainly hope he is right |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| earthside
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #37 |
| 65. But isn't Kansas an example ...? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #65 |
| 69. We have had several Democrats as governor |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frisbee
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 82. It was Chris Kofinas (sp?) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 84. Then he can have Hoffman in his district. I don't want him. | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pink-o
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 87. That was Chris Kofinis talking to O'Donnell on Olbermann. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheWraith
|
Sun Nov-01-09 02:13 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 107. It's a win win for us, really. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pattmarty
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #27 |
| 41. From what I'm hearing the district has been Republican for like.............. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CitizenLeft
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 46. that's what I meant too (above). |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 54. I live in a district that has been red for a hundred years too but we have a Dem rep |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 57. yes, NY 23 is republican but |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #57 |
| 85. As I said in another thread. I can't be as confident about the not "wacko" part. | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Jim Lane
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 95. Obama carried the district (although narrowly) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Captain Hilts
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:57 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 28. Sux to be a Republican. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MonteLukast
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 30. Sux to try to make it as a Repug when you're a woman |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Captain Hilts
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 43. Yeah. I really wonder the level of dissociation, if that's the word, of folks like Snowe and her. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| graywarrior
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 29. OMG, dems will be running against complete lunatics in 2012. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 45. One thing I learned from Dummya. Never misunderestimate the enemy, no |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DumbBassRepublicans
(96 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #45 |
| 80. Dubya's Legacy... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pennylane100
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 31. naybe she hopes her moderate supporters will go for the democrat |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joanne98
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 33. She probably got death threats from the Palin mob. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 34. The comments are PRICELESS, these Puke fucks think this is the beginning of a comeback |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #34 |
| 38. Half of them are confident, the other half scared to death, and both halves are fighting over it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 42. Their stupidity is priceless............ |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 35. The conservative candidate knows nothing about local issues. He doesn't |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 49. S/he doesn't have to know about local issues. God and "no new taxes" are |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ldf
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 63. god, guns and faggots |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| smalll
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 11:33 PM Response to Reply #63 |
| 125. Yeah, they're just a bunch of bitter clingers. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Nov-02-09 04:43 AM Response to Reply #125 |
| 137. Trillions spent on wars are a lot ess affordable than trillions spent on |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Nov-02-09 04:22 AM Response to Reply #63 |
| 134. Ditto vijayjays. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 53. Dumb question I know but how does a person who doesn't live in the district run for office |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dennis Donovan
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 56. He rents a travel trailer in Gouverneur... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 58. Well I know you don't have to live in district in CA. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 92. Congressional districts aren't written into the Constitution |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
|
Sun Nov-01-09 07:03 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 121. He would have until 12-31-09 to move into the district |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dennis Donovan
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #35 |
| 55. In all fairness, he lives on the edge of the district in Lake Placid... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #55 |
| 64. I hope the Dem is exploiting his opponent's ignorance. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| brooklynite
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 36. Not sure how to forecast this... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Salviati
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 62. Although I bet some of the institutional rebubs will defect as well... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| rogerashton
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 48. It's a purge |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 70. They've done this before. Nixon got rid of the Rockefeller repubs. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 50. Is this a traditional time for dropping out of races? I read only yesterday or so about Newsom. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| onehandle
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 52. Hey, Teabaggers. No reason to stay in the GOP. The Conservative party is the future! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 59. Michael Steele is smiling as he presides over the death of his own party... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #59 |
| 61. OMG!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redwitch
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #59 |
| 90. Aww! Michael Steele is so cute! And so tech savvy! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nod factor
(48 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 60. I wish |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
adamuu
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #60 |
| 67. We tried it -- we had a successful primary challenge against Lieberman, for one |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OswegoAtheist
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 66. FFFFFUUUUU- |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joanne98
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 68. Chairman of the Independence Party just endorsed Owens., |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alofarabia
(65 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 71. Scozzafava quits NY-23 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine1967
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 72. Link here: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine1967
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 73. sorry double post... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| alofarabia
(65 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 74. If she doesn't endorse Hoffman that could help |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #74 |
| 75. I have NEVER heard of anyone's endorsement mattering one bit. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| FVZA_Colonel
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #75 |
| 94. Some, but will it be enough? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 76. The sleeping giant has been awoken-have fun controlling those tea baggers Republicans |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Nov-02-09 04:33 AM Response to Reply #76 |
| 135. As much fun as we have controlling the Blue Dogs, perhaps? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OswegoAtheist
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 77. Scozzafava throws in the towel? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dennis Donovan
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #77 |
| 78. I'm crossing my fingers for my former neighbors in Oswego... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #77 |
| 79. This was posted here earlier today and is on the Front Page: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 83. so much for running in the middle---or even close to it---wackos clearly in control now |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| SnakeEyes
(155 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #83 |
| 86. The suprising part |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Nov-02-09 04:40 AM Response to Reply #86 |
| 136. Not all that surprising if a Con is running against a Purple Snake in a traditionally Pub district. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pink-o
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 88. Most repigs have total reactionary loyalty to their party |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joanne98
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 89. Owens compares Hoffman to former President Bush |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ed76638
(224 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 91. Goddamnit |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 93. So, basically, she just got "Lamonted" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #93 |
| 97. not at all the same---Ned Lamont was the elected Dem candidate |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Justess
(17 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #97 |
| 100. Well, there |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #97 |
| 106. I was thinking of the prominent national Dems who backed Traitor Joe |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Nov-02-09 04:55 AM Response to Reply #93 |
| 138. Very useful new verb. Thanks. Just to add: The Republican Party's supporting a |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomCADem
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 96. Amazing - The Republicans Are Getting Even More Extreme |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 98. The lunatics are throwing out the last few reasonable people. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 99. Good, I hope they keep their idealogical purge going... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 101. Last Minute Polls had the Teabagger ahead, I wouldn't be too hopeful | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeff In Milwaukee
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #101 |
| 102. We don't lose on this one... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JCMach1
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #102 |
| 103. That is true... let them elect more crazies... | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
|
Mon Nov-02-09 05:15 AM Response to Reply #101 |
| 139. Not surprising that Pubs would rather vote for a Con than a Blue Dog. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| majamay
(51 posts)
|
Sun Nov-01-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 104. Although not necessarily, this may boost the Democrats' chances |