Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Financial overhaul bill gets wary reception

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:09 PM
Original message
Financial overhaul bill gets wary reception
Source: Yahoo

WASHINGTON (AP) -- An Obama administration plan to dissolve large, struggling financial firms rather than bail them out is encountering Republican resistance, Democratic doubts and only qualified support from regulators.

At a House Financial Services hearing Thursday, lawmakers from both parties worried that the proposal would give regulators and the executive branch unprecedented power.

"I'm not a man that fears this administration or you," Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa., told Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. "But I do fear the accumulation of power exercised by someone in the future that can be extraordinary."


Read more: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Financial-overhaul-bill-gets-apf-3530908886.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode=



Obama has great ideas. It is too bad he is being sabotaged by people in his own party. Just as his plans for health care were watered down by the Blue Dog traitors, you can expect the same from this group to protect their banking friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly when then, do we start to hold "Bill" Obama accountable for the economy, healthcare, etc???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. The FDIC Chairwoman had a point
Focusing the power in the Treasury and the Federal Reserve might not be the best idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yeah, but it's still better than focusing the power in Wall Street,
like it is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's what happen to Clinton, his own party was the majority & fought him at every turn....
Edited on Thu Oct-29-09 07:27 PM by GreenTea
including health care for all....and that's when the republicans moved in after two years later of Dems fighting Clinton the republicans took over the majority for the next 14 fucking years....Dem's just don't learn or care about their mistakes they always fight each other instead of moving along with progressive legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Forced liquidation sounds fine to me
Too big to fail needs to end. I don't see how this is any worse than FDIC closing troubled banks. I have seen no such concern about the FDIC's current powers and there is nothing wrong with expanding it to wind down larger financial firms as well. The status quo simply can't stand. We can't afford it, and we know big business is going to continue to abuse this socialized losses/privatized profits system unless it is changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earcandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. How can we help Obama?
Get rid of the Blue-dogs, now that we know they are there, and
who they are! 
When are they up for re-election?  Or can we recall them?  Or
impeach them? 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. So the answer to concentrated power is more concentrated power?
Edited on Thu Oct-29-09 10:26 PM by Psephos
Treasury Dept. isn't exactly inspiring a lot of faith in me these days.

I'd like to see a different approach. This one seems half-designed by the corporatists it deems to "regulate" and half-designed by those who have been handling public business with no transparency.

TARP has soured me deeply. Who even knows what's off the books and behind the doors in Treasury's backing of esoteric swaps and derivatives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimator Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-30-09 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. more good cop bad cop bullshit
none of these people have any intention of reforming anything
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC