kpete
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 12:53 PM
Original message |
| White House: Fox News Is 'A Wing Of The Republican Party' |  |
 |
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 12:57 PM by kpete
Source: Talking Points MemoWhite House: Fox News Is 'A Wing Of The Republican Party' Ben Frumin | October 11, 2009, 12:22PM White House Communications Director Anita Dunn slammed Fox News in an interview on CNN with Howie Kurtz this morning, saying that Fox News "is more a wing of the Republican Party" than an objective news organization. "The reality of it is that Fox News often operates almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party," Dunn said. But this morning, Dunn seems to have taken the White House's criticism of Fox News to the next level. For instance, she said that when President Obama talks to Fox News, he approaches it differently than other cable networks. *** When he goes on Fox, he understands he's not going on it really as a news network at this point, he's going on to debate the opposition.Read more: http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/white-...
Fox News is wing of the Republican Party VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWoc3PQiweQ&feature=play...
|

Bravo, Ms. Dunn! |
Kahuna |
Oct-11-09 12:56 PM |
#1 |
 
She was right on |
Farzan |
Oct-11-09 05:48 PM |
#76 |
  
I think you mean "beyond help" |
Wednesdays |
Oct-12-09 07:29 AM |
#138 |
 
"Brava" actually. |
YOY |
Oct-11-09 06:54 PM |
#86 |
  
I actually did know that. But I find it rude to do something in |
Kahuna |
Oct-12-09 07:38 AM |
#140 |
 
Naw. I believe you. |
YOY |
Oct-12-09 08:06 AM |
#142 |
 
As someone who also graduated from The School of Smartassery.... |
zanne |
Oct-12-09 10:07 AM |
#151 |
 
Finally, someone who tells the truth about Fox News! |
MindandSoul |
Oct-11-09 10:27 PM |
#104 |
  
And someone officially from the WHITE HOUSE! YEAH! |
Kablooie |
Oct-12-09 01:00 AM |
#120 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-12-09 01:02 PM |
#165 |

It's sad that we have to praise them for stating the obvious |
Stargleamer |
Oct-11-09 12:58 PM |
#2 |

Wow, spines and sharply honed tongues are breaking out all over. |
kestrel91316 |
Oct-11-09 12:58 PM |
#3 |
 
All they needed was some demonstrated leadership |
Mosaic |
Oct-11-09 04:21 PM |
#57 |

Well said. nt |
Captain Hilts |
Oct-11-09 12:59 PM |
#4 |

The White House should throw Fox News out of the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room... |
onehandle |
Oct-11-09 12:59 PM |
#5 |
 
Absolutely correct on that thought...n/t |
monmouth |
Oct-11-09 01:10 PM |
#7 |
  
I hope they do. Maybe that will start forcing the "MSM" to start being a little more honest. nt |
The Hope Mobile |
Oct-11-09 01:50 PM |
#18 |
 
So the way to make the MSM more honest is threaten to cut off their access if you dont like them? |
no limit |
Oct-12-09 10:01 AM |
#148 |
 
That worked VERY well during the Bush years. |
zanne |
Oct-12-09 10:09 AM |
#152 |
 
Right, and instead of fixing the system lets continue to abuse it |
no limit |
Oct-12-09 12:24 PM |
#163 |
 
Fox makes no attempt to be accurate with the truth. That should |
The Wielding Truth |
Oct-11-09 03:18 PM |
#40 |
  
Actually if they would just admit that they are a right-wing network that serves the GOP... |
onehandle |
Oct-11-09 03:53 PM |
#48 |
   
Where is a "liberal" news outlet? |
sendero |
Oct-11-09 04:44 PM |
#61 |
  
I think that The Nation and Huffington Post have White House Press Credentials |
Hippo_Tron |
Oct-11-09 05:00 PM |
#64 |
   
Right... |
sendero |
Oct-11-09 07:21 PM |
#89 |
  
Several |
demconservative |
Oct-11-09 09:44 PM |
#99 |
  
LOL. Yeah, Scarborough is super liberal. And so is Dobbs. |
tishaLA |
Oct-11-09 11:13 PM |
#109 |
  
Riiiight - a couple hours in the evening M-F on ONE network is the equivalent of 24/7/365... |
TankLV |
Oct-12-09 12:04 AM |
#115 |
   
Whammo...LOL |
Hubert Flottz |
Oct-12-09 05:24 AM |
#129 |
  
Too bad, I was hoping to have some fun with that one before they pulled his plug. |
Lasher |
Oct-12-09 09:57 AM |
#147 |
  
Yes, and they're messy. |
zanne |
Oct-12-09 10:12 AM |
#153 |
  
Who finishes his or her job, faster than anyone in the history |
Hubert Flottz |
Oct-12-09 12:48 PM |
#164 |
  
Yes, it's always a short read. n/t |
Lasher |
Oct-12-09 03:15 PM |
#172 |
  
With the exception of four |
Enthusiast |
Oct-12-09 04:51 AM |
#126 |
  
NBC and all of it's networks are owned by GE . . . so . . . no. |
HughBeaumont |
Oct-12-09 07:02 AM |
#135 |
  
Go back to Freerepublic with your idiotic tripe about "lib'rul media." |
Tutankhamun |
Oct-12-09 02:19 PM |
#170 |
  
You're.... |
sendero |
Oct-12-09 07:06 PM |
#174 |
  
TWT,that used to be the "law." |
dotymed |
Oct-12-09 05:31 AM |
#130 |
   
And today's political polarization was a direct result. |
Lasher |
Oct-12-09 09:54 AM |
#146 |
  
+1 |
shadowknows69 |
Oct-12-09 01:27 PM |
#168 |
 
I'd prefer that they keep one Faux shill in the room and... |
hvn_nbr_2 |
Oct-11-09 04:03 PM |
#51 |
 
Not just the White House. |
Golden Raisin |
Oct-11-09 04:52 PM |
#62 |
  
Or... |
GMA |
Oct-11-09 06:52 PM |
#85 |
  
Boycott Faux News! |
MindandSoul |
Oct-11-09 10:31 PM |
#105 |
 
Couldn't agree more. |
Vidar |
Oct-12-09 07:08 PM |
#175 |

Yes! |
drm604 |
Oct-11-09 01:07 PM |
#6 |

Talk about the worst kept secret in American Poultices. |
Mr. Sparkle |
Oct-11-09 01:12 PM |
#8 |
 
Shocked! Shocked to discover chickenshit at Fox. |
Piewhacket |
Oct-11-09 01:25 PM |
#13 |

I love it!!! |
jaxx |
Oct-11-09 01:21 PM |
#9 |

Well duh! I figured that out in 2002. |
Piewhacket |
Oct-11-09 01:22 PM |
#10 |

OWNED! |
Clintonista2 |
Oct-11-09 01:22 PM |
#11 |

truer words were never spoken |
samsingh |
Oct-11-09 01:23 PM |
#12 |

No doubt Fox will protest vociferously... |
AlbertCat |
Oct-11-09 01:27 PM |
#14 |
 
The louder they squeal |
Enthusiast |
Oct-11-09 03:11 PM |
#38 |
 
Actually I bet they do just the opposite. |
go west young man |
Oct-11-09 04:10 PM |
#53 |
  
NOT TWIGGY! ANYTHING BUT TWIGGY! |
Hawkeye-X |
Oct-11-09 11:07 PM |
#108 |
 
victims |
donquijoterocket |
Oct-11-09 04:59 PM |
#63 |

Fox News: bringing you a small narrow minded part of the story. |
BABarackus |
Oct-11-09 01:33 PM |
#15 |
 
Bullshit. You can't dump MSNBC in with Fox and Drudge |
WatchWhatISay |
Oct-11-09 02:31 PM |
#23 |
  
MSNBC usually says when it's editorializing |
Catshrink |
Oct-11-09 02:35 PM |
#25 |
  
Completely right |
liberalmike27 |
Oct-11-09 06:17 PM |
#80 |
   
Fox did win the right to misinform their viewers |
Stellar |
Oct-12-09 09:01 AM |
#143 |
  
Frankly it is naive to assume any source is unbiased... |
Cid_B |
Oct-12-09 05:03 AM |
#127 |
 
MSNBC hosts use FACTS and have ethics |
depakid |
Oct-11-09 02:43 PM |
#30 |
 
Faux News has a history of spewing outright lies. |
mzmolly |
Oct-11-09 02:48 PM |
#31 |
 
What a joke. |
Enthusiast |
Oct-11-09 03:14 PM |
#39 |
 
FOX will change the Republic's party affiliation from an 'R' to a 'D' |
dmr |
Oct-11-09 05:03 PM |
#65 |
 
The last time I went to CNN for news... |
zanne |
Oct-12-09 10:15 AM |
#154 |

We needa more Anita!!!!!! Ms. Dunn dunn good! |
valerief |
Oct-11-09 01:34 PM |
#16 |

YES!!! |
Fearless |
Oct-11-09 01:37 PM |
#17 |

Brava!!! |
horseshoecrab |
Oct-11-09 01:56 PM |
#19 |

Tee Hee |
Can of Whoop-ass |
Oct-11-09 02:07 PM |
#20 |
 
Welcome to DU Whoop-ass! |
givemebackmycountry |
Oct-11-09 02:32 PM |
#24 |
 
"made up stories about cigars and blue dresses"? |
WatchWhatISay |
Oct-11-09 02:38 PM |
#26 |
 
Anyone with that name should be shouted and sung to: WELCOME TO DU!!!!!!! |
calimary |
Oct-11-09 04:28 PM |
#58 |
 
Whoop-ass |
LittleGirl |
Oct-11-09 05:19 PM |
#67 |

The President said he was going to call the liars out |
liberal N proud |
Oct-11-09 02:10 PM |
#21 |

This is a Smart Move, Puts FOX on the Defensive |
YouTakeTheSkyway |
Oct-11-09 02:29 PM |
#22 |

When is Rupert going to start whining? nt |
tsuki |
Oct-11-09 02:39 PM |
#27 |

Stating the obvious |
depakid |
Oct-11-09 02:41 PM |
#28 |

K&R ...Finally!!! nt |
Thickasabrick |
Oct-11-09 02:41 PM |
#29 |

Poor, put-upon Fox. |
Beartracks |
Oct-11-09 02:56 PM |
#32 |

How many years has it taken to say this ? At least 8 ? |
graywarrior |
Oct-11-09 02:57 PM |
#33 |

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Fox dishonest??? |
Plucketeer |
Oct-11-09 02:58 PM |
#34 |

One more reason to love this White House. It's a superb team |
bleever |
Oct-11-09 02:59 PM |
#35 |

advertizers should be considered contributors to a GOP PAC. |
JohnWxy |
Oct-11-09 03:03 PM |
#36 |

Can we have a +10 multple for recs on this thread? |
HughMoran |
Oct-11-09 03:09 PM |
#37 |
 
A K&R from me - it's about time this was said out loud by the WH - everyone knows it |
AnotherMother4Peace |
Oct-11-09 03:21 PM |
#41 |

+1 for stating the obvious. |
baldguy |
Oct-11-09 03:21 PM |
#42 |

I was talking about this with my brother & s-i-l this morning how FOX is a propaganda network. |
Historic NY |
Oct-11-09 03:25 PM |
#43 |

Fair and Balanced |
YewNork |
Oct-11-09 03:30 PM |
#44 |

At least |
ut oh |
Oct-11-09 03:32 PM |
#45 |

Well I guess the meeting with scumfuck Roger Alies didn't go well |
DainBramaged |
Oct-11-09 03:34 PM |
#46 |
 
!!! |
creeksneakers2 |
Oct-11-09 04:08 PM |
#52 |

I'm not kidding I guess the meeting was for shit..... |
DainBramaged |
Oct-11-09 04:11 PM |
#54 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-11-09 05:38 PM |
#73 |

Okay becKKK, it's time to break out that 55 gallon drum of Vicks Vapo-Rub |
Submariner |
Oct-11-09 03:47 PM |
#47 |

CNN isn't much of a 'news' network, either... |
DutchLiberal |
Oct-11-09 03:53 PM |
#49 |
 
+1 mass media corporate brainwashers just hazing plebe faux in bizarre "news" initiation ritual. nt |
phasma ex machina |
Oct-11-09 08:48 PM |
#95 |
 
None of the Corporate outlets are. They are about entertainment, not news. |
harun |
Oct-12-09 09:13 AM |
#145 |

News from the "No shit, Sherlock" office of the White House |
Love Bug |
Oct-11-09 04:03 PM |
#50 |

PS if this thread doesn't get 100 recs, I'll shit a brick |
DainBramaged |
Oct-11-09 04:12 PM |
#55 |

Actually, I think that all of the news networks are just in it for the best possible ratings and... |
totodeinhere |
Oct-11-09 04:21 PM |
#56 |
 
Yep. |
emilyg |
Oct-11-09 09:54 PM |
#101 |

That is awesome .. TELL it like it fricken is.. |
AsahinaKimi |
Oct-11-09 04:36 PM |
#59 |

As Obama gains in popularity, will Fox put an (R) next to his name? |
MetaTrope |
Oct-11-09 04:37 PM |
#60 |

Of course, Faux Noose is part of the GOP, but not a wing. |
Quasimodem |
Oct-11-09 05:04 PM |
#66 |
 
Not a "wing" |
MindandSoul |
Oct-11-09 10:35 PM |
#106 |

Kurtz will not let this go--expect his next column to be a defense of Fox |
Kingofalldems |
Oct-11-09 05:23 PM |
#68 |
 
There's a reason why he won Media Whore of the Year in the early 00's |
depakid |
Oct-11-09 06:28 PM |
#83 |
 
He's already having a cow - this morning's show was hilarious to see him whine and squirm... |
TankLV |
Oct-12-09 12:16 AM |
#116 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-11-09 05:23 PM |
#69 |
 
Oh look another 'Democrat party' spouting fan of pigboy Limbaugh |
Kingofalldems |
Oct-11-09 05:42 PM |
#74 |
  
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-11-09 05:43 PM |
#75 |
 
Why don't you tell us what the republic version is? |
thelordofhell |
Oct-11-09 05:53 PM |
#77 |
 
Democratic Forum |
SoDesuKa |
Oct-11-09 05:55 PM |
#79 |

FOX News is so over-the-top about it, how could anyone... |
left of center |
Oct-11-09 05:26 PM |
#70 |

Already being spun |
joeglow3 |
Oct-11-09 05:32 PM |
#71 |

Fox cable news has high ratings... |
spin |
Oct-11-09 05:33 PM |
#72 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-11-09 05:54 PM |
#78 |
 
MSNBC is not available on Comcast cable |
doc03 |
Oct-11-09 07:39 PM |
#92 |

Discrimination! |
MindandSoul |
Oct-11-09 10:37 PM |
#107 |
 
In this area Comcast moved MSNBC over to digital |
doc03 |
Oct-11-09 11:59 PM |
#113 |

That is really screwed up. (n/t) |
spin |
Oct-11-09 11:47 PM |
#112 |

No shit ma'am. |
YOY |
Oct-11-09 06:23 PM |
#81 |
 
know new information here |
Livinson |
Oct-12-09 06:39 AM |
#133 |

Uh what? |
YOY |
Oct-12-09 08:05 AM |
#141 |

Stand Up and Fight |
FREEDOM61 |
Oct-11-09 06:25 PM |
#82 |

YES...Fox IS a tool of the GOP! |
alp227 |
Oct-11-09 06:30 PM |
#84 |

Ahhh... |
GMA |
Oct-11-09 06:58 PM |
#87 |

Sky is blue. Grass is green. The Pope is Catholic. Film at 11. |
gauguin57 |
Oct-11-09 07:13 PM |
#88 |

Anyone who hasn't known this fact for at least 10 years is either in complete denial or |
GreenTea |
Oct-11-09 07:27 PM |
#90 |

she's right on! n/t |
Claire Beth |
Oct-11-09 07:35 PM |
#91 |

It is about time that we started yelling about that naked emperor!!! |
BrklynLiberal |
Oct-11-09 07:53 PM |
#93 |

By admitting this, now you have to wonder how Fox isn't legally breaking some sort of campaign laws |
MessiahRp |
Oct-11-09 08:00 PM |
#94 |

Hmm, still nothing on Fux News about Ms. Dunn's comments as of now |
Rozlee |
Oct-11-09 08:53 PM |
#96 |
 
I'm sure they'll have on LIEberman to get the DemocRAT viewpoint... |
TankLV |
Oct-12-09 12:19 AM |
#117 |

Git 'er Dunn!! |
RoccoR5955 |
Oct-11-09 08:55 PM |
#97 |

She said whaaat? |
katsy |
Oct-11-09 09:22 PM |
#98 |

Anita Dunn is outstanding! but I read she's leaving to spend more time with her 13 y.o. son... |
Hekate |
Oct-11-09 09:51 PM |
#100 |

I love that the Democratic Party seems to be getting a little more in-your-face. |
Vickers |
Oct-11-09 10:17 PM |
#102 |

You think? |
KyleA |
Oct-11-09 10:24 PM |
#103 |

K&R |
BumRushDaShow |
Oct-11-09 11:16 PM |
#110 |

SAY IT, SISTER |
Skittles |
Oct-11-09 11:40 PM |
#111 |

About fucking time!!! |
TankLV |
Oct-12-09 12:01 AM |
#114 |

Couldn't the same thing be said about CNN? |
devilgrrl |
Oct-12-09 12:42 AM |
#118 |

I'm pretty sure this will be on the Daily Show come Monday. |
go west young man |
Oct-12-09 12:48 AM |
#119 |

YOU KNOW WHY THE FOX NEWS PROPAGANDA CHANNEL HAS HIGH RATINGS? |
Unicron1978 |
Oct-12-09 01:28 AM |
#121 |

This is like saying the sky is blue |
Harry Monroe |
Oct-12-09 02:22 AM |
#122 |

GEE, why don't you just come right out and SAY it??? |
moonbatmax |
Oct-12-09 03:17 AM |
#123 |

Ought to change the name from Fox News to Fox Lies.... |
old mark |
Oct-12-09 03:17 AM |
#124 |

Fox is indeed the Ministry of Propaganda for the anti-Americans who cluster |
SpiralHawk |
Oct-12-09 04:23 AM |
#125 |

it's a small step, but significant that a Democratic leader can acknowledge some part of reality |
yurbud |
Oct-12-09 05:20 AM |
#128 |

Wake 'em up, Ms. Dunn! |
BluDemocratGirl |
Oct-12-09 05:56 AM |
#131 |

This just in... |
Hubert Flottz |
Oct-12-09 06:03 AM |
#132 |

File this under No Shit, Sherlock! |
eridani |
Oct-12-09 06:41 AM |
#134 |

About time. |
Ganja Ninja |
Oct-12-09 07:17 AM |
#136 |

The "butt this morning..." before the continued post |
ejbr |
Oct-12-09 07:28 AM |
#137 |

OBAMA WINS ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE! WATER IS WET! |
HughBeaumont |
Oct-12-09 07:34 AM |
#139 |

The Bush White House admitted this |
Doctor_J |
Oct-12-09 09:10 AM |
#144 |

One reason the Faux Noose |
disndat |
Oct-12-09 10:03 AM |
#149 |

THANK YOU! nt |
zanne |
Oct-12-09 10:04 AM |
#150 |

Welp, how many years did that take? |
lonestarnot |
Oct-12-09 10:16 AM |
#155 |

And the rest of the MSM |
irislake |
Oct-12-09 10:23 AM |
#156 |

Does this mean the gloves are off? I hope so! N/T |
tonekat |
Oct-12-09 10:29 AM |
#157 |

What I dont understand is WHY Fox is allowed to call themselves a News Network |
mmarsh |
Oct-12-09 10:41 AM |
#158 |

he approaches it differently than other cable networks?????? |
varebel |
Oct-12-09 10:55 AM |
#159 |
 
What planet are you from? |
blossomstar |
Oct-12-09 11:17 AM |
#160 |
 
Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh . . . |
HughBeaumont |
Oct-12-09 07:17 PM |
#176 |

About time -- |
defendandprotect |
Oct-12-09 11:57 AM |
#161 |

and has been so for over 10 years. Only a fool could deny that! |
ecstatic |
Oct-12-09 12:11 PM |
#162 |

Fox once said WMD had been found in Iraq |
TomCanyon |
Oct-12-09 01:03 PM |
#166 |

Are they sure? I thought that the Republican Party was now a wing of Faux News. |
damntexdem |
Oct-12-09 01:16 PM |
#167 |

Absolutely correct |
mvd |
Oct-12-09 01:32 PM |
#169 |

The only people clueless enough not to know that are Fox News watchers. n/t |
Zorra |
Oct-12-09 02:22 PM |
#171 |

K&R |
steven johnson |
Oct-12-09 06:47 PM |
#173 |

Isn't this common knowledge by now? Glad they said it! |
katty |
Oct-12-09 08:25 PM |
#177 |

For at least 6 years. |
moondust |
Oct-12-09 08:45 PM |
#178 |
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message |
Farzan
(87 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
 |
Fox's somebody said "an increasing number of people get their news from Fox". I am not sure about "increasing" but I sure know it is not the "news" they are getting. And those who choose Fox, lets consider them lost beyond reproach and move on.
|
Wednesdays
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #76 |
| 138. I think you mean "beyond help" |
YOY
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #86 |
| 140. I actually did know that. But I find it rude to do something in |
 |
Edited on Mon Oct-12-09 07:40 AM by Kahuna
cyberspace that you would probably not due in person. I mean really? Do you go around correcting people in real life? I doubt that. That would be douche-baggery of the highest order. Take care.
P.S. For the record, you could do a search of kahuna + brava, and verify that I actually do know the proper usage. Sometimes you just want to see who has nothing better to do.
|
YOY
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #140 |
 |
And I would do it in person with a joking smart ass look on my face.
You took that smart assery a little too hard!
|
zanne
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #142 |
| 151. As someone who also graduated from The School of Smartassery.... |
 |
Smartassery doesn't often translate the same way in written form. I'm sure you didn't mean to be rude, and I'm guilty of having done the same thing myself in the past, but us smartasses have to be careful.
|
MindandSoul
(239 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 104. Finally, someone who tells the truth about Fox News! |
 |
Ms. Dunn is absolutely right! And it was time this was said loud and clear. Between her and Grayson. . .there is some hope for the Democrats yet!
|
Kablooie
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #104 |
| 120. And someone officially from the WHITE HOUSE! YEAH! |
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Stargleamer
(527 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. It's sad that we have to praise them for stating the obvious |
kestrel91316
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Wow, spines and sharply honed tongues are breaking out all over. |
Mosaic
(102 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 57. All they needed was some demonstrated leadership |
 |
And Alan Grayson provided it. I see the beginning of a new trend of progressive strength.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. The White House should throw Fox News out of the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room... |
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. Absolutely correct on that thought...n/t |
The Hope Mobile
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 18. I hope they do. Maybe that will start forcing the "MSM" to start being a little more honest. nt |
no limit
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 148. So the way to make the MSM more honest is threaten to cut off their access if you dont like them? |
zanne
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #148 |
| 152. That worked VERY well during the Bush years. |
 |
It worked for the Republican Party for a long time during that period, if you remember.
|
no limit
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #152 |
| 163. Right, and instead of fixing the system lets continue to abuse it |
 |
Edited on Mon Oct-12-09 12:24 PM by no limit
Because the dems happen to be in power (dems that do plenty of wrong). That is until the next republican is elected and then people like you will be bitching about how the white house controls the media.
Maybe I'm naive for thinking this broken system can actually be fixed.
|
The Wielding Truth
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 40. Fox makes no attempt to be accurate with the truth. That should |
 |
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 03:20 PM by The Wielding Truth
disqualify them as members of the Press. Propaganda and out and out lies are not the qualities of a professional News network that is trusted with mass communications.
|
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
| 48. Actually if they would just admit that they are a right-wing network that serves the GOP... |
 |
...I would be less concerned with them being in the Press Room.
There are conservative and liberal news outlets that are there and upfront about who they are and who they represent.
Fox News should be shunned until they admit their mission.
...and then shunned for their lies.
|
sendero
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
| 61. Where is a "liberal" news outlet? |
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #61 |
| 64. I think that The Nation and Huffington Post have White House Press Credentials |
sendero
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #64 |
demconservative
(4 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #61 |
 |
MSNBC, CNN, and most of the time the major networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) - although they jump right for variety sometimes.
|
tishaLA
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #99 |
| 109. LOL. Yeah, Scarborough is super liberal. And so is Dobbs. |
 |
NONE of those networks is 'liberal'--the major networks are centrist/corporatist. They only look left when you're peering at them from the vantage point of neoconservatives.
|
TankLV
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #99 |
| 115. Riiiight - a couple hours in the evening M-F on ONE network is the equivalent of 24/7/365... |
 |
You can take your repuke BULLSHIT and shove it up your repuke ass...
THERE IS NO "EQUIVALENCY"!!!!
|
Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #115 |
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #129 |
| 147. Too bad, I was hoping to have some fun with that one before they pulled his plug. |
zanne
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #147 |
| 153. Yes, and they're messy. |
Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #147 |
| 164. Who finishes his or her job, faster than anyone in the history |
 |
of work? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Any mind-reader who reads any republican's minute moran mind. A VERY short read indeed!(.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 Nanosecond or less)
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #164 |
| 172. Yes, it's always a short read. n/t |
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #99 |
| 126. With the exception of four |
 |
hours on MSNBC the ones you listed are either a little right of center or very right of center. CNN is nearly as blatantly right wing as Fox.
|
HughBeaumont
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #99 |
| 135. NBC and all of it's networks are owned by GE . . . so . . . no. |
 |
Edited on Mon Oct-12-09 07:03 AM by HughBeaumont
ABC is owned by that commie liberal company Disney and broadcast the Clinton hit piece The Path to 9/11. So . . . yeah, no.
CBS is owned by Viacom, which is run by conservatives. Sooooooooooooooooo . . . no.
CNN cheerleads military occupations for ratings and can best be described as right-leaning centrist, AT BEST. So . . . . no again.
There is NO liberal media.
|
Tutankhamun
(860 posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #99 |
| 170. Go back to Freerepublic with your idiotic tripe about "lib'rul media." |
 |
The media that rolled over and bent over to get Cheney/Bush installed and propagandize their wars and misdeeds is really liberal.
You need to update your talking points.
|
sendero
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #99 |
dotymed
(944 posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
| 130. TWT,that used to be the "law." |  |
 |
Sadly, since Reagan had the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE rescinded, the
Fla. supreme court has decided that "News organizations
do NOT have the responsibility to be honest." Of course.
that was a case that involved Fox "news", when some
of its employees sued them (FOX) for purposely wanting them
to distort the facts(lie). President Obama appoints the FCC
members. All he has to do is appoint a chair person who
believes that the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE should be reinstated.
Then, MSM propaganda will stop. President Obama, at one time,
said that he would not reinstate the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE. Maybe,
he has changed his mind. I really hope so. I sincerely believe
that it is responsible for the "dumbing down" of
America. The media used to be required, by law,to announce
when they were giving personal opinions instead of raw facts.
They had to give free air time to individuals with opposing
views. This insured that our country had one of the best
informed citizenry on earth. Since the reagan decision, the
truth was effectively sold to the highest bidder.."I
believe that the content of NEWS programs should be
determined by the free market"..that is why we have so
many ill informed people.I believe our education levels will
rise along with the consciousness of our citizens.
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #130 |
| 146. And today's political polarization was a direct result. |
 |
It wasn't the only factor but the degradation of our political climate can be traced back to this policy change.
|
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
hvn_nbr_2
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 51. I'd prefer that they keep one Faux shill in the room and... |
Golden Raisin
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 62. Not just the White House. |
 |
Democrats (Governors, Senators, Representatives, Mayors, etc.) should not appear on Fox, period. All they do is lend it credence and "respectability" which it has neither earned nor deserves.
|
GMA
(467 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #62 |
 |
they could show that they're grown-ups, put the message out there, regardless.
|
MindandSoul
(239 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #62 |
 |
You got a point! maybe a serious boycott by all the Democrats would make it clear that they only offer Extreme Right Wing Spin!
|
Vidar
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 175. Couldn't agree more. |
drm604
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
Mr. Sparkle
(696 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. Talk about the worst kept secret in American Poultices. |
 |
I bet the regular cracker-jack media are all in a state of shock, now that one of their sources for news has been labeled a partisan, propaganda outfit.
|
Piewhacket
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 13. Shocked! Shocked to discover chickenshit at Fox. |
jaxx
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
That ought to explode heads over at Ruperts pet project. The whine will be deafening.
|
Piewhacket
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. Well duh! I figured that out in 2002. |
Clintonista2
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
samsingh
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. truer words were never spoken |  |
AlbertCat
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. No doubt Fox will protest vociferously... |
 |
....and it will be a joke like everything else on air there.
We will enjoy their distress.
|
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 38. The louder they squeal |
go west young man
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 53. Actually I bet they do just the opposite. |
 |
They will ignore this news as they do other news that doesn't fit their agenda. I checked out their website a minute ago and they have no mention of it. They propagandize, they lie, and they obfuscate the truth. They'll prpbably spend the afternoon discussing a waterskiing squirrel instead.
|
Hawkeye-X
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #53 |
| 108. NOT TWIGGY! ANYTHING BUT TWIGGY! |
donquijoterocket
(85 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
 |
What they'll do is immediately go into the attacked messenger victimization mode, standard wingnut tactic when called out. About the only thing more boilerplate is the liberal biased media dodge which is nothing more than a portable escape hatch. There will of course be the usual number of their already brain-damaged true believers rise to their defense mindlessly mouthing the talking points pox noise and the RNC have put there, but all in all I expect that most Americans will be pleased to see the White House standing up for what it believes in. Personally I can only handle pox noise in doses of 5 minutes or less, but their reaction ought to be mildly entertaining.I might even have to check in once in a while.Maybe Glennda the Beckerhead will squeeze out a few real tears over this.
|
BABarackus
(8 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 15. Fox News: bringing you a small narrow minded part of the story. |
 |
Maybe there should be some standards set for calling it a news organization, along with new names for those who don't make the cut. eg... News: (full coverage of actual occurrences and occasional well defined editorializing)ABC, NBC, NYT, CNN etc...
Seminews: (some coverage of events with opinion and editorializing masquerading as fact)Fox News, MSNBC, Drudge report, etc...
News Parody: (making fun of the news and making stuff up)Daily Show, The Onion, etc...
|
WatchWhatISay
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 23. Bullshit. You can't dump MSNBC in with Fox and Drudge |
 |
there is certainly more editorializing on MSNBC than CNN and the networks, but that does not mean they are on par with Fox/Drudge
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 25. MSNBC usually says when it's editorializing |
 |
Faux news just spews its crap as if it is news with no differentiation. They're so used to lying and spreading the RNC talking points that I doubt anyone over there knows the difference. Maybe Shep. I like Shep.
|
liberalmike27
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
 |
While FAUX basically often tells complete lies, MSNBC, though maybe tending to be a little more to the center, today's and the corporate media's left, at least strives to put forward honest reporting.
FAUX, on the other hand, actually has won a lawsuit about its coverage of bovine growth hormone, in a Florida local station, by using the truth that "news is in no way, required by any law, to have factual coverage."
Man, that's as close to tragic as anything, but it's true. Isn't it just the damndest thing that news doesn't have to be honest, or true? They can, and do, just lie, and lie, and lie with no penalties. But show a little nipple, and you're in deep do.
|
Stellar
(70 posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #80 |
| 143. Fox did win the right to misinform their viewers |
Cid_B
(954 posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 127. Frankly it is naive to assume any source is unbiased... |
 |
Wasn't it NBC who put sparkers in their GM trucks when they crashed them in order to insure an explosion?
Seriously, everyone needs to take it all with a grain of salt and move on.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 30. MSNBC hosts use FACTS and have ethics |
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 31. Faux News has a history of spewing outright lies. |  |
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
 |
MSNBC actually has facts to back up assertions. Faux and Drudge make things up whole cloth.
|
dmr
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 65. FOX will change the Republic's party affiliation from an 'R' to a 'D' |
 |
when reporting a Republic in trouble with the law or a sex tryst.
Why would they do that on a consistent basis?
I know the answer, do you?
MSNBC, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, etc doesn't do that, ever.
|
zanne
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
| 154. The last time I went to CNN for news... |
 |
All I got was snarky reporters who were editorializing every piece of news they presented. I think it's been so long that we've seen real journalism that we don't know what it is anymore.
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. We needa more Anita!!!!!! Ms. Dunn dunn good! |
Fearless
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
horseshoecrab
(400 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
Can of Whoop-ass
(28 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 02:09 PM by Can of Whoop-ass
I figured that out in 1996 with their obsession with Clinton's Monica-gate.
FOX's stock market analysts would bring up Monica-gate; their high school reporters and fashion editors would bring it up.
"What will Bill be wearing to the Camp David meetings... by the way.....".
Their interns and cameramen would talk about bj's while collecting their bribes from the GOP.
Their caffetia workers, lawn jockies and shoe-shine boys would say, "Good morning Mr. Sean Insannity, how about President 'Stiffy' Clinton"?
Ann Coulter stated that Clinton was a pervert and made up stories about cigars and blue dresses.
And on and on and on..........
|
givemebackmycountry
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 24. Welcome to DU Whoop-ass! |
 |
If I remember (and I do) FOX News was created just to cover the Clinton administration, and they were deplorable back then and they still are today.
Just once I would like to see one of the token liberals they bring on to mock and ridicule, reach across the desk and smack the shit out of Bill-O or that smarmy piece of shit Hannity. Just knock them on their ass, and sit back and laugh and say "Fair and Balanced Mother-Fucker!"
|
WatchWhatISay
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 26. "made up stories about cigars and blue dresses"? |
calimary
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 58. Anyone with that name should be shouted and sung to: WELCOME TO DU!!!!!!! |
LittleGirl
(102 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 21. The President said he was going to call the liars out |
YouTakeTheSkyway
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 22. This is a Smart Move, Puts FOX on the Defensive |
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message |
| 27. When is Rupert going to start whining? nt |
depakid
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
Thickasabrick
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message |
Beartracks
(893 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Now the talking heads will beat their drums and their chests and complain about unfair treatment, about how out of touch the White House is, and that this kind of attitude from liberals only proves that Fox is in fact the last great bastion of objective journalism, blah blah blah. They take this kind of stuff as a badge of honor, and they'll be raising the alarm about the "fairness doctrine." 
|
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |
| 33. How many years has it taken to say this ? At least 8 ? |
Plucketeer
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 34. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Fox dishonest??? |
 |
It's too bad the Three Stooges are dead. They'd be perfect as an hour-long feature on Fox! 
|
bleever
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message |
| 35. One more reason to love this White House. It's a superb team |
 |
of thinkers and communicators.
They're not constrained by the "realities" made by the previous regime of thugs and liars.
|
JohnWxy
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 36. advertizers should be considered contributors to a GOP PAC. |
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 37. Can we have a +10 multple for recs on this thread? |
AnotherMother4Peace
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
| 41. A K&R from me - it's about time this was said out loud by the WH - everyone knows it |
baldguy
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 42. +1 for stating the obvious. |
 |
Now, what are they going to do about it? Fairness Doctrine anyone? And/Or Stricter Ownership Rules?
I won't hold my breath.
|
Historic NY
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |
| 43. I was talking about this with my brother & s-i-l this morning how FOX is a propaganda network. |
YewNork
(355 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
ut oh
(118 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 46. Well I guess the meeting with scumfuck Roger Alies didn't go well |
creeksneakers2
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
| 54. I'm not kidding I guess the meeting was for shit..... |
 |
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/10/it-has-begun-... At a time of tension between their organizations, White House senior adviser David Axelrod met with Fox News chairman and chief executive officer Roger Ailes two weeks ago, sources tell POLITICO. The two met privately in Manhattan during the president’s visit to the United Nations. The two discussed news coverage and the relationship between the organizations. An FNC spokesperson tells POLITICO that Ailes and Axelrod had a “cordial conversation” over coffee while the president was in town. Ailes is the founder of Fox News. A key part of Axelrod’s portfolio is the president’s image and broad message. White House officials have expressed pique with what they consider heavy coverage of Obama critics by opinion shows on the news channel. Obama aides showed their displeasure by omitting “Fox News Sunday” when the president granted interviews last month to the other Sunday shows.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
Submariner
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message |
| 47. Okay becKKK, it's time to break out that 55 gallon drum of Vicks Vapo-Rub |
DutchLiberal
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 49. CNN isn't much of a 'news' network, either... |
phasma ex machina
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
| 95. +1 mass media corporate brainwashers just hazing plebe faux in bizarre "news" initiation ritual. nt |
harun
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #49 |
| 145. None of the Corporate outlets are. They are about entertainment, not news. |
Love Bug
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 50. News from the "No shit, Sherlock" office of the White House |
DainBramaged
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 55. PS if this thread doesn't get 100 recs, I'll shit a brick |
totodeinhere
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 56. Actually, I think that all of the news networks are just in it for the best possible ratings and... |
 |
profits. It's not just Fox News. Fox is using a right wing agenda to milk their ratings. MSNBC is trying the opposite approach. But I believe that if Fox thought that a move to the left would increase their ratings, they would move left in a heartbeat. And for that matter, some of Fox's personnel such as Beck and Hannity are even to the right of the Republican Party.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
AsahinaKimi
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 59. That is awesome .. TELL it like it fricken is.. |
MetaTrope
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 60. As Obama gains in popularity, will Fox put an (R) next to his name? |
Quasimodem
(227 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 66. Of course, Faux Noose is part of the GOP, but not a wing. |
MindandSoul
(239 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #66 |
 |
It's more like the tail that wags the dog!!! I'm not sure what what is left of the Republican party would do without Fox News to give them their "spin" on news! Oh, wait. . .they would still have their supreme leader: Rush Limbaugh!
|
Kingofalldems
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 68. Kurtz will not let this go--expect his next column to be a defense of Fox |
 |
I had an email exchange with him years ago--he claimed Fox to be completely unbiased.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
| 83. There's a reason why he won Media Whore of the Year in the early 00's |
TankLV
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #68 |
| 116. He's already having a cow - this morning's show was hilarious to see him whine and squirm... |
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
Kingofalldems
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
| 74. Oh look another 'Democrat party' spouting fan of pigboy Limbaugh |
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #74 |
thelordofhell
(523 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
| 77. Why don't you tell us what the republic version is? |
 |
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 05:53 PM by thelordofhell
Since you only seem to only get Democratic right when you post "sarcastically". Enjoy your pizza.
|
SoDesuKa
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
 |
You might have guessed from the website name that this is a forum for Democrats. Democrats are contentious people, a fact which you also might have observed over time. That said, there are vaguely defined core beliefs that define us as Democrats, as opposed to CPUSA members. If you're not one of us, then, you're here as a guest. That imposes an obligation on you to be at least well-mannered.
You're not a Democrat, and you acknowledge that. I can't guess from just one post whether you behave yourself rhetorically or not. Because right wingers generally don't have any manners, they quickly make themselves unwelcome in discussions in which politeness is important. This forum is one of those places. There's no unusual standard of behavior imposed on you that isn't imposed on any other guest.
If you want examples of rude behavior, watch the clips of Hannity or O'Reilly using low-level verbal assaults, interrupting their guests, raising their voices, and being generally obnoxious. Right wingers have come to think of that as debating opposing viewpoints - which it certainly is not. If you have been bounced from Democratic Underground in the past, it's likely that you will be bounced again. Learn to behave yourself.
|
left of center
(287 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:26 PM
Response to Original message |
| 70. FOX News is so over-the-top about it, how could anyone... |
 |
... come to any other conclusion!! Other news organizations have their bias, even liberal bias, but FOX News spins everything negatively about everything and everyone they don't like, which is apparently a lot these days!
They are a joke, and someone should take them to court over their "fair and balanced" claim.
|
joeglow3
(916 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
My in-laws were discussing this today and said it is proof that all other media is in the tank because the White House admitted no other outlets challenge them.
|
spin
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 72. Fox cable news has high ratings... |
 |
In all of cable, Fox News finished the quarter as the second-most-watched network in primetime, behind only USA Network. CNN ranked 17th, MSNBC placed 24th and HLN, CNN’s sister news channel, came in 30th. For the total programming day, Fox News was 5th, CNN was 14th and MSNBC was 28th. Fox News also dominated the list of top news analysis programs, claiming nine of the top 10 spots. “The O’Reilly Factor” finished first, averaging 3.4 million viewers and posting a 27% gain over last year. “O’Reilly” also wrapped up the month of March with its 100th consecutive month in the No. 1 spot. Following “O’Reilly” in the top five were “Hannity” (2.7 million), “Glenn Beck” (2.2 million), “Special Report With Bret Baier” (2 million) and “The Fox Report With Shepard Smith” (1.9 million). MSNBC broke into the top 10 with “Countdown With Keith Olbermann,” which averaged 1.4 million viewers for the quarter. http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/03/cnn_ratings_down_fox... I'm not sure that any of the major news networks is all that influential on how voters decide when they go to the polls. Most Americans rarely watch cable news, but instead watch reality shows and other babble. There is no doubt that Fox is far from "far and balanced". I doubt that anything the Obama administration says will change that. Fox News may even glory in it and proudly proclaim it on their commercials. The irritating part is that MSNBC is not in HD on Direct TV. That doesn't help their ratings.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
doc03
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
| 92. MSNBC is not available on Comcast cable |
MindandSoul
(239 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #92 |
 |
If this is true, it is outright discrimination! No wonder Fox is so proud of telling everyone that they have so many more viewers! I do get MSNBC, but i never noticed that I was actually paying extra for it! I think it should be paying extra for both or for neither!
|
doc03
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #107 |
| 113. In this area Comcast moved MSNBC over to digital |
spin
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #92 |
| 112. That is really screwed up. (n/t) |
YOY
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message |
Livinson
(1 posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #81 |
| 133. know new information here |
YOY
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Oct-12-09 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #133 |
FREEDOM61
(13 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
About time! I have been looking for them to stand up to the Republican. They act like they scare to stand up for the people who got them elected.
|
alp227
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 84. YES...Fox IS a tool of the GOP! |
 |
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 06:39 PM by alp227
Of course! Why? The obvious: Rupert Murdoch hired Republican political consultant Roger Ailes as FNC's first CEO. Then in 2001, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) released its study " The Most Biased Name in News" that disproved FNC's deceptive slogan "Fair and Balanced". Also FAIR found in 1996: In the 1995-96 election cycle, over $3.2 million was donated to national political organizations by the five TV news networks, their corporate parents, subsidiaries or top officers. The five heavyweights are Disney (ABC), Time Warner (CNN), News Corp/Rupert Murdoch (Fox), General Electric (NBC) and Westinghouse (CBS).
The national soft money was split evenly between Democrats and Republicans, although Rupert Murdoch tipped the balance rightward with an additional $1 million pre-election gift to the California GOP. (emphasis mine) So not only a tool but also a reliable donor. Reiterating my point about donations: here's some sites where you can look up Fox News campaign contributions http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.php?capcode=mf... http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com / (search terms: Fox News, Fox News Channel, FNC)
|
GMA
(467 posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
gauguin57
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message |
| 88. Sky is blue. Grass is green. The Pope is Catholic. Film at 11. |
GreenTea
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 90. Anyone who hasn't known this fact for at least 10 years is either in complete denial or |  |
 |
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 07:28 PM by GreenTea
consummate idiots - As most in the media and the democratic party are....
Fox masquerades as a legitimate news organization ONLY to manipulate the news & their bullshit polls solely to benefit the republican party ideology.
The slimy fucking republicans know this & use (Fox news) as a tool, to their advantage by pretending it's a real news organization yet in reality it's ALL bullshit putting out slanted lies and omitted news stories along with their unbelievable bullshit polls that are so obviously full of shit it's amazing the rest of media and the democratic party even pays attention to them...
Yet the media & Dems do even though the only reason Fox news chief neocon republican Roger Alias functions are day to day, are to benefit his own republican party and to trash all democrats, as well as democratic ideology, policy, philosophy and agenda....
Fox news, like the republican party & the pigman Limbaugh solitary reason to exists is to increase the profits & power of the corporations over the people...That's it. Nothing more (or less)!
|
Claire Beth
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
BrklynLiberal
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Oct-11-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message |
| 93. It is about time that we started yelling about that naked emperor!!! |