Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FTC: Bloggers Must Disclose Payments for Reviews

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
SecularMotion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 09:38 AM
Original message
FTC: Bloggers Must Disclose Payments for Reviews
Source: NY Times

PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- The Federal Trade Commission will require bloggers to clearly disclose any freebies or payments they get from companies for reviewing their products.

It is the first time since 1980 that the commission has revised its guidelines on endorsements and testimonials, and the first time the rules have covered bloggers.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/10/05/business/AP-US-TEC-Bloggers-FTC.html?_r=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, that's going to tick off a lot of bloggers...
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 09:59 AM by MineralMan
It's also going to be very, very hard to enforce.

The odd thing is that the bloggers want their work to be taken seriously. And, yet, they don't want to follow the rules that other publications must follow.

As someone who worked as a journalist and product reviewer for almost 30 years, I had a very strict code of ethics to follow, imposed by the publications I wrote for, and I followed it. Now that I write for myself on the web, I simply don't mention any product unless I really, really like it or really, really hate it. In either case, nothing of value ever changes hands.

Now, the FTC wants to hold bloggers to a similar standard...I expect much wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. What about Senators?
So if the Pentagon pays off "reporters" or pundits must that also be disclosed?

What about infomercials?

Isn't it always the little guys who get regulated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. All good questions...
The Pentagon never offered to pay me anything, but under the contract I had with the publication I most frequently wrote for, I would have been obligated to report it. It would also have to be disclosed in print if I did the article.

Infomercials are obvious advertising. You may have noticed that there are disclaimers for advertorials, as well, when they appear in publications.

Actually, it's the big guys who have been regulated by the FTC, and for years and years. The little guys are unregulated, so your statement is incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. I'm a blogger
My blog has been in operation for over two years now. I write primarily about politics and football (what a combo, huh?). I get upwards of 30,000 hits a month.

I have never accepted any kind of payment to write about a product, TV show, or whatever. I get a lot of press releases asking me to write about different people or their events. I won't unless it's something I deem appropriate, or would be interesting to my readers.

I also do not post anything I can't independently source. I don't care to get sued.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. this will CLEARLY be a violation of those bloggers freedom of speech
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 10:18 AM by groundloop
and just in case not everyone gets it, here's........


:sarcasm:




And, I might add that this is a hell of a good ruling. Right up there with requiring Fox News to report facts.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cpamomfromtexas Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Will this affect Doctors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. I confess! I confess!
I do NOT find Fox News to be "Fair and Balanced", nor do I possess evidence to suggest that Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck have NOT been carrying on a clandestine affair...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Product reviews? Doesn't sound like it would affect political blogs much
This seems more like it's directed at things like video game reviewers. Political blogs may review the occasional book or movie -- and generally lean over backwards to specify if it's by a friend or former contributor -- but they're hardly in the business of paid reviews.

Or at least liberal blogs aren't. Goodness knows what's going to pump up the sales of Glenn Beck or Michelle Malkin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebecca_herman Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have a review blog
Edited on Mon Oct-05-09 08:22 PM by rebecca_herman
I started it for fun, to review books I had purchased myself. I did get some followers and as a result a small number of the books I review are now sent by authors or publishers. I don't care if I bought it or got it for free, I hold all the books I review to the same standards. If I'm sent a book and I didn't enjoy it, I say that I didn't enjoy it. It's fun to get free (sometimes signed by the author) books and I don't see why I should not be allowed to keep something someone wanted to give me. I don't make a profit, because I love books and want to keep them, not sell them. I've never promised a positive review for anything I get, just that I'll read it and eventually review it, but it may be a negative review if I didn't enjoy it. I don't mind saying at the end of a review where the book came from whether it was bought, library book, gift from a friend, sent by publisher, but I object to the idea I should have to give back a book I enjoyed and want in my collection when I want to keep it and the person who sent it is ok with me keeping it.

BTW anyone who regularly sold the stuff they got for review would probably be removed from any future mailings, and not make a profit anyway, as the publishers typically don't want these books sold as they may be unfinished copies and they'd rather a new copy be purchased then a used one. I have been told with review copies I get that if I don't want to keep it, I must either give it away for free or throw it out. They don't want it mailed back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-05-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. Will it cover opinionators on teevee and cable?
Wouldn't it be useful to see a quick rundown on the chyron when someone is plumping for other people's kids to go kill and die ostensibly for the U.S. of A. to find out who's filling that opinionator's coffers? Like, say, a defense contractor? Or the Pentagon, which routinely paid folks to go on electronic media and write opinion columns during the Bush years.

Naaaah. That would be too onerous. Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-06-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. U.S. Seeks to Restrict Gift Giving to Bloggers
OCTOBER 6, 2009

U.S. Seeks to Restrict Gift Giving to Bloggers

By AMY SCHATZ and MIGUEL BUSTILLO
WSJ

WASHINGTON -- The government wants to make it a little harder for bloggers to shill products online for fun and profit. New guidelines released by the Federal Trade Commission say bloggers must disclose any money or freebies they receive in exchange for writing product reviews, a fast-growing and loosely regulated way for companies to market everything from diapers to movies. The move is an effort to apply the same rules that already cover broadcast stations, newspapers and magazines to the Wild West marketplace of the World Wide Web. Separately, the FTC also updated its guidelines for celebrity endorsements, saying that celebrities must "disclose their relationships with advertisers when making endorsements outside the context of traditional ads, such as on talk shows or in social media." It also eliminated one loophole used in many diet and fitness ads, which allowed marketers to tout massive weight loss by some subjects as long as they included the disclaimer that the "results not typical." In the future, the FTC said, those testimonial ads will also have to include some information about what the typical weight loss might be.

The question of how and whether bloggers should divulge their relationships with companies has been hotly debated in recent months. It is a particularly controversial issue online, where the traditional division between editorial and advertising found in newspapers and magazines is harder to maintain. As blogging has grown, more users are opining on topics ranging from their jobs to their dinner on social-networking and other Web sites. Big companies are increasingly using these forums to build buzz, sending bloggers products to review or even helping them host parties to encourage others to try their wares.

The new FTC guidelines represent the latest in a series of efforts by the government to respond to the needs of consumers who increasingly spend time online. Congress is mulling new legislation to regulate targeted advertising online. Meanwhile, the Federal Communications Commission is looking at how to adapt its children's TV rules to cover online videos.

(snip)

Some First Amendment advocates worry that the guidelines could represent a restriction of free speech. They point out that, while the FTC has long regulated advertising claims in traditional media, the agency generally has allowed publications to police themselves when it comes to editorial content. For instance, newspapers generally prohibit reporters from accepting gifts from a company they write about to protect their credibility with readers.. The new guidelines are a response to complaints about bloggers writing positive reviews of freebies they have received from corporations, including Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Ford Motor Co. and Microsoft Corp., which came under scrutiny a few years ago for giving away free laptops to potential reviewers. Bloggers and others who are paid or give freebies to promote products online will be required to offer some sort of written disclosure for readers, the FTC said, or face possible fines of as much as $11,000 per violation. The guidelines reaffirm that making false and misleading claims about products in print, broadcast or on the Internet violate federal laws. They also clarify that advertisers and publishers can be held liable if a sponsored blogger makes false or misleading statements about a product.

(snip)

The FTC regulations target such bloggers as Christine Young of California, who parlayed a personal Web site detailing her experiences home-schooling her six children into a significant commercial enterprise. She is one of the Elevenmoms, a cadre of bloggers organized by Wal-Mart Stores Inc., which receives free merchandise from the retailer's suppliers, and has been flown to special events by Frito Lay, Johnson & Johnson and other companies. Ms. Young said she has toughened her standards and discloses the relationship when she writes about the items. "The brands and companies directly working with bloggers need to be held accountable," she said. "While some companies may choose not to work with us now, I would much rather work with companies that wanted us to be open in the first place."

(snip)

Enforcing the guidelines could be difficult, because the agency has limited authority and staff. With a broad mission to protect consumers from deceptive trade and anti-competitive business practices, the FTC investigations generally originate with consumer complaints.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125475547130664753.html (Subscription)

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC