430
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

US Senate Panel Rejects Adding Public Plan To Health Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:11 PM
Original message
US Senate Panel Rejects Adding Public Plan To Health Bill
Source: DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The Senate Finance Committee rejected an amendment Tuesday that would have created a government-run health insurance plan, but debate over a proposed public plan is not expected to end at the committee.

By a 15-8 vote, the Finance panel rejected an amendment sponsored by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., that would create a public health insurance option. Under Rockefeller's amendment, a government-run plan would inherit Medicare's network of doctors and hospitals and pay them based on Medicare payment rates for its first two years.

All Republicans on the panel voted against Rockefeller's amendment, in addition to Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Sens. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., Kent Conrad, D-N.D., Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., and Thomas Carper, D-Del.

Rockefeller argued that a public option is necessary to hold costs down and provide ample competition for private insurers, which he said engaged in "banditry."

Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090929-712129.htm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   Key Senate panel rejects public health plan  LTR   Sep-29-09 03:16 PM   #1 
   Are they all going to give up theirs???  Captain Hilts   Sep-29-09 03:16 PM   #2 
   +1  RT Atlanta   Sep-29-09 03:16 PM   #7 
   +2 & the bottom line: Senators, YOU have gov.-run health care  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:29 PM   #84 
   Wouldn't matter. They're all multi-millionaires and could handle having no insurance.  PSPS   Sep-29-09 06:03 PM   #74 
   heckuva job Senate finance!  dave29   Sep-29-09 03:16 PM   #3 
   Ghouls!  ShortnFiery   Sep-29-09 03:16 PM   #4 
   As expected. nt  WriteDown   Sep-29-09 03:16 PM   #5 
   Now Obama  Turbineguy   Sep-29-09 03:16 PM   #6 
   With what?  Delphinus   Sep-29-09 05:43 PM   #73 
   self delete  ShortnFiery   Sep-29-09 03:16 PM   #8 
   4 Against other than Baucus  liskddksil   Sep-29-09 03:18 PM   #12 
      Thanks :-)  ShortnFiery   Sep-29-09 03:19 PM   #13 
      5 against It wasn't even close. 15 - 8  Better Believe It   Sep-29-09 03:23 PM   #15 
   Thanks, Sen. Rockefeller. Schumer's amendment is up next.  No Elephants   Sep-29-09 03:16 PM   #9 
   Not quite right  Old Codger   Sep-29-09 03:27 PM   #20 
   "Five committee Democrats...joined with all 10 committee Republicans..."  Zorra   Sep-29-09 03:42 PM   #28 
   Sigh  WeekendWarrior   Sep-29-09 04:14 PM   #39 
   Ways to contact Baucus  The Hope Mobile   Sep-29-09 04:18 PM   #43 
   Key Senate panel rejects public health plan  LTR   Sep-29-09 03:16 PM   #10 
   These Democratic Senators need to be DEFEATED in their next primary ... we need Progressives!  ShortnFiery   Sep-29-09 03:18 PM   #11 
   Lincoln is the only one who is up for reelection next year  Freddie Stubbs   Sep-29-09 03:23 PM   #14 
   They should be forced to spend the Insurance Co $  Blue State Blues   Sep-29-09 03:25 PM   #18 
   They voted 'NO', but their faces reflected fear...  dmosh42   Sep-29-09 03:23 PM   #16 
   Baucus is not a millionaire. In fact, he is the poorest man in the Senate:  Freddie Stubbs   Sep-29-09 03:30 PM   #22 
      So he is such a poor manager of his own finances that he has a negative  mbperrin   Sep-29-09 03:34 PM   #24 
      Didn't Baucus get $1.3 Million from health insurance  Christa   Sep-29-09 06:22 PM   #77 
      I don't believe that he is not rich, with all those health "care" companies giving him money. nt  AlinPA   Sep-29-09 10:40 PM   #91 
      He's so poor, he lives in a $900,000 home  SOS   Sep-30-09 01:29 PM   #105 
   punked again. Now Obama has an excuse to not push for the public option....  FLAprogressive   Sep-29-09 03:24 PM   #17 
   Baucus is a jackass  droidamus2   Sep-29-09 03:25 PM   #19 
   Ahhh, shades of Daschell(sp) and Reid  lyonn   Sep-29-09 03:41 PM   #27 
   what can we expect when Fauck-US got $3MM from insurance cos. in '03-'08?  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:31 PM   #85 
   these 5 dems are motherfuckers.  orleans   Sep-29-09 03:27 PM   #21 
   Our only hope now is for the House to force it into the reconciliation committee  derby378   Sep-29-09 03:33 PM   #23 
   There is an earlier step where the HELP and Finance bills are merged  karynnj   Sep-29-09 03:50 PM   #30 
   The chances of that happening with a strong public option are none to zero  Better Believe It   Sep-29-09 03:51 PM   #31 
   Insurance companies rejoice!  Arrowhead2k1   Sep-29-09 03:34 PM   #25 
   True, true, must go check the market and see how swell  lyonn   Sep-29-09 03:52 PM   #32 
      They haven't gone down during this whole debacle because everyone knows their  harun   Sep-29-09 08:25 PM   #79 
   "Primary" those bastards out. I'm sending my money to Act Blue. nt  AlinPA   Sep-29-09 03:38 PM   #26 
   I keep ignoring the appeals I get from the DSCC, myself  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:33 PM   #86 
   159 days until the filing deadline for the Arkansas primary  Freddie Stubbs   Sep-30-09 09:49 AM   #104 
   Someone remind me why I keep voting for Democrats.  Flaneur   Sep-29-09 03:43 PM   #29 
   Because the only Senators who voted FOR the public option  kenichol   Sep-29-09 04:15 PM   #40 
   A Democratic party that continues to give a big "fuck-you" to the citizens needs to go...  Iowa   Sep-29-09 09:15 PM   #81 
   Senate Finance Panel Rejects Insurance Option  The Hope Mobile   Sep-29-09 03:52 PM   #33 
   Any word on the other Democrats voting against it? (nt)  Nicholas D Wolfwood   Sep-29-09 03:52 PM   #34 
      Also Lincoln and Conrad.voted no  The Hope Mobile   Sep-29-09 04:16 PM   #41 
   What is their excuse?  treestar   Sep-29-09 03:53 PM   #35 
   "We got OUR government-run health care program. Why should you?"  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:34 PM   #87 
   Bad news  seattle_blue   Sep-29-09 04:08 PM   #36 
   Don't bother blaming the republicans  NeoConsSuck   Sep-29-09 08:34 PM   #80 
      apparently, it's not the "little people who put them into office"---it's the insurance corps!  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:35 PM   #88 
   fucking traitors (nt)  harmonicon   Sep-29-09 04:12 PM   #37 
   Its a sad reality, but this just shows the public option will not be in health care reform  Norwood   Sep-29-09 04:13 PM   #38 
   it ain't over til it's over---time to put the pressure on---call senators & flood Fauckus' office  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:38 PM   #89 
   Obviously they felt little pressure to support the option...  freddie mertz   Sep-29-09 04:18 PM   #42 
   +1  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:38 PM   #90 
   Senate Panel Rejects Divisive 'Public Option'  goodboy   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #44 
   It was so "divisive" that over 65% of the country was for it.  rudy23   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #45 
   even more before the lies started. (nt)  goodboy   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #52 
   "divisive" my ass  fascisthunter   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #46 
   If there is no public option, I will work to defeat those who defeated it.  closeupready   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #47 
   It won't pass without it.  Buddyblazon   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #48 
   If you saw Rachel last night, Dean was on.  RoccoR5955   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #50 
      Is there any way to bypass the Finance Committee?  Buddyblazon   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #53 
         Of course there is- but that requires leadership and commitment to the public interest  depakid   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #66 
   "divisive"? - Reality takes another hit.  jsamuel   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #49 
   NPR has morphed into the mouthpiece of the ruling elite.  ShortnFiery   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #51 
   Dontcha know that NPR is National Petroleum Radio?  RoccoR5955   Sep-29-09 08:09 PM   #78 
   Senate Finance Committee = Death Panel (nt)  goodboy   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #54 
   Hopping Mad!  Plucketeer   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #55 
   Baucus, Lincoln, Conrad, Nelson and Carper.  closeupready   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #59 
      Thank you! My pen's spitting smoke already!  Plucketeer   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #68 
   "My job is to put together a bill that gets to 60 votes" .... Max Baucus  Botany   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #56 
   Which side ARE you on Max, well it's more than obvious now nt  flamingdem   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #58 
   I could punch that fucker in the mouth  Chulanowa   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #62 
   Only need 51  bc3000   Sep-29-09 06:16 PM   #75 
   rich, corporate insurance industry writing your laws - think hard and enjoy  tomm2thumbs   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #57 
   Baucus - the representative of the insurance companies.  dbonds   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #60 
   Divisive = the corporate masters don't like it  Solly Mack   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #61 
   "Divisive" is my tax-dollars funding state sponsored terror in Afghanistan  ixion   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #63 
   "Divisive?" -nice right wing framing. Reminding me again why I don't listen to NPR  depakid   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #64 
   Make sure that you write to them and tell them that  Lorien   Sep-29-09 09:22 PM   #82 
   Divisive is a huge mandate on working families  laughingliberal   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #65 
   K&R. NT  Thornleylv   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #67 
   No Public Option?  Jkid   Sep-29-09 05:12 PM   #69 
   "No one shows me how to get to 60 votes with a public option." Vote your own conscience, fucker  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:40 PM   #92 
   Senate panel votes down public option for health care bill  gorfle   Sep-29-09 05:34 PM   #70 
   18th time this has been posted  bluestateguy   Sep-29-09 05:34 PM   #71 
   Say Nite Night to any bill  saigon68   Sep-29-09 05:34 PM   #72 
      OUCH!!!!  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:53 PM   #100 
   OK people. It's time to get busy in the Primaries and get rid of these pretenders.  FriendlyReminder   Sep-29-09 06:18 PM   #76 
   before that, how about getting busy NOW & flooding the senators' offices with our demands?  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:42 PM   #93 
   Lincoln is the only one up for reelection next year  Freddie Stubbs   Oct-01-09 12:02 PM   #106 
   Why is this being treated as a suprise?  Dawson Leery   Sep-29-09 09:52 PM   #83 
   it's NOT a surprise. We need to regroup and get active at these outrages  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:44 PM   #96 
      I have called and written letters  Dawson Leery   Sep-29-09 10:58 PM   #101 
   duplicate sorry please remove  Meeker Morgan   Sep-29-09 10:44 PM   #94 
   So?  PATRICK   Sep-29-09 10:44 PM   #95 
   Howard Dean was on with Rachel . . . Baucus is deciding this for all of us . ..  defendandprotect   Sep-29-09 10:45 PM   #97 
   Public Plan . . . preferably now known as .... 'C H O I C E" . . . !!!  defendandprotect   Sep-29-09 10:46 PM   #98 
   Another pro-choice issue...I've got mixed feelings about that talking point  wordpix   Sep-29-09 10:53 PM   #99 
      Everyone loves CHOICE . . .  defendandprotect   Sep-30-09 12:22 AM   #102 
   do we have 50 votes ? .. c'mon, somebody knows ..nt  excess_3   Sep-30-09 12:45 AM   #103 
 
LTR (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Key Senate panel rejects public health plan
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 03:14 PM by LTR
Source: MSNBC

WASHINGTON - A key Senate panel on Tuesday voted against creating a new government health insurance plan to compete with the private market.

The 15-to-8 vote in the Senate Finance Committee could forecast the fate of the public option in the Senate as a whole.

The outcome was expected but still a defeat for liberals who view government-sponsored insurance for the middle class as a key component of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.
Story continues below ↓advertisement | your ad here

Five committee Democrats, including Chairman Max Baucus, joined with all 10 committee Republicans to defeat the measure by Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia.

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33069014/ns/politics-health...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Are they all going to give up theirs???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RT Atlanta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. +1
What's good for the goose is good for the gander... and all that other shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
84. +2 & the bottom line: Senators, YOU have gov.-run health care
Stop your BS lines about why WE shouldn't have it, how bad it will be for US, the public, and how Government-run programs are so terrible. The senators have gov-run health care---on our backs! We want the public option!

:grr:

People, we need a march on Washington NOW for the public option before these aholes give $483 billion in subsidies to the rich insurance companies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
74. Wouldn't matter. They're all multi-millionaires and could handle having no insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. heckuva job Senate finance!
meh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Ghouls!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. As expected. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Now Obama
can go ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
73. With what?
Wasn't the public option his idea?

I want to go ahead with HR 676 - Single Payer Medicare for All.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. self delete
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 03:19 PM by ShortnFiery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil (900 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. 4 Against other than Baucus
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 03:25 PM by liskddksil
Carper
Conrad
Lincoln
Bill Nelson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. 5 against It wasn't even close. 15 - 8Updated at 10:16 PM
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 03:24 PM by Better Believe It
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Thanks, Sen. Rockefeller. Schumer's amendment is up next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Not quite right
Baucus and 14 of his fellow repubs voted against the amendment....No other way to decipher these votes..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. "Five committee Democrats...joined with all 10 committee Republicans..."
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 03:43 PM by Zorra
And there you have it, brother and sister Democrats, the very crux of the biscuit, as Frank Zappa used to say.
:puke:
Bu*h Dog DINOrats, together with a united front of their republican brethren, voting to quash humane, progressive legislation under orders from their corporate owners. We need to get these traitorous fuckers out of office ASAP.

What should now be perfectly clear to any reasonable American is that we must outlaw corporate personhood, and outlaw all corporate interference in government as well. The penalty for breaking these laws should be mandatory life in prison without parole for any person representing a corporation that approaches a legislator with the intent to influence that legislator.

Next time these piece of shit traitorous DINOrats run for office I'm sending every spare penny to their opponents in the primaries.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeekendWarrior (126 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Sigh
Why do we have to even put up with this farce? These people must go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. Ways to contact Baucus

511 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-2602
DC Phone: 202-224-2651
DC Fax: 202-224-9412
Email Address: http://baucus.senate.gov/contact/emailForm.cfm?subj=iss...
WWW Homepage: http://baucus.senate.gov /
Twitter: No Known Twitter Account

District Offices:
113 3rd Street
Great Falls, MT 59401 Voice: 406-761-1574
FAX: 406-452-1117
to Great Falls office from Google Maps
122 West Towne Street
Glendive, MT 59330 Voice: 406-365-7002
FAX: Not Currently Available
to Glendive office from Google Maps
280 East Front Street, Suite 100
Missoula, MT 59802 Voice: 406-329-3123
FAX: 406-728-7610
to Missoula office from Google Maps
222 North 32nd Street, Suite 100
Billings, MT 59101 Voice: 406-657-6790
FAX: 406-657-6793
to Billings office from Google Maps
Federal Building, Room 114
32 East Babcock
Bozeman, MT 59715 Voice: 406-586-6104
FAX: 406-587-9177
to Bozeman office from Google Maps
Empire Block
30 West 14th Street
Helena, MT 59601 Voice: 406-449-5480
FAX: 406-449-5484
to Helena office from Google Maps
8 Third Street East
Kalispell, MT 59901 Voice: 406-756-1150
FAX: 406-756-1152
to Kalispell office from Google Maps
27 North Wyoming Street, Suite A
Butte, MT 59701 Voice: 406-782-8700
FAX: 406-782-6553
to Butte office from Google Maps

Party: Democrat
Leadership: None
Freshman: No
First Elected To Office: November 7, 1978
Year of Next Election: November 4, 2014
Previous Political Work: US House of Representatives
Montana House of Representatives
Committee Membership:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Key Senate panel rejects public health plan
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 03:14 PM by LTR
This thread has been combined with another thread.

Click here to read this message in its new location.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. These Democratic Senators need to be DEFEATED in their next primary ... we need Progressives!
"Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., and Sens. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., Kent Conrad, D-N.D., Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., and Thomas Carper, D-Del."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Lincoln is the only one who is up for reelection next year
Who is going to take her out in the primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Blues Donating Member (541 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. They should be forced to spend the Insurance Co $
to defend their seats in a primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (912 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Tue Sep-29-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. They voted 'NO', but their faces reflected fear...
knowing they are running against the tide. Rockefeller said it best that "the public option is on the march", and will be back again and again. The arguments were pathetic by the Repukes, and they were studdering as they tried to argue against it. What can anyone expect from a millionaires club?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Baucus is not a millionaire. In fact, he is the poorest man in the Senate:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. So he is such a poor manager of his own finances that he has a negative
net worth, but I can trust him with the national health plan.....

Hmmmm.....something here is not quite right, but it smells like something for sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Christa Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
77. Didn't Baucus get $1.3 Million from health insurance Updated at 9:23 AM
companies for his campaign?




*

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
91. I don't believe that he is not rich, with all those health "care" companies giving him money. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Sep-30-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
105. He's so poor, he lives in a $900,000 home
plus he will cash out millions in unspent insurance graft money when he leaves the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. punked again. Now Obama has an excuse to not push for the public option....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 (992 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. Baucus is a jackass
When asked Baucus claimed that his responsibility was to get a bill passed his committee that could get 60 votes. I have news for ya Max your damn job is to do the right thing by the American people not to placate the Republicans. You are a prime example of the weak-kneed wing of the Democratic party. You won't rock the boat or stand up to anybody or for anything. As I understand it there are currently 4 other bills 3 in the House and 1 in the Senate that include a public option who the hell does Baucus think he is standing in the way of what the rest of the Democrats and by the polls the majority of people in this country want. Max if you want to work for the insurance companies step down from your Senate seat and go work for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Ahhh, shades of Daschell(sp) and Reid
Soft spoken leaders that go along to get along. That is not what most voters voted for. Notice, Daschel is gone and Reid is not popular, will he be the next to be voted out and replaced by a mouthy repubs? The repubs put up with Ensign even tho he "has sinned but repents" god loves him and forgives. That is what his constituents want and they get it. We dems want strong leaders but eventually find we have those that won't back us up! What's the deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
85. what can we expect when Fauck-US got $3MM from insurance cos. in '03-'08?
The a-hole's vote and "leadership" are so predictable, it's not funny. :puke: Fauck-US is nothing but a re-PUKE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. these 5 dems are motherfuckers.
GIVE UP YOUR GODDAMN INSURANCE THAT WE'RE PAYING FOR YOU ASSHOLES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Tue Sep-29-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. Our only hope now is for the House to force it into the reconciliation committee
No public option, no healthcare reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. There is an earlier step where the HELP and Finance bills are merged
Schumer made the point on one of his 2 weaker PO amendments (he himself preferred Rockefeller's) might get a high enough vote - even if it loses - to show significant support when it goes to the entire Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. The chances of that happening with a strong public option are none to zeroUpdated at 10:16 PM

Look at how the House leadership folded when they went into the House/Senate Conference on the stimulus bill. All of the demands made by the three Republicans who wrote and weakened the Senate stimulus bill were accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arrowhead2k1 (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. Insurance companies rejoice!
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 03:35 PM by Arrowhead2k1
They're about to make some very rich people even richer! Yay Amerika!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. True, true, must go check the market and see how swell
the insurance stock is after Schusters failed too, BS...... Baucus "NO"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
79. They haven't gone down during this whole debacle because everyone knows their
guys in the House and Senate have had their backs from day one. Even with a public option they stand to gain massive revenue for years before they have to pull back a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. "Primary" those bastards out. I'm sending my money to Act Blue. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
86. I keep ignoring the appeals I get from the DSCC, myself
Why support these guys? I'll send money to individuals, but not to the group
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Sep-30-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
104. 159 days until the filing deadline for the Arkansas primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
29. Someone remind me why I keep voting for Democrats.
I know they are better than Republicans, but at times, the differences seem vanishingly thin.

Democrats seem like the "nice" wing of the Single Unified Capitalist War Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenichol (103 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. Because the only Senators who voted FOR the public option
...are Democrats: Kerry, Bingaman, Rockefeller, ooooh someone help me.

I continue to support my Senator Bingaman because he (along with most who voted yes on public option) voted NO on the Iraqi War Resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
81. A Democratic party that continues to give a big "fuck-you" to the citizens needs to go...
And the presence of a few good guys in the party isn't a good enough reason to prop it up - a few good guys can't do a damned thing. Either they can get things done as a group, or they can't, and this party clearly can't. And they can't because they don't want to; they no longer work for us.

I despised Richard Nixon and his corporate party in the 60s, and I see no reason to support a corporate party today. The Democratic party is comprised of a bunch of corporatists who hijacked the brand name of the once-great party of FDR, and a brand name sure as hell isn't sufficient reason to support them. Being a smidgen better than the Republican party isn't a sufficient reason either.

I'll be voting third party for the duration. The bastards sold us out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
33. Senate Finance Panel Rejects Insurance Option
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 03:50 PM by The Hope Mobile
Source: AP

Senate Finance panel rejects insurance option


WASHINGTON (AP) — Liberal Democrats failed Tuesday to inject a government-run insurance option into sweeping health care legislation taking shape in the Senate Finance Committee, despite widespread accusations that private insurers routinely deny coverage in pursuit of higher profits.

The 15-8 rejection marked a victory for Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., the committee chairman, who is hoping to push his middle-of-the-road measure through the panel by week's end. It also kept alive the possibility that at least one Republican may yet swing behind the bill, a key goal of both Baucus and the White House.

"My job is to put together a bill that gets to 60 votes" in the full Senate, the Montana Democrat said shortly before he joined a majority on the committee in opposing the provision. "No one shows me how to get to 60 votes with a public option," the term used to describe a new government role in health care. It takes 60 votes to overcome delaying actions that Republicans may attempt on the Senate floor.

The maneuvering occurred as the committee plunged into a second week of public debate on legislation that generally adheres to conditions that President Barack Obama has called for. The bill includes numerous new consumer protections, including a ban on companies denying insurance on the basis of pre-existing conditions. At the same time it provides government subsidies to help lower-income Americans afford insurance that is currently beyond their means. It also includes steps that supporters say will begin to slow the rate of growth in health care costs nationwide.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-09-29-heal...

Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-09-29-heal...



Thanks Baucus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Any word on the other Democrats voting against it? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Also Lincoln and Conrad.voted no
Let him know how you feel about it

Max Baucus
511 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-2602
DC Phone: 202-224-2651
DC Fax: 202-224-9412
Email Address: http://baucus.senate.gov/contact/emailForm.cfm?subj=iss...
WWW Homepage: http://baucus.senate.gov /
Twitter: No Known Twitter Account

District Offices:
113 3rd Street
Great Falls, MT 59401 Voice: 406-761-1574
FAX: 406-452-1117
to Great Falls office from Google Maps
122 West Towne Street
Glendive, MT 59330 Voice: 406-365-7002
FAX: Not Currently Available
to Glendive office from Google Maps
280 East Front Street, Suite 100
Missoula, MT 59802 Voice: 406-329-3123
FAX: 406-728-7610
to Missoula office from Google Maps
222 North 32nd Street, Suite 100
Billings, MT 59101 Voice: 406-657-6790
FAX: 406-657-6793
to Billings office from Google Maps
Federal Building, Room 114
32 East Babcock
Bozeman, MT 59715 Voice: 406-586-6104
FAX: 406-587-9177
to Bozeman office from Google Maps
Empire Block
30 West 14th Street
Helena, MT 59601 Voice: 406-449-5480
FAX: 406-449-5484
to Helena office from Google Maps
8 Third Street East
Kalispell, MT 59901 Voice: 406-756-1150
FAX: 406-756-1152
to Kalispell office from Google Maps
27 North Wyoming Street, Suite A
Butte, MT 59701 Voice: 406-782-8700
FAX: 406-782-6553
to Butte office from Google Maps

Party: Democrat
Leadership: None
Freshman: No
First Elected To Office: November 7, 1978
Year of Next Election: November 4, 2014
Previous Political Work: US House of Representatives
Montana House of Representatives
Committee Membership:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Tue Sep-29-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
35. What is their excuse?
Moran Carper won't say what it is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
87. "We got OUR government-run health care program. Why should you?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seattle_blue (168 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
36. Bad news
I am not sure how to react to this piece of news. The Democratic Party had better figure out how to represent the people who put them into office, and fast! They know what we want, so they better figure out how to deliver. I really hope that liberal Democrats run challenge candidates against the Blue ball Democrats. I have faith that they can still deliver a public option, and hope they do so.
I think they need to thank the republicans for all their "help" and then tell them that we got it from here. RAM THE PUBLIC OPTION THROUGH! JAM IT DOWN THEIR THROATS! SHOW NO MERCY!
Let me get going because I am just getting to pissed off. I AM ON FIRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #36
80. Don't bother blaming the republicans
you knew how they would vote before this ever got off the ground.

Blame our party turncoats. Time and time again, they vote for their master's interests, not the little people who put them into office.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #80
88. apparently, it's not the "little people who put them into office"---it's the insurance corps!
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 10:36 PM by wordpix
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. fucking traitors (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norwood (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
38. Its a sad reality, but this just shows the public option will not be in health care reform
Thus making whatever they do pass absolutely pointless. I feel physically ill about this, why are people so against everyone being able to have a chance at health care????

I don't get it and its fucking bullshit! Are we really that selfish a country? I got mine so fuck everyone else??? What The Fuck!??!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
89. it ain't over til it's over---time to put the pressure on---call senators & flood Fauckus' office
with phone calls demanding he give up his own government-run health care.

I bet the fucker has a nice fat job waiting for him as exec. of an insurance co.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Tue Sep-29-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. Obviously they felt little pressure to support the option...
From you-know-where.

We have all seen this coming for weeks now.

I'm sickened beyond words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #42
90. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
44. Senate Panel Rejects Divisive 'Public Option'
Source: NPR

The Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday voted down an attempt by liberal Democrats to include a government-run insurance option as part of its legislation overhauling the nation's health care system.

The 15-to-8 vote was a defeat for liberals who view government-sponsored insurance as a key component of President Obama's health care proposal.

"My job is to put together a bill that gets to 60 votes" in the full Senate, committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) said before voting against the amendment by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV). "No one shows me how to get to 60 votes with a public option."

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11...

Read more: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11...



Fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. It was so "divisive" that over 65% of the country was for it.
Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. even more before the lies started. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. "divisive" my ass
fucking corporate sellouts. You serve the minority... we will never forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. If there is no public option, I will work to defeat those who defeated it.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buddyblazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. It won't pass without it.
So what then? We start all over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. If you saw Rachel last night, Dean was on.
He said to strip out all the money from the bill, and go with the other "good" things in the bill. Like no more denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buddyblazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Is there any way to bypass the Finance Committee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #53
66. Of course there is- but that requires leadership and commitment to the public interest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. "divisive"? - Reality takes another hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. NPR has morphed into the mouthpiece of the ruling elite.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #51
78. Dontcha know that NPR is National Petroleum Radio?
So says Greg Palast, and I believe he's correct!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodboy Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. Senate Finance Committee = Death Panel (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
55. Hopping Mad!
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 04:43 PM by Plucketeer
When will we know which of the traitor Dems voted for the insurance companies??? We already KNOW that Baucus is boiught and paid for, but I want to know the names of the others. I want to send them letters stating my resolve to see them displaced come next election cycle! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Baucus, Lincoln, Conrad, Nelson and Carper.
Five Democrats opposed the public option: Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) and Tom Carper (D-Del.).


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/29/first-public-o...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #59
68. Thank you! My pen's spitting smoke already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
56. "My job is to put together a bill that gets to 60 votes" .... Max Baucus
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 04:50 PM by Botany
No Max your job was given to you by your bosses in the Health Care Insurance Industry ...... kill the public option.
It didn't have a damn thing to do w/ 60 votes.

I hope that they go ahead and put the public option back into the bill after mark up so these "blue dogs" and
republicans will have to vote against and the will of 70% of the American people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. Which side ARE you on Max, well it's more than obvious now nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. I could punch that fucker in the mouth
"My job is to put together a bill that gets to 60 votes" - even if it's not worth voting for, Max, you useless heap of shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 (401 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #56
75. Only need 51
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. rich, corporate insurance industry writing your laws - think hard and enjoy

If you think they'll stop at this, think again. Once they feel the power of their influence paying off, they'll start working on other anti-consumer protections and put their political network to good use on making themselves even more gross profits and cutting people out of the system. Sure you can get health care, but did we tell you about the rates you'll be forced to pay?

These are bottom-line corporations. They aren't going to stop at one potato chip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbonds (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
60. Baucus - the representative of the insurance companies.
Time for him to 'explore other opportunities' as they say in the corporate world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
61. Divisive = the corporate masters don't like it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
63. "Divisive" is my tax-dollars funding state sponsored terror in Afghanistan
not a public option for healthcare, which would make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
64. "Divisive?" -nice right wing framing. Reminding me again why I don't listen to NPR
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 04:57 PM by depakid
Even public radio in the states is laced with dishonest propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #64
82. Make sure that you write to them and tell them that
My neighbor is one of their news directors. The top only listens to the people who strongly voice their opinion (the right wing ALWAYS does, while the Left rarely says a word).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
65. Divisive is a huge mandate on working families
that will enrich the insurance companies even more. Baucus is the best representation the industry could buy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thornleylv Donating Member (145 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
67. K&R. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jkid Donating Member (752 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
69. No Public Option?
Time to kill this bill and start over.

HR 676 is still waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #44
92. "No one shows me how to get to 60 votes with a public option." Vote your own conscience, fucker
Of course, his conscience is obviously fixed on more millions from the health insurance lobby. He's only gotten $3 million we know of in the past 6 yrs., so far. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gorfle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
70. Senate panel votes down public option for health care bill
Source: CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday rejected two amendments to include a government-run public health insurance option in the only compromise health care bill so far.



Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/09/29/senate.public.op...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. 18th time this has been posted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. Say Nite Night to any bill
These mother fuckers have their lips on the organ of the insurance companies and are leaving teeth marks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #72
100. OUCH!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FriendlyReminder (173 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
76. OK people. It's time to get busy in the Primaries and get rid of these pretenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #76
93. before that, how about getting busy NOW & flooding the senators' offices with our demands?
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 10:43 PM by wordpix
We want the public option NOW.

:think: Some enterprising senator should now introduce a bill stating there shall be no government-run health care for senators and congressmen if there is no public option for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-01-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #76
106. Lincoln is the only one up for reelection next year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery (61 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
83. Why is this being treated as a suprise?
Max Baucus owes his career to the insurance/financial/defense industries.

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?CID=...

Schering-Plough Corp $76,200 $64,200 $12,000
Goldman Sachs $47,900 $47,900 $0
KKR & Co $47,000 $47,000 $0
American International Group $46,750 $37,000 $9,750
Aetna Inc $45,250 $35,250 $10,000

Securities & Investment $839,650 $694,150 $145,500
Lawyers/Law Firms $684,354 $472,412 $211,942
Insurance $558,075 $259,525 $298,550
Pharmaceuticals/Health Products $507,313 $203,964 $303,349
Health Professionals $504,641 $120,141 $384,500


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #83
96. it's NOT a surprise. We need to regroup and get active at these outrages
Thanks for the stats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery (61 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #96
101. I have called and written letters
to various Representatives and Senators.
What else can we do?

We do not have any rallies to counter the "tea parties".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meeker Morgan (884 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
94. duplicate sorry please remove
Edited on Tue Sep-29-09 08:13 PM by Meeker Morgan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #94
95. So?
It shows the Blue Dogs isolated and rejecting compromise and unable to muster votes on any alternative if even THEIR plan would be the final version. What they done is get greedy, exposed and ineffective. The GOP is left with an empty bag probably hoping ONLY for the final ways of denying ANY bill getting passed- so that the Dem version can and must be made better without them.

Without the blustering Lilliputian Finance Committee to hide behind in any really viable way, public pressure- long denied a voice- might actually improve the imperfections still extant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
97. Howard Dean was on with Rachel . . . Baucus is deciding this for all of us . ..
and he's merely a buy bought, bribed and paid for by the "for profit" health care industry!

How how we permitted Baucus to stay in charge of the health care hearings????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
98. Public Plan . . . preferably now known as .... 'C H O I C E" . . . !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Sep-29-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #98
99. Another pro-choice issue...I've got mixed feelings about that talking point
How about: Senators, YOU"VE got government-run health care. How about the people you're supposed to serve?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Sep-30-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #99
102. Everyone loves CHOICE . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
excess_3 (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Sep-30-09 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
103. do we have 50 votes ? .. c'mon, somebody knows ..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb 10th 2010, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC