430
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Scowcroft Agrees With Obama on Missile Defense Shift

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep-18-09 02:32 PM
Original message
Scowcroft Agrees With Obama on Missile Defense ShiftUpdated at 3:23 PM
Source: WP

President Obama's decision to shift direction on missile defense in Europe has produced howls from many Republicans, but one prominent GOP foreign-policy heavyweight weighed in Friday with support for the president's plan.

"I strongly approve of President Obama's decision regarding missile defense deployments in Europe. I believe it advances U.S. national security interests, supports our allies, and better meets the threats we face," Brent Scowcroft said in a statement issued through the Atlantic Council, a policy group.

Scowcroft was national security adviser to Presidents Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush. Bush's son, George W. Bush, pushed as president for the missile defense plan abandoned by Obama.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, also a Republican, was Scowcroft's deputy during the first Bush administration.

Read more: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/09/18/scowcrof...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   This Is So Obvious, Sir, It Should Not Need Stating  The Magistrate   Sep-18-09 02:36 PM   #1 
      Huh? What does Khyber Pass has to do with European Missle Defense?  nyy1998   Sep-18-09 03:17 PM   #2 
         As You May Have Noted, Sir  The Magistrate   Sep-18-09 03:33 PM   #3 
         Well, from a Yankee fan I would expect such a question...  damonm   Sep-18-09 03:38 PM   #4 
 
The Magistrate (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep-18-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. This Is So Obvious, Sir, It Should Not Need Stating
Supply through the Khyber Pass is tenuous, and may in future be severed. In that case, U.S. forces could be maintained in Afghanistan only through territory of Russia, and territory where Russian influence is predominant. Hence some practical concessions towards 'friendship' occur....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyy1998 (255 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep-18-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Huh? What does Khyber Pass has to do with European Missle Defense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep-18-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. As You May Have Noted, Sir
Russia does not much like the establishment of this 'shield' on territory formerly belonging to the Warsaw Pact, and even in Czarist times, in the cas of Poland, considered part of Russia itself. A favor in the west for a favor in the east....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep-18-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, from a Yankee fan I would expect such a question...
Psych! :P

Anyway, The Magistrate's point is that easing relations with Russia in the form of this action helps us by ensuring supply routes for our troops in Afghanistan.
That aside, the Christian Science Monitor has praise for it for a different reason:


The Obama administration's new anti-Iran missile plan is not so much a "reversal" of the Bush plan, as a refinement of it.

And a well-timed one for the coming round of diplomacy with Iran.

On Oct. 1, the US will join China, Russia, France, Britain, and Germany for talks with Iran, presumably on its nuclear weapons program. The world has been at a stalemate in forcing Iran to comply with international nuclear nonproliferation standards. Neither sanctions nor a new US openness to deal with Tehran has yet to yield results.

But today's announcement that the US will soon have a missile defense system ready to intercept possible Iranian short- and medium-range nuclear missiles should significantly add to the pressure on Iran. Perhaps, too, Russia may reverse itself and agree to tougher sanctions if Iran still doesn't comply.

read the whole thing at http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20090917/cm_csm/emissiledef...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb 10th 2010, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC