In Afghanistan, halting civilian deaths in strikes is mission impossible
The U.S. has made the goal a top priority. But the nature of the war calls for split-second life-or-death decisions, almost guaranteeing more accidental casualties.
By David Zucchino
June 19, 2009
Reporting from Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan — When Afghan parliament member Obaidullah Helali went to visit his constituents in the village of Garani last month, they confronted him with clubs and stones.
It was three days after a U.S. airstrike killed dozens of civilians in the remote settlement in western Farah province. Enraged villagers threatened to beat Helali and other officials and asked why the Afghan government couldn't protect them -- not from the Taliban, but from the U.S. military.
"If the Americans don't stop these kind of accidents, the people will never believe the government will keep them safe," Helali said.
But experiences such as the fateful May 4 airstrike show that halting civilian deaths will not be an easy goal. Fighter pilots and air controllers at the main U.S. air base near Kabul, the Afghan capital, say that even the most comprehensive safeguards can fail under the stress and confusion of combat against an enemy that they say often uses civilians as human shields.
The mounting death toll of Afghan civilians from U.S. airstrikes has unleashed a tide of resentment and fury that threatens to undermine the American counterinsurgency effort here. From President Obama to the new U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Army Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, American officials have made the reduction of civilian deaths a top priority as they revamp their strategy here.
<more>
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-civilian-deaths19-2009jun19,0,3718403.story