Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

North Korea's Kim moves to anoint youngest son as heir

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Jun-01-09 11:01 PM
Original message
North Korea's Kim moves to anoint youngest son as heir
Source: Reuters

North Korean leader Kim Jong-il has told top officials to pledge loyalty to his youngest son, signaling his anointment as heir to the family dynasty that has ruled since the state's founding, a lawmaker and South Korean media said on Tuesday.

Kim, 67, is thought to have suffered a stroke in August that raised questions about his continued control. Analysts have said the North's recent military grandstanding, including a nuclear test last week, may be aimed at helping him solidify power so he can name a successor.

North Korea has asked the country's main bodies and its overseas missions to pledge loyalty to Kim's youngest son Kim Jong-un, various South Korean media outlets quoted informed sources as saying.

...

Kim Jong-un, born either in 1983 or early 1984, was educated in Switzerland and intelligence sources have said he appears to be the most capable of Kim's three known sons.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSSEO1200542...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   Why not annoint the whiskey drinker that went incognito to the Japanese amusement park ?  ohio2007   Jun-01-09 11:12 PM   #1 
   Let me guess  izquierdista   Jun-01-09 11:43 PM   #2 
   Wow, he's younger than I am by a couple of years  Posteritatis   Jun-02-09 02:08 AM   #3 
   Note the source: "a [South Korean] lawmaker and South Korean media said"  New Dawn   Jun-02-09 02:41 AM   #4 
      North Korea's last designated successor was chosen six years before he was officially named (nt)  Posteritatis   Jun-02-09 03:07 AM   #5 
         Actually, there was no "designated successor" when Kim Il-Sung died.  New Dawn   Jun-02-09 03:16 AM   #6 
            Kim Jong-il was announced as successor at the 1980 congress  Posteritatis   Jun-02-09 03:28 AM   #7 
               I found a source explaining the 1980 WPK congress, but no mention of any "designated successor"  New Dawn   Jun-02-09 03:46 AM   #8 
 
ohio2007 (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Jun-01-09 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why not annoint the whiskey drinker that went incognito to the Japanese amusement park ?
He liked the lifestyle, bright lights and big cities of the west.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Jun-01-09 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let me guess
His other sons are Kim Jong-deux and Kim Jong-trois. And I thought Charlie Chan was a stereotype.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Jun-02-09 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, he's younger than I am by a couple of years
Between that and bypassing Kim's other sons I wonder what the guy's chances are if he actually takes power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Jun-02-09 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Note the source: "a [South Korean] lawmaker and South Korean media said"
If this story were true, it would definitely be covered in the North Korean media: http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-e.htm

There is no mention of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Jun-02-09 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. North Korea's last designated successor was chosen six years before he was officially named (nt)
Edited on Tue Jun-02-09 03:09 AM by Posteritatis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Jun-02-09 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Actually, there was no "designated successor" when Kim Il-Sung died.
Edited on Tue Jun-02-09 03:18 AM by New Dawn
For several years after Kim Il-Sung's death, there was a power struggle between Kim Yong Nam and Kim Jong-il.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Jun-02-09 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Kim Jong-il was announced as successor at the 1980 congress
Edited on Tue Jun-02-09 03:29 AM by Posteritatis
Of course there'd be people who objected to the fact and fought over it - it's a Stalinist state with a family dynasty - but there was definitely a specific This Guy's Next After Me lined up by Kim Il-Sung.

Jong-un is going to be wearing the concentric circles even if he is officially confirmed, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Jun-02-09 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I found a source explaining the 1980 WPK congress, but no mention of any "designated successor"
Edited on Tue Jun-02-09 03:47 AM by New Dawn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov 21st 2009, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC