|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
elleng
|
Sun May-24-09 10:52 PM Original message |
| North Korea Conducts Nuclear Test, South Korea Says. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| tnlurker
(543 posts)
|
Sun May-24-09 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Maybe this is related |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| obliviously
|
Sun May-24-09 10:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. coincident? I think not. N/T |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Posteritatis
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 02:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 31. Doubt it, since the quake happened 10km underground (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8
|
Mon May-25-09 09:04 AM Response to Reply #31 |
| 48. The nuke test was underground, wasn't it? nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 05:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
| 41. Deleted message |
dgibby
|
Sun May-24-09 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Here's another link. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
|
Sun May-24-09 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. These people are really pushing the envelope |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TiredOldMan
(143 posts)
|
Sun May-24-09 11:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 7. You said it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| christx30
(240 posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 02:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
| 76. Doubt it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 12:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 17. First a rocket launch capable of easily reaching Japan, now a nuclear test. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Baby Snooks
|
Mon May-25-09 05:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 40. And we are better than them? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
|
Mon May-25-09 05:03 AM Response to Reply #40 |
| 42. And my experiment is concluded: 5 hrs 44 min |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| okieinpain
|
Mon May-25-09 05:11 AM Response to Reply #42 |
| 44. funny.. n/t. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
piedmont
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 65. +1 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ronnie624
|
Mon May-25-09 02:03 PM Response to Reply #42 |
| 75. It can't possibly be the fault of the U.S. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| greguganus
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 08:19 AM Response to Reply #40 |
| 46. No one in America is going hungry to the extreme that they are in North Korea. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| NeedleCast
|
Mon May-25-09 10:24 AM Response to Reply #40 |
| 57. Yes, we are, by alot. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Throd
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 11:49 AM Response to Reply #40 |
| 63. Yes |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6
|
Mon May-25-09 12:33 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 72. Actually, yes, we are. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
|
Mon May-25-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 74. Yes we are. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
|
Tue May-26-09 07:11 AM Response to Reply #40 |
| 86. people here are far, far better off than citizens of North Korea. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 05:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 43. Deleted message |
| tj2001
(685 posts)
|
Sun May-24-09 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. Typical M.O. to get more food/money from the U.S. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TiredOldMan
(143 posts)
|
Sun May-24-09 11:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 8. Done it before |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
|
Mon May-25-09 03:49 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 38. I agree. Seems to be how they cadge food and fuel oil n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Old Hob
(296 posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 12:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 71. BS. Kim is looking for a military solution to his South Korea problem. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Buzz Clik
|
Sun May-24-09 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Any indication of the size? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
|
Sun May-24-09 11:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. 4.7 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 12:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 18. The last one was 4.2 magnitude, which yeilded a 1k ton nuclear bomb. So this one is similar. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekJ
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 02:28 AM Response to Reply #18 |
| 34. See post #21. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
|
Mon May-25-09 01:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 26. Unusual earthquake activity in North Korea nuclear test area (ThaiIndian News) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
|
Mon May-25-09 07:50 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 45. Russia says DPRK blast had 20 kilotonne force | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 09:48 AM Response to Reply #45 |
| 53. Deleted message |
Canuckistanian
|
Mon May-25-09 10:06 AM Response to Reply #6 |
| 56. Equivalent to the Nagasaki bomb, it was estimated |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
|
Mon May-25-09 03:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 77. N.Korea test "slightly bigger" than in 2006 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun May-24-09 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. does mass starvation sound like a half assed nuke? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BrotherBuzz
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 02:03 AM Response to Reply #10 |
| 30. The possibility of coordinating millions of hungry people... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 09:47 AM Response to Reply #30 |
| 52. Game Theory requires parties to be "sane" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum
|
Mon May-25-09 10:13 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 82. Stand under a "half assed nuke" with your loved ones and get back to me |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimlup
|
Mon May-25-09 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 11. Damn! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
|
Mon May-25-09 12:20 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 12. I was hoping that too |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimlup
|
Mon May-25-09 12:25 AM Response to Reply #12 |
| 14. No - actually I was wrong... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 12:34 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 16. You test in seismically quiet zones to *avoid* causing tremors and other earthquakes. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions
|
Mon May-25-09 01:19 AM Response to Reply #11 |
| 22. deleted. wrong place. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| onehandle
|
Mon May-25-09 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 13. Did they use one of the nukes they developed while Bush was invading Iraq? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimlup
|
Mon May-25-09 12:31 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 15. Actually they just started reprocessing plutonium a few months ago |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 12:41 AM Response to Reply #15 |
| 19. This one was more efficient than the last, too. If you compare blast size. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimlup
|
Mon May-25-09 12:44 AM Response to Reply #19 |
| 20. Do you know the magnitude of the first fizzle |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimlup
|
Mon May-25-09 12:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 21. OK... I'm estimating it was just over a kiloton... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekJ
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 01:49 AM Response to Reply #21 |
| 27. The Richter Scale is a logarithmic scale with a base of 10. The new weapon is 3 times as strong. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekJ
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 03:06 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 36. Small correction to the equation above. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions
|
Mon May-25-09 01:20 AM Response to Original message |
| 23. BREAKING: North Korea test-fires short-range missile |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio2007
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 09:44 AM Response to Reply #23 |
| 51. naw...no connection to this story. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Kablooie
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 24. That's wonderful! I'm so proud of them! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
|
Tue May-26-09 02:10 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 84. Me too. They've overcome the obstacles and now have an insurance policy against invasion. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
|
Mon May-25-09 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
| 25. US consulting with allies to establish facts on NKorean test claim (AFP | Hindustan Times) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
|
Mon May-25-09 01:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 28. U.S. unable to confirm N.K.'s nuke test (Korean Herald) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
|
Mon May-25-09 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
| 29. Q+A-What's the real threat of N.Korea's nuclear programme? (Reuters) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ronnie624
|
Mon May-25-09 11:50 AM Response to Reply #29 |
| 64. Now you've done it. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Arrowhead2k1
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
| 32. Whoa, I wasn't expecting this. Did North Korea say they would resume testing? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Regret My New Name
|
Mon May-25-09 02:14 AM Response to Reply #32 |
| 33. Aren't they always saying something along those lines? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| thewiseguy
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
| 35. Russia says the yield was 20kt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| proteus_lives
|
Mon May-25-09 03:48 AM Response to Original message |
| 37. Well, what pricks. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 03:51 AM Response to Original message |
| 39. The USGS says it was a Mw 4.7, which means this bomb was about 11.2 kt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| davidpdx
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 08:43 AM Response to Original message |
| 47. We didn't feel anything down here in Seoul |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 11:15 AM Response to Reply #47 |
| 60. What is general sentiment there? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| davidpdx
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-26-09 07:05 AM Response to Reply #60 |
| 85. Nobody is panicking |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
|
Mon May-25-09 09:11 AM Response to Original message |
| 49. Lunacy, simple lunacy! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio2007
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 09:40 AM Response to Reply #49 |
| 50. The inner circle chose to feed the people grass and dirt in order to conduct such tests but who is |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
|
Mon May-25-09 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
| 54. So, what happens now? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 10:03 AM Response to Reply #54 |
| 55. They still starve and eat dirt in there.. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 11:11 AM Response to Reply #55 |
| 59. Chances of a N.-S. Korea reunification certainly look gloomy now. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 01:26 PM Response to Reply #59 |
| 73. Deleted message |
Pavulon
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #73 |
| 79. 0 - 2 so far... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio2007
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 09:14 PM Response to Reply #79 |
| 81. 0-3. As you know, Kim has been around for 15 years, not 8 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ronnie624
|
Tue May-26-09 01:19 AM Response to Reply #79 |
| 83. In Kwangju City, South Jolla Province, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muttocracy
|
Mon May-25-09 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
| 58. another legacy of the Cheney years. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Akoto
|
Mon May-25-09 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 61. North Korea: "Boo, nuke testing! More aid now, please." |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Akoto
|
Mon May-25-09 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
| 62. Delete, double post. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tomm2thumbs
|
Mon May-25-09 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 66. Report: NKorea test-fires 2 more missiles |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turborama
|
Mon May-25-09 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 67. Obama says N.Korea nuclear test a "grave concern" |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| jessicaconway
(1 posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #67 |
| 68. Massive worry |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tomm2thumbs
|
Mon May-25-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #68 |
| 69. it's the more expensive version of Viagra n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio2007
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 12:23 PM Response to Reply #67 |
| 70. What does China say about these recent actions of their lap dog ? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress
|
Mon May-25-09 03:05 PM Response to Reply #67 |
| 78. UN chief sees 'violation' if NKorea test confirmed |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| ohio2007
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-25-09 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 80. LOL headline of the day...........Iran: no nuclear, missile cooperation with N.Korea |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Feb 09th 2010, 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC