|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Ian David
|
Mon May-11-09 07:17 PM Original message |
| (Senator Al) Franken Asks Court To Give Minnesota Governor A Direct Order | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
Qutzupalotl
|
Mon May-11-09 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Go Al! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head
|
Mon May-11-09 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Why is Coleman torturing his state? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
|
Mon May-11-09 07:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. Because he's a self-absorbed hypocritical asshole. i.e. Republican |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
|
Mon May-11-09 09:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 25. Because his constituents inconveniently stand in the way of his ambition. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
|
Tue May-12-09 12:31 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 40. republican and torture |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bette Noir
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 01:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 43. Because he wants his political career to be over? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 02:36 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 46. I think the GOP is making him do it. I don't think it is really Coleman personally. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| zogtheobvious
(116 posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #46 |
| 82. I agree, but... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed May-13-09 11:05 PM Response to Reply #82 |
| 87. Coleman is getting lots of "points" for doing this. He knows he will not take the seat. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
|
Tue May-12-09 09:14 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 55. Because he thinks the Minnesota voters are combatants? And should be waterboard? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| happygoluckytoyou
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 09:34 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 58. Because he got a state-sized waterboard for Christmas ? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| George II
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 10:25 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 63. When does his corruption trial begin? THAT might end this. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| JonathanMeador
(13 posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 10:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
| 65. Because he hates his state... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Earth Bound Misfit
|
Tue May-12-09 12:42 PM Response to Reply #65 |
| 71. Good post. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
|
Tue May-12-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #65 |
| 80. so true.. he thinks - "you bastards let this comedian get more than 35% of the damn vote? screw you |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
|
Tue May-12-09 06:43 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 84. Is that question rhetorical? nm |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
|
Mon May-11-09 07:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. recommend |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
|
Mon May-11-09 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. FRAK Coleman! He is just a whore for the Senate GOP |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Downwinder
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-11-09 07:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 11. among others. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Optical.Catalyst
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-11-09 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. The people of the United States think the law is clear also. Seat Franken |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Optical.Catalyst
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-11-09 07:35 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. K&R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HopeHoops
|
Mon May-11-09 07:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Coleman needs to get a fucking life. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David
|
Mon May-11-09 07:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 10. I hope the state of Minnesota sues him after Senator Franken is seated. n/t | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| HopeHoops
|
Mon May-11-09 07:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. They need to recover the legal costs of his bullshit. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
|
Mon May-11-09 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. Doesn't the court rule in June? | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| glinda
|
Mon May-11-09 07:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 13. Yes. And they might request that T-Pal sign it. T-Pal might refuse if Normie wants to take it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| old guy
(907 posts)
|
Mon May-11-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 16. Thank you. You are correct IMO. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Earth Bound Misfit
|
Tue May-12-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
| 72. + 1 n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
|
Mon May-11-09 08:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 19. Pawlenty must sign it if the MN Supremes |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| glinda
|
Mon May-11-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 28. I believe you are correct but I heard T-Pal, when asked about that, not give a direct answer. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| backscatter712
|
Mon May-11-09 10:49 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 33. If he had the choice, he would... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Bette Noir
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 01:19 AM Response to Reply #33 |
| 44. Removal from office? Don't tease! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| glinda
|
Tue May-12-09 12:39 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 70. Oh I know!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We could only hope! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme
|
Tue May-12-09 12:00 PM Response to Reply #28 |
| 68. If he answered directly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| glinda
|
Tue May-12-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #68 |
| 69. I think it had to do with "if" it was pursued at the Federal level. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
primavera
|
Mon May-11-09 09:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 22. And there's now binding Supreme Court precedent... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Stellabella
|
Mon May-11-09 09:13 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 24. But Bush v. Gore isn't supposed to set a precedent. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal
|
Mon May-11-09 10:38 PM Response to Reply #22 |
| 31. Not necessarily, since the Senate can still refuse to seat Coleman |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| backscatter712
|
Mon May-11-09 10:50 PM Response to Reply #31 |
| 34. The Supreme Court of MN can give a writ of mandamus to Pawlenty. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| progressoid
|
Tue May-12-09 01:00 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 74. T pal? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Sushi Bandit
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 05:06 PM Response to Reply #74 |
| 83. OMG she is HOT! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
|
Mon May-11-09 07:53 PM Response to Reply #9 |
| 14. Yes, ruling expected around June 3 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| davidpdx
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 05:52 AM Response to Reply #14 |
| 49. I don't think it will come that quickly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
|
Mon May-11-09 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. Is this the same Norm Coleman that said |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
primavera
|
Mon May-11-09 09:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 23. Don't be silly |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
|
Mon May-11-09 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. K & R! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Optical.Catalyst
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon May-11-09 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Another Kick |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| neverforget
|
Mon May-11-09 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. I can't imagine the hissy fit the GOP would throw if the shoe were on the |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
|
Mon May-11-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 27. just remember how batshit nuts they went about Gore fighting B*sh in 2000! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| kegler14
(539 posts)
|
Mon May-11-09 10:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 29. You haven't been reading conservative sites. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TheCowsCameHome
|
Mon May-11-09 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. It's past time to get this thing over and done. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays
|
Mon May-11-09 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
| 26. K&R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bobshin
(165 posts)
|
Mon May-11-09 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. I'd like to think of this as karma... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
|
Mon May-11-09 11:02 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 35. Um |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Mon May-11-09 11:11 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 36. And how should a candidate address inconsistent voting laws and procedures? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pab Sungenis
|
Tue May-12-09 09:36 AM Response to Reply #36 |
| 62. Not during his candidacy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| demwing
|
Mon May-11-09 11:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 38. I don't think they will |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435
|
Tue May-12-09 02:05 AM Response to Reply #38 |
| 45. Shout! won't even get it out. Maybe Oxi-Clean |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pink-o
|
Tue May-12-09 03:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 81. Oh, puleeze--45 posts is a dead giveaway |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| backscatter712
|
Mon May-11-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 32. This is the beginning of the end. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annm4peace
|
Mon May-11-09 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. What MN's think of Gov Pawlenty |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| riderinthestorm
|
Mon May-11-09 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. K and R!! nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
| 41. Republicans are paying the bucks for this bullshit keeping Coleman from conceding, keep the | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RedCloud
|
Tue May-12-09 09:03 AM Response to Reply #41 |
| 53. This has to be remembered come 2010. More repug suicide. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 76. Yes, Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-Minn.) must be singled out & all resources used to defeat him in 2010! | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Piewhacket
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 42. Huh.. that's interesting. That seems right. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| InfiniteThoughts
(311 posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 05:00 AM Response to Original message |
| 47. simple & elegant solution - 3 years for Franken & 3 years for Coleman |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Optical.Catalyst
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 05:12 AM Response to Original message |
| 48. Kick |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
|
Tue May-12-09 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
| 50. Big K & R !!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah
|
Tue May-12-09 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
| 51. K&R Seat Franken, now. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soylent Brice
|
Tue May-12-09 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
| 52. he's a fighter, and that's EXACTLY what we need in the senate. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 09:05 AM Response to Reply #52 |
| 54. Deleted message |
Dinger
|
Tue May-12-09 09:30 AM Response to Reply #54 |
| 57. Enjoy Your Short Stay |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian
|
Tue May-12-09 11:44 AM Response to Reply #57 |
| 67. Aww, man, why do I always seem to miss |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
|
Tue May-12-09 02:55 PM Response to Reply #67 |
| 77. He/It Only Made To 2 Posts |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
|
Tue May-12-09 09:35 AM Response to Reply #54 |
| 60. Just Guessing, Are You That "name removed" Guy From The Gun Forum? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger
|
Tue May-12-09 09:36 AM Response to Reply #54 |
| 61. Guns Are Your Hobby? Cool |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| OnionPatch
|
Tue May-12-09 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 56. If the situation was reversed, Coleman would have been seated long ago. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| happygoluckytoyou
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 09:35 AM Response to Reply #56 |
| 59. NOT IF I WERE IN CHARGE..... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx
|
Tue May-12-09 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
| 64. K&R |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire1
|
Tue May-12-09 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
| 66. K&R. This has gone on long enough. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Earth Bound Misfit
|
Tue May-12-09 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
| 73. Kicked & Bookmarked |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma
|
Tue May-12-09 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 75. Pawlenty is obstructing the peoples vote to be recognized |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
|
Tue May-12-09 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 78. JUST IMAGINEEEEEE if this was Coleman being held back from being reseated? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
| 79. I hope the Senate Dems have the balls and the sense |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
|
Tue May-12-09 06:45 PM Response to Reply #79 |
| 85. Senate Dems are gutless shills of CorpAmerica. nm |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dramarama
(469 posts)
|
Tue May-12-09 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 86. This is taking too long. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Feb 10th 2010, 02:25 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC