427
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

China's birth limits create dangerous gender gap

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Mme. Defarge (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 01:35 PM
Original message
China's birth limits create dangerous gender gap
Source: AP

BEIJING – China has 32 million more young men than young women — a gender gap that could lead to increasing crime — because parents facing strict birth limits abort female fetuses to have a son, a study released Friday said.

The imbalance is expected to steadily worsen among people of childbearing age over the next two decades and could trigger a slew of social problems, including a possible spike in crime by young men unable to find female partners, said an author of the report published in the BMJ, formerly known as the British Medical Journal.

The study said analysis of China's 2005 census data extrapolated that males under age 20 exceeded their female counterparts by a whopping 32 million.

The study found that China has 119 male births for every 100 girls, compared with 107 to 100 for industrialized countries.

The prevalence of sonograms in recent years has allowed parents to learn the gender of their fetus about 20 weeks into pregnancy, Hesketh said, leading to a rise in abortions based on sex. Abortion is legal and widely available.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090410/ap_on_re_as/as_chin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   All them wimmen are.....over here!!! The ones that weren't aborted, anyway.  MADem   Apr-10-09 01:43 PM   #1 
   indeed.  pansypoo53219   Apr-10-09 02:01 PM   #5 
   Wow. Your uncle is the first I've EVER heard to have adopted a male child.  MADem   Apr-10-09 02:23 PM   #11 
      Some friends of mine recently adopted a boy from China.  MissB   Apr-11-09 04:39 PM   #36 
   That's because the Chinese rarely make males available for  LibertyLover   Apr-10-09 02:09 PM   #7 
   I know one . . .  DollyM   Apr-10-09 05:37 PM   #27 
   According to Alex Jone's The End Game, it was papa Bush who fathered...  Just-plain-Kathy   Apr-10-09 01:47 PM   #2 
   Which is of course total nonsense.  ProgressiveProfessor   Apr-10-09 01:57 PM   #3 
   Absolutely-Alex Jones doesn't do anything but total horseshit  Reterr   Apr-10-09 02:01 PM   #4 
   He was clearly wrong about this one  ProgressiveProfessor   Apr-10-09 02:26 PM   #12 
   Not everything Alex Jones says is nonsense. n/t  Just-plain-Kathy   Apr-10-09 03:11 PM   #17 
      Never claimed it was...however, he is dead wrong on this point  ProgressiveProfessor   Apr-10-09 03:25 PM   #18 
   That's as silly as saying he father ed Yao Ming!  MADem   Apr-10-09 02:13 PM   #8 
   China's Population Control Policies  On the Road   Apr-10-09 03:36 PM   # 
   delete -- double post  On the Road   Apr-10-09 03:36 PM   #20 
   Yes, all those couples have their precious sons...  Lydia Leftcoast   Apr-10-09 02:04 PM   #6 
   Not my understanding of how karma works. The boys who were born had no choice in the  No Elephants   Apr-11-09 08:30 AM   #34 
      The karma is that while the parents themselves will have someone to  Lydia Leftcoast   Apr-11-09 09:24 AM   #35 
   If I were a propective Chinese parent I would choose a girl  IDFbunny   Apr-10-09 02:14 PM   #9 
   Boys take care of their parents in old age  XemaSab   Apr-10-09 03:04 PM   #16 
   Though gangs of men can kidnap women, and probably would.  SharonAnn   Apr-10-09 09:55 PM   #32 
   These are the computer nerds with far too much time on their hands hacking into our  truthisfreedom   Apr-10-09 02:17 PM   #10 
   How is something over 30 years in the making breaking news?  wuushew   Apr-10-09 02:26 PM   #13 
   The classical way to deal with too many excess males is war  Bearware   Apr-10-09 02:37 PM   #14 
   I agree. War is inevitable. nt  Romulox   Apr-10-09 03:55 PM   #21 
   If China invades anything, it will be Siberia.  Xithras   Apr-10-09 03:55 PM   #22 
   just goes to show  shanti   Apr-10-09 02:43 PM   #15 
   um, asymptotic population explosion IS fooling with nature n/t  MisterP   Apr-10-09 03:29 PM   #19 
   same thing is happening in India, with no birth control policies. The result is  robinlynne   Apr-10-09 04:18 PM   #23 
   There is only one need for such an imbalance.  smiley_glad_hands   Apr-10-09 04:20 PM   #24 
   Well when governments interfere with choice they create imbalance  LaurenG   Apr-10-09 04:43 PM   #25 
   Sexism is vulgar, I'm sorry they feel otherwise.  Deja Q   Apr-10-09 05:00 PM   #26 
   They can all become gay. Problem solved.  rollingrock   Apr-10-09 05:59 PM   #28 
   Smells like War  GinaMaria   Apr-10-09 06:55 PM   #29 
   why don't they just allow two men to marry one woman. It would lower the  demigoddess   Apr-10-09 07:24 PM   #30 
   Because the woman would be worked to death. nt  Nay   Apr-10-09 07:47 PM   #31 
   Title incorrect. The birth limits, while an intrusion on individual rights,  No Elephants   Apr-11-09 08:26 AM   #33 
   This is WHY governments should butt out of family  JeanGrey   Apr-11-09 04:57 PM   #37 
 
MADem (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. All them wimmen are.....over here!!! The ones that weren't aborted, anyway.
How many male adopted Chinese babies have you seen?

I've not seen a single one. It's only the girlbabies that are "disposable."

Same shit happens in India, too. As a consequence, women of "lower caste" (what a stupid concept) are able to move on up to the East Side, because there just aren't enough women of the "right" caste to go around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. indeed.
tho my uncle has a chinese girl and a boy. but it is rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Wow. Your uncle is the first I've EVER heard to have adopted a male child.
I live in a town with a fair number of rich and older parents with adopted kids...and not one Chinese male! Lotta females, though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr-11-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. Some friends of mine recently adopted a boy from China.
He had a cleft issue which was easily taken care of once they returned to the States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. That's because the Chinese rarely make males available for
adoption. It is the rare family who will abandon a male child in China. About the only time it happens is if that child is disabled, either physically or mentally. Our adoption agency told us that in all the years they had been facilitating adoptions from China they had had fewer than 20 boys offered to them for placement. And most of those boys all had physical problems like mitral stenosis and clift palate. Things that are fixable here, but not in China for the children of the poor - one reason they were abandoned. The other boys, mainly the ones with mental disabilities or severe physical problems, are kept in the orphanages and not put on the list of adoptable children. I know some families who begged and pleaded with Chinese adoption officials to be permitted to adopt a special needs boy and who were turned down because it was deemed not to be in the best interests of China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DollyM Donating Member (583 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. I know one . . .
Many years ago, a family I knew had a daughter by birth and was told that they shouldn't try again due to the mother's health so they adopted a baby boy from China. Of course, this was before the one child rule so there may have been more males available then. They wanted a boy to complete thier family and it was easier to adopt a chinese baby boy than an American one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. According to Alex Jone's The End Game, it was papa Bush who fathered...
...China's population control policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Which is of course total nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reterr (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Absolutely-Alex Jones doesn't do anything but total horseshit
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. He was clearly wrong about this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. Not everything Alex Jones says is nonsense. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Never claimed it was...however, he is dead wrong on this point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's as silly as saying he father ed Yao Ming!
:rofl:

And of course, Yao plays for Houston to be near his family!!!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Apr-10-09 03:36 PM
Original message
China's Population Control Policies
go farther back than Bush Sr's stint as liaison to China.

In 1956, China started a campaign to limit population growth to 2% a year through various measures including birth control.

In 1971, a policy limited urban couples to two children and prevented rural women from marrying until they were 23.

The current one-child policy was introduced in the late 1970s. There are many exceptions to the one-child policy, including:

- Ethnic minorities such as the Man, Mongols, Tibetans, or Uighurs
- Rural couples in some areas who have a girl as their first child
- Children who are not Chinese citizens
- Multiple births
- Children born with a physical or mental disability
- In Henan, a couple who are both only children can have a second child

The policy was intended to be in force for a generation, although it has been extended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Apr-10-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. delete -- double post
Edited on Fri Apr-10-09 03:37 PM by On the Road
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, all those couples have their precious sons...
who won't be able to find wives.

Karma in action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr-11-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
34. Not my understanding of how karma works. The boys who were born had no choice in the
matter and their parents have spouses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr-11-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. The karma is that while the parents themselves will have someone to
take care of them in their old age, they'll never have grandchildren, and their son will have no one in his old age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDFbunny Donating Member (492 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. If I were a propective Chinese parent I would choose a girl
and demand a big dowry for marrying her off well. Economics sez if there are too few young ladies that their worth will go up. A surplus of young men means their worth goes down.

Don't girls also get their inheritance or are they gyped somehow.

Countries with to many young boys typically send them off to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Boys take care of their parents in old age
Girls take care of their husband's parents.

Ergo, if you have a girl you will have nobody to take care of you when you are old. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Apr-10-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. Though gangs of men can kidnap women, and probably would.
Though the women would be more rare, that doesn't mean they have more power.

And most violence in the world is created by young men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. These are the computer nerds with far too much time on their hands hacking into our
networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. How is something over 30 years in the making breaking news?
Edited on Fri Apr-10-09 02:26 PM by wuushew
:shrug:

Lets check back in 15-20 years when this article speculates there will be a massive crime explosion, otherwise it is needless male bashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bearware (49 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. The classical way to deal with too many excess males is war
1. This doesn't get a great deal of attention but China will soon have roughly 20 million excess males of military age.

2. China has so much of the worlds manufacturing infrastructure that they would not have a lot of trouble equipping that 20 million as infantry.

3. China has intercontinental nuclear weapons delivery capability as well as rapidly improving conventional air force and air defense capability. Any conflict with China would not be a repeat of Korea where many soldiers didn't have weapons.

1 + 2 + 3 = Every country in Asia, with a few exceptions, is likely to be invaded as the economic chaos deepens and more social unrest develops in China. The few exceptions probably include Japan, Russia, Ukraine, India, Pakistan and maybe some others. Even with some atomic bombs and shorter range delivery options, India and Pakistan are by no means safe. :scared:

How far can Asian countries go in assuming that the U.S. nuclear umbrella will be used to protect them when the U.S. would be under direct nuclear threat.

Even if China only goes after a few countries, the rest will fall in line out of fear.





:scared: :scared: :scared: :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I agree. War is inevitable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. If China invades anything, it will be Siberia.
Mongolia will fall simply because it's in the way and China claims it anyway (like Tibet), but the real prize is Siberia. Endless natural resources, oil, gas, fresh water, fertile land, and very few people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. just goes to show
it's not nice to fool with mother nature!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. um, asymptotic population explosion IS fooling with nature n/t
Edited on Fri Apr-10-09 03:29 PM by MisterP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. same thing is happening in India, with no birth control policies. The result is
kidnapping of women to become forced wives, sale of girls....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
24. There is only one need for such an imbalance.
War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Well when governments interfere with choice they create imbalance
So it looks like Chinese men will have to find wives outside of their own country. I guess the government won't be able to encourage the population to remain within the country for partners and China will change. That will might be a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
26. Sexism is vulgar, I'm sorry they feel otherwise.
How's homosexuality treated, what with that extrapolation and all? (1.4 billion people, and if the males exceed females by only 32 million, what's really to whine about? Or do they mean 32 million males to 1 female? :wow: )

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rollingrock (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
28. They can all become gay. Problem solved.
homosexuality is a choice, after all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
29. Smells like War
Old (and generally powerful) men make war and young men make love. Sadly, those old ones who make war, send the young ones to do their dirty work. And why not? Surplus males with no partners or hope of a partner? Draft them! Some trumped up threat will be manufactured and tap into their frustration. Many will die. That will thin the herd.

Now who will they go to war with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. why don't they just allow two men to marry one woman. It would lower the
birth rate further and allowing all the women to have two babies would allow for greater gender balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr-10-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Because the woman would be worked to death. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr-11-09 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
33. Title incorrect. The birth limits, while an intrusion on individual rights,
are not responsible for the gender gap. The choices of the parents are responsible for the gender gap. And the choices of the parents reflect a near global, age old, social preference for males over females.

Blaming that on China alone is like blaming on the bossa nova.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr-11-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
37. This is WHY governments should butt out of family
planning issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb 10th 2010, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC