397
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Senate deal could lead to smooth sailing for public lands omnibus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Mar-17-09 11:35 PM
Original message
Senate deal could lead to smooth sailing for public lands omnibus
Source: NYT

The Senate is likely to pass the public lands, water and natural resources omnibus bill this week after Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) reached an agreement with Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) to allow votes on six amendments.

Reid told reporters today that the agreement could mean the Senate could have the entire omnibus wrapped up as soon as tomorrow, joking that the vote was long overdue. "We're getting used to working on it, we've done it for so long," he quipped.

The deal will allow for 60 minutes of debate on each of Coburn's amendments and require 60 votes for final passage. The Senate first passed the omnibus bill in January, 74-21, and a cloture vote yesterday was approved, 73-21.

Two of Coburn's amendments would strike all provisions that could restrict renewable energy development on public lands and sections that Coburn deems frivolous, such as the $3.5 million to celebrate the 450th Anniversary of St. Augustine, Fla., in 2015. Noting the National Park Service's $9 billion maintenance backlog, one amendment would bar new construction until all current park sites are certified as fully operational, ensuring full access by the public, and posing no health or safety threat.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/03/17/17greenwire-sen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   wow that's a lot of bill  NMDemDist2   Mar-17-09 11:59 PM   #1 
   The deal is to require 60 votes for passage.  No Elephants   Mar-18-09 09:51 AM   #2 
   The park service people are grownups  Dumak   Mar-18-09 11:17 AM   #3 
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Tue Mar-17-09 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. wow that's a lot of bill
and I think it's a good idea to get the Parks backlog cleared before new construction

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Mar-18-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. The deal is to require 60 votes for passage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dumak Donating Member (378 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Mar-18-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. The park service people are grownups
they can best figure out out to schedule their work without papa pander Coburn telling them what to do. I suspect the maintenance backlog has more to do with lack of funding courtesy of Republicans like Coburn than any project management difficulties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Feb 09th 2010, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC