Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Delphi salaried retirees fight benefit cuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 04:49 PM
Original message
Delphi salaried retirees fight benefit cuts
Source: Associated Press

Sunday, February 22, 2009
Delphi salaried retirees fight benefit cuts
Bree Fowler / Associated Press


NEW YORK -- Nancy Shade's father and grandparents had enjoyed the security of General Motors' benefits before they helped draw her to a job there, too. Now, the five-year breast cancer survivor is wondering how she'll afford her own health coverage if GM's spun-off parts maker, Delphi, terminates medical and life insurance benefits for salaried retirees.

Delphi Corp., which has been under bankruptcy protection since 2005, has asked a judge to allow it to cancel the benefits as soon as April 1, so the Troy, Mich., company can save more than $70 million a year and take more than $1.1 billion in liabilities off its balance sheet.

More than 75 Delphi Corp. retirees like Shade have written directly to U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain, begging him to keep them from joining the ranks of the uninsured. Attorneys representing at least three groups of retirees have filed formal objections to the plan.

A hearing on Delphi's motion is scheduled for Tuesday in New York.

Read more: http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090222/AUTO01/902220329/1148
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's funny how failing to pay what you promised is called "saving" money
Then aren't people who don't pay their mortgages and walk away from foreclosed homes just saving money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. How would Universal Single Payer Health Care be bad for America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pattmarty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because it's "Socialist" and probably "Islamofascist" also.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Because, umm, wait, wait, I know..
It would be bad because it would cut insurance company profits, and, umm, oh, yeah, it would let all kindsa freeloaders get health care, and there would be these huge waiting lines, and, um, Hannity thinks it's a bad idea, so that's good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. me too
if universal health care can relieve the suffering of our citizens, i don't care how long i have to wait in line for a doctor! i'm really tying my hopes on President Obama getting this thru!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, every once in a while the Canadian provincial systems start bogging down.
That almost always happens just after the conservatives get in power & cut funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. For a starter, the law should be changed to allow retirees over 55 to buy into Medicare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. The law should be changed to allow citizens over 55 to buy into Medicare.

Lots of us over 55 are working and don't have group medical insurance.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D-Lee Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Shifting the costs of retirement and health to the government AGAIN
and then the Repugs complain about the costs of Social Security retirement and health benefits.

It's that old "race to the bottom" -- how badly can you treat workers?

Gets us to our current cliffhanger: how long will ordinary people survive when reduced to the minimum economic sustenance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. I expect that Nancy Shade won't get gov't coverage & cannot buy into any health care insurance/plan
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathappened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. talk about traders to our country
all these corperations have over sea's operations going on while they are cutting work for our workers of this country , all of them should be held accountable for heath care and pensions promissed , i worked in these dirty plants for buick , and after u retire u need the health insurance , just to cope with the bad air , and many other conditions u work in well employed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why aren't Executives and CEO's being slashed and burned?
Instead of the clear-cutting of the hourly wage workers, get rid of all those layers of bloated bloviating beurocracy which do nothing but go to meetings, lunches, and think of creative ways to screw the floor worker?

I've said it a thousand times: eliminating 10 Executives at $500,000 a year saves $5 MILLION dollars: that money could instead
be used to keep 125 hourly workers employed @ $40k/yr, and employed workers meet their mortgages and SHOP, which will in turn
get the rest of the economy moving again, thereby creating MORE jobs.

Does no-fucking-body in Washington understand this??!?!?!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. The real reason behind the Bankruptcy of GM, legacy costs.
Edited on Mon Feb-23-09 11:54 AM by sarcasmo
Dirty rotten FUCKS. The Bankruptcy is going to happen, Saab was just the start. If they can't sell Saturn by 2011 they are going to shut Saturn down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC