|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Purveyor
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Dec-31-08 08:26 PM Original message |
| Chief Justice Roberts Says Congress Should Give Judges Same Inflation-Related Pay Hike It Is Getting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| pocoloco
|
Wed Dec-31-08 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. Wah! Wah! Wah! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
|
Wed Dec-31-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 8. We'd hardly be able to afford it, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GOPNotForMe
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Dec-31-08 09:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. I totally agree with you! nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:39 AM Response to Reply #9 |
| 29. Thanks, GOPNot; |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
|
Wed Dec-31-08 11:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 19. Yeah, Clarence Thomas and Scalia are fucking geniuses. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
|
Wed Dec-31-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 20. Such language; |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
|
Thu Jan-01-09 01:59 AM Response to Reply #20 |
| 34. nice profile n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:19 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 26. Anyone who can't live well on $169,000 per year needs to be in another lne of work |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BklnDem75
|
Thu Jan-01-09 02:13 AM Response to Reply #8 |
| 36. That's unfortunate. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bemildred
|
Wed Dec-31-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. He ought to return to private practice. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| brentspeak
|
Wed Dec-31-08 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Somehow, I doubt Roberts supported cost-of-living increases for the average working person |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
|
Wed Dec-31-08 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. I think his pay should be adjusted by the same percentage average American workers |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lasher
|
Thu Jan-01-09 04:55 AM Response to Reply #4 |
| 41. Then he should be getting 1% less than a SCOTUS justice got in 2000, adjusted for inflation. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jan-02-09 02:05 PM Response to Reply #41 |
| 59. Real household income -1% |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DissedByBush
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 51. They are government workers |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| sandnsea
|
Wed Dec-31-08 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. And people starving on minimum wage... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| customerserviceguy
|
Wed Dec-31-08 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Let's look at the other side of this |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
|
Wed Dec-31-08 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. He doesn't even work as much as the legislators!! Screw him! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
|
Wed Dec-31-08 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 10. Chief Justice Roberts can bite me. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
|
Wed Dec-31-08 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
| 11. Fucking thieves n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
psychmommy
|
Wed Dec-31-08 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. i am a state employee, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DissedByBush
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Dec-31-08 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. Judges give up pay to be in the position |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skyounkin
(462 posts)
|
Wed Dec-31-08 10:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 15. Us first! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
| 27. $169,000 a year?!?! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DissedByBush
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jan-01-09 02:19 AM Response to Reply #27 |
| 37. Can you go into private practice and easily triple your salary? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
|
Thu Jan-01-09 02:46 AM Response to Reply #37 |
| 39. Actiually public school teachers earn more than most university professors |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| UTUSN
|
Wed Dec-31-08 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. All him & DRUG ADDICT Rehnquist cared about were PAY RAISES!1 N/T |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X
|
Wed Dec-31-08 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. Fuck you, Illegal Chief Roberts. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod
|
Wed Dec-31-08 10:34 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. 217,000 dollars?...that`s not worth it in terms of wages |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool
|
Wed Dec-31-08 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Like they used to tell us when we wanted a raise. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
|
Wed Dec-31-08 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. The dumb fucks ignored the law and gave us Bush for eight years. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
williesgirl
|
Wed Dec-31-08 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. We're in a fucking depression - none of them deserve raises now. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| cstanleytech
(903 posts)
|
Wed Dec-31-08 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
| 23. What? Is he going to resign if he doesnt get his own way from pouting? Woohoo |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aquart
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:25 AM Response to Reply #23 |
| 28. Now there's an interesting thought. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:04 AM Response to Original message |
| 24. Its time to downsize or offshore some of the Supreme Court and US Congress | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69
|
Thu Jan-01-09 07:42 AM Response to Reply #24 |
| 43. Best.Idea.Yet. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nolabels
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
| 25. It's a free market |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omaha Steve
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
| 30. Chief Justice John Roberts could resign |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 31. Mother fucking mother fuckers |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69
|
Thu Jan-01-09 01:28 AM Response to Original message |
| 32. How about none of you should get a fucking cent |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
|
Thu Jan-01-09 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
| 33. Let's get the Minimum Wage and Single Payer Health Care . . . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| The Second Stone
(139 posts)
|
Thu Jan-01-09 02:08 AM Response to Original message |
| 35. How about a multiple of minimum wage? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RCinBrooklyn
(421 posts)
|
Thu Jan-01-09 02:31 AM Response to Original message |
| 38. Roberts' wife makes more than enough to keep him in Porsche's & Furs. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly
|
Thu Jan-01-09 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 40. Too bad you fuk'n evil fools. The bastard you installed as president | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly
|
Fri Jan-02-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #40 |
| 58. that's moot | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| lonestarnot
|
Thu Jan-01-09 05:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 42. What your unitary executive didn't steal enough to give you a raise asshat? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca
|
Thu Jan-01-09 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
| 44. I thought we were bordering on deflation. Maybe we should take some money back. nt |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TEmperorHasNoClothes
(356 posts)
|
Thu Jan-01-09 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
| 45. is it too much to hope that he'll quit if he doesn't get a raise??? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| eilen
|
Thu Jan-01-09 09:26 AM Response to Reply #45 |
| 46. I find it compelling that he is complaining of judge's salaries |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TEmperorHasNoClothes
(356 posts)
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:55 PM Response to Reply #46 |
| 52. well he is a bush appointee--- they don't care about the little guys |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mitchum
|
Thu Jan-01-09 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
| 47. It's called public SERVICE, you asshole in a robe |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 2Design
|
Thu Jan-01-09 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
| 48. i he wants more money go somewhere else - he is not wanted anyway n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| tinymontgomery
|
Thu Jan-01-09 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
| 49. Has roberts done anything except complain |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Igel
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jan-01-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 54. In this case, he's doing his job. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PuppyBismark
|
Thu Jan-01-09 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 50. If we want good judges, they need to be well paid. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GinaMaria
|
Thu Jan-01-09 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 53. That's the difference between private and public service |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Igel
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jan-01-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 55. Want the entire federal judiciary to quit? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Joe Steel
(337 posts)
|
Thu Jan-01-09 04:32 PM Response to Reply #55 |
| 56. Not a bad idea. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GinaMaria
|
Thu Jan-01-09 04:43 PM Response to Reply #55 |
| 57. That 'insult ' happens all the time |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Nov 20th 2009, 08:06 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC