Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Obama dismisses Bush Pentagon appointees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 07:00 PM
Original message
Obama dismisses Bush Pentagon appointees
Source: TheHill.com

Despite keeping Defense Secretary Robert Gates in the Pentagon, President-elect Obama’s transition team informed 90 Bush appointees their services will not be needed after Inauguration Day.

Scott Gration, a senior official on Obama’s transition team, called and emailed several of President Bush’s Pentagon appointees about 10 days ago to inform them they were being dismissed.

Those calls and emails were followed up by an email from Jim O'Beirne, the special assistant to the secretary of defense for White House liaisons, who expressed exasperation that Gration informed the employees directly instead of letting O'Beirne's office know first.<...>

In the email, O'Beirne tried to assure the soon-to-be displaced employees that the decisions were based on "policy change in the Obama administration" and not based on performance.

However, he said, if employees "harbor residual doubts" then they can "content yourself with the likelihood that it was your outstanding performance as a Bush appointee that drew the opposition's attention to you."

"In that regard, you may take justifiable satisfaction that you were among the first to be chosen," O'Beirne wrote.

Read more: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/obama-dismisses-bus...



Anybody else appalled at the blatant partisanship of O'Beirne? I'm only pissed that the cuts weren't deeper... Of the 250 odd Political Appointee slots at DoD only 90 are cut...? Well, it is a start...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   But I thought that wasn't the Change we can believe in?  halo experiment   Dec-31-08 07:08 PM   #1 
   Appears as though  tyne   Dec-31-08 07:13 PM   #2 
   Every last one of them...  CTuttle   Dec-31-08 07:22 PM   #4 
      Use square brackets, not angle brackets  tblue37   Dec-31-08 09:13 PM   #11 
         Mahalo, I'm still a young pup...!  CTuttle   Dec-31-08 09:28 PM   #13 
            Welcome to DU. I could see by your post count that you are a newbie,  tblue37   Dec-31-08 09:52 PM   #15 
               Wow, I'm honored that the story is receiving top billing...! ;-)  CTuttle   Dec-31-08 10:29 PM   # 
   The entire W administration is going to need a gigantic dose  PearliePoo2   Dec-31-08 07:14 PM   #3 
   Love the dry humour. "Outstanding performance as a Bush appointee".  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Dec-31-08 07:25 PM   #5 
   Oh, dear. He was serious? Never occurred to me.  aquart   Dec-31-08 11:20 PM   #28 
   And for his e-mail, O'Beirne should be the next to go  matt819   Dec-31-08 07:50 PM   #6 
   ... and ask AGAG all about the job prospects...  CTuttle   Dec-31-08 08:30 PM   #8 
   so tell me, is O'Beirne next on the list? seems he is a partisan p.o.s. who needs to go  peacebird   Dec-31-08 08:27 PM   #7 
   He is calling his soon to be boss "the opposition"?  Robbien   Dec-31-08 08:47 PM   #9 
   I worry that he's one of the burrowers...!  CTuttle   Dec-31-08 09:01 PM   #10 
   and OBierne goes home exactly when?  robinlynne   Dec-31-08 09:22 PM   #12 
   Hopefully in about 6 to 10 years (with time off for good behavior)  jgraz   Dec-31-08 10:53 PM   #24 
   It's going to take a tanker truck of..  sendero   Dec-31-08 09:37 PM   #14 
   Disgusted? I would expect no less from the bUsh ass kissing dogs.  geckosfeet   Dec-31-08 09:58 PM   #16 
   *smile* Thank you Barak! Change has come!  superconnected   Dec-31-08 10:04 PM   #17 
   It reminds me of what followed when JFK issued National Security Action Memo #263  whistle   Dec-31-08 10:16 PM   #18 
   Gates should be getting the "boot" as well.  roamer65   Dec-31-08 10:28 PM   #19 
   Meaningless...  Baby Snooks   Dec-31-08 10:29 PM   #20 
   Count my veteran arse amongst that same crowd!  CTuttle   Dec-31-08 10:34 PM   #21 
   Clark won't be eligable for cabinet service until 2010  halo experiment   Dec-31-08 11:07 PM   #25 
   Well maybe Obama is just  cstanleytech   Dec-31-08 11:22 PM   #30 
   O'Beirne should have been canned first nt  Joey Liberal   Dec-31-08 10:37 PM   #22 
   O'Beirne screened staff for loyalty to Bush over competence - WAPO  grassfed   Dec-31-08 10:45 PM   #23 
   Stuart Bowen's SIGIR report put's the CPA's ineptitude front and center...  CTuttle   Dec-31-08 11:15 PM   #26 
   LMAO. Did he really say that?  aquart   Dec-31-08 11:18 PM   #27 
   Is this O'Beirne related to Kate O'Beirne, the antifeminist gasbag from the National Review?  Ken Burch   Dec-31-08 11:21 PM   #29 
   The very same android...!  CTuttle   Dec-31-08 11:38 PM   #32 
   Welcome to DU. Kick and Rec.  OnceUponTimeOnTheNet   Dec-31-08 11:24 PM   #31 
   Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-01-09 02:11 AM   #33 
   Why didn't you post a journal...?  CTuttle   Jan-01-09 04:17 AM   #34 
   I am really getting sick of you posting this  Jazzgirl   Jan-01-09 10:21 AM   #37 
   This cut needs to go deeper, per O'Beirne's comment:  librarycard   Jan-01-09 04:40 AM   #35 
   *oof* That doesn't bode well...!  CTuttle   Jan-01-09 05:20 AM   #36 
   On the face of it, it looks like presumption on O'Beirne's part, but on further reflection, I think  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Jan-01-09 01:18 PM   #38 
   CTuttle you were quoted on this website - pretty neat - thought you might like to see it...  1776Forever   Jan-01-09 06:07 PM   #39 
 
Idealism (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. But I thought that wasn't the Change we can believe in?
Some people even on this forum want to impeach the man before he even gets into office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyne (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Appears as though
O'Beirne needs an e-mail. Get rid of all the thinned skinned paranoia Bush types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Every last one of them...
As <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/12/31/1360/9719/474/... ">Billmon</a> at the Orange place notes...

<blockquote>O’Beirne’s name should ring a bell among students of the Iraq War fiasco. Husband of National Review columnist and all-around harpie Kate O'Beirne, he was a minor but highly instrumental player in the cabal of neoconservative bureaucrats who helped turn the late, unlamented Coalition Provisional Authority into what I liked to call the RNC branch office on the Tigris.</blockquote>

The damage he has wrought is immeasurable...! :grr: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Use square brackets, not angle brackets
for HTML tags here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Mahalo, I'm still a young pup...!
:toast: Hau'oli Makahiki Hou! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Welcome to DU. I could see by your post count that you are a newbie,
Edited on Wed Dec-31-08 10:40 PM by tblue37
so I thought I would let you know why your HTML tags weren't working right. I was rushing, though, so I forgot to add a proper welcome.

Heh: My subject line sounds like a line from "The Streets of Laredo": "I see by your outfit that you are a cowboy. . . ."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 10:29 PM
Original message
Wow, I'm honored that the story is receiving top billing...! ;-)
:headbang: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PearliePoo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. The entire W administration is going to need a gigantic dose
of "industrial strength " rodent pest control.
Root out these burrowing rats.
Suck it up you bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Love the dry humour. "Outstanding performance as a Bush appointee".
Heck. I've just realised O'Beirne works for Bush - and he would have said it in all seriousness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. Oh, dear. He was serious? Never occurred to me.
Well, I appreciate the irony even if he can't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matt819 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Dec-31-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. And for his e-mail, O'Beirne should be the next to go
His response to being outflanked and the substance of his message suggest to me that his should be the next resignation asked for. I think it was a certain president, hang on it minute, it'll come to me. . . oh, year, Bush43 - if you're not with us, you're against us. Hmmmm. . . words to live, and look for jobs, by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. ... and ask AGAG all about the job prospects...
:puke: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. so tell me, is O'Beirne next on the list? seems he is a partisan p.o.s. who needs to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. He is calling his soon to be boss "the opposition"?
"that drew the opposition's attention to you"

This guy is partisan through and through. AND he gets to keep his job where he will be thinking each and every day that he is working for "the opposition".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I worry that he's one of the burrowers...!
:nuke: :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. and OBierne goes home exactly when?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Hopefully in about 6 to 10 years (with time off for good behavior)
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's going to take a tanker truck of..
.. Crony-Be-Gone to clean these useless patrons out of our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Dec-31-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. Disgusted? I would expect no less from the bUsh ass kissing dogs.
Edited on Wed Dec-31-08 10:00 PM by geckosfeet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
17. *smile* Thank you Barak! Change has come!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. It reminds me of what followed when JFK issued National Security Action Memo #263
<snip>
October 11, 1963
To: Secretary of State

Secretary of Defense

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff


SUBJECT: South Vietnam

At a meeting on October 5, 1963, the President considered the recommendations contained in the report of Secretary McNamara and General Taylor on their mission to South Vietnam.

The President approved the military recommendations contained in Section I B (1-3) of the report, but directed that no formal announcement be made of the implementation of plans to withdraw 1,000 U.S. military personnel by the end of 1963.

After discussion of the remaining recommendations of the report, the President approved the instruction to Ambassador Lodge which is set forth in State Department telegram No. 534 to Saigon.

McGeorge Bundy


Copy furnished:

Director of Central Intelligence

Administrator, Agency for International Development

<MORE>

http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/nsam263.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. Gates should be getting the "boot" as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. Meaningless...
Barack Obama can fire everyone in the Pentagon and it will be meaningless simply because of his decision to keep "Gates and Company."

What happened to Wesley Clark?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Gates

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley_Clark

I think most of the people who voted for Barack Obama would rather have had someone with actual military experience than a former CIA director who served under George HW Bush.

I think most of the people who voted for Barack Obama would rather have had anyone but Robert Gates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Count my veteran arse amongst that same crowd!
I was sorely disappointed with Obama's decision...! :grr: :shrug: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Clark won't be eligable for cabinet service until 2010
due to his recent military service. Gates is a short-term appointee, with Clark perhaps replacing him in two years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech (903 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. Well maybe Obama is just
doing this for a little bit for 2 reasons, #1 to mollify the far right a little bit and #2 to bring someone else fully up to speed who can make a plan to get us out of this mess the Republicans and Bush got us in as fast and as safely as possible
I really hope its more of #2 though, I just dont like Gates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. O'Beirne should have been canned first nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. O'Beirne screened staff for loyalty to Bush over competence - WAPO
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...

Ties to GOP Trumped Know-How Among Staff Sent to Rebuild Iraq
Early U.S. Missteps in the Green Zone
By Rajiv Chandrasekaran
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, September 17, 2006; A01

Adapted from "Imperial Life in the Emerald City," by Rajiv Chandrasekaran, copyright Knopf 2006

After the fall of Saddam Hussein's government in April 2003, the opportunity to participate in the U.S.-led effort to reconstruct Iraq attracted all manner of Americans -- restless professionals, Arabic-speaking academics, development specialists and war-zone adventurers. But before they could go to Baghdad, they had to get past Jim O'Beirne's office in the Pentagon.

To pass muster with O'Beirne, a political appointee who screens prospective political appointees for Defense Department posts, applicants didn't need to be experts in the Middle East or in post-conflict reconstruction. What seemed most important was loyalty to the Bush administration. O'Beirne's staff posed blunt questions to some candidates about domestic politics: Did you vote for George W. Bush in 2000? Do you support the way the president is fighting the war on terror? Two people who sought jobs with the U.S. occupation authority said they were even asked their views on Roe v. Wade .

Many of those chosen by O'Beirne's office to work for the Coalition Provisional Authority, which ran Iraq's government from April 2003 to June 2004, lacked vital skills and experience. A 24-year-old who had never worked in finance -- but had applied for a White House job -- was sent to reopen Baghdad's stock exchange. The daughter of a prominent neoconservative commentator and a recent graduate from an evangelical university for home-schooled children were tapped to manage Iraq's $13 billion budget, even though they didn't have a background in accounting.

The decision to send the loyal and the willing instead of the best and the brightest is now regarded by many people involved in the 3 1/2 -year effort to stabilize and rebuild Iraq as one of the Bush administration's gravest errors. Many of those selected because of their political fidelity spent their time trying to impose a conservative agenda on the postwar occupation, which sidetracked more important reconstruction efforts and squandered goodwill among the Iraqi people, according to many people who participated in the reconstruction effort..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Stuart Bowen's SIGIR report put's the CPA's ineptitude front and center...
Here's the source material...! (PDF) :fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. LMAO. Did he really say that?
Bet it floats right over their irony-challenged heads.

Must pay more attention to O'Beirne. He's a hoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Dec-31-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. Is this O'Beirne related to Kate O'Beirne, the antifeminist gasbag from the National Review?
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. The very same android...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Dec-31-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
31. Welcome to DU. Kick and Rec.
Like your attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed (0 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan-01-09 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan-01-09 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Why didn't you post a journal...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jan-01-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. I am really getting sick of you posting this
rant over and over. Stop. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librarycard (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan-01-09 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
35. This cut needs to go deeper, per O'Beirne's comment:
if employees "harbor residual doubts" then they can "content yourself with the likelihood that it was your outstanding performance as a Bush appointee that drew the opposition's attention to you."

"In that regard, you may take justifiable satisfaction that you were among the first to be chosen," O'Beirne wrote.


I work for the DoD, and I have bosses that were given raises and then did whatever Bush told them to do rather than considering what was best for the organization and hashing things out in open debate, as would have been done during a Clinton administration. "Outstanding performance" means taking the increase in pay, doing Bush's bidding of dismantling DoD departments so the budget money could be funneled to Iraq and Afghanistan war contractors. Some of these "parrots" (military and civilian) have already left without waiting for their letter. Allison Barber (propaganda chief of AFN/Stars & Stripes; coordinator the America Supports You program and of Bush's telecommunications set-up w/troops) resigned suddenly in Oct. Some are being shuffled between the Pacific and European commands in hopes of not being noticed, and they are close friends of Dick Cheney.

The culling needs to go deeper, particularly in the civilian sector of the DoD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTuttle (88 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan-01-09 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. *oof* That doesn't bode well...!
Happy New Year from the Isles...! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan-01-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. On the face of it, it looks like presumption on O'Beirne's part, but on further reflection, I think
Edited on Thu Jan-01-09 01:21 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
it shows a lack of understanding quite characteristic of the Neocon regime.

And since Obama's style has not been wantonly confrontational, i.e. for the sake of it (unlike the Republicans after Reagan's mob left the White House), but, rather, conciliatory, there must have been a very good reason for not informing O'Beirne first - assuming that would have been the normal protocol, courtesy, convention, etc. Is that so difficult to grasp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan-01-09 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
39. CTuttle you were quoted on this website - pretty neat - thought you might like to see it...
http://www.daylife.com/words/Jim_O%3FBeirne

I was looking around to see more on this subject and found it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov 21st 2009, 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC