|
|
|
This topic is archived. First thread | Last thread |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Purveyor
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 01:49 PM Original message |
| Caroline Kennedy to Seek Clinton’s Senate Seat |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. This should be fun to watch. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
|
Mon Dec-15-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. So true. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WriteDown
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. No more political dynasties!!!!!!!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clixtox
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 13. I completely agree... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| qwlauren35
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 05:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
| 64. Political Dynasties are Interwoven in American History. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 14. So, in your opinion, does |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raskolnik
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #14 |
| 36. Not banned from seeking public office, but shouldn't be *appointed* to public |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 44. So, out of the pool of all the others who may be *appointed*, |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raskolnik
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #44 |
| 48. I'm tired of dynasties. She can do good work elsewhere. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 49. No, it won't. It will go to someone who can get elected, aka raise campaign money. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raskolnik
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #49 |
| 50. And the way to fix that is to appoint a Kennedy with no government experience to the club? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 51. What fix? You think it can be fixed? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raskolnik
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #51 |
| 53. You and I have differing opinions on the merits of political dynasty. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #53 |
| 54. Definite on the Kennedys, with their record of service and sacrifice. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WriteDown
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #54 |
| 65. Like the Bay of Pigs Invasion or this? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #65 |
| 66. The Bay of Pigs was not a Kennedy operation. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WriteDown
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #66 |
| 68. So Joe Kennedy is responsible... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #68 |
| 70. The Bay of Pigs was already in progress when Kennedy took office. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WriteDown
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 05:58 PM Response to Reply #70 |
| 71. Invasion was launched in April 1961 |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 06:02 PM Response to Reply #71 |
| 72. Please read something about the Bay of Pigs. It was already in place |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WriteDown
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 06:06 PM Response to Reply #72 |
| 73. So was invading Iraq.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 06:38 PM Response to Reply #73 |
| 78. You only are showing how little you know both about the Bay of Pigs |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WriteDown
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Dec-16-08 12:16 AM Response to Reply #78 |
| 82. So the pentagon and CIA was just to powerful for JFK to fight? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges
|
Tue Dec-16-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 87. Is it fair to dicriminate |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Dec-16-08 10:48 AM Response to Reply #36 |
| 84. That simply is not possible at this time. However, if appointed, she will have to defend her |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges
|
Tue Dec-16-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 85. So an appointing official should |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
|
Tue Dec-16-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #85 |
| 86. Neither discrimnate against, nor favor. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges
|
Tue Dec-16-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #86 |
| 88. But she has the right to apply. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Critters2
|
Tue Dec-16-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #88 |
| 89. "Right to apply"? She's got NO experience. Hell, I should apply |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges
|
Tue Dec-16-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #89 |
| 90. Go right ahead. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 22. Depends upon the history of the Dynasty. I'll take ten more Kenney-esque |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Donnachaidh
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 31. I guess it's OKAY if the legacy is blue :sarcasm: |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Alexander
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
| 55. No Kennedy dynasties, but Clinton dynasties are okay? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| paulk
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Dec-16-08 12:46 AM Response to Reply #55 |
| 83. did Chelsea get appointed Senator? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Trajan
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. Yay ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Saturday
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. I wonder what Gov. Paterson will get in return? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Captain Hilts
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
| 11. The article doesn't suggest she's closer to getting the nod. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shiver
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
| 26. So Patterson should appoint someone who doesn't want it? eom |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges
|
Tue Dec-16-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
| 91. That seems to be the feeling of a lot of the people here. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polichick
|
Mon Dec-15-08 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. Chris Cillizaa, msnbc just said that Clinton doesn't want her because she supported Barack... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| BeyondGeography
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. By that standard, Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild is a superior choice |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Captain Hilts
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 10. You believe shit like that? They're trying to stir up trouble. Give it a rest Chris!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 24. I don't know if it's true or not but you're right. The media would love to |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Captain Hilts
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
| 27. Change 'squabble' to 'catfight' and yeah, the media just LOVES it! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 21. Is there a link to that quote from Clinton? NT |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 32. Of course not. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polichick
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 35. Norah just covered it again - it's friends of Clinton making remarks... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| onehandle
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 38. He said that, huh. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| polichick
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
| 47. Not necessarily - but it is true that some of Clinton's supporters... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. Great news |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| CheCheCheCheYerBooty
(36 posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. I admire her |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 15. Well, that osmosis thing will surely be the defining qualification when |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pacalo
|
Mon Dec-15-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
| 77. It depends on which dynasty being discussed. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 34. Welcome to DU. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Donnachaidh
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 37. she *knows* enough from being a Kennedy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Doremus
|
Mon Dec-15-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
| 74. I like her too. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. If she runs for it and wins it, then that's fine with me |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juajen
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #12 |
| 23. I totally agree. She should run for it, not be appointed. NT |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bottomtheweaver
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. I think she wants to finish what her father and uncles started |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| proud progressive
(349 posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. 'questioned her credentials' - for starters, she is not a typical political whore |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| 2Design
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. Good - this is a family that likes people and does good works NOT like BUSH |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 19. Sorry, the dynasty thing has me voting no |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bitchkitty
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
| 43. Loved that show. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. This is so exciting! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 28. Very exciting! I wonder when Paterson is going to make a decision? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace frog
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
| 25. Best of luck to Mrs. Schlossberg |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hedgehog
|
Mon Dec-15-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. Given the state of th Democratic Party in New York, I'd rather see Caroline Kennedy than any |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. She's likely to be a goo-goo. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IthinkThereforeIAM
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #30 |
| 41. That is why I hope she gets the nod... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Raskolnik
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. Booooooooooooo. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #33 |
| 56. Deleted message |
| Raskolnik
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #56 |
| 59. Really? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneBlueSky
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
| 39. while I understand the reservations that some have . . . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| IthinkThereforeIAM
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 42. Yep... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YvonneCa
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. Good luck, Caroline! I'm pulling for you... | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 45. Fine by me |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Libertas1776
|
Mon Dec-15-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
| 46. Damn it!!! | ![]() |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LostinVA
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 52. The hypocrisy of some on this board is astounding |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #52 |
| 57. I am anti-dynasty for president but they are not as negative when it |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BooScout
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #52 |
| 58. Ain't it though? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LostinVA
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #58 |
| 61. Nope |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mark D.
(256 posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
| 60. Screw Hypocrisy |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LostinVA
|
Mon Dec-15-08 04:50 PM Response to Reply #60 |
| 62. Both my granddads did more to fight the Nazis, and LBJ did more for civil rights |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WriteDown
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #60 |
| 63. Yep.... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| brentspeak
|
Mon Dec-15-08 05:50 PM Response to Reply #63 |
| 67. I've read some lame reasons why Caroline Kennedy shouldn't be appointed Senator |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WriteDown
(1000+ posts)
|
Mon Dec-15-08 05:52 PM Response to Reply #67 |
| 69. I was responding to the posters reasoning that her family name |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LostinVA
|
Mon Dec-15-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #69 |
| 75. Joe Kennedy was Pro-Hitler and rabidly anti-Semitic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #75 |
| 76. And, how does that follow? In 1962, I was still being taught that the Jews |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| LostinVA
|
Mon Dec-15-08 07:12 PM Response to Reply #76 |
| 80. How does what follow? Joe Kennedy was a Nazi appeaser and rabidly antisemitic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
|
Mon Dec-15-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #80 |
| 81. Sorry -- I thought this thread was about a Senate run. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Stellabella
|
Tue Dec-16-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #80 |
| 93. That doesn't mean his granddaughter is. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| pacalo
|
Mon Dec-15-08 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
| 79. From TPM... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Stellabella
|
Tue Dec-16-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 92. I think she's eminently qualified |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Nov 21st 2009, 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Links | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC