431
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

UN Nuclear Agency Chief Critical of U.S. (Over Syria - ElBaradei: Iraq Claims Were 'Bonkers')

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Tue Nov-25-08 08:19 AM
Original message
UN Nuclear Agency Chief Critical of U.S. (Over Syria - ElBaradei: Iraq Claims Were 'Bonkers')Updated at 2:49 AM
Edited on Tue Nov-25-08 08:29 AM by Hissyspit
Source: Asssociated Press

UN nuclear agency chief critical of US

By GEORGE JAHN – 36 minutes ago
VIENNA, Austria (AP) — The chief U.N. nuclear inspector has urged caution against prematurely judging Syria's atomic program by reminding diplomats about false U.S. claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, comments released Tuesday show. The bluntness of remarks by Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, reflected tensions over whether Syria should be given potentially sensitive nuclear guidance at a time it is being investigated for alleged secret atomic activities.

Speaking at a closed meeting of the IAEA's board on Monday, ElBaradei did not mention the United States by name. But his reference to claims that Saddam had a secret chemical, nuclear and biological weapons program — assertions that helped form the U.S. rationale for the invasion of Iraq — made it clear that his criticism was directed mostly at Washington. "There are claims against Iraq, which proved to be bonkers, but only after a terrible war," ElBaradei said after the U.S. and its allies questioned Syria's right to his agency's help in planning a power-producing atomic reactor.

"There is one thing called investigation, another called clear-cut proof of innocence or guilt ... and all of you, even if you are not lawyers, know that people and countries are innocent until proven guilty," he said.
The clash reflected tensions between ElBaradei and key Western nations over whether Syria should be given potentially sensitive nuclear guidance at a time when it is being investigated.

President George W. Bush's administration initially argued that Saddam had to be toppled to stop him from using what Bush claimed were the Iraqi leader's weapons of mass destruction or from selling them to al-Qaida or other terrorist groups. But no such weapons were ever found. ElBaradei was among the chief skeptics questioning the claims.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5ibbvK...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   Associated Pukes' history writing...  Peace Patriot   Nov-25-08 11:56 AM   #1 
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Nov-25-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Associated Pukes' history writing...
"But his reference to claims that Saddam had a secret chemical, nuclear and biological weapons program — assertions that helped form the U.S. rationale for the invasion of Iraq — made it clear that his criticism was directed mostly at Washington. "There are claims against Iraq, which proved to be bonkers, but only after a terrible war," ElBaradei said after the U.S. and its allies questioned Syria's right to his agency's help in planning a power-producing atomic reactor."

How accurate history should read...

"But his reference to claims that Saddam had a secret chemical, nuclear and biological weapons program — assertions that helped form the U.S./Bushwhack pre-written narrative for its pre-determined invasion of Iraq and slaughter of a million innocent people to get their oil — made it clear that his criticism was directed mostly at Washington. "There are claims against Iraq, which proved to be bonkers, but only after a terrible war," ElBaradei said after the U.S. and its allies questioned Syria's right to his agency's help in planning a power-producing atomic reactor." (my edit/additions]

----------

Beware of Associated Pukes writing our history. It's very sneaky.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb 10th 2010, 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC