Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Marine denied recognition because of how he died

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Nov-19-08 11:32 AM
Original message
Marine denied recognition because of how he died
Source: The Virginian Pilot

HAMPTON, Va. - Marine Lance Cpl. Darrell Schumann, a 25-year-old from Hampton, fought bloody door-to-door battles for three months in Fallujah in late 2004. A few weeks later, he boarded a helicopter for the first leg of his trip home.

The helicopter, carrying Schumann and 30 comrades, flew into a sandstorm and crashed in the Iraqi desert, killing everyone on board. It remains the greatest single loss of U.S. troops in the Iraq war.

President Bush praised Schumann by name for his valor. But his name will not be found on the Virginia War Memorial in Richmond.

State officials have deemed that only the names of service members killed in hostile combat in the Middle East will be added to the stone-and-glass walls, which bear the names of 11,600 Virginians killed since World War II.

Recent veterans who died under other circumstances, such as aircraft accidents, are excluded.

The policy has changed since the memorial was erected, and the names of many service members who were killed in accidents are found on the wall.

Rick Schumann, Darrell's father, wants the policy changed again.

Read more: http://www.dailypress.com/news/local/virginia/dp-va--re...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   I thought dying in a combat AREA was still considered combat  Sabriel   Nov-19-08 11:34 AM   #1 
   That's just low down if you ask me.  redirish28   Nov-19-08 11:34 AM   #2 
   I think anyone who dies "in country" as a direct result of their service  wienerdoggie   Nov-19-08 11:37 AM   #3 
   How petty. n/tr  Gormy Cuss   Nov-19-08 11:38 AM   #4 
   If you are killed while on active duty during wartime ...  nyc 4 Biden   Nov-19-08 11:47 AM   #5 
   Have to make sure that "official" death toll in Iraq stays within "acceptable losses"  shadowknows69   Nov-19-08 11:48 AM   #6 
   That is incredibly tacky - what would be the point of differentiating in  petronius   Nov-19-08 12:10 PM   #7 
   Sounds like they're running out of room on the monument.  louis-t   Nov-19-08 12:28 PM   #8 
   Honor those who have died for this country!  hamsterjill   Nov-19-08 12:37 PM   #9 
   Stonewall Jackson was killed by his own troops on accident  bluestateguy   Nov-19-08 12:41 PM   #10 
   This is how they do it...  blackbart99   Nov-19-08 01:28 PM   #11 
   Bingo! An ever increasing American death count works against them(R)  MALEVOLENT MARINE   Nov-19-08 05:06 PM   #12 
   DOD counts the accidental deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan  RamboLiberal   Nov-19-08 05:32 PM   #13 
   What is the matter with people. n/t  sfexpat2000   Nov-19-08 06:01 PM   #14 
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. I thought dying in a combat AREA was still considered combat
Regardless of the situation that resulted in the death. Is that not so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's just low down if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Nov-19-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think anyone who dies "in country" as a direct result of their service
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 11:38 AM by wienerdoggie
(and yes, most transportation accidents are directly related to their service) should be honored--maybe they could just add some symbol of special recognition for those who exhibited extra valor or died during combat, instead of excluding those who still gave their lives for their country but happened to die the wrong way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. How petty. n/tr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Nov-19-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. If you are killed while on active duty during wartime ...
you should be included. Regardless of how. It is the "War Memorial" not the "Killed by Enemy Fire Memorial" My 2 cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Have to make sure that "official" death toll in Iraq stays within "acceptable losses"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. That is incredibly tacky - what would be the point of differentiating in
cause of death between people who died on active duty. If someone dies during training in the U.S. or whether they die in battle in Afghanistan, they still lost their lives in service to the country (and would probably be alive if they hadn't joined up). Why does it matter exactly what killed them?

It's such a repuke attitude - wave the flag and eat hot dogs at the Veterans Day parade and shoot dirty looks at anyone who doesn't stand straight enough during the anthem, but god forbid we do anything tangible to honor or help our veterans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sounds like they're running out of room on the monument.
How about stopping wars instead? Then we won't have to find more room to honor war dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamsterjill (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Honor those who have died for this country!
Stupid rules and policies get in the way of the true intent of memorializing the heroes - all of them. Anyone who has died for his/her country should be honored. Semantics shouldn't get in the way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Stonewall Jackson was killed by his own troops on accident
And yet he was considered a great war hero for the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackbart99 (162 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is how they do it...
They keep the death figures low by weeding out accidental death. Its just a way of lieing to the American people so they won't get so upset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ACTION BASTARD Donating Member (765 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Bingo! An ever increasing American death count works against them(R)
The republicans hate our military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Nov-19-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. DOD counts the accidental deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 05:45 PM by RamboLiberal
And this is about a local memorial, not DOD figures.

BTW, families have also fought to add names to "The Wall" in DC for Vietnam veterans. Nearly every year names are added for those who have died of wounds or for instances where they were not originally counted as casualties.

Krywicki was killed in 1966 in Vietnam when a member of his unit accidentally discharged his rifle. The Navy initially declined to add Krywicki’s name to the memorial because he died not in combat but in a “friendly fire” incident. The Navy reversed course following inquiries from his family.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18476907 /

Army medic Charles McGonigle was shot in Vietnam in 1970 while treating his comrades under fire. McGonigle lapsed into a coma, as his father -- who snuck into Vietnam to get his son -- told KDKA in 1982.

"No visa, no nothing -- but I got over there, and I saw my son. He was unconscious. Never woke up -- 28 months," the senior McGonigle recalled.

His son died in Pittsburgh outside the war zone -- not unlike Marine corporal Harold Brazen of North Versailles who also fought in Vietnam.

Brazen lost his life when his plane went down near Hong Kong, enroute to Vietnam following a brief R&R, but crashing outside the technical war zone.

"They put together this war zone idea and they certified these names to us as official casualties," recalls Jan Scruggs, who chaired the effort to build the Memorial. The Pentagon, says Scruggs, had strict rules about who could be listed on it.

-----

"President Reagan said although they are not in the war zone, I am the Commander in Chief and these names will be placed on the memorial," Scruggs noted.

http://kdka.com/local/Vietnam.Memorial.Wall.2.861840.ht...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Nov-19-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. What is the matter with people. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov 21st 2009, 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC