419
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Stevens Falls Further Behind in Alaska Senate Race (1,022)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
underpants (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov-15-08 09:25 AM
Original message
Stevens Falls Further Behind in Alaska Senate Race (1,022)
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 09:26 AM by underpants
Source: Fox News

Mark Begich, the two-term mayor of Anchorage, increased his lead from 814 votes to 1,022 over Sen. Ted Stevens as state election workers counted 17,100 ballots.

ANCHORAGE, Alaska -- Republican Sen. Ted Stevens, a stalwart of Alaska politics who was convicted of felony charges last month, fell further behind his Democratic rival Friday, and most remaining ballots come from parts of the state that have favored the challenger.

Mark Begich, the two-term mayor of Anchorage, increased his lead from 814 votes to 1,022 as state election workers counted 17,100 ballots. Begich had 47.4 percent of the vote to Stevens' 47.0 percent.

"With the gap widening slightly in our favor today, I feel even more optimistic that when all the ballots are counted next week, we'll see Alaskans came out to vote for new leadership in Washington, D.C.," Begich said in a news release.

The 25,000 remaining votes will be counted Tuesday. They come mostly from Anchorage and the surrounding area, where Begich is leading, and from the state's southeastern panhandle, where he was doing even better.

Read more: http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/11/15/stevens-falls-a... /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   Alaska, Minnesota, and (maybe) Georgia too?  Botany   Nov-15-08 09:28 AM   #1 
   Leiberman geting closer to becoming all-powerful again  legin   Nov-15-08 09:32 AM   #2 
   The only reason to keep LIEberman in the HHS chair at this point is venality.  last1standing   Nov-15-08 09:53 AM   #6 
   Stevens's gonna lose!  PCIntern   Nov-15-08 09:33 AM   #3 
   YESSSSS!!!!!!!!  lisa58   Nov-15-08 09:49 AM   #4 
   Good news!  NV Whino   Nov-15-08 09:52 AM   #5 
   This is great news because it keeps Palin from making a Senate Bid  Winebrat   Nov-15-08 09:57 AM   #7 
   He was down 1,061 last night, per the AK SOS.  gristy   Nov-15-08 09:58 AM   #8 
   The behinder he gets the better  Zambero   Nov-15-08 11:07 AM   #9 
   Palin might win a special election, but she cannot "grab" Stevens' Senate seat. n/t  elocs   Nov-15-08 11:46 AM   #10 
   Dear President Obama, please do something about elections.  tclambert   Nov-15-08 08:26 PM   #11 
   I doubt President Elect Obama reads here, but he has two websites and probably an office you can  No Elephants   Nov-16-08 05:09 AM   #14 
   IIRC the "magic number" is arround 1,500  sutz12   Nov-16-08 12:45 AM   #12 
   Good! n/t  Lugnut   Nov-16-08 01:16 AM   #13 
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov-15-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Alaska, Minnesota, and (maybe) Georgia too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
legin (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov-15-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Leiberman geting closer to becoming all-powerful again
I make that 58 (56 + 2 independents) if Mark Begich wins.

(warning: my margin of error is geting worse)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov-15-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. The only reason to keep LIEberman in the HHS chair at this point is venality.
The only reasons to keep Holy Joe in the Democratic caucus are to first obtain the 51 vote majority for control of the Senate and second to gain more seats in each committee by virtue of numbers. The problem with the second reason is that Holy Joe is very likely to do more damage to the Democratic party and obstruct President Obama if he is left there than passing another seat to the repubs ever could.

Based on that, there is no good reason to keep the traitor whether he could make that 'magic' number 60 or no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Sat Nov-15-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Stevens's gonna lose!
TF BAD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisa58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov-15-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. YESSSSS!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov-15-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Good news!
Can you say GOOD NEWS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Sat Nov-15-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is great news because it keeps Palin from making a Senate Bid
Stevens would have been kicked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov-15-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
8. He was down 1,061 last night, per the AK SOS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov-15-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. The behinder he gets the better
If he was to win, which doesn't appear likely at this point, the GOP would just kick him out anyway, paving the way for Palin to grab his seat in order to "strengthen" her resume. Curses, she's been foiled again! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov-15-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Palin might win a special election, but she cannot "grab" Stevens' Senate seat. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tclambert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov-15-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dear President Obama, please do something about elections.
This is fracking embarrassing. In 2000, we had dangling chads. In 2004, we had hacking of voting machines. In 2008, we have to wait weeks to find out who won Senate races in multiple states. This is some kind of 3rd world banana republic crap. People should be able to vote simply and conveniently and clearly. The votes should be counted, all of them, accurately and quickly. Recount procedures should be clearly laid out, fair, and efficient. This shouldn't be so hard. Please, Mr. President, give the order to get it fixed. You don't have to spend a lot of time on it personally. We've got lots of good people who you delegate it to. kthxbai.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov-16-08 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I doubt President Elect Obama reads here, but he has two websites and probably an office you can
contact. And a snail mail mailbox. I encourage you do to contact his peeps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov-16-08 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. IIRC the "magic number" is arround 1,500
I heard some talking head say that the automatic recount occurs at around 1,500 votes

If he can get over that many, the would pretty much end it completely. If he's not there, there might be an auto recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov-16-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. Good! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Feb 09th 2010, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC