Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Baristas at Minneapolis Starbucks unionize (1st union shop in USA)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:12 PM
Original message
Baristas at Minneapolis Starbucks unionize (1st union shop in USA)
Source: Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal

Baristas working for a Starbucks in Minneapolis have voted to unionize.

Employees at the location joined the Starbucks Workers Union, which is affiliated with the Industrial Workers of the World Union. The union said in a release that the store is the second in Minnesota and the first in Minneapolis to unionize.

The union also announced that baristas walked off the job Wednesday to petition management for a security guard at the location.

The unionized store is in a neighborhood that has seen significant criminal activity, the union said, including several robberies at knifepoint of nearby stores. Starbucks workers and customers had signed a petition for management to get a security guard for worker and customer safety.

Read more: http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2008/11/10/daily20.html



Also see Baristas Present 500 Petition Signatures Demanding Improved Security at a Minneapolis Starbucks

http://www.starbucksunion.org/

Submitted by SWU on Wed, 11/12/2008 - 5:44pm.

Workers, Customers, and Community Members Concerned About Threats and Harassment at the Location

November 12, 2008

Minneapolis, MN- Baristas at a Starbucks coffee shop in Minneapolis walked off the floor Wednesday morning to present a petition to management, signed by more than 500 concerned customers and community members, demanding Starbucks hire a security guard to ensure the safety of its patrons and partners. Today's action marks the expansion of activity by the IWW Starbucks Workers Union to a second store in the Twin Cities after baristas at the Mall of the America started taking action for improved working conditions over the summer.

Store partners circulated an internal petition, compiling signatures from most of the store's employees, requesting a meeting to discuss the security situation. After receiving no productive response from either the store or district manager, the employees turned to the customers to prove their point.

"We hoped management would recognize the need to discuss these concerns with us, but when they refused to even hold a meeting, we knew more action was needed," said Aaron Kocher, a current store employee. "We can't work when we are constantly being harassed, threatened, and intimidated, or trying to protect our customers from the same mistreatment," he said.

Nancy Athanasselis, a regular customer known to everyone at the store,
was gratified to see someone finally doing something about the problem.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Congrats! Now comes the hard part: bargaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. This is a tough one. People don't need to buy $4.00 lattes
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 05:58 PM by fed_up_mother
If the union demands too much, the coffee shops will close. It's not like unionizing teachers, nurses, police officers, large manufacturers, etc. You can only charge so much for a cup of coffee. That kind of job is inherently low paying for a reason. With labor being the highest cost, they can price themselves right out of business.

I don't mean to be taking up for Starbucks, but economics are economics. (WhenI do drink coffee out, I go to a locally owned shop.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. That arguement - or variant - is made every time workers anywhere try to unonize
Meanwhile, US workers have not seen a real raise in around 30 years. Workers can either keep swallowing that arguement or keep organizing - because it doesn't make sense to shut a shop to bust the union if the one down the road votes union too.

Bravo for the Starbucks workers! They are putting themselves out in the vanguard for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yeah, well, even a stopped clock is right every twice a day
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 08:27 PM by fed_up_mother
Coffee shops over here are already hurting. In a bad economy, that latte is the first to go.

I strongly support unions in other areas, but unionizing coffee shops is stupid. A few years ago, we hardly had any coffee shops, and they can disappear again when the labor costs get to be too much for the product sold - flavored water. :(

We expect living wages and healthcare for somebody making flavored water? It's not going to happen. They will get priced right out of the market.

(This is another reason why we need single payer healthcare...)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. HUH?

Why would Starbucks have to raise prices because the employees have a union? They must charge Americans more to pay the union workers in Asia, Europe, South America, etc... There are thousands of McDonald's around the globe that have union workers too. It is a known fact. Feel free to look it up. Start with the Labor Forum here on the DU. You will find that unionized Starbucks workers around the world protested when an American was fired for organizing.

What was your point again? Oh ya. Water. It seems your opinion doesn't hold enough water to make any coffee.

OS



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. My point is that in our present economy we may not have any coffee shops left
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 10:43 PM by fed_up_mother
if coffee shops were unionized and demanded more pay and benefits. How much will you pay for a cup of flavored water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Why do you feel the price of a cup of coffee will go up?

IF union workers at Starbucks around the world (we are all in this recession) can earn a living wage and benefits, why can't American workers do it too? But you are right we do need universal health. We do compete against ALL the other industrialized nations on health care.

Starbucks has a history of labor tactics against it's workers. All public record. It says it is a blue (progressive) company, but has refused to end it's contract with Cintas. Long story there too.

Thank you for the polite conversation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Hey, you take whatever you can get. Service sector unions are the future.
Because all the manufacturing jobs have been sent overseas by the bosses who run this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. You think that when prices go up it goes toward pay and benefits? Then how come clothes made
in China aren't any cheaper than when they were made here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Because they have a larger profit margin on those clothes
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 12:14 AM by fed_up_mother
The profit margin in coffee isn't as much as you think it is. Around here, most coffee shops have fairly prime real estate locations to draw in the customers. Rent and labor really eats into the profits - that's why so many privately owned shops can't make it.

And by the way, I'm in my fifties. Kids clothes, for instance, are cheaper now than they were twenty-five years ago considering the cost of living. Much cheaper. All of my friends who are now buying clothes for grandkids say the same thing. I remember paying five dollars for basic little shirts at Target years ago. Those same type shirts are still just five or six dollars! (The fabric is pretty crappy, though. :( )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buenaventura Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. No - the hard part is organizing. Wobblies know
that bargaining only leads to compromise. Why compromise when "every wheel in the creation, every mine and every mill, fleets and armies of all nations will at our command STAND STILL." Solidarity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Expect Starbucks to promptly CLOSE the unionized store, claiming
it's not profitable enough to keep open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Let em. My wife and I drink Starbucks and buy their grocery store product as well
but if they close that store, I vow to spend my money elsewhere. Not hard to do considering all the other coffee shops in the Seattle area. Let's see them do it. If they do, I will pick up the phone and tell Starbucks why I will grassroots campaign against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Razoor Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. they probably will
I am sure they will close it down due to "claims" of losing profits. I hate companies who claim they are pro-associate and not anti union and then when a store starts a union they close it down.
so basically lying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does this mean they are no longer
Howard's "partners"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Woot! Good on them and good for us all! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalifornia.Kid Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Expect this store to close for a new location within a super-market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good for them but it may be a moot point
The franchise will probably just close the shop. SB's is hurting in a big way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Power to the Average American Worker
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 06:42 PM by fascisthunter
If executives, CEO's and their Board of Directors took a pay cut, I'm positive their companies would not have to lay so many off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good for them.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC