sabra
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 12:59 PM
Original message |
| (Senator) Kyl issues warning to Obama on Supreme Court appointments |
 |
Source: Phoenix Business Journal - Jon Kyl, the second-ranking Republican in the U.S. Senate, warned president-elect Barack Obama that he would filibuster U.S. Supreme Court appointments if those nominees were too liberal. Kyl, Arizona’s junior senator, expects Obama to appoint judges in the mold of U.S Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer. Those justices take a liberal view on cases related to social, law and order and business issues, Kyl said. “He believes in justices that have empathy,” said Kyl, speaking at a Federalist Society meeting in Phoenix. The attorneys group promotes conservative legal principles. Kyl said if Obama goes with empathetic judges who do not base their decisions on the rule of law and legal precedents but instead the factors in each case, he would try to block those picks via filibuster. Read more: http://triangle.bizjournals.com/triangle/othercities/ph...
|

screw VileKyl n/t |
AZDemDist6 |
Nov-07-08 01:00 PM |
#1 |
 
My first thought, too. |
Catshrink |
Nov-07-08 02:56 PM |
#63 |
 
Hey Kyl. YOU LOST! GET OVER IT! |
Joe Bacon |
Nov-08-08 08:12 AM |
#155 |
 
vileKyl = nice ring to it, blech |
wordpix |
Nov-08-08 09:28 AM |
#156 |

Can't have any empathy on the court. nt |
MookieWilson |
Nov-07-08 01:01 PM |
#2 |
 
Nope, can't think about the people. Citizens just get in the way |
dmr |
Nov-07-08 05:32 PM |
#117 |

Bite my shiny metal ass, Senator. |
onehandle |
Nov-07-08 01:01 PM |
#3 |
 
I read your subject line "hearing" Bender's voice. LOL. n/t |
myrna minx |
Nov-09-08 08:54 AM |
#162 |

Yes Kyl, judges may have empathy too |
wtmusic |
Nov-07-08 01:01 PM |
#4 |

Democrats to Kyl... |
Deep13 |
Nov-07-08 01:02 PM |
#5 |
 
Exactly and.. |
debunkthelies |
Nov-07-08 02:29 PM |
#57 |

A filibuster would fail miserably. |
David__77 |
Nov-07-08 01:02 PM |
#6 |
 
Can we vend popcorn at the event? |
aquart |
Nov-07-08 01:36 PM |
#39 |
 
Pray that Stevens makes it until after Pres. Obama has taken the oath. |
No Elephants |
Nov-07-08 02:09 PM |
#51 |
  
Wouldn't make a difference |
laptoprepairguy |
Nov-07-08 03:03 PM |
#69 |
 
seriously? |
JerseygirlCT |
Nov-07-08 04:34 PM |
#97 |
  
I'd hope for that, but we need younger progressives no matter who they're replacing. |
David__77 |
Nov-07-08 07:44 PM |
#143 |
  
Scablia hinted on 60 Min that he may not be long for the SCOTUS. |
RUMMYisFROSTED |
Nov-09-08 10:08 AM |
#163 |
 
That would be too wonderful for words, truly |
JerseygirlCT |
Nov-09-08 01:23 PM |
#165 |
 
If Obama gets 8 years he could appoint 6, 7 with Thomas. |
RUMMYisFROSTED |
Nov-09-08 05:13 PM |
#166 |
 
They should certainly do so pending the replacement... |
yowzayowzayowza |
Nov-07-08 05:15 PM |
#110 |
 
Yes totally |
realpolitik |
Nov-07-08 06:50 PM |
#137 |

Up or down vote, up or down vote. Squawk |
MiniMe |
Nov-07-08 01:03 PM |
#7 |

Shut up and sit down, Kyl. |
brentspeak |
Nov-07-08 01:03 PM |
#8 |
 
GMTA. I was going to write, "Hey Kyl, sit down and shut the eff up" |
Turn CO Blue |
Nov-07-08 05:20 PM |
#114 |

Sen. Kyl missed the memo... |
LynnTheDem |
Nov-07-08 01:04 PM |
#9 |

Senator Who? I'm having trouble hearing those banished from power! |
stopbush |
Nov-07-08 01:04 PM |
#10 |
 
To Kyl: A sphincter says what? |
wtmusic |
Nov-07-08 01:08 PM |
#14 |

What an idiot |
Barney |
Nov-07-08 01:05 PM |
#11 |
 
he doesn't like judges with empathy |
noiretblu |
Nov-07-08 05:33 PM |
#118 |

Kyl, You lost. Get used to it. nt |
Cognitive_Resonance |
Nov-07-08 01:06 PM |
#12 |

This is where Rahm Emmanuel comes in handy. |
lurky |
Nov-07-08 01:07 PM |
#13 |
 
he'll twist it off and beat them with it. |
SemperEadem |
Nov-07-08 01:20 PM |
#26 |
 
I think you owe me a keyboard. |
Catshrink |
Nov-07-08 02:59 PM |
#65 |
  
... |
lurky |
Nov-07-08 03:34 PM |
#83 |
 
I like that idea. |
Alter Ego |
Nov-07-08 03:45 PM |
#88 |
  
Ah yes! The Atomic Wedgie!! |
Robb |
Nov-07-08 03:52 PM |
#91 |
 
Perfect! |
Catshrink |
Nov-07-08 04:09 PM |
#92 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-07-08 05:36 PM |
#119 |

I like to think we've evolved. |
crim son |
Nov-07-08 07:18 PM |
#141 |

Kyl: Empathy Baaaaad! Apathy Goooood!! |
paparush |
Nov-07-08 01:11 PM |
#15 |

I think we should let a professor of Constitutional Law choose the next few Supremes. |
Bette Noir |
Nov-07-08 01:12 PM |
#16 |
 
OOOH! OOOH! Pick me! Pick me! I know this one! |
VWolf |
Nov-07-08 01:32 PM |
#35 |
 
I don't know one personally, but I love watching and listening |
Janice325 |
Nov-07-08 01:32 PM |
#36 |

Warning????? |
Highway61 |
Nov-07-08 01:12 PM |
#17 |

What's with these hacks (Pelosi, Kyl) issuing "warnings"? |
eowyn_of_rohan |
Nov-07-08 01:14 PM |
#18 |

I don't remember Senator Kyl winning more than twice as many electoral votes as his adversary. |
asthmaticeog |
Nov-07-08 01:15 PM |
#19 |

hey Kyle, STFU and get over your cheapsuited self |
UpInArms |
Nov-07-08 01:15 PM |
#20 |

Kyl Issues "warning" |
CitizenPatriot |
Nov-07-08 01:16 PM |
#21 |
 
Right! No pork for Arizona... |
SemperEadem |
Nov-07-08 01:23 PM |
#29 |
  
And they mean it. |
Catshrink |
Nov-07-08 03:06 PM |
#72 |
 
Good one :) |
wroberts189 |
Nov-07-08 05:12 PM |
#107 |
 
Poor President Obama |
wryter2000 |
Nov-07-08 06:14 PM |
#134 |

Oh, yeah.... |
CitizenPatriot |
Nov-07-08 06:41 PM |
#136 |

Fuck Kyl!!!!! What about the reactionary Alito and .......... |
pattmarty |
Nov-07-08 01:16 PM |
#22 |
 
I don't thnk Karl Marx would be such a good choice for the Supreme Court |
tclambert |
Nov-07-08 03:04 PM |
#71 |
  
Satire, my good man/woman....... |
pattmarty |
Nov-07-08 03:49 PM |
#90 |
   
Satire right back atcha! |
tclambert |
Nov-07-08 05:36 PM |
#120 |
  
You may not be a hermaphrodite |
wryter2000 |
Nov-07-08 06:18 PM |
#135 |
  
Perhaps an obligatory seance when the SCOTUS gets together |
nolabels |
Nov-08-08 03:28 AM |
#149 |
 
I'd like to see Nadine Strossen replace Ruth Bader Ginsberg. |
Chan790 |
Nov-07-08 03:21 PM |
#79 |

The Constitution does not limit the Supreme Court to nine Justices |
tclambert |
Nov-07-08 05:38 PM |
#122 |

'who do not base their decisions on the rule of law and legal precedents'—? |
DemItAllAnyway |
Nov-07-08 01:16 PM |
#23 |

Ok, we'll cut all federal programs to Arizona, douchebag |
sasquatch |
Nov-07-08 01:19 PM |
#24 |
 
Hey! I live in Arizona |
Catshrink |
Nov-07-08 03:04 PM |
#70 |

you're warning him? |
SemperEadem |
Nov-07-08 01:19 PM |
#25 |
 
I'm with you and also ..Warning him with what ???? |
wroberts189 |
Nov-07-08 05:15 PM |
#111 |

Go Ahead...Make My Day |
iamjoy |
Nov-07-08 01:21 PM |
#27 |
 
Collins and Snow will disappoint you every time |
NBachers |
Nov-08-08 03:09 AM |
#148 |

(hey... pssssssst... Bozo... |
Left Brain |
Nov-07-08 01:22 PM |
#28 |
 
Hee hee! |
Mad_Dem_X |
Nov-07-08 03:45 PM |
#87 |

Defectors |
DemFromMem |
Nov-07-08 01:23 PM |
#30 |
 
I'm afraid it might be the Democrats we have to worry about . . . |
janet118 |
Nov-07-08 05:21 PM |
#115 |

FU Kyl |
lawdem_atlanta |
Nov-07-08 01:25 PM |
#31 |

Hey Kyl, if the GOP hadn't stacked the SC with far right judges, we wouldn't need liberals |
MessiahRp |
Nov-07-08 01:26 PM |
#32 |
 
Dennis K for the SCt just to rub the GoP's face in a pile of Kyl |
Supersedeas |
Nov-07-08 05:40 PM |
#124 |

Why do I have to have two idiots for my senators? |
Miss Chybil |
Nov-07-08 01:27 PM |
#33 |

Hey Kyl....can you say NUCLEAR?? I knew you could. |
OwnedByFerrets |
Nov-07-08 01:31 PM |
#34 |

Elections have consequences |
noonwitch |
Nov-07-08 01:33 PM |
#37 |
 
Hell yeah! |
Catshrink |
Nov-07-08 03:02 PM |
#67 |

Kyl needs to GET OVER IT!! |
Lasher |
Nov-08-08 07:09 AM |
#153 |

Another discredited GOP hack trying to look relevant - Dear Sen |
BR_Parkway |
Nov-07-08 01:33 PM |
#38 |

Time to bring back that nuclear option that Bill Frist once talked about |
bluestateguy |
Nov-07-08 01:37 PM |
#40 |
 
Exactly. I'm glad you pointed that out. |
acmavm |
Nov-07-08 01:47 PM |
#43 |
 
Back in "nuclear option" day, hypocrite Kyl was running around saying stuff like |
struggle4progress |
Nov-07-08 05:13 PM |
#108 |

So now "empathy" is something to be scorned? |
iceman66 |
Nov-07-08 01:37 PM |
#41 |

Sen. Kyl let me remind you elections have consequences..n/t |
BunkerHill24 |
Nov-07-08 01:41 PM |
#42 |

I don't think they are in any position to "issue warnings" |
graywarrior |
Nov-07-08 01:50 PM |
#44 |

John Kyl...KMA |
husky92 |
Nov-07-08 01:50 PM |
#45 |

at the risk of repeating something as I haven't read the comments yet... |
Kali |
Nov-07-08 01:55 PM |
#46 |

they should bring back the actual filibuster... |
QuestionAll |
Nov-07-08 01:58 PM |
#47 |
 
Damn straight |
goddess40 |
Nov-09-08 05:26 PM |
#169 |

With all due respect Senator.. |
BadGimp |
Nov-07-08 02:03 PM |
#48 |

Um, blow it out your ass Kyl. |
BonnieJW |
Nov-07-08 02:05 PM |
#49 |

Not so much, Senator Kyl... it's more like this: President Obama will explain how things are going |
truthisfreedom |
Nov-07-08 02:08 PM |
#50 |

American people issue warning to Kyl - We will vote you out |
OhioBlues |
Nov-07-08 02:14 PM |
#52 |
 
He sounds more like a cornered rat |
Career Prole |
Nov-07-08 03:38 PM |
#84 |

you've gotta be kidding me! |
frylock |
Nov-07-08 02:16 PM |
#53 |

What was that "Justice Sunday" crap all about? OH YEAH! "UP OR DOWN VOTE!" |
Roland99 |
Nov-07-08 02:20 PM |
#54 |

Go for it!!! |
mayahbird |
Nov-07-08 02:23 PM |
#55 |

Kyle can go fuck himself |
norepubsin08 |
Nov-07-08 02:25 PM |
#56 |

Duplicate post after 'page not found' display! |
sinkingfeeling |
Nov-07-08 02:30 PM |
#58 |

And the Democrats could change the Senate rules and 'Nuke 'em'! |
sinkingfeeling |
Nov-07-08 02:30 PM |
#59 |

America has spoken, Sen Kyl... |
Zgrrl |
Nov-07-08 02:46 PM |
#60 |

Oh my god - empathy! How horrible! n/t |
nbcouch |
Nov-07-08 02:46 PM |
#61 |

I dimly remember something, uh um uh, oh yeah nuclear option. |
Gman2 |
Nov-07-08 02:51 PM |
#62 |

Sociopaths neither believe in nor understand empathy |
depakid |
Nov-07-08 02:56 PM |
#64 |

Gonna be hard to do -- especially if the Dems pick up the 3 outstanding seats. |
damntexdem |
Nov-07-08 03:00 PM |
#66 |

Wait, didn't the Republicans lose this election? |
superduperfarleft |
Nov-07-08 03:03 PM |
#68 |

What happened to Upperdownvotes? Orrin, where are you? |
yellowcanine |
Nov-07-08 03:08 PM |
#73 |

oooooohhhhhhhhh ............... |
resnah |
Nov-07-08 03:09 PM |
#74 |

How about Bill Clinton for the Supreme Court? |
tclambert |
Nov-07-08 03:10 PM |
#75 |

Fillibuster all you like, you little prick! |
Vidar |
Nov-07-08 03:11 PM |
#76 |
 
They may not be able to if a few more races go our way. :) |
wroberts189 |
Nov-07-08 05:19 PM |
#113 |

Yeah...now there's a surprise |
Solly Mack |
Nov-07-08 03:12 PM |
#77 |

Play the GOP game: -- You don't like this liberal .. ??? |
defendandprotect |
Nov-07-08 03:21 PM |
#78 |
 
Yeah.. or their red herring game... |
wroberts189 |
Nov-08-08 06:43 AM |
#151 |

After McCain PROMISED to overturn Roe vs Wade + appt Scalia types |
defendandprotect |
Nov-07-08 03:23 PM |
#80 |

so now kyl is trying on his new big mans pants? |
Javaman |
Nov-07-08 03:28 PM |
#81 |

Then take a page out of Bush's book... |
ljm2002 |
Nov-07-08 03:30 PM |
#82 |
 
My first nominee would be |
The Wizard |
Nov-07-08 06:00 PM |
#127 |

Empathy is a foreign concept to Rethugs. |
Mad_Dem_X |
Nov-07-08 03:43 PM |
#85 |

Go fuck yourself, Jon Kyl. |
Alter Ego |
Nov-07-08 03:44 PM |
#86 |

Your side LOST, and LOST BIG, Kyl. Sit down and Shut up. The grown folks are back in charge. |
AzDar |
Nov-07-08 03:47 PM |
#89 |

Sen. Kyl has supported appointees to the court who base |
Libertyfirst |
Nov-07-08 04:10 PM |
#93 |

Obama/Biden netroots supporters/donators issue warning to Kyl |
Progs Rock |
Nov-07-08 04:11 PM |
#94 |

With all due respect, Senator, go fuck yourself. nt |
No Surrender |
Nov-07-08 04:29 PM |
#95 |

How is he going to filibuster? |
JerseygirlCT |
Nov-07-08 04:34 PM |
#96 |

OH NO, NOT EMPATHY! |
Zhade |
Nov-07-08 04:39 PM |
#98 |

Hey, Kyl - filibuster this: |
Zorra |
Nov-07-08 04:50 PM |
#99 |

It's amazing how these thugs |
crickets |
Nov-07-08 05:03 PM |
#100 |

Kyl, you and the other Republican traitors won't be getting a reach across the aisle, so much as a.. |
MilesColtrane |
Nov-07-08 05:04 PM |
#101 |

NUCLEAR OPTION ...hey the pubs invented it not me. n/t |
wroberts189 |
Nov-07-08 05:09 PM |
#102 |

And not too longer ago.... |
Jawja |
Nov-07-08 05:10 PM |
#103 |

If the Republicans/Fascists |
The Wizard |
Nov-07-08 05:11 PM |
#104 |
 
Now your talking ... keep those pubs in line :) |
wroberts189 |
Nov-07-08 05:47 PM |
#126 |

Good luck with that, Senator |
d_b |
Nov-07-08 05:11 PM |
#105 |

What makes this shit bag think his opinion counts for anything? |
santamargarita |
Nov-07-08 05:12 PM |
#106 |

The sure cure for any opposition by Kyl |
jrandom421 |
Nov-07-08 05:15 PM |
#109 |

Hypocrite |
gaspee |
Nov-07-08 05:18 PM |
#112 |

"Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer." |
Tiggeroshii |
Nov-07-08 05:32 PM |
#116 |
 
Catshrink nailed it! |
GoldenOldie |
Nov-07-08 06:08 PM |
#131 |
 
I misinterpreted that as well. He means they are too liberal... |
wroberts189 |
Nov-08-08 06:37 AM |
#150 |

ohh... |
Tiggeroshii |
Nov-09-08 12:50 AM |
#160 |

Hey Kyl, elections have consequences. |
IsItJustMe |
Nov-07-08 05:37 PM |
#121 |

This just goes to show that it is time to end the |
MurrayDelph |
Nov-07-08 05:39 PM |
#123 |
 
the "gentleman's filibuster" reminds me of that old star trek episode |
unblock |
Nov-07-08 06:04 PM |
#130 |

Filibuster all you want, asshole. We will have 60 votes. |
pirhana |
Nov-07-08 05:40 PM |
#125 |

Is this friggin' moran a fucking robot in disguise? |
HughMoran |
Nov-07-08 06:02 PM |
#128 |

Like a Constitutionalist is going to pick someone who can't |
qwlauren35 |
Nov-07-08 06:03 PM |
#129 |

This just in |
wryter2000 |
Nov-07-08 06:10 PM |
#132 |

Kyl doesn't see himself for the extremist he is |
fascisthunter |
Nov-07-08 06:11 PM |
#133 |

As though Obama is worried about Kyl |
benny05 |
Nov-07-08 06:52 PM |
#138 |

Clarence Thomas has overturned more legislated law than Beyer & Ginsburg |
TOJ |
Nov-07-08 07:11 PM |
#139 |

Guess what, Kyl? YOUR PARTY LOST, you piece-of-shit loser. WE OWN THE COURT NOW. n/t |
NoodleyAppendage |
Nov-07-08 07:12 PM |
#140 |

him and who's army? |
Parche |
Nov-07-08 07:43 PM |
#142 |

Fuck off, Kyl. |
Vektor |
Nov-07-08 07:46 PM |
#144 |

Impeach roberts, scalia, thomass, and |
Dinger |
Nov-08-08 12:17 AM |
#145 |

DUPE |
elleng |
Nov-08-08 12:39 AM |
#146 |

Send him some of Justice Breyer's opinions. |
elleng |
Nov-08-08 12:39 AM |
#147 |

“He believes in justices that have empathy,” said Kyl |
wroberts189 |
Nov-08-08 06:47 AM |
#152 |

So empathy is a crime? |
LeftishBrit |
Nov-08-08 08:05 AM |
#154 |
 
so much for "compassionate conservatism" hahaha. SORE LOSERS! |
wordpix |
Nov-08-08 09:29 AM |
#157 |

The man is an idiot |
merh |
Nov-08-08 09:53 AM |
#158 |

FU kyl |
Claire Beth |
Nov-08-08 10:14 AM |
#159 |

Anyone to the left of Hitler is liberal to Kyl |
IndianaGreen |
Nov-09-08 12:54 AM |
#161 |

No doubt that the Republicans will do what the Democrats didn't have the guts to do when |
ryanmuegge |
Nov-09-08 10:48 AM |
#164 |

Is it smart or politically advantageous to block Obama |
GinaMaria |
Nov-09-08 05:20 PM |
#167 |

sorry Kyl, Obama will keep on sending the justices |
cap |
Nov-09-08 05:23 PM |
#168 |

I thought the Repukes were all about up or down votes? |
high density |
Nov-09-08 05:53 PM |
#170 |
NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 63. My first thought, too. |
Joe Bacon
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-08-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 155. Hey Kyl. YOU LOST! GET OVER IT! |
 |
That is precisely how Rove treated us. Screw Kyl and the elephant he rode in on!
|
wordpix
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-08-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 156. vileKyl = nice ring to it, blech |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Can't have any empathy on the court. nt |
dmr
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 117. Nope, can't think about the people. Citizens just get in the way |
 |
of their powerful and profitable special interest groups.
Up yours, Kyl, your brand of cruelty to Americans is dead.
|
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Bite my shiny metal ass, Senator. |
 |
You have five seats. We will go nuclear on your butt.
|
myrna minx
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-09-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 162. I read your subject line "hearing" Bender's voice. LOL. n/t |
wtmusic
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Yes Kyl, judges may have empathy too |
 |
That's the idea, or we would decide Supreme Court cases much quicker and cheaper using software.
|
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
We won.
You lost.
Get over it.
|
debunkthelies
(251 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
David__77
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. A filibuster would fail miserably. |
 |
In any event, I hope that Stevens and Ginsberg both retire shortly. Anything else is a bonus as well.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 39. Can we vend popcorn at the event? |
No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 51. Pray that Stevens makes it until after Pres. Obama has taken the oath. |
customerserviceguy
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
| 69. Wouldn't make a difference |
 |
Anybody Chimpy would nominate tomorrow would NEVER get the fifty votes necessary to be confirmed by the Senate at this point. Even if Joementum voted with the Repukes.
I cannot imagine any of the current Justices resigning in the middle of a term, they usually wait until July to do this.
|
JerseygirlCT
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
 |
I'd rather hope for early retirement for Scalia, Thomas and Alito myself.
|
David__77
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #97 |
| 143. I'd hope for that, but we need younger progressives no matter who they're replacing. |
 |
The right-wingers would resist retiring, in all likelihood. Justices who are concerned about a rightward slide in the court should retire so they can be replaced by someone younger.
|
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-09-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #97 |
| 163. Scablia hinted on 60 Min that he may not be long for the SCOTUS. |
 |
And if he goes, his lapdog Thomas may not be far behind.
|
JerseygirlCT
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-09-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #163 |
| 165. That would be too wonderful for words, truly |
 |
Two new appointments? Replacing those two horrors? Wonderful!
|
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-09-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #165 |
| 166. If Obama gets 8 years he could appoint 6, 7 with Thomas. |
 |
John Paul Stevens-88 years old Antonin Scalia-72 Anthony Kennedy-72 David Souter-69 Clarence Thomas-60 Ruth Bader Ginsburg-75 Stephen Breyer-70 ________________________________ Roberts-53 Alito-58 Avg. retirement age= 79 (they must really eat right!) 
|
yowzayowzayowza
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 110. They should certainly do so pending the replacement... |
 |
selection, a la O'Connor, less the court become rightist during a protracted nomination fight.
|
Fovea
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
 |
and I doubt the Republics could hang on to national party hood if they tried over SCOTUS. In that respect, I welcome them to the world of cyclical epic fail, trying the same old shit again and again with increasingly less effect.
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Up or down vote, up or down vote. Squawk |
brentspeak
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 8. Shut up and sit down, Kyl. |
Turn CO Blue
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 114. GMTA. I was going to write, "Hey Kyl, sit down and shut the eff up" |
LynnTheDem
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Sen. Kyl missed the memo... |
stopbush
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. Senator Who? I'm having trouble hearing those banished from power! |
 |
Dear Kyl - NOBODY CARES WHAT YOU THINK!
|
wtmusic
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 14. To Kyl: A sphincter says what? |
Barney
(104 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Pushing judges who base decisions on the rule of law and legal president, including those the ultra right wing Federalist Society would approve, is fine, but pushing judges who base their decisions on the factors in each case is "liberal?" and therefore something to be prevented? ?
|
noiretextatique
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 118. he doesn't like judges with empathy |
 |
that pretty much says it all, doesn't it?
|
Cognitive_Resonance
(54 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. Kyl, You lost. Get used to it. nt |
lurky
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. This is where Rahm Emmanuel comes in handy. |
 |
He can go down to the Hill and give people wedgies until we have enough votes to get these nominations through. I don't especially like his DLC politics, but he is reputed to be a hell-of-a-good arm twister.
|
SemperEadem
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 26. he'll twist it off and beat them with it. |
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 65. I think you owe me a keyboard. |
lurky
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #65 |
Alter Ego
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
 |
Rahm going to the Hill and actually giving Republican senators atomic wedgies.
|
Robb
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #88 |
| 91. Ah yes! The Atomic Wedgie!! |
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #91 |
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
 |
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
crim son
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #119 |
| 141. I like to think we've evolved. |
 |
The latest electoral map certainly suggests it.
|
paparush
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 15. Kyl: Empathy Baaaaad! Apathy Goooood!! |
Bette Noir
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. I think we should let a professor of Constitutional Law choose the next few Supremes. |
VWolf
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 35. OOOH! OOOH! Pick me! Pick me! I know this one! |
Janice325
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
| 36. I don't know one personally, but I love watching and listening |
 |
to Jonathan Turley when he's on Olbermann's show. The guy is always so calm and articulate.
|
Highway61
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Who the fuck does he think he's talking to? Good luck with that warning, senator. Yep, good luck with that.
|
eowyn_of_rohan
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 18. What's with these hacks (Pelosi, Kyl) issuing "warnings"? |
 |
Don't recall Pelosi or anybody (except maybe Conyers) giving ANY warnings to bu$h (man I am so sick of typing that creep's name)
|
asthmaticeog
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 19. I don't remember Senator Kyl winning more than twice as many electoral votes as his adversary. |
 |
Because that was OBAMA who did that. It was OBAMA that reduced right wing extremists to farts in a hurricane. Sit down and shut your fucking lie-hole, Senator.
|
UpInArms
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 20. hey Kyle, STFU and get over your cheapsuited self |
CitizenPatriot
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Dems respond, "thank you for the head's up that you won't be 'reaching across the aisle". Now take your pet projects and kiss them goodbye. You don't want to coooperate, you think you're still in charge, you can't play ball? You are irrelevant."
Obama makes toilet paper out of Republican "warnings" and "demands". The President elect is quotes as saying, "recycling is a great thing we can all do for our country."
Kyl, meet the President's ass. Kiss it. Now you're playing ball.
|
SemperEadem
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 29. Right! No pork for Arizona... |
 |
I mean, that's what the senior senator from AZ was saying all through out this campaign..
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
 |
So we zonies get little federal pork. Douchebags. Jeff Flake is my congressman and he doesn't believe in pork.
|
wroberts189
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 134. Poor President Obama |
 |
He has to submit to an ass kissing by Kyl? Oh, gag... 
|
CitizenPatriot
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #134 |
 |
Can you see the look of bemused disgust on President Obama's face???? "No, we don't need that, Kyl. Just learn to get along, OK?" Kyl still kissing ass. Obama, "No, seriously, Kyl. Enough." 
|
pattmarty
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
| 22. Fuck Kyl!!!!! What about the reactionary Alito and .......... |
 |
.........the other right wing ass hole that "junior" appointed???? If the opportunity arises, I hope he appoints fucking Karl Marx. Fuck all those right wing shitbags. IT IS OUR TURN NOW!!!!!
|
tclambert
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
| 71. I don't thnk Karl Marx would be such a good choice for the Supreme Court |
 |
I mean, he is dead and all.
|
pattmarty
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #71 |
| 90. Satire, my good man/woman....... |
tclambert
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #90 |
| 120. Satire right back atcha! |
 |
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 05:39 PM by tclambert
I thought the "dead and all" part made the satire clear. Although, with Supreme Court Justices, I'm not sure being dead is that big a sticking point. The Constitution doesn't explicitly say. And apparently, Justices don't have to be "natural born citizens" either. So, the fact that Karl Marx was German might not be a sticking point, either.
You want to see Republican heads explode? How about this? Michael Moore for Supreme Court! We can pretty sure corporate personhood would be on the chopping block.
PS. I am not a hermaphrodite.
|
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #120 |
| 135. You may not be a hermaphrodite |
 |
But you're sure as hell funny. You might even be DUzy material, but you didn't hear that from me. 
|
nolabels
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-08-08 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #71 |
| 149. Perhaps an obligatory seance when the SCOTUS gets together |
 |
I mean like wouldn't that be a good way to stay current on precedence and everything 
|
Chan790
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
| 79. I'd like to see Nadine Strossen replace Ruth Bader Ginsberg. |
 |
She's young so she'd be there forever, she's bright and talented as a lawyer, her credentials are impeccable (fmr. President of the ACLU, Professor of Con. Law, Member of the Council on Foreign Relations) and let's be frank...she'd make Jon Kyl cry and she'd demolish a intellectual lightweight like Sammy Alito.
|
tclambert
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #79 |
| 122. The Constitution does not limit the Supreme Court to nine Justices |
 |
What would it take to add a few more?
|
Demit
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
| 23. 'who do not base their decisions on the rule of law and legal precedents'—? |
 |
You mean like Bush v. Gore in 2000? That the SCOTUS instructed was a one off and couldn't be used as precedent? You mean like that?
Pfffft.
|
sasquatch
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |
| 24. Ok, we'll cut all federal programs to Arizona, douchebag |
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
| 70. Hey! I live in Arizona |
 |
not that Kyl and Mc* have brought us much bacon anyway, other than our big ole canal. Pisses me off they've done nothing about solar for Arizona. Hey douchebags (Kyl & Mc*), the sunshine is free!
|
SemperEadem
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
you're threatening to subvert the will of the people? Is that what you're saying, Kyl?
This country just handed down a liberal mandate to the congress--you need to act like you know. This country is no longer conservative or "center right". It's left of center with the clearly voiced permission of We The People. Time to get over it or get out.
|
wroberts189
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
| 111. I'm with you and also ..Warning him with what ???? |
 |
Just let them try to obstruct..... there is a new game in town. NEW RULES ...pubs can take their "warnings" and go home and drink them off.
|
iamjoy
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 27. Go Ahead...Make My Day |
 |
Go ahead Kyl, you try to filibuster. I think even if we don't have the 60 Democrats needed to stop it that some principled Republicans will not stand for it. Susan Collins, Olympia Snowe, Lindsey Graham and John McCain were all part of the "Gang of 14" - and they are still serving as Republicans in the Senate. I think there may even be others who just have little taste for the filibuster.
|
NBachers
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-08-08 03:09 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
| 148. Collins and Snow will disappoint you every time |
 |
Don't make the mistake of thinking they'll join with us on anything. They will let you down.
|
Left Brain
(877 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 28. (hey... pssssssst... Bozo... |
 |
guess you didn't get the word. You clowns don't call the shots anymore.) 
|
Mad_Dem_X
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
DemFromMem
(998 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
With a Republican Party in utter disarray, I'm not particularly confident the Republican Caucus can be unified about anything. The Dems need to pick off just a couple and you can bet that the blue state Republicans - Coleman, Specter, Collins, Snowe just to name a few - will have to think long and hard about how they plan on voting.
|
janet118
(647 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 115. I'm afraid it might be the Democrats we have to worry about . . . |
 |
If they don't back Obama, I will scream. Especially after so many approved Roberts and Alito without a whimper. No more hiding for DINOs.
|
Swede Atlanta
(594 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
You don't count anymore Repukkke!!! Get out of the way and let us govern the way you governed for 8 frigging years.
|
MessiahRp
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message |
| 32. Hey Kyl, if the GOP hadn't stacked the SC with far right judges, we wouldn't need liberals |
 |
to counterbalance the court.
Unfortunately without a couple left wing judges on the court to balance the many far right wings ones the court will tilt to the right even with moderate Dems being appointed.
You guys chose to not go with moderates, now we need to balance. Blame yourselves.
Rp
|
Supersedeas
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 124. Dennis K for the SCt just to rub the GoP's face in a pile of Kyl |
Miss Chybil
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 33. Why do I have to have two idiots for my senators? |
 |
And why does he feel the need now to crawl out from under his rock? Go ahead Kyl. Do as you will. The wind is at our backs and my middle finger is in your face.
|
OwnedByFerrets
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
| 34. Hey Kyl....can you say NUCLEAR?? I knew you could. |
noonwitch
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 37. Elections have consequences |
 |
Isn't that what they said?
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
 |
I loved it when Boxer reminded the former chair of her committee about that. "I get to do this now," she said waving her gavel. 
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-08-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #67 |
| 153. Kyl needs to GET OVER IT!! |
 |
How dare he question our new Commander in Chief! Why does he hate the troops?
|
BR_Parkway
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
| 38. Another discredited GOP hack trying to look relevant - Dear Sen |
 |
Asswipe - you really don't get what the word MANDATE really means after it was so wrongly stolen and used in describing Shrub. You are about to get re-educated
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 40. Time to bring back that nuclear option that Bill Frist once talked about |
acmavm
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
| 43. Exactly. I'm glad you pointed that out. |
struggle4progress
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
| 108. Back in "nuclear option" day, hypocrite Kyl was running around saying stuff like |
 |
This is strictly about whether or not a minority of senators is going to prevent the president from being able to name and get confirmed judges that he chooses after he's been elected by the American people. And it's never been the case until the last two years that a minority could dictate to the majority what they could doJUDICIAL WARS <NewsHour transcript> April 25, 2005 http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/congress/jan-june05/judg...
|
iceman66
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 41. So now "empathy" is something to be scorned? |
BunkerHill24
(981 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message |
| 42. Sen. Kyl let me remind you elections have consequences..n/t |
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 44. I don't think they are in any position to "issue warnings" |
 |
Who do they think they are?
|
husky92
(42 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Hey John:
You and your cohorts had your day and you screwed up this country.
You were salivating with the Republicans with a McCain win and the thought of a right-leaning court. It's the Democrats turn now, jackass.
You got your right wingers in Roberts and Alito and that's it. Obama and the Dems rule now.
|
Kali
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message |
| 46. at the risk of repeating something as I haven't read the comments yet... |
 |
fuck you Kyl, I am so sick of embarrassing politicians from this state. God, just STFU.
|
dysfunctional press
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 47. they should bring back the actual filibuster... |
 |
and if a senator wants to- he HAS to.
|
goddess40
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-09-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
 |
make'em piss in a bottle!
|
BadGimp
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 48. With all due respect Senator.. |
BonnieJW
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 49. Um, blow it out your ass Kyl. |
 |
We wouldn't want justices who are empathetic!!! We don't want them to appreciate the human condition and, my god, feel something. We want justices who think just like a peckerheaded idiot like you.
|
truthisfreedom
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message |
| 50. Not so much, Senator Kyl... it's more like this: President Obama will explain how things are going |
 |
to go, and you're going to sit down and be quiet while doing as your told.
|
LaurenG
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
| 52. American people issue warning to Kyl - We will vote you out |
 |
if you don't stop acting like a scared rabbit. Washington is no longer a place for cowards.
|
Career Prole
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
| 84. He sounds more like a cornered rat |
 |
than a scared rabbit. In fact, "cornered rat" describes the new republican...caucusette.
|
frylock
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
| 53. you've gotta be kidding me! |
 |
it's called blowback, you dumbshits!
|
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 54. What was that "Justice Sunday" crap all about? OH YEAH! "UP OR DOWN VOTE!" |
mayahbird
(28 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
All I can say to Jon Kyl is go Go For It! You had your turn for the last how many years and look what happened to this country. Let someone who knows something have a try at it. Maybe we will all be better off!!!
|
norepubsin08
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
| 56. Kyle can go fuck himself |
 |
we have a mandate for some liberal judges!!!
|
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 58. Duplicate post after 'page not found' display! |
 |
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 02:30 PM by sinkingfeeling
|
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 59. And the Democrats could change the Senate rules and 'Nuke 'em'! |
Zgrrl
(75 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 60. America has spoken, Sen Kyl... |
 |
...and it has totally repudiated the Republican brand. So please STFU.
|
nbcouch
(170 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 61. Oh my god - empathy! How horrible! n/t |
Gman2
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 62. I dimly remember something, uh um uh, oh yeah nuclear option. |
depakid
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 64. Sociopaths neither believe in nor understand empathy |
 |
John Kyl, like others in his mold, are snakes in suits, as the world's foremost expert on their kind has noted.
|
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 66. Gonna be hard to do -- especially if the Dems pick up the 3 outstanding seats. |
superduperfarleft
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 68. Wait, didn't the Republicans lose this election? |
 |
What am I missing?
Since when does the loser party get to make demands like this?
|
yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
| 73. What happened to Upperdownvotes? Orrin, where are you? |
dothemath
(197 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 74. oooooohhhhhhhhh ............... |
 |
President-elect Obama must be quaking in his boots.
Kyl, from the 'Party of the discredited' is threatening the first elected president in 16 years with a filibuster. Quick, everyone, lock your doors and retreat into fear. It is what Karl Rove would want.
Something about 'stop digging' flashed through my mind ......... never mind, I don't want the repubs to stop digging.
Damn, I feel good about what happened Tuesday. I was born during the depression and I was not responsible for 'putting food on my family', but I was responsible for finding cardboard from which I cut pieces to put in my shoes as a way to cover the holes in the soles. My mother wrapped my school lunch sandwich in Nolde's Bread wrappers, when available. Remember those wax-coated paper wrappers?
|
tclambert
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 75. How about Bill Clinton for the Supreme Court? |
 |
Would that make Sen. Kyl's head explode, Scanners's style? (Clinton wouldn't take it. Justices don't make enough money. Judge Judy makes more than all the Supreme Court Justices combined.)
|
Vidar
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 76. Fillibuster all you like, you little prick! |
wroberts189
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
| 113. They may not be able to if a few more races go our way. :) |
 |
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 05:21 PM by wroberts189
Go Al Franken !!!!!!!!
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 77. Yeah...now there's a surprise |
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 78. Play the GOP game: -- You don't like this liberal .. ??? |
 |
Here are a dozen more even more liberal ...!!!
|
wroberts189
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-08-08 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #78 |
| 151. Yeah.. or their red herring game... |
 |
Send up the most liberal of them all and then make a "compromise" on someone slightly less liberal.
worked for bushie
|
defendandprotect
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 80. After McCain PROMISED to overturn Roe vs Wade + appt Scalia types |
 |
who agreed with him---!!! ???
|
Javaman
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 81. so now kyl is trying on his new big mans pants? |
 |
he can blather all he wants, it's a false threat at best.
|
ljm2002
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 82. Then take a page out of Bush's book... |
 |
...and nominate the most far-left flaming radical judge you can find, and when Congress and the public are tired and angry from a prolonged filibuster, nominate the liberal judge you really wanted for the position.
Of course, unlike Bush, make sure both are fully qualified for the position.
|
The Wizard
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #82 |
| 127. My first nominee would be |
 |
a handicapped, blind, lesbian naturalized citizen who is in a gay marriage. Let's make 'em twitch.
|
Mad_Dem_X
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message |
| 85. Empathy is a foreign concept to Rethugs. |
 |
Empathetic judges? Oh no, anything but that!
|
Alter Ego
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |
| 86. Go fuck yourself, Jon Kyl. |
AzDar
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message |
| 89. Your side LOST, and LOST BIG, Kyl. Sit down and Shut up. The grown folks are back in charge. |
Libertyfirst
(534 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 93. Sen. Kyl has supported appointees to the court who base |
 |
their opinions on their opinions. He should take a deep breath and begin to talk. Let the nation watch as he makes a fool of himself. Which he does very easily.
I agree that if they want to filibuster, let them. It will show just how obstructionist they intend to be.
|
Norrin Radd
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 94. Obama/Biden netroots supporters/donators issue warning to Kyl |
 |
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 04:12 PM by Progs Rock
We can generate a shit ton of money for your future opponent for your seat.
|
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 95. With all due respect, Senator, go fuck yourself. nt |
JerseygirlCT
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message |
| 96. How is he going to filibuster? |
 |
I'm confused.
What is he going to muster?
|
Zhade
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
The horror!
What a fucking DOUCHEBAG kyl is.
|
Zorra
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 99. Hey, Kyl - filibuster this: |
crickets
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 100. It's amazing how these thugs |
 |
come crawling out to issue their fatuous 'warnings' without realizing how petty and pathetic they sound. It's embarrassing. Hee.
|
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 101. Kyl, you and the other Republican traitors won't be getting a reach across the aisle, so much as a.. |
 |
...reach around...IF you make nice
We're in charge. You will take that fact, and you will like it.
|
wroberts189
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 102. NUCLEAR OPTION ...hey the pubs invented it not me. n/t |
Jawja
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message |
| 103. And not too longer ago.... |
 |
I remember a thing called the "nukular option" being dragged out to force Democrats to approve Bush's far right nut jobs. Making threats to a Senate that will have a big Democratic majority....
|
The Wizard
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 104. If the Republicans/Fascists |
 |
want to play hardball, cut off all federal spending in their respective states. Money talks louder than a filibuster.
|
wroberts189
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #104 |
| 126. Now your talking ... keep those pubs in line :) |
d_b
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 105. Good luck with that, Senator |
santamargarita
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 106. What makes this shit bag think his opinion counts for anything? |
 |
Him and McLoser come up for election at the same time.
|
jrandom421
(346 posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 109. The sure cure for any opposition by Kyl |
 |
"Senator, the Vice President and the White House Chief of Staff are here to discuss your opposition to the President's Supreme Court nominee. Apparently they've brought the good silverware."
|
gaspee
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
If it was wrong for Dems to filibuster Bush's appointments (according to R's) then why isn't it wrong for them to filibuster.
Because Republicans are nothing but hypocrites and crybabies. As Bush and his gang liked to say - elections have consequences, so pull up your big boy pants, you whiny crybaby and deal with it.
|
Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
| 116. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter and Stephen Breyer." |
GoldenOldie
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #116 |
| 131. Catshrink nailed it! |
 |
We have 2-Republican Senators from Arizona, that couldn't find their way to the Mexican Border without a driver and/or a Spanish translator. Yet these 2-worthless assholes, spout their knowledge on illegal immigration, drugs, energy, etc., etc., etc. Arizona is the major crossing of drugs and our border towns have been facing serious drug wars both within and directly across our border with Mexico. Both innocent American and Mexican citizens are being caught in cross-fire of Mexican drug lords battles.
Arizona has the largest nuclear power plant in the US, just west of Phoenix which within the past few years has had a security breakdown.....with little report to the public. Solar along with wind energy could provide Arizona much of our energy, yet these 2-Republican Senators, have done nothing to support or encourage the technology/small business entrepreneurs struggling to open Arizona our Nation and the world to these badly needed energy systems which could provide work for thousands.
Arizonan's through John McCain's campaign for POTUS is suddenly awakening to the fact that although John McCain deserves honor for his POW status, this does not make him a qualified nor good representative for the peoples of Arizona. Kyl cannot even claim honor for military service and his actual knowledge of Arizona problems is even weaker than McCain's. Kyl is a blowhard and not even a good one, at that.
|
wroberts189
(1000+ posts)
|
Sat Nov-08-08 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #116 |
| 150. I misinterpreted that as well. He means they are too liberal... |
 |
He "expects" as in "expects his appointments to be like them and he does not approve of it".
|
Tiggeroshii
(1000+ posts)
|
Sun Nov-09-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #150 |
 |
Ginsberg and Souter were both Republican nominees. It's funny how this works.
|
IsItJustMe
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 121. Hey Kyl, elections have consequences. |
MurrayDelph
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
| 123. This just goes to show that it is time to end the |
 |
"Gentleman's filibuster."
It used to be that if you wanted to filibuster, you had to by-gum filibuster; you had to get up and stand (if capable of standing in the first place) and keep talking.
Now, all you have to do is announce your intention to filibuster (Hey. I intend to win tonight's lottery. Send me the money, please!)
Bring back REAL filibusters.
|
unblock
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #123 |
| 130. the "gentleman's filibuster" reminds me of that old star trek episode |
 |
where they had a war for 500 years run by computers that simulated the action of war and simply spit out the names of the victims, who were then summoned and killed by their own side by agreement in order to avoid all the messiness and disruption and infrastructure destruction of an actual war.
with a real filibuster, you had to bring ALL senate business to a halt, and you had to get up there and let everyone know and see what you were doing. it was a risk: you could be seen as standing on principle or being an obstructionist, and so you did not filibuster lightly. nevermind the planning and stamina it required.
with today's gentleman's filibuster, it doesn't bring any senate business to a halt, it merely prevents the one vote; nor does it require any ongoing effort other than to vote to continue the filibuster when the question come up again. it basically means that there's very little that can get done by majority vote; any actual legislation requires 60 votes, and hence some republican cooperation.
meanwhile, when republicans had a bare majority, they ROLLED over the democrats by threatening to "go nuclear" and take away the filibuster entirely. as a result of this tactic, democrats were afraid to exert much power.
three guesses as to whether or not democrats will EVER threaten to take away the republicans' power of filibuster!
|
jillan
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
| 125. Filibuster all you want, asshole. We will have 60 votes. |
 |
Lieberman is pro-choice, and I'm sure we can pick up a couple of more votes.
Kyl - I am so sorry everybody. I tried to get him defeated in 2006, but his opponent wasn't worth shit. Pederson didn't have a clue how to run a campaign.
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Nov-07-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 128. Is this friggin' moran a fucking robot in disguise? |
 |
Edited on Fri Nov-07-08 06:03 PM by HughMoran
Wow, he really needs to shut the fuck up..
|