410
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

A Last Push To Deregulate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
DogPoundPup (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-30-08 11:31 PM
Original message
A Last Push To Deregulate
Source: Washington Post

The White House is working to enact a wide array of federal regulations, many of which would weaken government rules aimed at protecting consumers and the environment, before President Bush leaves office in January.

The new rules would be among the most controversial deregulatory steps of the Bush era and could be difficult for his successor to undo. Some would ease or lift existing constraints on private industry, including power plants, mines and farms.

Those and other regulations would help clear obstacles to some commercial ocean-fishing activities, ease controls on emissions of pollutants that contribute to global warming, relax drinking-water standards and lift a key restriction on mountaintop coal mining.

Once such rules take effect, they typically can be undone only through a laborious new regulatory proceeding, including lengthy periods of public comment, drafting and mandated reanalysis.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   Coz they didn't manage to steal as much as they wanted from Americans,  LynnTheDem   Oct-30-08 11:35 PM   #1 
   This is Cheney's baby. Last year he stated this was what he would be working on  Robbien   Oct-30-08 11:37 PM   #2 
   I believe it would be constitutional for Obama to immediately reverse  Submariner   Oct-30-08 11:42 PM   #3 
   After all, didn't Bush reverse many of the regulations that Clinton put into effect?  csziggy   Oct-31-08 12:04 AM   #6 
   No, the rules would have to be challenged in court- which is difficult  depakid   Oct-31-08 12:14 AM   #9 
   Is there NOTHING they can do to stop this nut?  glinda   Oct-30-08 11:46 PM   #4 
   We could have stopped them if we'd impeached...  GoddessOfGuinness   Oct-31-08 12:06 AM   #7 
      Does anyone really understand why not?  glinda   Oct-31-08 12:17 AM   #10 
         Well from what Pelosi has said, impeaching a prez. because  GoddessOfGuinness   Oct-31-08 12:53 AM   #11 
            ... to the extreme Right perhaps.  glinda   Oct-31-08 01:09 AM   #13 
   New admin can foot drag until changes are made. eom  smiley_glad_hands   Oct-30-08 11:56 PM   #5 
   I hate that lyin, cheating, stealing, polluting, corporate welfare supporting bastard  sonias   Oct-31-08 12:11 AM   #8 
   If they can be enacted, they can be undone. The problem is a lack of courage on the part of the  ryanmuegge   Oct-31-08 01:02 AM   #12 
   Bush launches last minute deregulation push  blossomstar   Oct-31-08 07:10 AM   #28 
   to think we thought laize faire was bad..this is laize fuck you!!! n/t  angstlessk   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #14 
   I think an executive order to reverse every piece of legislation * signed  Thor_MN   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #15 
   UBF -- LOL  Winebrat   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #16 
   It Can Be Done. It's Bush's MO. Just Do It, and Let the Courts Fight It Out  Demeter   Oct-31-08 07:28 AM   #30 
   "lift a key restriction on mountaintop coal mining"  whirlygigspin   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #17 
   And there was no agency left untouched for the last 8 years.  BumRushDaShow   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #18 
   So you thought the old George Bush was the worst  StClone   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #19 
   You are so right, but since we know what they're going to do, we can combat it! n/t  ColbertWatcher   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #20 
   "23% approval rating?"  azurnoir   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #21 
   Between the election and swearing in of his successor  LastLiberal in PalmSprings   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #22 
   Reminds me of Saddam burning oil wells  dcindian   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #23 
   This is one of the main reasons we should have impeached the bastard  nichomachus   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #24 
   Absolutely.  tismyself   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #26 
   No more, Chimpo.  AzDar   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #25 
   Why doesn't the bush just out law elections and voting.  fasttense   Oct-31-08 05:10 AM   #27 
   K & R  Duppers   Oct-31-08 07:21 AM   #29 
   What an evil group of people  RedEarth   Oct-31-08 11:55 AM   #31 
   And very anti-American.....  llmart   Oct-31-08 08:38 PM   #34 
   Ed Schultz made a great analogy today about Bush's lame duck deregulation  recoveringdittohed   Oct-31-08 05:58 PM   #32 
   They are vile. There's no other way to put it.  Laelth   Oct-31-08 07:20 PM   #33 
   Would emailing our Reps help?  madeline_con   Oct-31-08 08:46 PM   #35 
   What else would they be working on.  superconnected   Oct-31-08 09:05 PM   #36 
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-30-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Coz they didn't manage to steal as much as they wanted from Americans,
and they didn't manage to destroy America quite as much as they'd hoped for.

But hey, VOTE McCAIN and he'll finish the deal!

How the fuck did so many Americans get to be so fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-30-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is Cheney's baby. Last year he stated this was what he would be working on
during the last year in office. Getting rid of environmental controls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-30-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I believe it would be constitutional for Obama to immediately reverse
ALL of these anti-environment schemes the day he gets in office. Bush and Cheney are clearly incompetent traitors and need to be imprisoned for high crimes and misdemeanors. These proposed regs are clearly harmful to our environment, and need to be stopped before even being implemented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. After all, didn't Bush reverse many of the regulations that Clinton put into effect?
If I remember correctly, Clinton established a number of regulations on clean air, environmental protection - such as limiting snow mobiles in national parks - and more that Bush immediately reversed.

Bush signs repeal of ergonomic rules into law
March 20, 2001
Web posted at: 7:46 PM EST (0046 GMT)

WASHINGTON -- President Bush signed into law Tuesday a repeal of Clinton administration regulations that set new workplace ergonomic rules to combat repetitive stress injuries.

In a statement, Bush said the rules signed by former president Bill Clinton were "unduly burdensome and overly broad."
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/03/20/bush.erg... /


ORDER REVERSALS
January 22, 2001
Two members of Congress discuss President Bush's plan to reverse and suspend executive orders from the Clinton administration.
MARGARET WARNER: Moments after President Bush's inauguration Saturday, the White House suspended scores of executive orders and regulations issued in the waning days of the Clinton administration, pending a full review. Today's reversal of a 1993 executive order on abortion suggests even settled Clinton actions may be reversed.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june01/abor...


REPORTER'S NOTEBOOK; Bush Waits, Politely, to Undo What Clinton Has Done
By DAVID E. SANGER
Published: December 24, 2000

By road, it's a little more than 1,500 miles between the Governor's Mansion here and the White House. That's too far to spit.

Mere distance, however, is not stopping anyone from trying.

Just before they pack their bags, President Clinton's aides are taking one last shot at creating an America in their image -- churning out new emission rules for cars and trucks, reviewing last-minute authorizations for national monuments, putting the final touches on Mr. Clinton's effort to make sure that development stops in roadless areas of national forests.

All this has left the Bush folks fuming, because they know -- or their lawyers are telling them -- that the rules cannot be wiped out at the stroke of a pen. There must be hearings and committees.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C01E5DA...



January 20, 2001: President Bush Stymies Environmental Regulations

On his first day in office, President Bush has his chief of staff, Andrew Card, issue directives to every executive department with authority over environmental issues, and orders them to immediately put on hold dozens of regulations passed by the Clinton administration. The Clinton regulations include lowering arsenic levels in drinking water; reducing the release of raw sewage into rivers and streams; setting limits on logging, drilling, and mining on public lands; increasing energy efficiency standards; and banning snowmobiles from Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks.
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a012001b...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. No, the rules would have to be challenged in court- which is difficult
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 12:14 AM by depakid
or the agencies would have to follow established APA proceedures to reverse the rules- and/or promulgate new, more rational ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-30-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is there NOTHING they can do to stop this nut?
I mean, there has to be something. He has broken so many laws and is obviously causing increasing amount of harm to this Country and Planet. Can't they tie him up and let Dennis sit on him for the rest of his term or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. We could have stopped them if we'd impeached...
But somebody didn't want to go there. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Does anyone really understand why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well from what Pelosi has said, impeaching a prez. because
he led us into a war on false pretenses equates to getting even with the thugs for impeaching Clinton over his blow job.

It's so obvious that the blow job was a far more serious crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. ... to the extreme Right perhaps.
They don't seem to mind war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct-30-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. New admin can foot drag until changes are made. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Oct-31-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hate that lyin, cheating, stealing, polluting, corporate welfare supporting bastardUpdated at 1:43 PM
He is still such a tool for the industries. He will never be topped as the "worst president ever". But he doesn't care. :grr:


Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanmuegge (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. If they can be enacted, they can be undone. The problem is a lack of courage on the part of the
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 01:05 AM by ryanmuegge
Democrats. Don't believe the corporate media's excuse of, "oh, once it's done it can't be reversed." I'm sure the Democrats will be echoing the same excuse soon, but it's not true. No matter how big of a majority we have, they will still lack the courage to do what they know is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blossomstar (772 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
28. Bush launches last minute deregulation push
Source: Washington Post

The White House is working to enact a wide array of federal regulations, many of which would weaken government rules aimed at protecting consumers and the environment, before President Bush leaves office in January.

The new rules would be among the most controversial deregulatory steps of the Bush era and could be difficult for his successor to undo. Some would ease or lift constraints on private industry, including power plants, mines and farms.

Those and other regulations would help clear obstacles to some commercial ocean-fishing activities, ease controls on emissions of pollutants that contribute to global warming, relax drinking-water standards and lift a key restriction on mountaintop coal mining.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27466701 /

Read more: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27466701 /



This is absolutely UNBELIEVABLE. I clicked on this article because I just knew that it was a "typo" and they meant to say "REGULATE" since their deregulation is the cause of the current financial crisis! Bush obviously wants to give the American people one final giganic syphilis screw on his way out. This convinces me that Bush hates this earth, it's people and himself. Sick, sick EVIL bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
14. to think we thought laize faire was bad..this is laize fuck you!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
15. I think an executive order to reverse every piece of legislation * signed
would be the best way out. Unfortunately I don't think that can be done. It's going to take years to undo the crap that * has foisted off on us. I do think Obama needs to created a cabinet level postion of "Undoing Bush's Fuckups." The UBF would be charged with reviewing every piece of paper signed by Bush and drafting executive orders to mitigate the damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. UBF -- LOL
Funny. But it will be of utmost importance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
30. It Can Be Done. It's Bush's MO. Just Do It, and Let the Courts Fight It Out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whirlygigspin Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
17. "lift a key restriction on mountaintop coal mining"
--somebody from West Virginia, spread this news in your state before tuesday!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
18. And there was no agency left untouched for the last 8 years.
Every single one infested. :banghead:

January 20, 2009 can't come soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
19. So you thought the old George Bush was the worst
Well the freak is at it digging deeper in the sewer. This can be undone. The problem is that when you undo it the Fascist are building the framework to attack Obama. Picture this in three years or so:

"Working people suffered when Obama shut down vital coal mine operations in West Virginia...industry suffered and Obama caused your energy prices to rise with his Liberal Environment-over-people-agenda..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. You are so right, but since we know what they're going to do, we can combat it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
21. "23% approval rating?"
Edited on Fri Oct-31-08 05:57 AM by azurnoir
I'll show you !!!

But we knew he;d leave as big a pile behind him when he left, legacy my arse, if he can't replace Reagan as the republican messiah, he'll aim for Hoover's record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
22. Between the election and swearing in of his successor
Bush is going to be a loose cannon. You think he's been irresponsible so far? Can you imagine what he's going to be like knowing there isn't a damned thing anyone can (or will) do to him before he gets out of office. He could completely disassemble the government, if he wanted (it sounds like he's made a good start).

Every big money interest that "invested" in Bush is now going to get their money back one hundredfold. I'll be surprised if there is a single regulatory agency that is untouched. He truly is going down in history as the "Worst President Ever."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcindian (881 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
23. Reminds me of Saddam burning oil wells
He is trying to make things harder on an Obama presidency. Trying to give a wedge issue to the republican propaganda machine Fuks News for the next four years.

while Obama and the congress work to reset these main street protects the cries of socialism will be pounded into us by the MSM.


They know defeat is coming their way and now they are trying to destroy America in spite of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
24. This is one of the main reasons we should have impeached the bastard
If he were fighting an impeachment battle now, he wouldn't have time for this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tismyself (499 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
25. No more, Chimpo.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #28
27. Why doesn't the bush just out law elections and voting.
That way he and his bushies could ignore Obama's coming win and pick the president. I'm sure McBush would ensure corporate welfare will continue.

Bunch of scum. Passing last minute regulations that help out the corporations at the expense of American citizens. What about Democracy does the bush like? He should move to Saudi Arabia, there's no Democracy there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duppers Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
29. K & R
Damn!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
31. What an evil group of people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. And very anti-American.....
and unpatriotic. There - I've said it. It needs to be said. When you do stuff like this just to spite the incoming President and it hurts all of America, then yes, they are unAmerican. They have done everything in their power to trash this once great country. This is why they're going to get thrown out the door come November 4th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recoveringdittohed (424 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. Ed Schultz made a great analogy today about Bush's lame duck deregulation
Schultz said on his talk show today (I may not remember this verbatim) that Bush deregulating on the way out the door is like Bush gets on on elevator with us, farts, gets off the elevator and leaves us to deal with the fart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
33. They are vile. There's no other way to put it.
Nevertheless, I have faith that, in time, we can right most of the damage they have done.

So I HOPE.

The United States is a LIBERAL Country.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
35. Would emailing our Reps help?
There has to be something we can do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct-31-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
36. What else would they be working on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Feb 09th 2010, 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC