Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Tentative meltdown deal: Bush, McCain, Obama meet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 04:16 PM
Original message
Tentative meltdown deal: Bush, McCain, Obama meet
Source: AP

Welcoming Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama, Bush said, "My hope is that we can reach an agreement very shortly."

The tentative accord would give the Bush administration just a fraction of the $700 billion it had requested up front, with half the money subject to a congressional veto, congressional aides said. Under the plan, the Treasury secretary would get $250 billion immediately and could have an additional $100 billion if he certified it was needed. The last $350 billion could be blocked by a vote of Congress under the arrangement, designed to give lawmakers a stronger hand in controlling the unprecedented rescue.

The aides described the details on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080925/ap_on_bi_ge/financi...



a little more information. We might be able to piece things together from different articles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   $350 Billion here, $350 Billion there, pretty soon it starts to add up to real money.  olddad56   Sep-25-08 04:23 PM   #1 
   If China is no longer floating us loans  GinaMaria   Sep-25-08 05:55 PM   #9 
   Oh the Federal Reserve will just print some more paper!  crossroads   Sep-25-08 07:10 PM   #12 
   How long to apples keep in the 'frig?  sfexpat2000   Sep-25-08 05:57 PM   #10 
   They could make it 249 billion and give the extra billion where it might do some good.  Voice for Peace   Sep-25-08 04:27 PM   #2 
   What a cluster fuck! The economy is going to tank regardless  greyghost   Sep-25-08 04:33 PM   #3 
   Yes but at least they're consistent  Indenturedebtor   Sep-25-08 04:49 PM   #4 
      They are that!  greyghost   Sep-25-08 05:21 PM   #6 
   No word on how the price for these assets will be determined.  amandabeech   Sep-25-08 04:53 PM   #5 
   They wan to buy dogshit at gold prices, essentially.  dixiegrrrrl   Sep-25-08 07:06 PM   #11 
   the only thing to shake them up would be a run on the banks...  Historic NY   Sep-25-08 05:32 PM   #7 
      I've got most everything in the Credit Union  GinaMaria   Sep-25-08 05:51 PM   #8 
 
olddad56 (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. $350 Billion here, $350 Billion there, pretty soon it starts to add up to real money.
he truth is that the economy has already collapsed. This bailout is just an attempt to preserve the public's preception until after 11/4. I don't think they can keep the big secret that long. Especially with China no longer playing along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. If China is no longer floating us loans
where will the money come from for this bailout? Will the tax man be at the door ready to shake us down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Oh the Federal Reserve will just print some more paper!
None of our money is 'real' anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. How long to apples keep in the 'frig?
If I'm going into retail, I need to figure out the supply line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Sep-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. They could make it 249 billion and give the extra billion where it might do some good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. What a cluster fuck! The economy is going to tank regardless
and these assholes continue to have their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes but at least they're consistent
There is no uncertainty when it comes to figuring out who comes first in this country, and who doesn't even factor in. The American people were/are against this plan. But who gives a shit about that. You'll take it and you'll like it PEON! Now get back to work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. They are that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Sep-25-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. No word on how the price for these assets will be determined.
Krugman has voiced concern that the prices paid to financial institutions will be above current market price, because the administration, as per some remarks by Bernanke, seems to believe that the financial institutions will not have enough capital even if the U.S. buys those things at current market price.

Apparently, the idea is to buy at an above market price on the assumption that the current market price is a fire sale price. Then, the U.S. would hold the assets for as long as necessary to get the price up to something close to the government's purchase price plus interest and costs.

Personally, I think that time may never come considering the amount of junk derivative assets out there. Allowing bankruptcy courts to drop mortgages down to market value of houses at what would be considered fire sale prices might help, but I think there will be objections (I will have them), if bankrupts are allowed to then wait for home prices to go up, and make a windfall profit on the difference between the fire sale price and the market price once the housing market settles out. That doesn't seem any more fair than giving a windfall to the financial institutions.

Another issue that does not seem to be addressed is the type of junk that the U.S. gov will be buying. It has been suggested that the Gov not only purchase mortgage-backed securities, but also car loans backed by depreciating assets like monster trucks and SUVs, unsecured credit cards and credit default swaps. I am aware that there are derivatives out there involving commodity contracts, but I haven't heard anything about them.

This is all just far too much in scope and price, and THERE IS NO GUARANTEE THAT THIS PLAN WILL WORK!

I'd be happier if Congress had to ACT to hand more than $350 bill or so instead of allowing the Shrub/Cheney/Paulson/Bernanke to use the entire $700,000 unless Congress stops them. It will be difficult to get Congress focused and in session if it looks like things are not going as planned after $350 bill, and the bushies know it.

With what I know right now, I would be reluctant to vote for this thing, no matter how much respect I have for Barney Frank and Chris Dodd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. They wan to buy dogshit at gold prices, essentially.
and then hope if they bury it long enuff, it will turn to gold.

Say NO to Alchemy !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. the only thing to shake them up would be a run on the banks...
Edited on Thu Sep-25-08 05:34 PM by Historic NY
they're knees would be banging together if Americans in droves began yanking their funds back. I personally would take all my funds and put them in the Credit Union which is made up of neighbors & co-workers. How much has the FEd thrown down the swere this past year for what to keep the market going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep-25-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I've got most everything in the Credit Union
WaMu holds my mortgage though. What a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov 21st 2009, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC