Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Pentagon Plans to Send More Than 12,000 Additional Troops to Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Aug-20-08 10:15 AM
Original message
Pentagon Plans to Send More Than 12,000 Additional Troops to Afghanistan
Source: USNews

The U.S. commander there, in an exclusive interview, calls for a further buildup to counter the Taliban

The Pentagon will be sending 12,000 to 15,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan, possibly as soon as the end of this year, with planning underway for a further force buildup in 2009.

A request by Gen. David McKiernan, the commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, for three U.S. brigades with support staff has been approved. "Now that means we just need to figure out a way to get them there," adds a senior defense official.

The troops are slated to arrive earlier than has been previously discussed, on the heels of the deadliest months for American forces in Afghanistan since the war began.

The first wave of soldiers will be a U.S. Army brigade from the 10th Mountain Division, according to a senior military official. This brigade is scheduled to ship out between November and January, while two other brigades are likely to arrive "sometime in the spring or summer of next year," the official adds.

Read more: http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/iraq/2008/08/19/pen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   That's just great....  blackspade   Aug-20-08 02:31 PM   #1 
   Lol..  IA_Seth   Aug-20-08 03:12 PM   #6 
   Obama called for it first.  applegrove   Aug-20-08 02:33 PM   #2 
   He needs to keep that fact alive in the public's mind.  FVZA_Colonel   Aug-20-08 02:38 PM   #3 
      He said it in his speech yesterday. He should put it in an ad.  applegrove   Aug-20-08 02:56 PM   #5 
   More cannon fodder into the meat grinder (sorry for the mixed metaphor). As if  coalition_unwilling   Aug-20-08 02:40 PM   #4 
   When will our fearless  classysassy   Aug-20-08 09:14 PM   #7 
   And the reason to do this is....  and-justice-for-all   Aug-20-08 09:20 PM   #8 
   when the rich wage war, the poor do the dying  UpInArms   Aug-20-08 09:24 PM   #9 
   Methinks it's not Afghanistan they're worried about.  sofa king   Aug-20-08 09:27 PM   #10 
 
blackspade (276 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug-20-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's just great....
Three more brigades huh?
Where are they getting them from? Oh, right, from the soldiers on leave or rotated out of the quagmire known as Iraq.
I'm waiting for penal brigades made up of convicts 'leant' to the DoD by the prison industrial complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug-20-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Lol..
Ok, so I hope that's exaggeration. You do know penal bridgades aren't going to happen, right?

While I agree that our military is stretched tight and sending more troops anywhere will be a challenge, sending them to Afghanistan is the ONE place I would agree we should be. We need to finish what we started there and get out. We need troops to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug-20-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama called for it first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug-20-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He needs to keep that fact alive in the public's mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug-20-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. He said it in his speech yesterday. He should put it in an ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug-20-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. More cannon fodder into the meat grinder (sorry for the mixed metaphor). As if
the situation in Afghaistan is susceptible to a 'military solution.' Whatever . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug-20-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. When will our fearless
leaders learn from history,russia was there for ten years and left with their tails tucked between their legs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug-20-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. And the reason to do this is....
what exactly?

US occupation of foreign lands is no different than what Israel is doing to Palestine.

It is fucking illegal and unacceptable, there is No reason for us to be in Afghanistan or Iraq for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug-20-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. when the rich wage war, the poor do the dying
"The plan is, carved up the region at the fall of the Ottoman Empire. The neo-imperial vision, which can be ascertained from the writings of key administration figures and their co-visionaries in influential conservative think tanks, includes not only regime change in Iraq but control of Iraqi oil, a possible end to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and newly compliant governments in Syria and Iran -- either by force or internal rebellion."

The Bushes are carriers of the deny-destroy-and-be-damned virus. Prescott Bush never apologized for trading with the Nazis. George Bush Senior professed to know nothing of the drug and arms dealing that funded the bloody, illegal Iran-Contra operations, although it was common knowledge that he directed them.

He and his sons enriched themselves through shady real estate deals and financial manipulations that brought down entire banking and savings and loan institutions. They are all consummate inside traders, looting and leaving ruin in their wake.




http://www.hermes-presscom/BushSaud.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug-20-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Methinks it's not Afghanistan they're worried about.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/20081...

"ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — The Pakistani ruling coalition showed signs of fracture Tuesday, only a day after embattled President Pervez Musharraf resigned to avoid impeachment, and a bomb that killed at least 26 people in the country's volatile northwest underlined the challenges faced by the new government."

You know what I think is worrying the Bush Administration? The fact that an authoritarian religious-right-pandering dictator with a finger on the button can be forced to resign or risk being impeached. They sure as hell don't want that idea spreading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov 21st 2009, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC